Common Weakness Enumeration
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Back to CWE stats page
CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
CVE-2026-29607 (GCVE-0-2026-29607)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-19 01:00 – Updated: 2026-03-25 14:31 X_Open Source
VLAI
Title
OpenClaw < 2026.2.22 - Authorization Bypass via allow-always Wrapper Persistence
Summary
OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.22 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in allow-always wrapper persistence that allows attackers to bypass approval checks by persisting wrapper-level allowlist entries instead of validating inner executable intent. Remote attackers can approve benign wrapped system.run commands and subsequently execute different payloads without approval, enabling remote code execution on gateway and node-host execution flows.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') (CWE-78)
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/adv… | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/24c95… | patch |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-aut… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-02-23 00:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-29607",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-23T16:44:31.971619Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-23T16:56:30.653Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/openclaw",
"product": "OpenClaw",
"vendor": "OpenClaw",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2026.2.22",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openclaw:openclaw:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2026.2.22",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "tdjackey"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-02-23T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eOpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.22 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in allow-always wrapper persistence that allows attackers to bypass approval checks by persisting wrapper-level allowlist entries instead of validating inner executable intent. Remote attackers can approve benign wrapped system.run commands and subsequently execute different payloads without approval, enabling remote code execution on gateway and node-host execution flows.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.22 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in allow-always wrapper persistence that allows attackers to bypass approval checks by persisting wrapper-level allowlist entries instead of validating inner executable intent. Remote attackers can approve benign wrapped system.run commands and subsequently execute different payloads without approval, enabling remote code execution on gateway and node-host execution flows."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027) (CWE-78)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-25T14:31:10.922Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-6j27-pc5c-m8w8)",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-6j27-pc5c-m8w8"
},
{
"name": "Patch Commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/24c954d972400f508814532dea0e4dcb38418bb0"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: OpenClaw \u003c 2026.2.22 - Authorization Bypass via allow-always Wrapper Persistence",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-authorization-bypass-via-allow-always-wrapper-persistence"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"tags": [
"x_open-source"
],
"title": "OpenClaw \u003c 2026.2.22 - Authorization Bypass via allow-always Wrapper Persistence",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-29607",
"datePublished": "2026-03-19T01:00:47.572Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-04T16:16:15.967Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-25T14:31:10.922Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-29783 (GCVE-0-2026-29783)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-06 16:39 – Updated: 2026-03-11 03:56
VLAI
Title
GitHub Copilot CLI allows for dangerous shell expansion patterns that enable arbitrary command execution
Summary
The shell tool within GitHub Copilot CLI versions prior to and including 0.0.422 can allow arbitrary code execution through crafted bash parameter expansion patterns. An attacker who can influence the commands executed by the agent (e.g., via prompt injection through repository files, MCP server responses, or user instructions) can exploit bash parameter transformation operators to execute hidden commands, bypassing the safety assessment that classifies commands as "read-only." This has been patched in version 0.0.423.
The vulnerability stems from how the CLI's shell safety assessment evaluates commands before execution. The safety layer parses and classifies shell commands as either read-only (safe) or write-capable (requires user approval). However, several bash parameter expansion features can embed executable code within arguments to otherwise read-only commands, causing them to appear safe while actually performing arbitrary operations.
