CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
CVE-2024-1367 (GCVE-0-2024-1367)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-02-14 21:35 – Updated: 2025-05-02 16:26- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenable | Security Center |
Affected:
0 , < 6.3.0
(6.3.0)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T18:40:19.949Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2024-02"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-1367",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-02-15T20:05:10.392514Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-02T16:26:07.235Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"platforms": [
"Linux"
],
"product": "Security Center",
"vendor": "Tenable",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.3.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "6.3.0"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Pawe\u0142 Bednarz"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-02-14T19:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\n\nA command injection vulnerability exists where an authenticated, remote attacker with administrator privileges on the Security Center application could modify Logging parameters, which could lead to the execution of arbitrary code on the Security Center host. \n\n"
}
],
"value": "\nA command injection vulnerability exists where an authenticated, remote attacker with administrator privileges on the Security Center application could modify Logging parameters, which could lead to the execution of arbitrary code on the Security Center host. \n\n"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-248",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-248 Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-02-14T21:35:16.767Z",
"orgId": "5ac1ecc2-367a-4d16-a0b2-35d495ddd0be",
"shortName": "tenable"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2024-02"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\n\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cp\u003eTenable has released Security Center 6.3.0 to address these issues. The installation files can be obtained from the Tenable Downloads Portal: \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.tenable.com/downloads/security-center\"\u003ehttps://www.tenable.com/downloads/security-center\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"
}
],
"value": "\nTenable has released Security Center 6.3.0 to address these issues. The installation files can be obtained from the Tenable Downloads Portal: https://www.tenable.com/downloads/security-center https://www.tenable.com/downloads/security-center \n\n\n\n\n\n"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "TNS-2024-02",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Command Injection Vulnerability in Tenable Security Center",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "5ac1ecc2-367a-4d16-a0b2-35d495ddd0be",
"assignerShortName": "tenable",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-1367",
"datePublished": "2024-02-14T21:35:16.767Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-02-08T19:43:20.585Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-02T16:26:07.235Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-13892 (GCVE-0-2024-13892)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-03-06 14:00 – Updated: 2025-10-03 08:52- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://cert.pl/en/posts/2025/03/CVE-2024-13892/ | third-party-advisory |
| https://www.smartwares.eu/en-gb/smartwares-cip-37… | product |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smartwares | CIP-37210AT |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 3.3.0
(semver)
|
|
| Smartwares | C724IP |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 3.3.0
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-13892",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-03-06T14:48:01.194575Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-06T14:48:08.548Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "CIP-37210AT",
"vendor": "Smartwares",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.3.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "C724IP",
"vendor": "Smartwares",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.3.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Micha\u0142 Majchrowicz (Afine Team)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Marcin Wyczechowski (Afine Team)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-03-06T11:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Smartwares cameras\u0026nbsp;CIP-37210AT and\u0026nbsp;C724IP, as well as others which share the same firmware in versions up to 3.3.0, are vulnerable to command injection. \u003cbr\u003eDuring the initialization process, a user has to use a mobile app to provide devices with Access Point credentials. This input is not properly sanitized, what allows for command injection.\u003cbr\u003eThe vendor has not replied to reports, so the patching status remains unknown. Newer firmware versions might be vulnerable as well.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Smartwares cameras\u00a0CIP-37210AT and\u00a0C724IP, as well as others which share the same firmware in versions up to 3.3.0, are vulnerable to command injection. \nDuring the initialization process, a user has to use a mobile app to provide devices with Access Point credentials. This input is not properly sanitized, what allows for command injection.\nThe vendor has not replied to reports, so the patching status remains unknown. Newer firmware versions might be vulnerable as well."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-248",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-248 Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 7.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-03T08:52:55.831Z",
"orgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"shortName": "CERT-PL"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://cert.pl/en/posts/2025/03/CVE-2024-13892/"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.smartwares.eu/en-gb/smartwares-cip-37210at-indoor-wi-fi-camera-cip--37210at"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Command Injection in Smartwares cameras",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"assignerShortName": "CERT-PL",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-13892",
"datePublished": "2025-03-06T14:00:41.444Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-02-20T14:05:38.748Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-03T08:52:55.831Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-13985 (GCVE-0-2024-13985)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-27 21:23 – Updated: 2026-05-15 11:14 Unsupported When Assigned X_Known Exploited Vulnerability- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://support.dahuatech.com/bulletin/info?IsDpV… | vendor-advisory |
| https://cn-sec.com/archives/2554372.html | technical-descriptionexploit |
| https://blog.csdn.net/weixin_43567873/article/det… | technical-descriptionexploit |
| https://github.com/ahisec/nuclei-tps/blob/main/ht… | technical-descriptionexploit |
| https://s4e.io/tools/dahua-eims-remote-code-execution | third-party-advisory |
| https://pentest-tools.com/vulnerabilities-exploit… | third-party-advisory |
| https://www.cnvd.org.cn/flaw/show/CNVD-2024-17054 | third-party-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/dahua-eims-rce | third-party-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zhejiang Dahua Technology Co., Ltd. | EIMS |
Affected:
0 , < 2240008
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-13985",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-28T13:58:18.525817Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T13:59:49.010Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"capture_handle.action interface"
],
"product": "EIMS",
"vendor": "Zhejiang Dahua Technology Co., Ltd.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2240008",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Maodaner Security"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A command injection vulnerability in Dahua EIMS versions prior to 2240008 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the capture_handle.action interface. The flaw stems from improper input validation in the captureCommand parameter, which is processed without sanitization or authentication. By sending crafted HTTP requests, attackers can inject OS-level commands that are executed on the server, leading to full system compromise.\u0026nbsp;Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on \u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e2024-04-06 UTC\u003c/span\u003e."
}
],
"value": "A command injection vulnerability in Dahua EIMS versions prior to 2240008 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the capture_handle.action interface. The flaw stems from improper input validation in the captureCommand parameter, which is processed without sanitization or authentication. By sending crafted HTTP requests, attackers can inject OS-level commands that are executed on the server, leading to full system compromise.\u00a0Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2024-04-06 UTC."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-15T11:14:33.939Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://support.dahuatech.com/bulletin/info?IsDpValue=APKncD%2FBd6zIq4O2BUpuhjg6hGbLYAQKuf5hnmPaK9M%3D"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description",
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://cn-sec.com/archives/2554372.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description",
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://blog.csdn.net/weixin_43567873/article/details/136636198"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description",
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ahisec/nuclei-tps/blob/main/http/vulnerabilities/dahua/dahua-eims-capture-handle-rce.yaml"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://s4e.io/tools/dahua-eims-remote-code-execution"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://pentest-tools.com/vulnerabilities-exploits/dahua-eims-remote-command-execution_23961"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.cnvd.org.cn/flaw/show/CNVD-2024-17054"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/dahua-eims-rce"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"tags": [
"unsupported-when-assigned",
"x_known-exploited-vulnerability"
],
"title": "Dahua EIMS capture_handle.action RCE",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-13985",
"datePublished": "2025-08-27T21:23:37.944Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-27T17:25:56.109Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-15T11:14:33.939Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-14003 (GCVE-0-2024-14003)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-30 21:42 – Updated: 2025-11-17 18:21- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.nagios.com/products/security/#nagios-xi | vendor-advisorypatch |
| https://www.nagios.com/changelog/nagios-xi/ | release-notespatch |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nagios-xi-rc… | third-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-14003",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-31T13:05:41.149998Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-31T13:24:16.576Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"NRDP server plugins"
],
"product": "XI",
"vendor": "Nagios",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2024R1.2",
