Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-863

Allowed-with-Review

Incorrect Authorization

Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete

API response cwe.mitre.org

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.

5504 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-J7WH-X834-P3R7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-16 20:44 – Updated: 2026-03-30 14:00
VLAI
Summary
SiYuan: Authorization Bypass Allows Arbitrary SQL Execution via Search API
Details

Summary

SiYuan Note v3.6.0 (and likely prior versions) contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the /api/search/fullTextSearchBlock endpoint. When the method parameter is set to 2, the endpoint passes user-supplied input directly as a raw SQL statement to the underlying SQLite database without any authorization or read-only checks. This allows any authenticated user — including those with the Reader role — to execute arbitrary SQL statements (SELECT, DELETE, UPDATE, DROP TABLE, etc.) against the application's database.

This is inconsistent with the application's own security model: the dedicated SQL endpoint (/api/query/sql) correctly requires both CheckAdminRole and CheckReadonly middleware, but the search endpoint bypasses these controls entirely.

Root Cause Analysis

The Vulnerable Endpoint

File: kernel/api/router.go, line 188

ginServer.Handle("POST", "/api/search/fullTextSearchBlock", model.CheckAuth, fullTextSearchBlock)

This endpoint only applies model.CheckAuth, which permits any authenticated role (Administrator, Editor, or Reader).

The Properly Protected Endpoint (for comparison)

File: kernel/api/router.go, line 177

ginServer.Handle("POST", "/api/query/sql", model.CheckAuth, model.CheckAdminRole, model.CheckReadonly, SQL)

This endpoint correctly chains CheckAdminRole and CheckReadonly, restricting SQL execution to administrators in read-write mode.

The Vulnerable Code Path

File: kernel/api/search.go, lines 389-411

func fullTextSearchBlock(c *gin.Context) {
    // ...
    page, pageSize, query, paths, boxes, types, method, orderBy, groupBy := parseSearchBlockArgs(arg)
    blocks, matchedBlockCount, matchedRootCount, pageCount, docMode :=
        model.FullTextSearchBlock(query, boxes, paths, types, method, orderBy, groupBy, page, pageSize)
    // ...
}

File: kernel/model/search.go, lines 1205-1206

case 2: // SQL
    blocks, matchedBlockCount, matchedRootCount = searchBySQL(query, beforeLen, page, pageSize)

When method=2, the raw query string is passed directly to searchBySQL().

File: kernel/model/search.go, lines 1460-1462

func searchBySQL(stmt string, beforeLen, page, pageSize int) (ret []*Block, ...) {
    stmt = strings.TrimSpace(stmt)
    blocks := sql.SelectBlocksRawStmt(stmt, page, pageSize)

File: kernel/sql/block_query.go, lines 566-569, 713-714

func SelectBlocksRawStmt(stmt string, page, limit int) (ret []*Block) {
    parsedStmt, err := sqlparser.Parse(stmt)
    if err != nil {
        return selectBlocksRawStmt(stmt, limit)  // Falls through to raw execution
    }
    // ...
}

func selectBlocksRawStmt(stmt string, limit int) (ret []*Block) {
    rows, err := query(stmt)  // Executes arbitrary SQL
    // ...
}

File: kernel/sql/database.go, lines 1327-1337

func query(query string, args ...interface{}) (*sql.Rows, error) {
    // ...
    return db.Query(query, args...)  // Go's database/sql db.Query — executes ANY SQL
}

Go's database/sql db.Query() will execute any SQL statement, including DELETE, UPDATE, DROP TABLE, INSERT, etc. The returned *sql.Rows will simply be empty for non-SELECT statements, but the destructive operation is still executed.

Authorization Model

File: kernel/model/session.go, lines 201-210

func CheckAuth(c *gin.Context) {
    // Already authenticated via JWT
    if role := GetGinContextRole(c); IsValidRole(role, []Role{
        RoleAdministrator,
        RoleEditor,
        RoleReader,       // <-- Reader role passes CheckAuth
    }) {
        c.Next()
        return
    }
    // ...
}

File: kernel/model/session.go, lines 380-386

func CheckAdminRole(c *gin.Context) {
    if IsAdminRoleContext(c) {
        c.Next()
    } else {
        c.AbortWithStatus(http.StatusForbidden)  // <-- This check is MISSING on the search endpoint
    }
}

Proof of Concept

Prerequisites

  • SiYuan instance accessible over the network (e.g., Docker deployment)
  • Valid authentication as any user role (including Reader)

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Authenticate to SiYuan and obtain a valid session cookie or API token.

