CWE-754
Allowed-with-ReviewImproper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete
The product does not check or incorrectly checks for unusual or exceptional conditions that are not expected to occur frequently during day to day operation of the product.
905 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-XH4H-63X5-GR2F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-10 00:30 – Updated: 2026-04-10 00:30An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the chassis control daemon (chassisd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX1600, SRX2300 and SRX4300 allows a local attacker with low privileges to cause a complete Denial of Service (DoS).
When a specific 'show chassis' CLI command is executed, chassisd crashes and restarts which causes a momentary impact to all traffic until all modules are online again.
This issue affects Junos OS on SRX1600, SRX2300 and SRX4300:
- 24.4 versions before 24.4R1-S3, 24.4R2.
This issue does not affect Junos OS versions before 24.4R1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33786"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-754"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-09T22:16:28Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the chassis control daemon (chassisd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX1600, SRX2300 and SRX4300 allows a local attacker with low privileges to cause a complete Denial of Service (DoS).\n\nWhen a specific \u0027show chassis\u0027 CLI command is executed, chassisd crashes and restarts which causes a momentary impact to all traffic until all modules are online again.\n\nThis issue affects Junos OS on SRX1600, SRX2300 and SRX4300:\n\n\n\n * 24.4 versions before 24.4R1-S3, 24.4R2.\n\n\nThis issue does not affect Junos OS versions before 24.4R1.",
"id": "GHSA-xh4h-63x5-gr2f",
"modified": "2026-04-10T00:30:29Z",
"published": "2026-04-10T00:30:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33786"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://kb.juniper.net/JSA107810"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:A/V:X/RE:M/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-XH5H-C652-G9JR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-24 15:30 – Updated: 2026-03-24 21:31Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics: Canvas2D component. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 149, Firefox ESR < 115.34, and Firefox ESR < 140.9.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-4706"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-754"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-24T13:16:06Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics: Canvas2D component. This vulnerability affects Firefox \u003c 149, Firefox ESR \u003c 115.34, and Firefox ESR \u003c 140.9.",
"id": "GHSA-xh5h-c652-g9jr",
"modified": "2026-03-24T21:31:22Z",
"published": "2026-03-24T15:30:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-4706"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2015091"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-20"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-21"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-22"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-23"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-24"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XHGJ-59FX-F85C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:05 – Updated: 2026-05-29 15:30A CWE-754: Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability exists in Modicon M580, Modicon M340, Modicon Quantum, Modicon Premium (see security notification for specific versions) which could cause a Denial of Service when writing specific physical memory blocks using Modbus TCP.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-6856"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-754"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-01-06T23:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A CWE-754: Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability exists in Modicon M580, Modicon M340, Modicon Quantum, Modicon Premium (see security notification for specific versions) which could cause a Denial of Service when writing specific physical memory blocks using Modbus TCP.",
"id": "GHSA-xhgj-59fx-f85c",
"modified": "2026-05-29T15:30:21Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:05:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-6856"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.se.com/ww/en/download/document/SEVD-2019-344-01"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.us-cert.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-20-016-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XHXP-5WH5-QG3G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-01-13 00:30 – Updated: 2023-01-24 21:30An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in BGP route processing of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an attacker to cause Routing Protocol Daemon (RPD) crash by sending a BGP route with invalid next-hop resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). Continued receipt and processing of this packet will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue only affects systems without import policy configured. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S4; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S3; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S2; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R2-S2, 21.4R3; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R1-S2, 22.1R2; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R1-S1, 22.2R2. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved 21.4-EVO versions prior to 21.4R2-S2-EVO, 21.4R3-EVO; 22.1-EVO versions prior to 22.1R1-S2-EVO, 22.1R2-EVO; 22.2-EVO versions prior to 22.2R1-S1-EVO, 22.2R2-EVO. This issue does not affect: Juniper Networks Junos OS versions prior to 21.1R1. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved versions prior to 21.3R1-EVO.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-22393"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-754"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-01-13T00:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in BGP route processing of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an attacker to cause Routing Protocol Daemon (RPD) crash by sending a BGP route with invalid next-hop resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). Continued receipt and processing of this packet will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue only affects systems without import policy configured. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S4; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S3; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S2; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R2-S2, 21.4R3; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R1-S2, 22.1R2; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R1-S1, 22.2R2. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved 21.4-EVO versions prior to 21.4R2-S2-EVO, 21.4R3-EVO; 22.1-EVO versions prior to 22.1R1-S2-EVO, 22.1R2-EVO; 22.2-EVO versions prior to 22.2R1-S1-EVO, 22.2R2-EVO. This issue does not affect: Juniper Networks Junos OS versions prior to 21.1R1. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved versions prior to 21.3R1-EVO.",
"id": "GHSA-xhxp-5wh5-qg3g",
"modified": "2023-01-24T21:30:37Z",
"published": "2023-01-13T00:30:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-22393"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://kb.juniper.net/JSA70189"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XM24-7C3W-PFC7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-09 12:00 – Updated: 2022-11-09 19:02In setImpl of AlarmManagerService.java, there is a possible way to put a device into a boot loop due to an uncaught exception. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10 Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-234441463
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-20414"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-754",
"CWE-755"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-11-08T22:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In setImpl of AlarmManagerService.java, there is a possible way to put a device into a boot loop due to an uncaught exception. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10 Android-11 Android-12 Android-12L Android-13Android ID: A-234441463",