The specific dangerous patterns are ${var@P}, ${var=value} / ${var:=value}, ${!var}, and nested $(cmd) or <(cmd) inside ${...} expansions. An attacker who can influence command text sent to the shell tool - for example, through prompt injection via malicious repository content (README files, code comments, issue bodies), compromised or malicious MCP server responses, or crafted user instructions containing obfuscated commands - could achieve arbitrary code execution on the user's workstation. This is possible even in permission modes that require user approval for write operations, since the commands can appear to use only read-only utilities to ultimately trigger write operations. Successful exploitation could lead to data exfiltration, file modification, or further system compromise.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/github/copilot-cli/security/ad… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/github/copilot-cli/releases/ta… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| github | copilot-cli |
Affected:
<= 0.0.422
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-29783",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-10T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-11T03:56:38.092Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "copilot-cli",
"vendor": "github",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c= 0.0.422"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The shell tool within GitHub Copilot CLI versions prior to and including 0.0.422 can allow arbitrary code execution through crafted bash parameter expansion patterns. An attacker who can influence the commands executed by the agent (e.g., via prompt injection through repository files, MCP server responses, or user instructions) can exploit bash parameter transformation operators to execute hidden commands, bypassing the safety assessment that classifies commands as \"read-only.\" This has been patched in version 0.0.423. \n\nThe vulnerability stems from how the CLI\u0027s shell safety assessment evaluates commands before execution. The safety layer parses and classifies shell commands as either read-only (safe) or write-capable (requires user approval). However, several bash parameter expansion features can embed executable code within arguments to otherwise read-only commands, causing them to appear safe while actually performing arbitrary operations.\n\nThe specific dangerous patterns are ${var@P}, ${var=value} / ${var:=value}, ${!var}, and nested $(cmd) or \u003c(cmd) inside ${...} expansions. An attacker who can influence command text sent to the shell tool - for example, through prompt injection via malicious repository content (README files, code comments, issue bodies), compromised or malicious MCP server responses, or crafted user instructions containing obfuscated commands - could achieve arbitrary code execution on the user\u0027s workstation. This is possible even in permission modes that require user approval for write operations, since the commands can appear to use only read-only utilities to ultimately trigger write operations. Successful exploitation could lead to data exfiltration, file modification, or further system compromise."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-06T16:50:41.728Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/github/copilot-cli/security/advisories/GHSA-g8r9-g2v8-jv6f",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/github/copilot-cli/security/advisories/GHSA-g8r9-g2v8-jv6f"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/github/copilot-cli/releases/tag/v0.0.423",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/github/copilot-cli/releases/tag/v0.0.423"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-g8r9-g2v8-jv6f",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "GitHub Copilot CLI allows for dangerous shell expansion patterns that enable arbitrary command execution"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-29783",
"datePublished": "2026-03-06T16:39:27.424Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-04T16:26:02.898Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-11T03:56:38.092Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-3037 (GCVE-0-2026-3037)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-27 01:06 – Updated: 2026-02-27 19:09
VLAI
Title
Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection
Summary
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1
and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code
execution on the system by modifying malicious input injected into the
MBird SMS service URL and/or code via the utility route which is later
processed during system setup, leading to remote code execution.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
3 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copeland | Copeland XWEB 300D PRO |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.12.1
(custom)
|
|
| Copeland | Copeland XWEB 500D PRO |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.12.1
(custom)
|
|
| Copeland | Copeland XWEB 500B PRO |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.12.1
(custom)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-3037",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-27T19:09:29.232913Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-27T19:09:35.935Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Copeland XWEB 300D PRO",
"vendor": "Copeland",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.12.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Copeland XWEB 500D PRO",
"vendor": "Copeland",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.12.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Copeland XWEB 500B PRO",
"vendor": "Copeland",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.12.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Amir Zaltzman and Noam Moshe of Claroty Team82 reported this vulnerability to CISA."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 \nand prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code \nexecution on the system by modifying malicious input injected into the \nMBird SMS service URL and/or code via the utility route which is later \nprocessed during system setup, leading to remote code execution."
}
],
"value": "An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 \nand prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code \nexecution on the system by modifying malicious input injected into the \nMBird SMS service URL and/or code via the utility route which is later \nprocessed during system setup, leading to remote code execution."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-27T01:06:42.223Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://webapps.copeland.com/Dixell/Pages/SystemSoftwareUpdate"
},