"status": "unknown",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:nagios:nagios_xi:2024:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "r1.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Exodus Intelligence"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Nagios XI versions prior to 2024R1.2 are\u0026nbsp;vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) through its NRDP (Nagios Remote Data Processor) server plugins. Insufficient validation of inbound NRDP request parameters allows crafted input to reach command execution paths, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying host in the context of the web/Nagios service.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Nagios XI versions prior to 2024R1.2 are\u00a0vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) through its NRDP (Nagios Remote Data Processor) server plugins. Insufficient validation of inbound NRDP request parameters allows crafted input to reach command execution paths, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying host in the context of the web/Nagios service."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-17T18:21:48.995Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.nagios.com/products/security/#nagios-xi"
},
{
"tags": [
"release-notes",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.nagios.com/changelog/nagios-xi/"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nagios-xi-rce-via-nrdp-server-plugins"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eNagios addresses this vulnerability as \"\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eNagios XI was vulnerable to remote code execution through NRDP\" and \"\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(244, 247, 251);\"\u003eImproved validation in several NRDP server plugins.\"\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Nagios addresses this vulnerability as \"Nagios XI was vulnerable to remote code execution through NRDP\" and \"Improved validation in several NRDP server plugins.\""
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Nagios XI \u003c 2024R1.2 RCE via NRDP Server Plugins",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-14003",
"datePublished": "2025-10-30T21:42:19.225Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-22T18:36:16.828Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-17T18:21:48.995Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-14005 (GCVE-0-2024-14005)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-30 21:37 – Updated: 2025-11-17 18:21- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.nagios.com/products/security/#nagios-xi | vendor-advisorypatch |
| https://www.nagios.com/changelog/nagios-xi/ | release-notespatch |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nagios-xi-co… | third-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-14005",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-31T13:06:07.346607Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-31T13:25:31.802Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"Docker Wizard (Nagios XI web UI module)"
],
"product": "XI",
"vendor": "Nagios",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2024R1.2",
"status": "unknown",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:nagios:nagios_xi:2024:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "r1.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Exodus Intelligence"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Nagios XI versions prior to 2024R1.2 contain a command injection vulnerability in the Docker Wizard. Insufficient validation of user-supplied input in the wizard allows an authenticated administrator to inject shell metacharacters that are incorporated into backend command invocations. Successful exploitation enables arbitrary command execution with the privileges of the Nagios XI web application user.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Nagios XI versions prior to 2024R1.2 contain a command injection vulnerability in the Docker Wizard. Insufficient validation of user-supplied input in the wizard allows an authenticated administrator to inject shell metacharacters that are incorporated into backend command invocations. Successful exploitation enables arbitrary command execution with the privileges of the Nagios XI web application user."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-17T18:21:49.431Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.nagios.com/products/security/#nagios-xi"
},
{
"tags": [
"release-notes",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.nagios.com/changelog/nagios-xi/"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nagios-xi-command-injection-via-docker-wizard"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eNagios addresses this vulnerability as \"\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eNagios XI was vulnerable to command injection via the Docker Wizard\" and as a part of \"Improved validation in Docker Wizard and mitigated NULL poisoning vulnerability on systems with older PHP distributions.\"\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Nagios addresses this vulnerability as \"Nagios XI was vulnerable to command injection via the Docker Wizard\" and as a part of \"Improved validation in Docker Wizard and mitigated NULL poisoning vulnerability on systems with older PHP distributions.\""
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Nagios XI \u003c 2024R1.2 Command Injection via Docker Wizard",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Remove the Docker Wizard.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Remove the Docker Wizard."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-14005",
"datePublished": "2025-10-30T21:37:28.667Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-22T18:51:23.211Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-17T18:21:49.431Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-14008 (GCVE-0-2024-14008)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-30 21:43 – Updated: 2025-11-17 18:21- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.nagios.com/products/security/#nagios-xi | vendor-advisorypatch |
| https://www.nagios.com/changelog/nagios-xi/ | release-notespatch |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nagios-xi-rc… | third-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-14008",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-31T13:05:38.284562Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-31T13:24:00.739Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"WinRM Configuration Wizard"
