CWE-502
AllowedDeserialization of Untrusted Data
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product deserializes untrusted data without sufficiently ensuring that the resulting data will be valid.
4794 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-XR89-J843-VPGQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:20 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:20This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Orckestra C1 CMS 6.10. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within Composite.dll. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-14740.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-34992"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-11-15T16:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Orckestra C1 CMS 6.10. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within Composite.dll. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-14740.",
"id": "GHSA-xr89-j843-vpgq",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:20:54Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:20:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34992"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Orckestra/C1-CMS-Foundation/releases/tag/v6.11"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-21-1304"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-XRFH-Q76X-P6F2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-01 21:30 – Updated: 2026-06-01 21:30IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0, and 8.5 is affected by an improper validation of user-supplied data during deserialization using the SAML Web Single Sign-On component. This could result in remote code execution via a crafted HTTP request when combined with a suitable gadget chain.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-9330"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-01T19:16:55Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0, and 8.5 is affected by an improper validation of user-supplied data during deserialization using the SAML Web Single Sign-On component. This could result in remote code execution via a crafted HTTP request when combined with a suitable gadget chain.",
"id": "GHSA-xrfh-q76x-p6f2",
"modified": "2026-06-01T21:30:44Z",
"published": "2026-06-01T21:30:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-9330"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7274733"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XRJ9-8XHQ-9GJH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-13 00:00 – Updated: 2022-04-20 00:00A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC Energy Manager Basic (All versions < V7.3 Update 1), SIMATIC Energy Manager PRO (All versions < V7.3 Update 1). The affected system allows remote users to send maliciously crafted objects. Due to insecure deserialization of user-supplied content by the affected software, an unauthenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted serialized object. This could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device with SYSTEM privileges.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-23450"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-04-12T09:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC Energy Manager Basic (All versions \u003c V7.3 Update 1), SIMATIC Energy Manager PRO (All versions \u003c V7.3 Update 1). The affected system allows remote users to send maliciously crafted objects. Due to insecure deserialization of user-supplied content by the affected software, an unauthenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted serialized object. This could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device with SYSTEM privileges.",
"id": "GHSA-xrj9-8xhq-9gjh",
"modified": "2022-04-20T00:00:55Z",
"published": "2022-04-13T00:00:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-23450"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-655554.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XRWQ-V96X-P8VF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-25 21:32 – Updated: 2025-11-25 21:32An issue in the cms_rest.php component of SIGB PMB v8.0.1.14 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unserializing an arbitrary file.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-61168"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-25T19:15:50Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "An issue in the cms_rest.php component of SIGB PMB v8.0.1.14 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unserializing an arbitrary file.",
"id": "GHSA-xrwq-v96x-p8vf",
"modified": "2025-11-25T21:32:06Z",
"published": "2025-11-25T21:32:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-61168"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://forge.sigb.net/projects/pmb/wiki/Changelog_801#S%C3%A9curit%C3%A9-2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gist.github.com/ZanyMonk/446f6875a2ceb3decef5ff1176428f9e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://pmb.com"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://sigb.com"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XRX4-VQ84-23W6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:03 – Updated: 2025-10-22 00:32Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in CheckboxWeb.dll of Checkbox Survey allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code. This issue affects: Checkbox Survey versions prior to 7.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-27852"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-05-27T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in CheckboxWeb.dll of Checkbox Survey allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code. This issue affects: Checkbox Survey versions prior to 7.",
"id": "GHSA-xrx4-vq84-23w6",
"modified": "2025-10-22T00:32:13Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:03:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27852"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2021-27852"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/706695"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XV2M-FG2F-XRRW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-04 00:00 – Updated: 2022-05-12 00:02The Java Remote Management Interface of all versions of Orlansoft ERP was discovered to contain a vulnerability due to insecure deserialization of user-supplied content, which can allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized Java object.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-23620"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-05-02T23:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The Java Remote Management Interface of all versions of Orlansoft ERP was discovered to contain a vulnerability due to insecure deserialization of user-supplied content, which can allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized Java object.",
"id": "GHSA-xv2m-fg2f-xrrw",
"modified": "2022-05-12T00:02:00Z",
"published": "2022-05-04T00:00:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-23620"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gist.github.com/fuzzKitty/95106430aa09760ebdcfa6304777f31f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/joaomatosf/jexboss"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://orlansoft.com"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XV45-QM36-H77Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-06 19:24 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:35ToolboxST prior to version 7.10 is affected by a deserialization vulnerability. An attacker with local access to an HMI or who has conducted a social engineering attack on an authorized operator could execute code in a Toolbox user's context through the deserialization of an untrusted configuration file. Two CVSS scores have been provided to capture the differences between the two aforementioned attack vectors.