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-26-057-10"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-057-10.json"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Copeland has provided a fix for the vulnerabilities and recommends users\n update the XWEB Pro to the latest version by going to their software \nupdate page \n\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://webapps.copeland.com/Dixell/Pages/SystemSoftwareUpdate\"\u003ehttps://webapps.copeland.com/Dixell/Pages/SystemSoftwareUpdate\u003c/a\u003e in the \nsections dedicated to the different XWEBPRO models page.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Copeland has provided a fix for the vulnerabilities and recommends users\n update the XWEB Pro to the latest version by going to their software \nupdate page \n https://webapps.copeland.com/Dixell/Pages/SystemSoftwareUpdate in the \nsections dedicated to the different XWEBPRO models page."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Alternatively, a user logged into an XWEB Pro with internet access can \nupdate XWEB Pro directly from Copeland servers via the menu SYSTEM -- \nUpdates | Network.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Alternatively, a user logged into an XWEB Pro with internet access can \nupdate XWEB Pro directly from Copeland servers via the menu SYSTEM -- \nUpdates | Network."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ICSA-26-057-10",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-3037",
"datePublished": "2026-02-27T01:06:42.223Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-23T16:21:11.631Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-27T19:09:35.935Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-3040 (GCVE-0-2026-3040)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-23 22:02 – Updated: 2026-02-25 15:37 Unsupported When Assigned
VLAI
Title
DrayTek Vigor 300B Web Management uploadlangs cgiGetFile os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability was identified in DrayTek Vigor 300B up to 1.5.1.6. This affects the function cgiGetFile of the file /cgi-bin/mainfunction.cgi/uploadlangs of the component Web Management Interface. The manipulation of the argument File leads to os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor confirms that "300B is EoL, and this is an authenticated vulnerability. We don't plan to fix it." This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.347394 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.347394 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.757126 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/master-abc/cve/issues/42 | exploitissue-tracking |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DrayTek | Vigor 300B |
Affected:
1.5.1.0
Affected: 1.5.1.1 Affected: 1.5.1.2 Affected: 1.5.1.3 Affected: 1.5.1.4 Affected: 1.5.1.5 Affected: 1.5.1.6 |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-3040",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-25T15:36:47.699598Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-25T15:37:21.493Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"modules": [
"Web Management Interface"
],
"product": "Vigor 300B",
"vendor": "DrayTek",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.5.1.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.5.1.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.5.1.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.5.1.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.5.1.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.5.1.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.5.1.6"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "jiefengliang (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was identified in DrayTek Vigor 300B up to 1.5.1.6. This affects the function cgiGetFile of the file /cgi-bin/mainfunction.cgi/uploadlangs of the component Web Management Interface. The manipulation of the argument File leads to os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor confirms that \"300B is EoL, and this is an authenticated vulnerability. We don\u0027t plan to fix it.\" This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 4.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 4.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 5.8,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-23T22:02:07.526Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-347394 | DrayTek Vigor 300B Web Management uploadlangs cgiGetFile os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.347394"
},
{
"name": "VDB-347394 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.347394"
},
{
"name": "Submit #757126 | DrayTek Vigor 300B v1.5.1.6 OS Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.757126"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit",
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/master-abc/cve/issues/42"
}
],
"tags": [
"unsupported-when-assigned"
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-02-23T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-02-23T01:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-02-23T17:39:13.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "DrayTek Vigor 300B Web Management uploadlangs cgiGetFile os command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-3040",
"datePublished": "2026-02-23T22:02:07.526Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-23T16:34:06.326Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-25T15:37:21.493Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-30806 (GCVE-0-2026-30806)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-13 15:45 – Updated: 2026-04-13 18:08
VLAI
Title
OS Command Injection in Network Report leads to Remote Code Execution
Summary
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command vulnerability allows OS Command Injection via Network Report. This issue affects Pandora FMS: from 777 through 800
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pandora FMS | Pandora FMS |
Affected:
777 , ≤ 800
(custom)
|
Date Public
2026-04-13 15:45
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-30806",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-13T18:06:59.143034Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-13T18:08:02.082Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"all"
],
"product": "Pandora FMS",
"vendor": "Pandora FMS",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "800",
"status": "affected",
"version": "777",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Pedro J. N\u00fa\u00f1ez-Cacho Fuentes \u003ctunelko@gmail.com\u003e"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-04-13T15:45:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command vulnerability allows OS Command Injection via Network Report. This issue affects Pandora FMS: from 777 through 800"
}
],
"value": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command vulnerability allows OS Command Injection via Network Report. This issue affects Pandora FMS: from 777 through 800"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "YES",
"Recovery": "USER",
"Safety": "NEGLIGIBLE",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "AMBER",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "CONCENTRATED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "MODERATE"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS command injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-13T15:45:46.468Z",
"orgId": "63375d6c-d89a-45ed-8ecc-c8c361b0e04c",
"shortName": "PandoraFMS"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://pandorafms.com/en/security/common-vulnerabilities-and-exposures/"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Fixed in v800.1 and v801 Pandora FMS versions"
}
],
"value": "Fixed in v800.1 and v801 Pandora FMS versions"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "OS Command Injection in Network Report leads to Remote Code Execution",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "63375d6c-d89a-45ed-8ecc-c8c361b0e04c",
"assignerShortName": "PandoraFMS",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-30806",