],
"product": "XI",
"vendor": "Nagios",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2024R1.3.2",
"status": "unknown",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:nagios:nagios_xi:2024:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "r1.3.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Leo Trinh"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Nagios XI versions prior to 2024R1.3.2\u0026nbsp;contain a remote command execution vulnerability in the WinRM Configuration Wizard. Insufficient validation of user-supplied input allows an authenticated administrator to inject shell metacharacters that are incorporated into backend command invocations. Successful exploitation enables arbitrary command execution with the privileges of the Nagios XI web application user.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Nagios XI versions prior to 2024R1.3.2\u00a0contain a remote command execution vulnerability in the WinRM Configuration Wizard. Insufficient validation of user-supplied input allows an authenticated administrator to inject shell metacharacters that are incorporated into backend command invocations. Successful exploitation enables arbitrary command execution with the privileges of the Nagios XI web application user."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-17T18:21:50.058Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.nagios.com/products/security/#nagios-xi"
},
{
"tags": [
"release-notes",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.nagios.com/changelog/nagios-xi/"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nagios-xi-rce-via-winrm-configuration-wizard"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eNagios addresses this vulnerability as \"\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eNagios XI was vulnerable to remote command execution through the WinRM configuration wizard\" and as a part of \"Fixed RCE in WinRM Wizard.\"\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Nagios addresses this vulnerability as \"Nagios XI was vulnerable to remote command execution through the WinRM configuration wizard\" and as a part of \"Fixed RCE in WinRM Wizard.\""
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Nagios XI \u003c 2024R1.3.2 RCE via WinRM Configuration Wizard",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Remove WinRM configuration wizard.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Remove WinRM configuration wizard."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-14008",
"datePublished": "2025-10-30T21:43:07.355Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-22T19:14:53.241Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-17T18:21:50.058Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-14010 (GCVE-0-2024-14010)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-12 19:55 – Updated: 2026-04-07 14:08- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51752 | exploit |
| http://www.typora.io | product |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/typora-os-co… | third-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-14010",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-15T17:59:10.381657Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-15T17:59:17.977Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Typora",
"vendor": "Unknown",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.7.4"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:typora:typora:1.7.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Ahmet \u00dcmit BAYRAM"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-01-29T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eTypora 1.7.4 contains a command injection vulnerability in the PDF export preferences that allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands. Attackers can inject malicious commands into the \u0027run command\u0027 input field during PDF export to achieve remote code execution.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Typora 1.7.4 contains a command injection vulnerability in the PDF export preferences that allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands. Attackers can inject malicious commands into the \u0027run command\u0027 input field during PDF export to achieve remote code execution."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-07T14:08:28.519Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "ExploitDB-51752",
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51752"
},
{
"name": "Typora Vendor Homepage",
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "http://www.typora.io"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Typora 1.7.4 OS Command Injection via Export PDF Preferences",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/typora-os-command-injection-via-export-pdf-preferences"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Typora 1.7.4 OS Command Injection via Export PDF Preferences",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-14010",
"datePublished": "2025-12-12T19:55:03.584Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-22T21:37:48.606Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-07T14:08:28.519Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-14026 (GCVE-0-2024-14026)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-11 08:02 – Updated: 2026-03-12 03:55| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| QNAP Systems Inc. | QTS |
Affected:
5.1.x , < 5.1.9.2954 build 20241120
(custom)
Affected: 5.2.x , < 5.2.3.3006 build 20250108 (custom) |
|
| QNAP Systems Inc. | QuTS hero |
Affected:
h5.1.x , < h5.1.9.2954 build 20241120
(custom)
Affected: h5.2.x , < h5.2.3.3006 build 20250108 (custom) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-14026",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-11T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-12T03:55:17.771Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "QTS",