  2. Read all data (confidentiality breach):

curl -X POST http://<target>:6806/api/search/fullTextSearchBlock \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "Authorization: Token <reader_token>" \
  -d '{"method": 2, "query": "SELECT * FROM blocks LIMIT 100"}'
  1. Delete all blocks (integrity/availability breach):
curl -X POST http://<target>:6806/api/search/fullTextSearchBlock \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "Authorization: Token <reader_token>" \
  -d '{"method": 2, "query": "DELETE FROM blocks"}'
  1. Drop tables (availability breach):
curl -X POST http://<target>:6806/api/search/fullTextSearchBlock \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "Authorization: Token <reader_token>" \
  -d '{"method": 2, "query": "DROP TABLE blocks"}'
  1. Compare with the properly protected endpoint (should return HTTP 403 for Reader role):
curl -X POST http://<target>:6806/api/query/sql \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "Authorization: Token <reader_token>" \
  -d '{"stmt": "SELECT * FROM blocks LIMIT 10"}'

Expected Behavior

The search endpoint should reject SQL execution for non-admin users, or at minimum enforce read-only access, consistent with /api/query/sql.

Actual Behavior

Any authenticated user (including Reader role) can execute arbitrary SQL including destructive operations.

Impact

In a multi-user deployment (e.g., Docker with published access, or any network-accessible instance with access authorization code):

  • Confidentiality: A Reader-role user can read all data in the SQLite database, including blocks, assets, references, and configuration data they should not have access to.
  • Integrity: A Reader-role user can modify or delete any data in the database, despite having read-only access by design.
  • Availability: A Reader-role user can drop tables or corrupt the database, rendering the application unusable.

Suggested Fix

Add CheckAdminRole and CheckReadonly middleware to the search endpoint, or add explicit validation that only SELECT statements are accepted when method=2:

Option A — Restrict method=2 to admin (recommended):

In kernel/api/search.go, add a role check when method=2:

func fullTextSearchBlock(c *gin.Context) {
    // ...
    page, pageSize, query, paths, boxes, types, method, orderBy, groupBy := parseSearchBlockArgs(arg)

    // SQL mode requires admin privileges, consistent with /api/query/sql
    if method == 2 && !model.IsAdminRoleContext(c) {
        ret.Code = -1
        ret.Msg = "SQL search requires administrator privileges"
        return
    }
    // ...
}

Option B — Enforce SELECT-only for non-admin users:

Validate the parsed SQL to ensure only SELECT statements are executed when the user is not an administrator.