"datePublished": "2026-04-13T15:45:46.468Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-05T16:16:01.150Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-13T18:08:02.082Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-30809 (GCVE-0-2026-30809)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-13 15:46 – Updated: 2026-04-13 18:05
VLAI
Title
OS Command Injection in WebServerModuleDebug via Blacklist Bypass leads to Remote Code Execution
Summary
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command vulnerability allows OS Command Injection via WebServerModuleDebug. This issue affects Pandora FMS: from 777 through 800
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pandora FMS | Pandora FMS |
Affected:
777 , ≤ 800
(custom)
|
Date Public
2026-04-13 15:48
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-30809",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-13T18:05:28.661142Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-13T18:05:50.375Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"all"
],
"product": "Pandora FMS",
"vendor": "Pandora FMS",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "800",
"status": "affected",
"version": "777",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Pedro J. N\u00fa\u00f1ez-Cacho Fuentes \u003ctunelko@gmail.com\u003e"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-04-13T15:48:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command vulnerability allows OS Command Injection via WebServerModuleDebug. This issue affects Pandora FMS: from 777 through 800"
}
],
"value": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command vulnerability allows OS Command Injection via WebServerModuleDebug. This issue affects Pandora FMS: from 777 through 800"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "YES",
"Recovery": "USER",
"Safety": "NEGLIGIBLE",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "AMBER",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "CONCENTRATED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "MODERATE"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS command injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-13T15:46:53.349Z",
"orgId": "63375d6c-d89a-45ed-8ecc-c8c361b0e04c",
"shortName": "PandoraFMS"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://pandorafms.com/en/security/common-vulnerabilities-and-exposures/"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Fixed in v800.1 and v801 Pandora FMS versions"
}
],
"value": "Fixed in v800.1 and v801 Pandora FMS versions"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "OS Command Injection in WebServerModuleDebug via Blacklist Bypass leads to Remote Code Execution",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "63375d6c-d89a-45ed-8ecc-c8c361b0e04c",
"assignerShortName": "PandoraFMS",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-30809",
"datePublished": "2026-04-13T15:46:53.349Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-05T16:16:01.151Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-13T18:05:50.375Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-30815 (GCVE-0-2026-30815)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-08 17:52 – Updated: 2026-05-07 15:47
VLAI
Title
OS Command Injection Vulnerability in OpenVPN Module in TP-Link AX53
Summary
An OS command injection vulnerability in the OpenVPN module
of TP-Link Archer AX53 v1.0 allows an authenticated adjacent attacker to execute system commands when a specially crafted configuration file is processed due to insufficient input validation. Successful exploitation may allow modification of configuration files, disclosure of sensitive information, or further compromise of device integrity.
This issue affects AX53 v1.0: before 1.7.1 Build 20260213.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command injection')
Assigner
References
8 references
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TP-Link Systems Inc. | AX53 v1.0 |
Affected:
0 , < 1.7.1 Build 20260213
(custom)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-30815",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-08T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-09T03:56:16.458Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-07T15:47:04.878Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2025-2303"
},
{
"url": "https://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2025-2307"
},
{
"url": "https://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2025-2308"
},
{
"url": "https://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2025-2309"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"openvpn"
],
"product": "AX53 v1.0",
"vendor": "TP-Link Systems Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.7.1 Build 20260213",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Lilith \u003e_\u003e of Cisco Talos"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An OS command injection vulnerability in the OpenVPN module\nof TP-Link Archer AX53 v1.0\u0026nbsp;allows an authenticated adjacent attacker to execute system commands when a specially crafted configuration file is processed\u0026nbsp;due to insufficient input validation. Successful exploitation may allow modification of configuration files, disclosure of sensitive information, or further compromise of device integrity.\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects AX53 v1.0: before 1.7.1 Build 20260213.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An OS command injection vulnerability in the OpenVPN module\nof TP-Link Archer AX53 v1.0\u00a0allows an authenticated adjacent attacker to execute system commands when a specially crafted configuration file is processed\u00a0due to insufficient input validation. Successful exploitation may allow modification of configuration files, disclosure of sensitive information, or further compromise of device integrity.\n\nThis issue affects AX53 v1.0: before 1.7.1 Build 20260213."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS command injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T17:52:29.336Z",
"orgId": "f23511db-6c3e-4e32-a477-6aa17d310630",
"shortName": "TPLink"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.tp-link.com/my/support/download/archer-ax53/v1/#Firmware"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.tp-link.com/en/support/download/archer-ax53/v1/#Firmware"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/5055/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OS Command Injection Vulnerability in OpenVPN Module in TP-Link AX53",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.0-beta"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f23511db-6c3e-4e32-a477-6aa17d310630",
"assignerShortName": "TPLink",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-30815",
"datePublished": "2026-04-08T17:52:29.336Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-05T17:35:52.174Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-07T15:47:04.878Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-30818 (GCVE-0-2026-30818)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-08 17:54 – Updated: 2026-05-07 15:47
VLAI
Title
OS Command Injection Vulnerability in dnsmasq Module in TP-Link AX53
Summary
An OS command injection vulnerability in the dnsmasq module of TP-Link Archer AX53 v1.0 allows an authenticated adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code when a specially crafted configuration file is processed due to insufficient input validation. Successful exploitation may allow the attacker to modify device configuration, access sensitive information, or further compromise system integrity.
