Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-787

Allowed-with-Review

Out-of-bounds Write

Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft

The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

15321 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-295V-9M5G-79Q9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-06-28 21:30 – Updated: 2025-02-13 18:31
VLAI
Details

A heap out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the Linux Kernel ipvlan network driver can be exploited to achieve local privilege escalation.

The out-of-bounds write is caused by missing skb->cb initialization in the ipvlan network driver. The vulnerability is reachable if CONFIG_IPVLAN is enabled.

We recommend upgrading past commit 90cbed5247439a966b645b34eb0a2e037836ea8e.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-3090"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-06-28T20:15:09Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A heap out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the Linux Kernel ipvlan network driver can be exploited to achieve local privilege escalation.\n\nThe out-of-bounds write is caused by missing skb-\u003ecb  initialization in the ipvlan network driver. The vulnerability is reachable if\u00a0CONFIG_IPVLAN is enabled.\n\n\nWe recommend upgrading past commit 90cbed5247439a966b645b34eb0a2e037836ea8e.",
  "id": "GHSA-295v-9m5g-79q9",
  "modified": "2025-02-13T18:31:39Z",
  "published": "2023-06-28T21:30:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-3090"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=90cbed5247439a966b645b34eb0a2e037836ea8e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://kernel.dance/90cbed5247439a966b645b34eb0a2e037836ea8e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/07/msg00030.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/10/msg00027.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230731-0002"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5448"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5480"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/174577/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0097-1.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/175072/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0098-1.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-296C-8M99-Q77P

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-05 15:30 – Updated: 2024-08-05 15:30
VLAI
Details

Memory corruption when preparing a shared memory notification for a memparcel in Resource Manager.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-21481"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119",
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-08-05T15:15:45Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Memory corruption when preparing a shared memory notification for a memparcel in Resource Manager.",
  "id": "GHSA-296c-8m99-q77p",
  "modified": "2024-08-05T15:30:53Z",
  "published": "2024-08-05T15:30:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-21481"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.qualcomm.com/product/publicresources/securitybulletin/august-2024-bulletin.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-296V-W4C4-J24Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:18 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:18
VLAI
Details

The mobi_decode_font_resource function in util.c in Libmobi 0.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted mobi file.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-11726"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-06-19T21:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The mobi_decode_font_resource function in util.c in Libmobi 0.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted mobi file.",
  "id": "GHSA-296v-w4c4-j24q",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:18:58Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:18:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-11726"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/148114/libmobi-0.3-Information-Disclosure.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2018/Jun/16"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-296X-6W33-2MMQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:47 – Updated: 2025-05-20 18:30
VLAI
Details

A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka 'Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0920, CVE-2019-1005, CVE-2019-1055, CVE-2019-1080.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-0988"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-06-12T14:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka \u0027Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability\u0027. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0920, CVE-2019-1005, CVE-2019-1055, CVE-2019-1080.",
  "id": "GHSA-296x-6w33-2mmq",
  "modified": "2025-05-20T18:30:36Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T16:47:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-0988"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2019-0988"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2019-0988"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-19-723"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-2984-FGJ8-4X8H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:39 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:39
VLAI
Details

Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-1200"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-01-13T22:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities.",
  "id": "GHSA-2984-fgj8-4x8h",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:39:08Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:39:08Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-1200"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-rv-overflow-WUnUgv4U"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-298H-VFC8-FCFC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-11 03:30 – Updated: 2025-03-11 03:30
VLAI
Details

IBM Common Cryptographic Architecture 7.0.0 through 7.5.51 could allow an authenticated user to cause a denial of service in the Hardware Security Module (HSM) using a specially crafted sequence of valid requests.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-49823"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-03-11T01:15:33Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "IBM Common Cryptographic Architecture 7.0.0 through 7.5.51 could allow an authenticated user to cause a denial of service in the Hardware Security Module (HSM) using a specially crafted sequence of valid requests.",
  "id": "GHSA-298h-vfc8-fcfc",
  "modified": "2025-03-11T03:30:50Z",
  "published": "2025-03-11T03:30:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49823"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7185282"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-2992-3J6W-22HH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-08-25 15:32 – Updated: 2024-04-04 07:13
VLAI
Details