"id": "GHSA-xm24-7c3w-pfc7",
"modified": "2022-11-09T19:02:24Z",
"published": "2022-11-09T12:00:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-20414"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2022-11-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XPMQ-5HFQ-Q6Q6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-04-13 18:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 03:27libiec61850 v1.5.1 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via the function ControlObjectClient_setOrigin() at /client/client_control.c.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-27772"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-754"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-04-13T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "libiec61850 v1.5.1 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via the function ControlObjectClient_setOrigin() at /client/client_control.c.",
"id": "GHSA-xpmq-5hfq-q6q6",
"modified": "2024-04-04T03:27:05Z",
"published": "2023-04-13T18:30:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-27772"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mz-automation/libiec61850/issues/442"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mz-automation/libiec61850/commit/79a8eaf26070e02044afc4b2ffbfe777dfdf3e0b"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XQ8J-8H49-Q9Q4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:37 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:37An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader before 10.1.1 (and before 4.1.1 on macOS) and PhantomPDF before 9.7.5 and 10.x before 10.1.1 (and before 4.1.1 on macOS). An attacker can spoof a certified PDF document via an Evil Annotation Attack because the products fail to consider a null value for a Subtype entry of the Annotation dictionary, in an incremental update.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-35931"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-754"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-12-31T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader before 10.1.1 (and before 4.1.1 on macOS) and PhantomPDF before 9.7.5 and 10.x before 10.1.1 (and before 4.1.1 on macOS). An attacker can spoof a certified PDF document via an Evil Annotation Attack because the products fail to consider a null value for a Subtype entry of the Annotation dictionary, in an incremental update.",
"id": "GHSA-xq8j-8h49-q9q4",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:37:49Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:37:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-35931"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.foxitsoftware.com/support/security-bulletins.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-XR3F-844G-572F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-24 15:30 – Updated: 2026-03-24 21:31Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics: Canvas2D component. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 149, Firefox ESR < 115.34, and Firefox ESR < 140.9.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-4707"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-754"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-24T13:16:06Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics: Canvas2D component. This vulnerability affects Firefox \u003c 149, Firefox ESR \u003c 115.34, and Firefox ESR \u003c 140.9.",
"id": "GHSA-xr3f-844g-572f",
"modified": "2026-03-24T21:31:22Z",
"published": "2026-03-24T15:30:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-4707"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2015267"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-20"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-21"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-22"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-23"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2026-24"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XR64-JQXP-653Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:36 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:36QFX and EX Series switches configured to drop traffic when the MAC move limit is exceeded will forward traffic instead of dropping traffic. This can lead to denials of services or other unintended conditions. Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos OS: 14.1X53 versions prior to 14.1X53-D40; 15.1X53 versions prior to 15.1X53-D55; 15.1 versions prior to 15.1R7.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-0005"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-754"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-01-10T22:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "QFX and EX Series switches configured to drop traffic when the MAC move limit is exceeded will forward traffic instead of dropping traffic. This can lead to denials of services or other unintended conditions. Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos OS: 14.1X53 versions prior to 14.1X53-D40; 15.1X53 versions prior to 15.1X53-D55; 15.1 versions prior to 15.1R7.",
"id": "GHSA-xr64-jqxp-653q",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:36:04Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:36:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-0005"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://kb.juniper.net/JSA10833"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040182"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XRM3-543W-4G3Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-20 00:31 – Updated: 2026-05-20 18:31Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in Drupal Node View Permissions allows Forceful Browsing.
This issue affects Node View Permissions: from 0.0.0 before 1.7.0, from 2.0.0 before 2.0.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-8491"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-754"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-19T23:16:58Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in Drupal Node View Permissions allows Forceful Browsing.\n\nThis issue affects Node View Permissions: from 0.0.0 before 1.7.0, from 2.0.0 before 2.0.1.",
"id": "GHSA-xrm3-543w-4g3q",
"modified": "2026-05-20T18:31:34Z",
"published": "2026-05-20T00:31:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-8491"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.drupal.org/sa-contrib-2026-034"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-3
Strategy: Language Selection
- Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- Choose languages with features such as exception handling that force the programmer to anticipate unusual conditions that may generate exceptions. Custom exceptions may need to be developed to handle unusual business-logic conditions. Be careful not to pass sensitive exceptions back to the user (CWE-209, CWE-248).
Mitigation
Check the results of all functions that return a value and verify that the value is expected.
Mitigation
If using exception handling, catch and throw specific exceptions instead of overly-general exceptions (CWE-396, CWE-397). Catch and handle exceptions as locally as possible so that exceptions do not propagate too far up the call stack (CWE-705). Avoid unchecked or uncaught exceptions where feasible (CWE-248).
Mitigation MIT-39
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- Exposing additional information to a potential attacker in the context of an exceptional condition can help the attacker determine what attack vectors are most likely to succeed beyond DoS.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation MIT-38
If the program must fail, ensure that it fails gracefully (fails closed). There may be a temptation to simply let the program fail poorly in cases such as low memory conditions, but an attacker may be able to assert control before the software has fully exited. Alternately, an uncontrolled failure could cause cascading problems with other downstream components; for example, the program could send a signal to a downstream process so the process immediately knows that a problem has occurred and has a better chance of recovery.
Mitigation
Use system limits, which should help to prevent resource exhaustion. However, the product should still handle low resource conditions since they may still occur.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.