This issue affects AX53 v1.0: before 1.7.1 Build 20260213.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command injection')
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.tp-link.com/my/support/download/arche… | patch |
| https://www.tp-link.com/en/support/download/arche… | patch |
| https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/ | third-party-advisory |
| https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/5055/ | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_r… |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TP-Link Systems Inc. | AX53 v1.0 |
Affected:
0 , < 1.7.1 Build 20260213
(custom)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-30818",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-08T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-09T03:56:18.130Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-07T15:47:07.905Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2025-2306"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"dnsmasq"
],
"product": "AX53 v1.0",
"vendor": "TP-Link Systems Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.7.1 Build 20260213",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Lilith \u003e_\u003e of Cisco Talos"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An OS command injection vulnerability in the dnsmasq module of TP-Link Archer AX53 v1.0 allows an authenticated adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code when a specially crafted configuration file is processed due to insufficient input validation. Successful exploitation may allow the attacker to modify device configuration, access sensitive information, or further compromise system integrity.\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects AX53 v1.0: before 1.7.1 Build 20260213.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An OS command injection vulnerability in the dnsmasq module of TP-Link Archer AX53 v1.0 allows an authenticated adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code when a specially crafted configuration file is processed due to insufficient input validation. Successful exploitation may allow the attacker to modify device configuration, access sensitive information, or further compromise system integrity.\n\nThis issue affects AX53 v1.0: before 1.7.1 Build 20260213."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS command injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T17:54:44.175Z",
"orgId": "f23511db-6c3e-4e32-a477-6aa17d310630",
"shortName": "TPLink"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.tp-link.com/my/support/download/archer-ax53/v1/#Firmware"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.tp-link.com/en/support/download/archer-ax53/v1/#Firmware"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/5055/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OS Command Injection Vulnerability in dnsmasq Module in TP-Link AX53",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.0-beta"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f23511db-6c3e-4e32-a477-6aa17d310630",
"assignerShortName": "TPLink",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-30818",
"datePublished": "2026-04-08T17:54:44.175Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-05T17:35:52.175Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-07T15:47:07.905Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-30861 (GCVE-0-2026-30861)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-07 16:38 – Updated: 2026-03-09 18:24
VLAI
Title
WeKnora: Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Command Injection in MCP Stdio Configuration Validation
Summary
WeKnora is an LLM-powered framework designed for deep document understanding and semantic retrieval. From version 0.2.5 to before version 0.2.10, an unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in the MCP stdio configuration validation. The application allows unrestricted user registration, meaning any attacker can create an account and exploit the command injection flaw. Despite implementing a whitelist for allowed commands (npx, uvx) and blacklists for dangerous arguments and environment variables, the validation can be bypassed using the -p flag with npx node. This allows any attacker to execute arbitrary commands with the application's privileges, leading to complete system compromise. This issue has been patched in version 0.2.10.