Severity
9.8 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "0.0.0-20260313024916-fd6526133bb3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-32767"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863",
      "CWE-89"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-16T20:44:52Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-20T01:15:55Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nSiYuan Note v3.6.0 (and likely prior versions) contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the `/api/search/fullTextSearchBlock` endpoint. When the `method` parameter is set to `2`, the endpoint passes user-supplied input directly as a raw SQL statement to the underlying SQLite database without any authorization or read-only checks. This allows any authenticated user \u2014 including those with the `Reader` role \u2014 to execute arbitrary SQL statements (SELECT, DELETE, UPDATE, DROP TABLE, etc.) against the application\u0027s database.\n\nThis is inconsistent with the application\u0027s own security model: the dedicated SQL endpoint (`/api/query/sql`) correctly requires both `CheckAdminRole` and `CheckReadonly` middleware, but the search endpoint bypasses these controls entirely.\n\n## Root Cause Analysis\n\n### The Vulnerable Endpoint\n\n**File:** `kernel/api/router.go`, line 188\n\n```go\nginServer.Handle(\"POST\", \"/api/search/fullTextSearchBlock\", model.CheckAuth, fullTextSearchBlock)\n```\n\nThis endpoint only applies `model.CheckAuth`, which permits **any** authenticated role (Administrator, Editor, or Reader).\n\n### The Properly Protected Endpoint (for comparison)\n\n**File:** `kernel/api/router.go`, line 177\n\n```go\nginServer.Handle(\"POST\", \"/api/query/sql\", model.CheckAuth, model.CheckAdminRole, model.CheckReadonly, SQL)\n```\n\nThis endpoint correctly chains `CheckAdminRole` and `CheckReadonly`, restricting SQL execution to administrators in read-write mode.\n\n### The Vulnerable Code Path\n\n**File:** `kernel/api/search.go`, lines 389-411\n\n```go\nfunc fullTextSearchBlock(c *gin.Context) {\n    // ...\n    page, pageSize, query, paths, boxes, types, method, orderBy, groupBy := parseSearchBlockArgs(arg)\n    blocks, matchedBlockCount, matchedRootCount, pageCount, docMode :=\n        model.FullTextSearchBlock(query, boxes, paths, types, method, orderBy, groupBy, page, pageSize)\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\n**File:** `kernel/model/search.go`, lines 1205-1206\n\n```go\ncase 2: // SQL\n    blocks, matchedBlockCount, matchedRootCount = searchBySQL(query, beforeLen, page, pageSize)\n```\n\nWhen `method=2`, the raw `query` string is passed directly to `searchBySQL()`.\n\n**File:** `kernel/model/search.go`, lines 1460-1462\n\n```go\nfunc searchBySQL(stmt string, beforeLen, page, pageSize int) (ret []*Block, ...) {\n    stmt = strings.TrimSpace(stmt)\n    blocks := sql.SelectBlocksRawStmt(stmt, page, pageSize)\n```\n\n**File:** `kernel/sql/block_query.go`, lines 566-569, 713-714\n\n```go\nfunc SelectBlocksRawStmt(stmt string, page, limit int) (ret []*Block) {\n    parsedStmt, err := sqlparser.Parse(stmt)\n    if err != nil {\n        return selectBlocksRawStmt(stmt, limit)  // Falls through to raw execution\n    }\n    // ...\n}\n\nfunc selectBlocksRawStmt(stmt string, limit int) (ret []*Block) {\n    rows, err := query(stmt)  // Executes arbitrary SQL\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\n**File:** `kernel/sql/database.go`, lines 1327-1337\n\n```go\nfunc query(query string, args ...interface{}) (*sql.Rows, error) {\n    // ...\n    return db.Query(query, args...)  // Go\u0027s database/sql db.Query \u2014 executes ANY SQL\n}\n```\n\nGo\u0027s `database/sql` `db.Query()` will execute any SQL statement, including `DELETE`, `UPDATE`, `DROP TABLE`, `INSERT`, etc. The returned `*sql.Rows` will simply be empty for non-SELECT statements, but the destructive operation is still executed.\n\n### Authorization Model\n\n**File:** `kernel/model/session.go`, lines 201-210\n\n```go\nfunc CheckAuth(c *gin.Context) {\n    // Already authenticated via JWT\n    if role := GetGinContextRole(c); IsValidRole(role, []Role{\n        RoleAdministrator,\n        RoleEditor,\n        RoleReader,       // \u003c-- Reader role passes CheckAuth\n    }) {\n        c.Next()\n        return\n    }\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\n**File:** `kernel/model/session.go`, lines 380-386\n\n```go\nfunc CheckAdminRole(c *gin.Context) {\n    if IsAdminRoleContext(c) {\n        c.Next()\n    } else {\n        c.AbortWithStatus(http.StatusForbidden)  // \u003c-- This check is MISSING on the search endpoint\n    }\n}\n```\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n### Prerequisites\n- SiYuan instance accessible over the network (e.g., Docker deployment)\n- Valid authentication as any user role (including `Reader`)\n\n### Steps to Reproduce\n\n1. Authenticate to SiYuan and obtain a valid session cookie or API token.\n\n2. **Read all data (confidentiality breach):**\n```bash\ncurl -X POST http://\u003ctarget\u003e:6806/api/search/fullTextSearchBlock \\\n  -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n  -H \"Authorization: Token \u003creader_token\u003e\" \\\n  -d \u0027{\"method\": 2, \"query\": \"SELECT * FROM blocks LIMIT 100\"}\u0027\n```\n\n3. **Delete all blocks (integrity/availability breach):**\n```bash\ncurl -X POST http://\u003ctarget\u003e:6806/api/search/fullTextSearchBlock \\\n  -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n  -H \"Authorization: Token \u003creader_token\u003e\" \\\n  -d \u0027{\"method\": 2, \"query\": \"DELETE FROM blocks\"}\u0027\n```\n\n4. **Drop tables (availability breach):**\n```bash\ncurl -X POST http://\u003ctarget\u003e:6806/api/search/fullTextSearchBlock \\\n  -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n  -H \"Authorization: Token \u003creader_token\u003e\" \\\n  -d \u0027{\"method\": 2, \"query\": \"DROP TABLE blocks\"}\u0027\n```\n\n5. **Compare with the properly protected endpoint** (should return HTTP 403 for Reader role):\n```bash\ncurl -X POST http://\u003ctarget\u003e:6806/api/query/sql \\\n  -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n  -H \"Authorization: Token \u003creader_token\u003e\" \\\n  -d \u0027{\"stmt\": \"SELECT * FROM blocks LIMIT 10\"}\u0027\n```\n\n### Expected Behavior\nThe search endpoint should reject SQL execution for non-admin users, or at minimum enforce read-only access, consistent with `/api/query/sql`.\n\n### Actual Behavior\nAny authenticated user (including Reader role) can execute arbitrary SQL including destructive operations.\n\n## Impact\n\nIn a multi-user deployment (e.g., Docker with published access, or any network-accessible instance with access authorization code):\n\n- **Confidentiality:** A Reader-role user can read all data in the SQLite database, including blocks, assets, references, and configuration data they should not have access to.\n- **Integrity:** A Reader-role user can modify or delete any data in the database, despite having read-only access by design.\n- **Availability:** A Reader-role user can drop tables or corrupt the database, rendering the application unusable.\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\nAdd `CheckAdminRole` and `CheckReadonly` middleware to the search endpoint, or add explicit validation that only SELECT statements are accepted when `method=2`:\n\n**Option A \u2014 Restrict method=2 to admin (recommended):**\n\nIn `kernel/api/search.go`, add a role check when `method=2`:\n\n```go\nfunc fullTextSearchBlock(c *gin.Context) {\n    // ...\n    page, pageSize, query, paths, boxes, types, method, orderBy, groupBy := parseSearchBlockArgs(arg)\n\n    // SQL mode requires admin privileges, consistent with /api/query/sql\n    if method == 2 \u0026\u0026 !model.IsAdminRoleContext(c) {\n        ret.Code = -1\n        ret.Msg = \"SQL search requires administrator privileges\"\n        return\n    }\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\n**Option B \u2014 Enforce SELECT-only for non-admin users:**\n\nValidate the parsed SQL to ensure only SELECT statements are executed when the user is not an administrator.",
  "id": "GHSA-j7wh-x834-p3r7",
  "modified": "2026-03-30T14:00:31Z",
  "published": "2026-03-16T20:44:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/security/advisories/GHSA-j7wh-x834-p3r7"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32767"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/issues/17209"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/commit/d5e2d0bce0dffef5f61bd8066954bc2d41181fc5"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/releases/tag/v3.6.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "SiYuan: Authorization Bypass Allows Arbitrary SQL Execution via Search API"
}

