Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-384

Allowed

Session Fixation

Abstraction: Compound · Status: Incomplete

Authenticating a user, or otherwise establishing a new user session, without invalidating any existing session identifier gives an attacker the opportunity to steal authenticated sessions.

547 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-456X-9XRH-6X87

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-22 12:32 – Updated: 2026-06-22 12:32
VLAI
Details

EasyFlow .NET developed by Digiwin has a Session Fixation vulnerability. If unauthenticated remote attackers replace a specific session ID for a user, they can gain the user's privilege once the user logs in.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-12581"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-384"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-22T10:16:18Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "EasyFlow .NET developed by Digiwin has a Session Fixation vulnerability. If unauthenticated remote attackers replace a specific session ID for a user, they can gain the user\u0027s privilege once the user logs in.",
  "id": "GHSA-456x-9xrh-6x87",
  "modified": "2026-06-22T12:32:02Z",
  "published": "2026-06-22T12:32:02Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-12581"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/en/cp-139-10981-8617d-2.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/tw/cp-132-10980-0e640-1.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-45CQ-W2JP-HQP4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-08-09 09:30 – Updated: 2024-11-18 16:26
VLAI
Details

In certain conditions, depending on timing and the usage of the Chrome web browser, Guardian/CMC versions before 22.6.2 do not always completely invalidate the user session upon logout. Thus an authenticated local attacker may gain acces to the original user's session.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-24477"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-384"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-08-09T08:15:09Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In certain conditions, depending on timing and the usage of the Chrome web browser, Guardian/CMC versions before 22.6.2 do not always completely invalidate the user session upon logout. Thus an authenticated local attacker may gain acces to the original user\u0027s session.\n\n",
  "id": "GHSA-45cq-w2jp-hqp4",
  "modified": "2024-11-18T16:26:31Z",
  "published": "2023-08-09T09:30:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-24477"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.nozominetworks.com/NN-2023:8-01"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-45M8-CPM2-3V65

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 19:43 – Updated: 2026-05-15 23:52
VLAI
Summary
Open WebUI: Stale Admin Role in Socket.IO Session Pool Enables Post-Demotion Cross-User Note Access
Details

Stale Admin Role in Socket.IO Session Pool Enables Post-Demotion Cross-User Note Access

Affected Component

Socket.IO session state and role-check callsites: - backend/open_webui/socket/main.py (lines 330-351, connect handler — role snapshotted into SESSION_POOL) - backend/open_webui/socket/main.py (lines 393-398, heartbeat handler — does not refresh role) - backend/open_webui/socket/main.py (line 538, ydoc:document:join — uses cached role for admin check) - backend/open_webui/socket/main.py (line 611, document_save_handler — uses cached role for admin check) - backend/open_webui/routers/users.py (lines 557-633, role update — does not invalidate SESSION_POOL) - backend/open_webui/routers/users.py (line 641, user delete — does not invalidate SESSION_POOL)

Affected Versions

Current main branch (commit 6fdd19bf1) and likely all versions with the collaborative document (Yjs) Socket.IO handlers.

Description

When a user connects via Socket.IO, the connect handler authenticates them via JWT and stores their user record (including role) in the in-memory SESSION_POOL dictionary keyed by session ID. The heartbeat handler keeps the session alive indefinitely but only refreshes the last_seen_at timestamp — never the role.

Role checks in the Yjs collaborative document handlers (ydoc:document:join, document_save_handler) consult the cached SESSION_POOL role rather than the database. Meanwhile, administrative role changes and user deletions do not iterate SESSION_POOL to disconnect affected sessions. As a result, a user whose admin role has been revoked retains admin privileges within their existing Socket.IO session for as long as they keep the connection alive (via automatic heartbeats).

HTTP endpoints are not affected — get_current_user at utils/auth.py refetches the user record from the database on every request. The gap is exclusive to the Socket.IO session cache.