"vendor": "QNAP Systems Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.1.9.2954 build 20241120",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.1.x",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.2.3.3006 build 20250108",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.2.x",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "QuTS hero",
"vendor": "QNAP Systems Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "h5.1.9.2954 build 20241120",
"status": "affected",
"version": "h5.1.x",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "h5.2.3.3006 build 20250108",
"status": "affected",
"version": "h5.2.x",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If an attacker gains local network access who have also gained a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWe have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions:\u003cbr\u003eQTS 5.1.9.2954 build 20241120 and later\u003cbr\u003eQTS 5.2.3.3006 build 20250108 and later\u003cbr\u003eQuTS hero h5.1.9.2954 build 20241120 and later\u003cbr\u003eQuTS hero h5.2.3.3006 build 20250108 and later\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If an attacker gains local network access who have also gained a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands.\n\nWe have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions:\nQTS 5.1.9.2954 build 20241120 and later\nQTS 5.2.3.3006 build 20250108 and later\nQuTS hero h5.1.9.2954 build 20241120 and later\nQuTS hero h5.2.3.3006 build 20250108 and later"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "PHYSICAL",
"baseScore": 2,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"exploitMaturity": "UNREPORTED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-11T08:07:06.833Z",
"orgId": "2fd009eb-170a-4625-932b-17a53af1051f",
"shortName": "qnap"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.qnap.com/en/security-advisory/qsa-24-54"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions:\u003cbr\u003eQTS 5.1.9.2954 build 20241120 and later\u003cbr\u003eQTS 5.2.3.3006 build 20250108 and later\u003cbr\u003eQuTS hero h5.1.9.2954 build 20241120 and later\u003cbr\u003eQuTS hero h5.2.3.3006 build 20250108 and later\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions:\nQTS 5.1.9.2954 build 20241120 and later\nQTS 5.2.3.3006 build 20250108 and later\nQuTS hero h5.1.9.2954 build 20241120 and later\nQuTS hero h5.2.3.3006 build 20250108 and later"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "QSA-24-57",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "QTS, QuTS hero",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "2fd009eb-170a-4625-932b-17a53af1051f",
"assignerShortName": "qnap",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-14026",
"datePublished": "2026-03-11T08:02:13.413Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-09T01:19:53.496Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-12T03:55:17.771Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-1520 (GCVE-0-2024-1520)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-04-10 17:08 – Updated: 2024-08-01 18:40- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| parisneo | parisneo/lollms-webui |
Affected:
unspecified , < 9.1
(custom)
|
|
| parisneo | lollms-webui |
Affected:
9.0
cpe:2.3:a:parisneo:lollms-webui:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:parisneo:lollms-webui:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "lollms-webui",
"vendor": "parisneo",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.0"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-1520",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-07-31T15:12:34.783931Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-07-31T15:13:16.415Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T18:40:21.354Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/405c2059-3fe9-4233-8eed-741ec847d181"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/parisneo/lollms-webui/commit/2497d1a4fe5a09f003bf7a9bc426139e9295a934"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "parisneo/lollms-webui",
"vendor": "parisneo",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "9.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An OS Command Injection vulnerability exists in the \u0027/open_code_folder\u0027 endpoint of the parisneo/lollms-webui application, due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the \u0027discussion_id\u0027 parameter. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious OS commands, leading to unauthorized command execution on the underlying operating system. This could result in unauthorized access, data leakage, or complete system compromise."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-04-16T11:10:31.162Z",
"orgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
"shortName": "@huntr_ai"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/405c2059-3fe9-4233-8eed-741ec847d181"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/parisneo/lollms-webui/commit/2497d1a4fe5a09f003bf7a9bc426139e9295a934"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "405c2059-3fe9-4233-8eed-741ec847d181",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "OS Command Injection in parisneo/lollms-webui"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
"assignerShortName": "@huntr_ai",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-1520",
"datePublished": "2024-04-10T17:08:02.265Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-02-14T21:45:35.981Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T18:40:21.354Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-1624 (GCVE-0-2024-1624)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-03-01 15:47 – Updated: 2024-08-28 15:01- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dassault Systèmes | Documentation server |
Affected:
Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2022x Golden , ≤ Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2022x.FP.CFA.2406
(custom)
