VEX records
Browse vendor VEX statements available in this Vulnerability-Lookup instance and pivot to the related vulnerability.
290392 VEX records
API response| Vulnerability | Source | Title | Product status | Imported | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-25211 | redhat_vex | kernel: Local buffer overflow in ctnetlink_parse_tuple_filter in net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | fixed: 991 known affected: 32 known not affected: 52 | 2026-08-07T01:06:30+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2020-24489 | redhat_vex | hw: vt-d related privilege escalation | fixed: 101 known not affected: 6 | 2026-08-07T01:06:27+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2020-36385 | redhat_vex | kernel: use-after-free in drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c ctx use-after-free | fixed: 1260 known affected: 16 known not affected: 109 | 2026-08-07T01:06:16+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2010-4052 | microsoft_vex | Stack consumption vulnerability in the regcomp implementation in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.11.3, and 2.12.x through 2.12.2, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (resource exhaustion) via a regular expression containing adjacent repetition operators, as demonstrated by a {10,}{10,}{10,}{10,} sequence in the proftpd.gnu.c exploit for ProFTPD. | under investigation: 2 | 2026-08-07T01:05:02+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2019-6706 | microsoft_vex | Lua 5.3.5 has a use-after-free in lua_upvaluejoin in lapi.c. For example a crash outcome might be achieved by an attacker who is able to trigger a debug.upvaluejoin call in which the arguments have certain relationships. | fixed: 2 known affected: 2 under investigation: 1 | 2026-08-07T01:03:44+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2018-6829 | microsoft_vex | cipher/elgamal.c in Libgcrypt through 1.8.2, when used to encrypt messages directly, improperly encodes plaintexts, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading ciphertext data (i.e., it does not have semantic security in face of a ciphertext-only attack). The Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption does not hold for Libgcrypt's ElGamal implementation. | under investigation: 1 | 2026-08-07T00:59:42+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2018-1128 | microsoft_vex | It was found that cephx authentication protocol did not verify ceph clients correctly and was vulnerable to replay attack. Any attacker having access to ceph cluster network who is able to sniff packets on network can use this vulnerability to authenticate with ceph service and perform actions allowed by ceph service. Ceph branches master, mimic, luminous and jewel are believed to be vulnerable. | under investigation: 2 | 2026-08-07T00:42:03+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2005-3239 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2005-3239 | recommended: 19 | 2026-08-07T00:34:33+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2006-7254 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2006-7254 | known not affected: 233 | 2026-08-07T00:34:30+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2007-2447 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2007-2447 | recommended: 297 | 2026-08-07T00:34:28+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2008-0599 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2008-0599 | known not affected: 2896 recommended: 454 | 2026-08-07T00:34:23+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2008-0891 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2008-0891 | known not affected: 322 recommended: 64 | 2026-08-07T00:34:21+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2008-1673 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2008-1673 | known affected: 30 known not affected: 51 recommended: 76 | 2026-08-07T00:34:19+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2008-3272 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2008-3272 | known not affected: 144 | 2026-08-07T00:34:16+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2008-4226 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2008-4226 | known affected: 2 recommended: 238 | 2026-08-07T00:34:14+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2009-0846 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2009-0846 | recommended: 273 | 2026-08-07T00:34:11+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2009-0946 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2009-0946 | known affected: 3 recommended: 187 | 2026-08-07T00:34:10+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2009-1046 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2009-1046 | known not affected: 385 | 2026-08-07T00:34:08+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2009-1255 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2009-1255 | known affected: 16 | 2026-08-07T00:34:05+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2009-1302 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2009-1302 | known affected: 1 recommended: 193 | 2026-08-07T00:34:03+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2009-1310 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2009-1310 | known affected: 1 recommended: 119 | 2026-08-07T00:34:01+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2009-1311 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2009-1311 | known affected: 1 recommended: 193 | 2026-08-07T00:33:59+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2009-1389 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2009-1389 | known not affected: 497 recommended: 42 | 2026-08-07T00:33:57+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2009-1888 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2009-1888 | recommended: 1787 | 2026-08-07T00:33:55+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2009-3607 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2009-3607 | recommended: 381 | 2026-08-07T00:33:53+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2009-4026 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2009-4026 | known not affected: 458 recommended: 353 | 2026-08-07T00:33:51+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2010-0168 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2010-0168 | known affected: 21 known not affected: 137 recommended: 129 | 2026-08-07T00:33:49+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2010-0307 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2010-0307 | known not affected: 495 recommended: 42 | 2026-08-07T00:33:47+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2010-0547 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2010-0547 | recommended: 1787 | 2026-08-07T00:33:45+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2010-2252 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2010-2252 | recommended: 32 | 2026-08-07T00:33:43+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2010-4300 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2010-4300 | known affected: 3 recommended: 149 | 2026-08-07T00:33:39+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2010-4352 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2010-4352 | recommended: 205 | 2026-08-07T00:33:38+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2010-4523 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2010-4523 | known not affected: 5 recommended: 35 | 2026-08-07T00:33:36+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2011-1176 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2011-1176 | recommended: 206 | 2026-08-07T00:33:33+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2011-1473 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2011-1473 | known affected: 3 known not affected: 266 recommended: 34 | 2026-08-07T00:33:31+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2011-1581 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2011-1581 | known not affected: 94 recommended: 114 | 2026-08-07T00:33:29+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2011-2054 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2011-2054 | recommended: 172 | 2026-08-07T00:33:26+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2011-2689 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2011-2689 | known not affected: 496 | 2026-08-07T00:33:23+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2011-2692 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2011-2692 | known not affected: 42 recommended: 198 | 2026-08-07T00:33:21+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2011-3062 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2011-3062 | known not affected: 39 recommended: 163 | 2026-08-07T00:33:19+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2011-3172 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2011-3172 | known affected: 394 known not affected: 18 recommended: 119 | 2026-08-07T00:33:18+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2011-3660 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2011-3660 | known affected: 3 recommended: 153 | 2026-08-07T00:33:16+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2011-4110 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2011-4110 | known not affected: 495 recommended: 48 | 2026-08-07T00:33:14+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2011-4348 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2011-4348 | known not affected: 495 | 2026-08-07T00:33:12+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2012-0462 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2012-0462 | known not affected: 39 recommended: 156 | 2026-08-07T00:33:10+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2012-0502 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2012-0502 | known affected: 1 recommended: 88 | 2026-08-07T00:33:08+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2012-1126 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2012-1126 | known not affected: 3 recommended: 136 | 2026-08-07T00:33:06+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2012-1940 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2012-1940 | known affected: 3 recommended: 164 | 2026-08-07T00:33:03+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2012-2375 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2012-2375 | known not affected: 495 recommended: 84 | 2026-08-07T00:33:01+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |
| CVE-2012-3375 | suse_vex | SUSE CVE CVE-2012-3375 | known not affected: 495 recommended: 143 | 2026-08-07T00:32:58+00:00 | Vulnerability · Source |