Severity
10 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/Tencent/WeKnora/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-30861",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-09T17:58:51.217526Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-09T18:24:00.815Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "WeKnora",
"vendor": "Tencent",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.2.5, \u003c 0.2.10"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "WeKnora is an LLM-powered framework designed for deep document understanding and semantic retrieval. From version 0.2.5 to before version 0.2.10, an unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in the MCP stdio configuration validation. The application allows unrestricted user registration, meaning any attacker can create an account and exploit the command injection flaw. Despite implementing a whitelist for allowed commands (npx, uvx) and blacklists for dangerous arguments and environment variables, the validation can be bypassed using the -p flag with npx node. This allows any attacker to execute arbitrary commands with the application\u0027s privileges, leading to complete system compromise. This issue has been patched in version 0.2.10."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-07T16:38:38.063Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/Tencent/WeKnora/security/advisories/GHSA-r55h-3rwj-hcmg",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Tencent/WeKnora/security/advisories/GHSA-r55h-3rwj-hcmg"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-r55h-3rwj-hcmg",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "WeKnora: Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Command Injection in MCP Stdio Configuration Validation"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-30861",
"datePublished": "2026-03-07T16:38:38.063Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-05T21:27:35.342Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-09T18:24:00.815Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-30877 (GCVE-0-2026-30877)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-31 00:45 – Updated: 2026-04-02 14:43
VLAI
Title
baserCMS: OS Command Injection in the baserCMS Update Functionality
Summary
baserCMS is a website development framework. Prior to version 5.2.3, there is an OS command injection vulnerability in the update functionality. Due to this issue, an authenticated user with administrator privileges in baserCMS can execute arbitrary OS commands on the server with the privileges of the user account running baserCMS. This issue has been patched in version 5.2.3.
Severity
9.1 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/baserproject/basercms/security… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://basercms.net/security/JVN_20837860 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/baserproject/basercms/releases… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| baserproject | basercms |
Affected:
< 5.2.3
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-30877",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-02T14:43:30.917593Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-02T14:43:52.296Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "basercms",
"vendor": "baserproject",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 5.2.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "baserCMS is a website development framework. Prior to version 5.2.3, there is an OS command injection vulnerability in the update functionality. Due to this issue, an authenticated user with administrator privileges in baserCMS can execute arbitrary OS commands on the server with the privileges of the user account running baserCMS. This issue has been patched in version 5.2.3."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-31T00:45:09.718Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/baserproject/basercms/security/advisories/GHSA-m9g7-rgfc-jcm7",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/baserproject/basercms/security/advisories/GHSA-m9g7-rgfc-jcm7"
},
{
"name": "https://basercms.net/security/JVN_20837860",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://basercms.net/security/JVN_20837860"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/baserproject/basercms/releases/tag/5.2.3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/baserproject/basercms/releases/tag/5.2.3"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-m9g7-rgfc-jcm7",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "baserCMS: OS Command Injection in the baserCMS Update Functionality"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-30877",
"datePublished": "2026-03-31T00:45:09.718Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-06T00:04:56.699Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-02T14:43:52.296Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation ID: MIT-22
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Description:
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
Description:
- For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Mitigation ID: MIT-15
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation ID: MIT-4.3
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
Description:
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Mitigation ID: MIT-28
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Output Encoding
Description:
- While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
Mitigation
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- If the program to be executed allows arguments to be specified within an input file or from standard input, then consider using that mode to pass arguments instead of the command line.
Mitigation ID: MIT-27
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Parameterization
Description:
- If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Some languages offer multiple functions that can be used to invoke commands. Where possible, identify any function that invokes a command shell using a single string, and replace it with a function that requires individual arguments. These functions typically perform appropriate quoting and filtering of arguments. For example, in C, the system() function accepts a string that contains the entire command to be executed, whereas execl(), execve(), and others require an array of strings, one for each argument. In Windows, CreateProcess() only accepts one command at a time. In Perl, if system() is provided with an array of arguments, then it will quote each of the arguments.
Mitigation ID: MIT-5
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
Description:
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When constructing OS command strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing OS command injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent OS command injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, when invoking a mail program, you might need to allow the subject field to contain otherwise-dangerous inputs like ";" and ">" characters, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the character might reduce the risk of OS command injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the subject field would not be recorded as the user intended. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it could be more important when the program relies on well-structured subject lines in order to pass messages to other components.
- Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
Mitigation ID: MIT-21
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
Description:
- When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation ID: MIT-32
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Description:
- Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation ID: MIT-32
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation ID: MIT-39
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- In the context of OS Command Injection, error information passed back to the user might reveal whether an OS command is being executed and possibly which command is being used.
Mitigation
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Description:
- Use runtime policy enforcement to create an allowlist of allowable commands, then prevent use of any command that does not appear in the allowlist. Technologies such as AppArmor are available to do this.
Mitigation ID: MIT-29
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Firewall
Description:
- Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
Mitigation ID: MIT-17
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation ID: MIT-16
Phases: Operation, Implementation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-6: Argument Injection
An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection
In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.