# socket/main.py:330-351 — role snapshotted at connect time
async def connect(sid, environ, auth):
    user = None
    if auth and 'token' in auth:
        data = decode_token(auth['token'])
        if data is not None and 'id' in data:
            user = Users.get_user_by_id(data['id'])
        if user:
            SESSION_POOL[sid] = {
                'id': user.id,
                'role': user.role,   # ← snapshotted, never refreshed
                ...
            }

# socket/main.py:393-398 — heartbeat refreshes last_seen_at only
async def heartbeat(sid, data):
    user = SESSION_POOL.get(sid)
    if user:
        SESSION_POOL[sid] = {**user, 'last_seen_at': int(time.time())}
        # role is carried forward unchanged

# socket/main.py:538 — admin check against cached role
if user.get('role') != 'admin' and not has_access(user_id, 'note', note_id, 'read', db=db):
    return

Attack Scenario

  1. User B is an admin and has an active browser session with a live Socket.IO connection. SESSION_POOL[sid] records role='admin'.
  2. Admin A demotes User B to a regular user via POST /api/v1/users/{B_id}/update. The DB user.role becomes 'user'.
  3. No Socket.IO disconnect, no SESSION_POOL update, no token revocation event is triggered by the role change.
  4. User B's client continues sending heartbeat events every few seconds; these are accepted and only refresh last_seen_at.
  5. User B emits ydoc:document:join with document_id = 'note:<victim_note_id>' for any note they do not own.
  6. The handler at line 538 evaluates user.get('role') != 'admin' — returns False because SESSION_POOL still holds the stale admin role. Access check is bypassed, User B joins the document room, receives full document state and live updates.
  7. User B emits ydoc:document:update for the same note. The handler at line 611 performs the same cached-admin check, bypasses authorization, and persists attacker-controlled content to the victim's note via Notes.update_note_by_id.

The same bypass occurs if the user is deleted entirely (delete_user_by_id) — the deleted user retains admin privileges on their live socket until disconnection.

Impact

  • Read access to any user's notes after admin privileges have been revoked
  • Write access (content injection, overwrite) to any user's notes under the same conditions
  • The stale privilege is bounded only by the attacker's willingness to keep the Socket.IO connection alive; heartbeats extend the session indefinitely
  • Official admin demotion or user deletion gives a false sense of security — HTTP access is correctly revoked, but real-time collaborative access silently continues