Customers are advised to update to ToolboxST 7.10 which can be found in ControlST 7.10. If unable to update at this time customers should ensure they are following the guidance laid out in GE Gas Power's Secure Deployment Guide (GEH-6839). Customers should ensure they are not running ToolboxST as an Administrative user.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-1552"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-04-11T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "ToolboxST prior to version 7.10 is affected by a deserialization vulnerability. An attacker with local access to an HMI or who has conducted a social engineering attack on an authorized operator could execute code in a Toolbox user\u0027s context through the deserialization of an untrusted configuration file.\u00a0Two CVSS scores have been provided to capture the differences between the two aforementioned attack vectors.\u00a0\n\nCustomers are advised to update to ToolboxST 7.10 which can be found in ControlST 7.10. If unable to update at this time customers should ensure they are following the guidance laid out in GE Gas Power\u0027s Secure Deployment Guide (GEH-6839). Customers should ensure they are not running ToolboxST as an Administrative user.\u00a0",
"id": "GHSA-xv45-qm36-h77q",
"modified": "2024-04-04T05:35:49Z",
"published": "2023-07-06T19:24:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-1552"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ge.com/content/dam/cyber_security/global/en_US/pdfs/2023-03-23_ToolboxST_Deserialization_of_Untrusted_Configuration_Data.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XV4H-3JG8-VF5R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-17 18:35 – Updated: 2026-06-17 18:35Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection in Alukas < 3.0.0 versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-39445"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-17T14:17:50Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection in Alukas \u003c 3.0.0 versions.",
"id": "GHSA-xv4h-3jg8-vf5r",
"modified": "2026-06-17T18:35:54Z",
"published": "2026-06-17T18:35:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39445"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/theme/alukas/vulnerability/wordpress-alukas-theme-3-0-0-php-object-injection-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XV5G-36C6-HQWJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-16 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:35Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in jetmonsters JetFormBuilder allows Object Injection. This issue affects JetFormBuilder: from n/a through 3.5.1.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-53990"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-16T11:15:26Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in jetmonsters JetFormBuilder allows Object Injection. This issue affects JetFormBuilder: from n/a through 3.5.1.2.",
"id": "GHSA-xv5g-36c6-hqwj",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:35:46Z",
"published": "2025-07-16T12:30:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-53990"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/jetformbuilder/vulnerability/wordpress-jetformbuilder-plugin-3-5-1-2-php-object-injection-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XV5P-FJW5-VRJ6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-25 20:39 – Updated: 2025-11-27 09:00Summary
The Fugue framework implements an RPC server system for distributed computing operations. In the core functionality of the RPC server implementation, I found that the _decode() function in fugue/rpc/flask.py directly uses cloudpickle.loads() to deserialize data without any sanitization. This creates a remote code execution vulnerability when malicious pickle data is processed by the RPC server.The vulnerability exists in the RPC communication mechanism where the client can send arbitrary serialized Python objects that will be deserialized on the server side, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code on the victim's machine.
Details
_decode() function in fugue/rpc/flask.py directly uses cloudpickle.loads() to deserialize data without any sanitization.
PoC
-
Step1: The victim user starts an RPC server binding to open network using the Fugue framework. Here, I use the official RPC server code to initialize the server.
-
Step2: The attacker modifies the _encode() function in fugue/rpc/flask.py to inject malicious pickle data:
In this example, attacker modifies _encode to let the victim execute command “ls -l”
- Step 3: The attacker then uses the RPC client to send the malicious request
Fugue gives a demo video and the PoC in the attachment, along with modified flask.py. When users reproduce this issue, in the server side (as an victim), users can run python rpc_server.py. In the client side (as an attacker), users can first replace fugue/rpc/flask.py in pip site-packages with provided flask.py in the attachment and then run rpc_client.py.
Impact
Remote code execution in the victim's machine. Once the victim starts the RPCServer with network binding (especially 0.0.0.0), an attacker on the network can gain arbitrary code execution by connecting to the RPCServer and sending crafted pickle payloads. This vulnerability allows for:
- Complete system compromise
- Data exfiltration
- Lateral movement within the network
- Denial of service attacks
- Installation of persistent backdoors
Mitigation
- Replace unsafe deserialization: Replace
pickle.loads()with safer alternatives such as: - JSON serialization for simple data structures
- Protocol Buffers or MessagePack for complex data
-
If pickle must be used, implement a custom
Unpicklerwith a restrictedfind_class()method that only allows whitelisted classes -
Network security:
- If the service is intended for internal use only, bind to localhost (
127.0.0.1) instead of0.0.0.0 -
Implement authentication and authorization mechanisms
-
Security warnings: When starting the service on public interfaces, display clear security warnings to inform users about the risks.