Tenda AX3 v16.03.12.11 has a stack buffer overflow vulnerability detected at function form_fast_setting_wifi_set. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via the ssid parameter.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-40915"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-08-25T15:15:09Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Tenda AX3 v16.03.12.11 has a stack buffer overflow vulnerability detected at function form_fast_setting_wifi_set. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via the ssid parameter.",
  "id": "GHSA-2992-3j6w-22hh",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T07:13:04Z",
  "published": "2023-08-25T15:32:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-40915"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Korey0sh1/IoT_vuln/blob/main/Tenda/AX3/form_fast_setting_wifi_set.md"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-29CC-VCQ3-44CF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:07 – Updated: 2025-05-13 12:31
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROS M2100 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS M2200 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS M969 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC20 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC30 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC40 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC41 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC8388 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RP110 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS400 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS401 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416v2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < 5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS8000 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS8000A (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS8000H (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS8000T (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900G (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900G (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900GP (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS910 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS910L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS910W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS920L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS920W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS930L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS930W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS940G (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS969 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100P (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100P (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100P (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2200 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2288 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2488 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900C (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900G V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900G V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900R (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG920P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSL910 (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST2228 (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST916C (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST916P (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS i800 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS i801 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS i802 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS i803 (All versions < V4.3.7). The DHCP client in affected devices fails to properly sanitize incoming DHCP packets. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause memory to be overwritten, potentially allowing remote code execution.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-31895"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-120",
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-07-13T11:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROS M2100 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS M2200 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS M969 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC20 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC30 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC40 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC41 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC8388 V4.X (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RMC8388 V5.X (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RP110 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS400 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS401 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416v2 V4.X (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS416v2 V5.X (All versions \u003c 5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS8000 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS8000A (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS8000H (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS8000T (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900 (32M) V4.X (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900G (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900G (32M) V4.X (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900GP (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900L (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS900W (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS910 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS910L (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS910W (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS920L (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS920W (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS930L (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS930W (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS940G (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RS969 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100 (32M) V4.X (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100 V4.X (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100P (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100P (32M) V4.X (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2100P (32M) V5.X (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2200 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2288 V4.X (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2288 V5.X (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300 V4.X (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300 V5.X (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300P V4.X (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2300P V5.X (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2488 V4.X (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG2488 V5.X (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900 V4.X (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900 V5.X (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900C (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900G V4.X (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900G V5.X (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG900R (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG920P V4.X (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSG920P V5.X (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RSL910 (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST2228 (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST916C (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS RST916P (All versions \u003c V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM ROS i800 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS i801 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS i802 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM ROS i803 (All versions \u003c V4.3.7). The DHCP client in affected devices fails to properly sanitize incoming DHCP packets. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause memory to be overwritten, potentially allowing remote code execution.",
  "id": "GHSA-29cc-vcq3-44cf",
  "modified": "2025-05-13T12:31:35Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:07:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-31895"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-373591.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-373591.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-29CF-W3R7-XW8X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-04-01 06:31 – Updated: 2023-04-07 18:30
VLAI
Details

NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer, where an out-of-bounds write can lead to denial of service and data tampering.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-0186"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-04-01T05:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer, where an out-of-bounds write can lead to denial of service and data tampering.",
  "id": "GHSA-29cf-w3r7-xw8x",
  "modified": "2023-04-07T18:30:50Z",
  "published": "2023-04-01T06:31:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0186"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5452"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-29FM-9QQR-X2GP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:11 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:11
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered in HCC embedded InterNiche 4.0.1. A potential heap buffer overflow exists in the code that parses the HTTP POST request, due to an incorrect signed integer comparison. This vulnerability requires the attacker to send a malformed HTTP packet with a negative Content-Length, which bypasses the size checks and results in a large heap overflow in the wbs_multidata buffer copy.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-31227"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-08-19T11:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in HCC embedded InterNiche 4.0.1. A potential heap buffer overflow exists in the code that parses the HTTP POST request, due to an incorrect signed integer comparison. This vulnerability requires the attacker to send a malformed HTTP packet with a negative Content-Length, which bypasses the size checks and results in a large heap overflow in the wbs_multidata buffer copy.",
  "id": "GHSA-29fm-9qqr-x2gp",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T19:11:42Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:11:42Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-31227"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.forescout.com/blog/new-critical-operational-technology-vulnerabilities-found-on-nichestack"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/608209"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

Mitigation MIT-3
Requirements

Strategy: Language Selection

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer.
  • Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
Mitigation MIT-4.1
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Mitigation MIT-10
Operation Build and Compilation

Strategy: Environment Hardening

  • Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
  • D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
Mitigation MIT-9
Implementation
  • Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory:
  • Double check that the buffer is as large as specified.
  • When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string.
  • Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a loop and make sure there is no danger of writing past the allocated space.
  • If necessary, truncate all input strings to a reasonable length before passing them to the copy and concatenation functions.
Mitigation MIT-11
Operation Build and Compilation

Strategy: Environment Hardening

  • Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
  • Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
  • For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
Mitigation MIT-12
Operation

Strategy: Environment Hardening

  • Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.
  • For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].
Mitigation MIT-13
Implementation

Replace unbounded copy functions with analogous functions that support length arguments, such as strcpy with strncpy. Create these if they are not available.

No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.