Preconditions

  • Attacker must have an active Socket.IO connection established while they held admin role
  • Attacker must retain the Socket.IO session after demotion/deletion (trivial — just don't close the browser)
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.8.12"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "open-webui"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.9.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-44553"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-384",
      "CWE-613",
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-08T19:43:49Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-15T20:16:46Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "# Stale Admin Role in Socket.IO Session Pool Enables Post-Demotion Cross-User Note Access\n\n## Affected Component\n\nSocket.IO session state and role-check callsites:\n- `backend/open_webui/socket/main.py` (lines 330-351, `connect` handler \u2014 role snapshotted into SESSION_POOL)\n- `backend/open_webui/socket/main.py` (lines 393-398, `heartbeat` handler \u2014 does not refresh role)\n- `backend/open_webui/socket/main.py` (line 538, `ydoc:document:join` \u2014 uses cached role for admin check)\n- `backend/open_webui/socket/main.py` (line 611, `document_save_handler` \u2014 uses cached role for admin check)\n- `backend/open_webui/routers/users.py` (lines 557-633, role update \u2014 does not invalidate SESSION_POOL)\n- `backend/open_webui/routers/users.py` (line 641, user delete \u2014 does not invalidate SESSION_POOL)\n\n## Affected Versions\n\nCurrent main branch (commit `6fdd19bf1`) and likely all versions with the collaborative document (Yjs) Socket.IO handlers.\n\n## Description\n\nWhen a user connects via Socket.IO, the `connect` handler authenticates them via JWT and stores their user record (including `role`) in the in-memory `SESSION_POOL` dictionary keyed by session ID. The `heartbeat` handler keeps the session alive indefinitely but only refreshes the `last_seen_at` timestamp \u2014 never the role.\n\nRole checks in the Yjs collaborative document handlers (`ydoc:document:join`, `document_save_handler`) consult the cached `SESSION_POOL` role rather than the database. Meanwhile, administrative role changes and user deletions do not iterate `SESSION_POOL` to disconnect affected sessions. As a result, a user whose admin role has been revoked retains admin privileges within their existing Socket.IO session for as long as they keep the connection alive (via automatic heartbeats).\n\nHTTP endpoints are not affected \u2014 `get_current_user` at [utils/auth.py](backend/open_webui/utils/auth.py) refetches the user record from the database on every request. The gap is exclusive to the Socket.IO session cache.\n\n```python\n# socket/main.py:330-351 \u2014 role snapshotted at connect time\nasync def connect(sid, environ, auth):\n    user = None\n    if auth and \u0027token\u0027 in auth:\n        data = decode_token(auth[\u0027token\u0027])\n        if data is not None and \u0027id\u0027 in data:\n            user = Users.get_user_by_id(data[\u0027id\u0027])\n        if user:\n            SESSION_POOL[sid] = {\n                \u0027id\u0027: user.id,\n                \u0027role\u0027: user.role,   # \u2190 snapshotted, never refreshed\n                ...\n            }\n\n# socket/main.py:393-398 \u2014 heartbeat refreshes last_seen_at only\nasync def heartbeat(sid, data):\n    user = SESSION_POOL.get(sid)\n    if user:\n        SESSION_POOL[sid] = {**user, \u0027last_seen_at\u0027: int(time.time())}\n        # role is carried forward unchanged\n\n# socket/main.py:538 \u2014 admin check against cached role\nif user.get(\u0027role\u0027) != \u0027admin\u0027 and not has_access(user_id, \u0027note\u0027, note_id, \u0027read\u0027, db=db):\n    return\n```\n\n## Attack Scenario\n\n1. User B is an admin and has an active browser session with a live Socket.IO connection. `SESSION_POOL[sid]` records `role=\u0027admin\u0027`.\n2. Admin A demotes User B to a regular user via `POST /api/v1/users/{B_id}/update`. The DB `user.role` becomes `\u0027user\u0027`.\n3. No Socket.IO disconnect, no SESSION_POOL update, no token revocation event is triggered by the role change.\n4. User B\u0027s client continues sending `heartbeat` events every few seconds; these are accepted and only refresh `last_seen_at`.\n5. User B emits `ydoc:document:join` with `document_id = \u0027note:\u003cvictim_note_id\u003e\u0027` for any note they do not own.\n6. The handler at line 538 evaluates `user.get(\u0027role\u0027) != \u0027admin\u0027` \u2014 returns `False` because `SESSION_POOL` still holds the stale `admin` role. Access check is bypassed, User B joins the document room, receives full document state and live updates.\n7. User B emits `ydoc:document:update` for the same note. The handler at line 611 performs the same cached-admin check, bypasses authorization, and persists attacker-controlled content to the victim\u0027s note via `Notes.update_note_by_id`.\n\nThe same bypass occurs if the user is deleted entirely (`delete_user_by_id`) \u2014 the deleted user retains admin privileges on their live socket until disconnection.\n\n## Impact\n\n- Read access to any user\u0027s notes after admin privileges have been revoked\n- Write access (content injection, overwrite) to any user\u0027s notes under the same conditions\n- The stale privilege is bounded only by the attacker\u0027s willingness to keep the Socket.IO connection alive; heartbeats extend the session indefinitely\n- Official admin demotion or user deletion gives a false sense of security \u2014 HTTP access is correctly revoked, but real-time collaborative access silently continues\n\n## Preconditions\n\n- Attacker must have an active Socket.IO connection established while they held admin role\n- Attacker must retain the Socket.IO session after demotion/deletion (trivial \u2014 just don\u0027t close the browser)",
  "id": "GHSA-45m8-cpm2-3v65",
  "modified": "2026-05-15T23:52:21Z",
  "published": "2026-05-08T19:43:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-45m8-cpm2-3v65"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44553"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Open WebUI: Stale Admin Role in Socket.IO Session Pool Enables Post-Demotion Cross-User Note Access"
}

GHSA-465W-GG5P-85C9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-05-18 21:09 – Updated: 2021-05-18 20:45
VLAI
Summary
Insufficient Session Expiration in Kiali
Details

An insufficient JWT validation vulnerability was found in Kiali versions 0.4.0 to 1.15.0 and was fixed in Kiali version 1.15.1, wherein a remote attacker could abuse this flaw by stealing a valid JWT cookie and using that to spoof a user session, possibly gaining privileges to view and alter the Istio configuration.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/kiali/kiali"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.4.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.15.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-1762"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295",
      "CWE-384",
      "CWE-613"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2021-05-18T20:45:55Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An insufficient JWT validation vulnerability was found in Kiali versions 0.4.0 to 1.15.0 and was fixed in Kiali version 1.15.1, wherein a remote attacker could abuse this flaw by stealing a valid JWT cookie and using that to spoof a user session, possibly gaining privileges to view and alter the Istio configuration.",
  "id": "GHSA-465w-gg5p-85c9",
  "modified": "2021-05-18T20:45:55Z",
  "published": "2021-05-18T21:09:01Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-1762"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/kiali/kiali/commit/93f5cd0b6698e8fe8772afb8f35816f6c086aef1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/kiali/kiali/commit/c91a0949683976f621cca213c1193831d63b381c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810387"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2020-1762"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://kiali.io/news/security-bulletins/kiali-security-001"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Insufficient Session Expiration in Kiali"
}