GHSA-J85G-452W-9Q39

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-25 00:01 – Updated: 2022-03-17 00:05
VLAI
Details

The backend infrastructure shared by multiple mobile device monitoring services does not adequately authenticate or authorize API requests, creating an IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Reference) vulnerability.

Severity
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-0732"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284",
      "CWE-639",
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-02-24T16:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The backend infrastructure shared by multiple mobile device monitoring services does not adequately authenticate or authorize API requests, creating an IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Reference) vulnerability.",
  "id": "GHSA-j85g-452w-9q39",
  "modified": "2022-03-17T00:05:15Z",
  "published": "2022-02-25T00:01:01Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0732"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/284.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/229438"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://techcrunch.com/2022/02/22/stalkerware-network-spilling-data"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/229438"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-J899-9773-9WJF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:17 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:17
VLAI
Details

An improper authorization in the receiver component of Email.Product: AndroidVersions: Android SoCAndroid ID: A-149813048

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-0090"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-05-14T21:15:00Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "An improper authorization in the receiver component of Email.Product: AndroidVersions: Android SoCAndroid ID: A-149813048",
  "id": "GHSA-j899-9773-9wjf",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:17:51Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:17:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-0090"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2020-05-01"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-J8C9-3FF4-H2R8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-15 21:30 – Updated: 2024-10-15 21:30
VLAI
Details

Vulnerability in the Oracle Service Contracts product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Authoring). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.5-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Service Contracts. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Service Contracts accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Service Contracts accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).

Severity
8.1 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-21280"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-10-15T20:15:20Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle Service Contracts product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Authoring).  Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.5-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Service Contracts.  Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in  unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Service Contracts accessible data as well as  unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Service Contracts accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts).  CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).",
  "id": "GHSA-j8c9-3ff4-h2r8",
  "modified": "2024-10-15T21:30:39Z",
  "published": "2024-10-15T21:30:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-21280"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2024.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-J8FR-CP65-M9M7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-15 00:31 – Updated: 2024-12-03 18:31
VLAI
Details

A misconfiguration in the fingerprint authentication mechanism of Binance: BTC, Crypto and NFTS v2.85.4, allows attackers to bypass authentication when adding a new fingerprint.