Affected: Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2023x Golden , ≤ Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2023x FP.CFA.2350 (custom) Affected: Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2024x Golden , ≤ Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2024x.FP.CFA.2405 (custom) Affected: SIMULIA Abaqus Release 2022 Golden , ≤ SIMULIA Abaqus Release 2022.FP.CFA.2406 (custom) Affected: SIMULIA Abaqus Release 2023 Golden , ≤ SIMULIA Abaqus Release 2023.FP.CFA.2350 (custom) Affected: SIMULIA Abaqus Release 2024 Golden , ≤ SIMULIA Abaqus Release 2024.FP.CFA.2405 (custom) Affected: SIMULIA Isight Release 2022 Golden Affected: SIMULIA Isight Release 2023 Golden Affected: SIMULIA Isight Release 2024 Golden Affected: CATIA Composer Release R2023 Golden , ≤ CATIA Composer Release R2023 Refresh4 (custom) Affected: CATIA Composer Release R2024 Golden , ≤ CATIA Composer Release R2024 Refresh3 (custom) |
|
| 3ds | 3dexperience |
Affected:
r2022x_golden , ≤ r2022.fp.cfa.2406
(custom)
Affected: r2023x_golden , ≤ R2023x.FP.CFA.2350 (custom) Affected: r2024x_golden , ≤ R2024x.FP.CFA.2405 (custom) cpe:2.3:a:3ds:3dexperience:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| 3ds | simulia_abaqus |
Affected:
2022_golden , ≤ 2022.FP.CFA.2406
(custom)
Affected: 2023_golden , ≤ 2023.FP.CFA.2350 (custom) Affected: 2024_golden , ≤ 2024.FP.CFA.2405 (custom) cpe:2.3:a:3ds:simulia_abaqus:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| 3ds | simulia_insight |
Affected:
2022_golden
Affected: 2023_golden Affected: 2024_golden cpe:2.3:a:3ds:simulia_insight:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| 3ds | catia_composer |
Affected:
r2023_golden , ≤ R2023_Refresh4
(custom)
Affected: r2024_golden , ≤ R2023_Refresh3 (custom) cpe:2.3:a:3ds:catia_composer:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T18:48:20.645Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.3ds.com/vulnerability/advisories"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:3ds:3dexperience:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "3dexperience",
"vendor": "3ds",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "r2022.fp.cfa.2406",
"status": "affected",
"version": "r2022x_golden",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "R2023x.FP.CFA.2350",
"status": "affected",
"version": "r2023x_golden",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "R2024x.FP.CFA.2405",
"status": "affected",
"version": "r2024x_golden",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:3ds:simulia_abaqus:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "simulia_abaqus",
"vendor": "3ds",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2022.FP.CFA.2406",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2022_golden",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2023.FP.CFA.2350",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2023_golden",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2024.FP.CFA.2405",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2024_golden",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:3ds:simulia_insight:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "simulia_insight",
"vendor": "3ds",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2022_golden"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2023_golden"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2024_golden"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:3ds:catia_composer:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "catia_composer",
"vendor": "3ds",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "R2023_Refresh4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "r2023_golden",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "R2023_Refresh3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "r2024_golden",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-1624",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-08-28T14:37:31.323782Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-28T15:01:15.090Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Documentation server",
"vendor": "Dassault Syst\u00e8mes",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2022x.FP.CFA.2406",
"status": "affected",
"version": "Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2022x Golden",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2023x FP.CFA.2350",
"status": "affected",
"version": "Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2023x Golden",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2024x.FP.CFA.2405",
"status": "affected",
"version": "Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2024x Golden",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "SIMULIA Abaqus Release 2022.FP.CFA.2406",
"status": "affected",
"version": "SIMULIA Abaqus Release 2022 Golden",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "SIMULIA Abaqus Release 2023.FP.CFA.2350",
"status": "affected",
"version": "SIMULIA Abaqus Release 2023 Golden",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "SIMULIA Abaqus Release 2024.FP.CFA.2405",
"status": "affected",
"version": "SIMULIA Abaqus Release 2024 Golden",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SIMULIA Isight Release 2022 Golden"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SIMULIA Isight Release 2023 Golden"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SIMULIA Isight Release 2024 Golden"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "CATIA Composer Release R2023 Refresh4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "CATIA Composer Release R2023 Golden",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "CATIA Composer Release R2024 Refresh3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "CATIA Composer Release R2024 Golden",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cb\u003eAn OS Command Injection vulnerability affecting documentation server on 3DEXPERIENCE from Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2022x through Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2024x, SIMULIA Abaqus from Release 2022 through Release 2024, SIMULIA Isight from Release 2022 through Release 2024 and CATIA Composer from Release R2023 through Release R2024\u003c/b\u003e.\u003cbr\u003eA specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary command execution."