GHSA-469V-7RVC-6P7Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:35 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:35
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability in the session identification management functionality of the web-based management interface for Cisco Meeting Server could allow an unauthenticated, local attacker to hijack a valid user session identifier, aka Session Fixation. The vulnerability exists because the affected application does not assign a new session identifier to a user session when a user authenticates to the application. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a hijacked session identifier to connect to the application through the web-based management interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to hijack an authenticated user's browser session. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvi23787.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-0359"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-384"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-06-21T11:29:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in the session identification management functionality of the web-based management interface for Cisco Meeting Server could allow an unauthenticated, local attacker to hijack a valid user session identifier, aka Session Fixation. The vulnerability exists because the affected application does not assign a new session identifier to a user session when a user authenticates to the application. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a hijacked session identifier to connect to the application through the web-based management interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to hijack an authenticated user\u0027s browser session. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvi23787.",
  "id": "GHSA-469v-7rvc-6p7q",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:35:20Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:35:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-0359"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180620-cms-sf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104583"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041174"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-47VG-483W-HP3M

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-25 00:00 – Updated: 2022-06-06 17:58
VLAI
Summary
Improper user session handling in filegator
Details

FileGator prior to version 7.8.0 is vulnerable to session fixation.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "filegator/filegator"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "7.8.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-1849"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-384"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-05-25T22:44:17Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-05-24T16:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "FileGator prior to version 7.8.0 is vulnerable to session fixation.",
  "id": "GHSA-47vg-483w-hp3m",
  "modified": "2022-06-06T17:58:46Z",
  "published": "2022-05-25T00:00:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1849"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/filegator/filegator/commit/fcd3995f64f5dfc6a4c2c059cc22a2fef1e81225"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/filegator/filegator"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://huntr.dev/bounties/881f8f36-d5c8-470d-8261-f109e6d5db4b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Improper user session handling in filegator"
}

GHSA-4883-CVPP-V36G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:21 – Updated: 2025-04-09 03:44
VLAI
Details

Session fixation vulnerability in Joomla! before 1.0.13 (aka Sunglow) allows remote attackers to hijack administrative web sessions via unspecified vectors.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-4188"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-384"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-08-08T01:17:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Session fixation vulnerability in Joomla! before 1.0.13 (aka Sunglow) allows remote attackers to hijack administrative web sessions via unspecified vectors.",
  "id": "GHSA-4883-cvpp-v36g",
  "modified": "2025-04-09T03:44:51Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T18:21:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-4188"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/35953"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/26239"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.joomla.org/content/view/3677/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/476017/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/2719"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-49CR-36MP-HMJP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-11 09:30 – Updated: 2025-01-11 09:30
VLAI
Details

HCL MyXalytics is affected by a session fixation vulnerability. Cyber-criminals can exploit this by sending crafted URLs with a session token to access the victim's login session.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-42170"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-384"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-01-11T07:15:06Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "HCL MyXalytics is affected by a session fixation vulnerability.  Cyber-criminals can exploit this by sending crafted URLs with a session token to access the victim\u0027s login session.",
  "id": "GHSA-49cr-36mp-hmjp",
  "modified": "2025-01-11T09:30:30Z",
  "published": "2025-01-11T09:30:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42170"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article\u0026sysparm_article=KB0118149"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-4C2F-665C-X845

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-09 03:33 – Updated: 2024-02-17 00:31
VLAI
Details