Severity
9.8 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-31695"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-14T22:15:15Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "A misconfiguration in the fingerprint authentication mechanism of Binance: BTC, Crypto and NFTS v2.85.4, allows attackers to bypass authentication when adding a new fingerprint.",
  "id": "GHSA-j8fr-cp65-m9m7",
  "modified": "2024-12-03T18:31:02Z",
  "published": "2024-11-15T00:31:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31695"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://zzzxiin.github.io/post/binance"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-J8G4-6P94-J4FP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-07-19 00:00 – Updated: 2026-04-08 18:31
VLAI
Details

The plugin Wbcom Designs – BuddyPress Group Reviews for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized settings changes and review modification due to missing capability checks and improper nonce checks in several functions related to said actions in versions up to, and including, 2.8.3. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify reviews and plugin settings on the affected site.

Severity
5.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-2108"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862",
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-07-18T17:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The plugin Wbcom Designs \u2013 BuddyPress Group Reviews for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized settings changes and review modification due to missing capability checks and improper nonce checks in several functions related to said actions in versions up to, and including, 2.8.3. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify reviews and plugin settings on the affected site.",
  "id": "GHSA-j8g4-6p94-j4fp",
  "modified": "2026-04-08T18:31:57Z",
  "published": "2022-07-19T00:00:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2108"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/review-buddypress-groups/trunk/includes/bgr-ajax.php#L359"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2742109"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/397dabc3-5dcf-4d1f-9e24-28af889cb76f?source=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/vulnerability-advisories/#CVE-2022-2108"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-J8HG-PH7R-FWMJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:02 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:02
VLAI
Details

In the Query Engine in Couchbase Server 6.5.x and 6.6.x through 6.6.1, Common Table Expression queries were not correctly checking the user's permissions, allowing read-access to resources beyond what those users were explicitly allowed to access.

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-31158"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-05-19T19:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Query Engine in Couchbase Server 6.5.x and 6.6.x through 6.6.1, Common Table Expression queries were not correctly checking the user\u0027s permissions, allowing read-access to resources beyond what those users were explicitly allowed to access.",
  "id": "GHSA-j8hg-ph7r-fwmj",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T19:02:47Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:02:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-31158"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.couchbase.com/server/current/release-notes/relnotes.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.couchbase.com/resources/security#SecurityAlerts"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-J8VF-QMCJ-WV9F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-22 18:32 – Updated: 2024-10-22 18:32
VLAI
Details

Archer Platform 2024.03 before version 2024.08 is affected by an authorization bypass vulnerability related to supporting application files. A remote unprivileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to elevate their privileges and delete system icons.

Severity
5.9 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-49208"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-10-22T17:15:04Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Archer Platform 2024.03 before version 2024.08 is affected by an authorization bypass vulnerability related to supporting application files. A remote unprivileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to elevate their privileges and delete system icons.",
  "id": "GHSA-j8vf-qmcj-wv9f",
  "modified": "2024-10-22T18:32:12Z",
  "published": "2024-10-22T18:32:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49208"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.archerirm.community/t5/platform-announcements/archer-update-for-multiple-vulnerabilities/ta-p/747545"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.archerirm.community/t5/platform-announcements/tkb-p/product-advisories-tkb"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-J8W3-HXM2-CW7F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-19 06:30 – Updated: 2025-07-19 06:30
VLAI
Details

An incorrect authorisation check in the the 'plant transfer' function of the Growatt cloud service allowed a malicous attacker with a valid account to transfer any plant into his/her account.

Severity
9.4 (Critical)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/S:P/V:C
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-29757"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-19T06:15:23Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "An incorrect authorisation check in the the\u00a0\u0027plant transfer\u0027 function of the Growatt cloud service allowed a malicous attacker with a valid account to transfer any plant into his/her account.",
  "id": "GHSA-j8w3-hxm2-cw7f",
  "modified": "2025-07-19T06:30:57Z",
  "published": "2025-07-19T06:30:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-29757"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://csirt.divd.nl/CVE-2025-29757"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://csirt.divd.nl/DIVD-2025-00011"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oss.growatt.com"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://server.growatt.com"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:P/AU:X/R:X/V:C/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-J94J-PQHQ-QR6H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-10 21:30 – Updated: 2025-07-25 18:30
VLAI
Details

A non-admin user can cause short-term disruption in Target VM availability in Citrix Provisioning

Severity
4.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
4.8 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-6150"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-07-10T21:15:10Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A non-admin user can cause short-term disruption in Target VM availability\u00a0in\u00a0Citrix Provisioning",
  "id": "GHSA-j94j-pqhq-qr6h",
  "modified": "2025-07-25T18:30:33Z",
  "published": "2024-07-10T21:30:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-6150"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX678025"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
  • Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].

Mitigation MIT-4.4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
  • One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
System Configuration Installation

Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.

← Back to the CWE list