CWE-787
Allowed-with-ReviewOut-of-bounds Write
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
15246 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-FP2Q-62RV-WJC8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:17 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:17FATEK Automation WinProladder versions 3.30 and prior lacks proper validation of user-supplied data when parsing project files, which could result in an out-of-bounds write. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-38426"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-10-18T13:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "FATEK Automation WinProladder versions 3.30 and prior lacks proper validation of user-supplied data when parsing project files, which could result in an out-of-bounds write. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code.",
"id": "GHSA-fp2q-62rv-wjc8",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:17:50Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:17:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-38426"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-21-280-06"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-FP3F-MQXW-MG8X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-18 03:31 – Updated: 2024-09-18 03:31There is a buffer overflow vulnerability in ZTE MF296R. Due to insufficient validation of the SMS parameter length, an authenticated attacker could use the vulnerability to perform a denial of service attack.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-39068"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-122",
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-18T02:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "There is a buffer overflow vulnerability in ZTE MF296R. Due to insufficient validation of the SMS parameter length, an authenticated attacker could use the vulnerability to perform a denial of service attack.",
"id": "GHSA-fp3f-mqxw-mg8x",
"modified": "2024-09-18T03:31:06Z",
"published": "2024-09-18T03:31:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-39068"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.zte.com.cn/support/news/LoopholeInfoDetail.aspx?newsId=1028984"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FP47-2QF9-PPJW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-01 15:32 – Updated: 2024-07-01 15:32In trusty service, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service with System execution privileges needed
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-39428"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-01T09:15:06Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In trusty service, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service with System execution privileges needed",
"id": "GHSA-fp47-2qf9-ppjw",
"modified": "2024-07-01T15:32:06Z",
"published": "2024-07-01T15:32:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39428"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.unisoc.com/en_us/secy/announcementDetail/1807576926177525762"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FP48-R694-65JV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-09 09:30 – Updated: 2026-03-09 09:30A low-privileged remote attacker can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow via a crafted HTTP POST request using the ubr-network method resulting in full device compromise.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-41766"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-09T09:16:01Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A low-privileged remote attacker can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow via a crafted HTTP POST request using the ubr-network method resulting in full device compromise.",
"id": "GHSA-fp48-r694-65jv",
"modified": "2026-03-09T09:30:30Z",
"published": "2026-03-09T09:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-41766"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mbs-solutions.de/mbs-2025-0001"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FP4J-WGWV-VQV9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-04 00:00 – Updated: 2022-05-11 00:01In imgsensor, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS06479763; Issue ID: ALPS06479763.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-20095"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-05-03T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In imgsensor, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS06479763; Issue ID: ALPS06479763.",
"id": "GHSA-fp4j-wgwv-vqv9",
"modified": "2022-05-11T00:01:43Z",
"published": "2022-05-04T00:00:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-20095"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://corp.mediatek.com/product-security-bulletin/May-2022"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FP4M-FP9Q-CXFX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-14 21:34 – Updated: 2026-01-14 21:34IEEE 802.11 protocol dissector crash in Wireshark 4.6.0 to 4.6.2 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.12 allows denial of service
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-0959"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-14T21:15:52Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "IEEE 802.11 protocol dissector crash in Wireshark 4.6.0 to 4.6.2 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.12 allows denial of service",
"id": "GHSA-fp4m-fp9q-cxfx",
"modified": "2026-01-14T21:34:10Z",
"published": "2026-01-14T21:34:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-0959"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues/20939"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2026-02.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FP5J-76GH-RMHG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:17 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:17Adobe Acrobat Reader DC version 21.007.20095 (and earlier), 21.007.20096 (and earlier), 20.004.30015 (and earlier), and 17.011.30202 (and earlier) is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability when parsing a crafted JPEG2000 file, which could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-40731"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-10-15T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Adobe Acrobat Reader DC version 21.007.20095 (and earlier), 21.007.20096 (and earlier), 20.004.30015 (and earlier), and 17.011.30202 (and earlier) is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability when parsing a crafted JPEG2000 file, which could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.",
"id": "GHSA-fp5j-76gh-rmhg",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:17:41Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:17:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-40731"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb21-104.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-FP6R-8MPM-33RG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:21 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:21A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0590, CVE-2019-0591, CVE-2019-0593, CVE-2019-0605, CVE-2019-0607, CVE-2019-0610, CVE-2019-0640, CVE-2019-0642, CVE-2019-0644, CVE-2019-0651, CVE-2019-0652.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-0655"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-03-05T23:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka \u0027Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability\u0027. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0590, CVE-2019-0591, CVE-2019-0593, CVE-2019-0605, CVE-2019-0607, CVE-2019-0610, CVE-2019-0640, CVE-2019-0642, CVE-2019-0644, CVE-2019-0651, CVE-2019-0652.",
"id": "GHSA-fp6r-8mpm-33rg",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:21:27Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:21:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-0655"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2019-0655"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106912"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FP6W-C38V-F2MX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:03 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:03dwarf_elf_access.c in libdwarf before 20160923 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write) via a crafted file, related to relocation records.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-5034"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-02-17T17:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "dwarf_elf_access.c in libdwarf before 20160923 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write) via a crafted file, related to relocation records.",
"id": "GHSA-fp6w-c38v-f2mx",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:03:24Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:03:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-5034"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.prevanders.net/dwarfbug.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/24/1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/25/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FP7R-C8G8-G8JC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-13 12:31 – Updated: 2025-10-02 15:31Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') vulnerability in RTI Connext Professional (Core Libraries) allows Overflow Variables and Tags.This issue affects Connext Professional: from 7.0.0 before 7.3.0.5, from 6.1.0 before 6.1.2.21, from 6.0.0 before 6.0.1.40, from 5.0.0 before 5.3.1.45.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-52062"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-120",
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-13T11:15:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027) vulnerability in RTI Connext Professional (Core Libraries) allows Overflow Variables and Tags.This issue affects Connext Professional: from 7.0.0 before 7.3.0.5, from 6.1.0 before 6.1.2.21, from 6.0.0 before 6.0.1.40, from 5.0.0 before 5.3.1.45.",
"id": "GHSA-fp7r-c8g8-g8jc",
"modified": "2025-10-02T15:31:12Z",
"published": "2024-12-13T12:31:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-52062"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.rti.com/vulnerabilities/#cve-2024-52062"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-3
Strategy: Language Selection
- Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer.
- Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
Mitigation MIT-4.1
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Mitigation MIT-10
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
- D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
Mitigation MIT-9
- Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory:
- Double check that the buffer is as large as specified.
- When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string.
- Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a loop and make sure there is no danger of writing past the allocated space.
- If necessary, truncate all input strings to a reasonable length before passing them to the copy and concatenation functions.
Mitigation MIT-11
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
- Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
Mitigation MIT-12
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].
Mitigation MIT-13
Replace unbounded copy functions with analogous functions that support length arguments, such as strcpy with strncpy. Create these if they are not available.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.