IBM i Access Client Solutions (ACS) 1.1.2 through 1.1.4 and 1.1.4.3 through 1.1.9.4 is vulnerable to NT LAN Manager (NTLM) hash disclosure by an attacker modifying UNC capable paths within ACS configuration files to point to a hostile server. If NTLM is enabled, the Windows operating system will try to authenticate using the current user's session. The hostile server could capture the NTLM hash information to obtain the user's credentials. IBM X-Force ID: 279091.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-22318"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200",
      "CWE-327",
      "CWE-384"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-02-09T01:15:09Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "IBM i Access Client Solutions (ACS) 1.1.2 through 1.1.4 and 1.1.4.3 through 1.1.9.4 is vulnerable to NT LAN Manager (NTLM) hash disclosure by an attacker modifying UNC capable paths within ACS configuration files to point to a hostile server. If NTLM is enabled, the Windows operating system will try to authenticate using the current user\u0027s session. The hostile server could capture the NTLM hash information to obtain the user\u0027s credentials.  IBM X-Force ID:  279091.",
  "id": "GHSA-4c2f-665c-x845",
  "modified": "2024-02-17T00:31:38Z",
  "published": "2024-02-09T03:33:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-22318"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/279091"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7116091"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/177069/IBM-i-Access-Client-Solutions-Remote-Credential-Theft.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Feb/7"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-4C8Q-5Q86-GVJ9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-09-05 18:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 07:29
VLAI
Details

An issue in China Mobile Communications China Mobile Intelligent Home Gateway v.HG6543C4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the authentication mechanism.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-41012"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-384"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-09-05T16:15:07Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "An issue in China Mobile Communications China Mobile Intelligent Home Gateway v.HG6543C4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the authentication mechanism.",
  "id": "GHSA-4c8q-5q86-gvj9",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T07:29:03Z",
  "published": "2023-09-05T18:30:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-41012"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/te5tb99/For-submitting/wiki/Command-Execution-Vulnerability-in-China-Mobile-Intelligent-Home-Gateway-HG6543C4-Identity-verification-has-design-flaws"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Invalidate any existing session identifiers prior to authorizing a new user session.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

For platforms such as ASP that do not generate new values for sessionid cookies, utilize a secondary cookie. In this approach, set a secondary cookie on the user's browser to a random value and set a session variable to the same value. If the session variable and the cookie value ever don't match, invalidate the session, and force the user to log on again.

Mitigation MIT-29
Operation

Strategy: Firewall

Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].

CAPEC-196: Session Credential Falsification through Forging

An attacker creates a false but functional session credential in order to gain or usurp access to a service. Session credentials allow users to identify themselves to a service after an initial authentication without needing to resend the authentication information (usually a username and password) with every message. If an attacker is able to forge valid session credentials they may be able to bypass authentication or piggy-back off some other authenticated user's session. This attack differs from Reuse of Session IDs and Session Sidejacking attacks in that in the latter attacks an attacker uses a previous or existing credential without modification while, in a forging attack, the attacker must create their own credential, although it may be based on previously observed credentials.

CAPEC-21: Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers

An adversary guesses, obtains, or "rides" a trusted identifier (e.g. session ID, resource ID, cookie, etc.) to perform authorized actions under the guise of an authenticated user or service.

CAPEC-31: Accessing/Intercepting/Modifying HTTP Cookies

This attack relies on the use of HTTP Cookies to store credentials, state information and other critical data on client systems. There are several different forms of this attack. The first form of this attack involves accessing HTTP Cookies to mine for potentially sensitive data contained therein. The second form involves intercepting this data as it is transmitted from client to server. This intercepted information is then used by the adversary to impersonate the remote user/session. The third form is when the cookie's content is modified by the adversary before it is sent back to the server. Here the adversary seeks to convince the target server to operate on this falsified information.

CAPEC-39: Manipulating Opaque Client-based Data Tokens

In circumstances where an application holds important data client-side in tokens (cookies, URLs, data files, and so forth) that data can be manipulated. If client or server-side application components reinterpret that data as authentication tokens or data (such as store item pricing or wallet information) then even opaquely manipulating that data may bear fruit for an Attacker. In this pattern an attacker undermines the assumption that client side tokens have been adequately protected from tampering through use of encryption or obfuscation.

CAPEC-59: Session Credential Falsification through Prediction

This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.

CAPEC-60: Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)

This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.

CAPEC-61: Session Fixation

The attacker induces a client to establish a session with the target software using a session identifier provided by the attacker. Once the user successfully authenticates to the target software, the attacker uses the (now privileged) session identifier in their own transactions. This attack leverages the fact that the target software either relies on client-generated session identifiers or maintains the same session identifiers after privilege elevation.