}
],
"value": "An OS Command Injection vulnerability affecting documentation server on 3DEXPERIENCE from Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2022x through Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2024x, SIMULIA Abaqus from Release 2022 through Release 2024, SIMULIA Isight from Release 2022 through Release 2024 and CATIA Composer from Release R2023 through Release R2024. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary command execution."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-03-01T15:47:43.521Z",
"orgId": "f5a594e6-46a7-4e60-8a08-0a786e70e433",
"shortName": "3DS"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.3ds.com/vulnerability/advisories"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "OS Command Injection vulnerability affecting documentation server on certain Releases of 3DEXPERIENCE, SIMULIA Abaqus, SIMULIA Isight and CATIA Composer",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f5a594e6-46a7-4e60-8a08-0a786e70e433",
"assignerShortName": "3DS",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-1624",
"datePublished": "2024-03-01T15:47:43.521Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-02-19T12:24:17.797Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-28T15:01:15.090Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation ID: MIT-22
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Description:
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
Description:
- For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Mitigation ID: MIT-15
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation ID: MIT-4.3
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
Description:
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Mitigation ID: MIT-28
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Output Encoding
Description:
- While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
Mitigation
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- If the program to be executed allows arguments to be specified within an input file or from standard input, then consider using that mode to pass arguments instead of the command line.
Mitigation ID: MIT-27
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Parameterization
Description:
- If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Some languages offer multiple functions that can be used to invoke commands. Where possible, identify any function that invokes a command shell using a single string, and replace it with a function that requires individual arguments. These functions typically perform appropriate quoting and filtering of arguments. For example, in C, the system() function accepts a string that contains the entire command to be executed, whereas execl(), execve(), and others require an array of strings, one for each argument. In Windows, CreateProcess() only accepts one command at a time. In Perl, if system() is provided with an array of arguments, then it will quote each of the arguments.
Mitigation ID: MIT-5
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
Description:
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When constructing OS command strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing OS command injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent OS command injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, when invoking a mail program, you might need to allow the subject field to contain otherwise-dangerous inputs like ";" and ">" characters, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the character might reduce the risk of OS command injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the subject field would not be recorded as the user intended. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it could be more important when the program relies on well-structured subject lines in order to pass messages to other components.
- Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
Mitigation ID: MIT-21
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
Description:
- When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation ID: MIT-32
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Description:
- Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation ID: MIT-32
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation ID: MIT-39
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- In the context of OS Command Injection, error information passed back to the user might reveal whether an OS command is being executed and possibly which command is being used.
Mitigation
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Description:
- Use runtime policy enforcement to create an allowlist of allowable commands, then prevent use of any command that does not appear in the allowlist. Technologies such as AppArmor are available to do this.
Mitigation ID: MIT-29
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Firewall
Description:
- Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
Mitigation ID: MIT-17
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation ID: MIT-16
Phases: Operation, Implementation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-6: Argument Injection
An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection
In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.