Attachment: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y8bBBp7dnWoT_WHBtdB0Fts4NRUIfdWi/view?usp=sharing
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "fugue"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "0.9.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-62703"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502",
"CWE-78"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-11-25T20:39:15Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-25T22:15:47Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\nThe Fugue framework implements an RPC server system for distributed computing operations. In the core\u00a0functionality of the RPC server implementation, I\u00a0found that\u00a0the\u00a0_decode()\u00a0function in\u00a0fugue/rpc/flask.py\u00a0directly uses\u00a0cloudpickle.loads()\u00a0to deserialize data\u00a0without any sanitization. This creates a remote code execution vulnerability when malicious pickle data is processed by the RPC\u00a0server.The vulnerability exists in the RPC communication mechanism where the client can\u00a0send arbitrary serialized Python objects that will be deserialized on the server\u00a0side, allowing\u00a0attackers to\u00a0execute arbitrary code\u00a0on the victim\u0027s machine.\n\n### Details\n_decode()\u00a0function in\u00a0fugue/rpc/flask.py directly uses\u00a0cloudpickle.loads()\u00a0to deserialize data\u00a0without any sanitization.\n\n### PoC\n* Step1:\nThe victim user starts an RPC\u00a0server binding to open network using\u00a0the Fugue framework. Here, I use the\u00a0official RPC\u00a0server code\u00a0to initialize\u00a0the server. \n\n* Step2:\nThe attacker modifies\u00a0the\u00a0_encode()\u00a0function\u00a0in\u00a0fugue/rpc/flask.py\u00a0to\u00a0inject malicious pickle data:\n\n\u003cimg width=\"740\" height=\"260\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6064516b-e1a6-45fa-a91c-8e276bc4a106\" /\u003e\n\nIn this example, attacker modifies _encode to let the victim execute command \u201cls -l\u201d\n\n* Step 3:\nThe attacker then\u00a0uses the RPC client to send\u00a0the malicious\u00a0request\n\nFugue gives a demo video and the PoC in the attachment, along with modified flask.py. When users reproduce this issue, in the server side (as an victim), users can run python rpc_server.py. In the client side (as an attacker), users can first replace fugue/rpc/flask.py in pip site-packages with provided flask.py in the attachment and then run rpc_client.py.\n\n\n### Impact\nRemote code execution in the victim\u0027s machine. Once the victim starts\u00a0the RPCServer with network binding (especially\u00a00.0.0.0), an attacker on\u00a0the network\u00a0can gain arbitrary code execution by connecting to the RPCServer\u00a0and sending crafted pickle payloads. This vulnerability allows\u00a0for:\n\n- Complete system compromise\n- Data exfiltration\n- Lateral movement within the network\n- Denial of service attacks\n- Installation of persistent backdoors\n\n### Mitigation\n1. **Replace unsafe deserialization**: Replace `pickle.loads()` with safer alternatives such as:\n - JSON serialization for simple data structures\n - Protocol Buffers or MessagePack for complex data\n - If pickle must be used, implement a custom `Unpickler` with a restricted `find_class()` method that only allows whitelisted classes\n\n2. **Network security**: \n - If the service is intended for internal use only, bind to localhost (`127.0.0.1`) instead of `0.0.0.0`\n - Implement authentication and authorization mechanisms\n\n3. **Security warnings**: When starting the service on public interfaces, display clear security warnings to inform users about the risks.\n\nAttachment: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y8bBBp7dnWoT_WHBtdB0Fts4NRUIfdWi/view?usp=sharing",
"id": "GHSA-xv5p-fjw5-vrj6",
"modified": "2025-11-27T09:00:39Z",
"published": "2025-11-25T20:39:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fugue-project/fugue/security/advisories/GHSA-xv5p-fjw5-vrj6"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-62703"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fugue-project/fugue/commit/6f25326779fd1f528198098d6287c5a863176fc0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y8bBBp7dnWoT_WHBtdB0Fts4NRUIfdWi/view?usp=sharing"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/fugue-project/fugue"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Fugue is Vulnerable to Remote Code Execution\u00a0by Pickle Deserialization via FlaskRPCServer"
}
Mitigation
If available, use the signing/sealing features of the programming language to assure that deserialized data has not been tainted. For example, a hash-based message authentication code (HMAC) could be used to ensure that data has not been modified.
Mitigation
When deserializing data, populate a new object rather than just deserializing. The result is that the data flows through safe input validation and that the functions are safe.
Mitigation
Explicitly define a final object() to prevent deserialization.
Mitigation
- Make fields transient to protect them from deserialization.
- An attempt to serialize and then deserialize a class containing transient fields will result in NULLs where the transient data should be. This is an excellent way to prevent time, environment-based, or sensitive variables from being carried over and used improperly.
Mitigation
Avoid having unnecessary types or gadgets (a sequence of instances and method invocations that can self-execute during the deserialization process, often found in libraries) available that can be leveraged for malicious ends. This limits the potential for unintended or unauthorized types and gadgets to be leveraged by the attacker. Add only acceptable classes to an allowlist. Note: new gadgets are constantly being discovered, so this alone is not a sufficient mitigation.
Mitigation
Employ cryptography of the data or code for protection. However, it's important to note that it would still be client-side security. This is risky because if the client is compromised then the security implemented on the client (the cryptography) can be bypassed.
Mitigation MIT-29
Strategy: Firewall
Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
CAPEC-586: Object Injection
An adversary attempts to exploit an application by injecting additional, malicious content during its processing of serialized objects. Developers leverage serialization in order to convert data or state into a static, binary format for saving to disk or transferring over a network. These objects are then deserialized when needed to recover the data/state. By injecting a malformed object into a vulnerable application, an adversary can potentially compromise the application by manipulating the deserialization process. This can result in a number of unwanted outcomes, including remote code execution.