CWE-1286
AllowedImproper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
The product receives input that is expected to be well-formed - i.e., to comply with a certain syntax - but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input complies with the syntax.
160 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-2RQ5-QMGJ-689W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:28 – Updated: 2023-12-12 21:31Patient Information Center iX (PICiX) Versions B.02, C.02, C.03, PerformanceBridge Focal Point Version A.01, IntelliVue patient monitors MX100, MX400-MX850, and MP2-MP90 Versions N and prior, IntelliVue X3 and X2 Versions N and prior. The product receives input that is expected to be well-formed (i.e., to comply with a certain syntax) but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input complies with the syntax, causing the certificate enrollment service to crash. It does not impact monitoring but prevents new devices from enrolling.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-16220"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1286"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-09-11T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Patient Information Center iX (PICiX) Versions B.02, C.02, C.03, PerformanceBridge Focal Point Version A.01, IntelliVue patient monitors MX100, MX400-MX850, and MP2-MP90 Versions N and prior, IntelliVue X3 and X2 Versions N and prior. The product receives input that is expected to be well-formed (i.e., to comply with a certain syntax) but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input complies with the syntax, causing the certificate enrollment service to crash. It does not impact monitoring but prevents new devices from enrolling.",
"id": "GHSA-2rq5-qmgj-689w",
"modified": "2023-12-12T21:31:06Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:28:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-16220"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsma-20-254-01"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.philips.com/productsecurity"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-34F4-M9RH-9X9J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-11 18:31 – Updated: 2024-07-12 18:31An Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series with MPC10/11 or LC9600, MX304, and Junos OS Evolved on ACX Series and PTX Series allows an unauthenticated, network based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS).
This issue can occur in two scenarios:
-
If a device, which is configured with SFLOW and ECMP, receives specific valid transit traffic, which is subject to sampling, the packetio process crashes, which in turn leads to an evo-aftman crash and causes the FPC to stop working until it is restarted. (This scenario is only applicable to PTX but not to ACX or MX.)
-
If a device receives a malformed CFM packet on an interface configured with CFM, the packetio process crashes, which in turn leads to an evo-aftman crash and causes the FPC to stop working until it is restarted. Please note that the CVSS score is for the formally more severe issue 1.
The CVSS score for scenario 2. is: 6.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H)
This issue affects Junos OS:
- All versions before 21.2R3-S4,
- 21.4 versions before 21.4R2,
- 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S2;
Junos OS Evolved:
- All versions before 21.2R3-S8-EVO,
- 21.4 versions before 21.4R2-EVO.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-39542"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1286"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-11T17:15:13Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series with MPC10/11 or LC9600, MX304, and Junos OS Evolved on ACX Series and PTX Series allows an unauthenticated, network based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS).\n\nThis issue can occur in two scenarios:\n\n1. If a device, which is configured with SFLOW and ECMP, receives specific valid transit traffic, which is subject to sampling, the packetio process crashes, which in turn leads to an evo-aftman crash and causes the FPC to stop working until it is restarted. (This scenario is only applicable to PTX but not to ACX or MX.)\n\n2. If a device receives a malformed CFM packet on an interface configured with CFM, the packetio process crashes, which in turn leads to an evo-aftman crash and causes the FPC to stop working until it is restarted.\u00a0Please note that the CVSS score is for the formally more severe issue 1.\n\nThe CVSS score for scenario 2. is: 6.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H)\n\n\n\n\nThis issue affects Junos OS:\n\n\n\n * All versions before\u00a021.2R3-S4,\n * 21.4 versions before 21.4R2,\n * 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S2;\u00a0\n\n\n\n\nJunos OS Evolved:\n\n\n\n\n * All versions before\u00a021.2R3-S8-EVO,\n * 21.4 versions before 21.4R2-EVO.",
"id": "GHSA-34f4-m9rh-9x9j",
"modified": "2024-07-12T18:31:48Z",
"published": "2024-07-11T18:31:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39542"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA83002"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-355P-VP22-PP2V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-12 03:30 – Updated: 2024-01-12 03:30An Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause Denial of Service (DoS).
On all Junos OS MX Series and SRX Series platforms, when SIP ALG is enabled, and a specific SIP packet is received and processed, NAT IP allocation fails for genuine traffic, which causes Denial of Service (DoS). Continuous receipt of this specific SIP ALG packet will cause a sustained DoS condition.
NAT IP usage can be monitored by running the following command.
user@srx> show security nat resource-usage source-pool
Pool name: source_pool_name .. Address Factor-index Port-range Used Avail Total Usage X.X.X.X 0 Single Ports 50258 52342 62464 96% <<<<< - Alg Ports 0 2048 2048 0% This issue affects:
Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series and SRX Series
- All versions earlier than 21.2R3-S6;
- 21.3 versions earlier than 21.3R3-S5;
- 21.4 versions earlier than 21.4R3-S5;
- 22.1 versions earlier than 22.1R3-S4;
- 22.2 versions earlier than 22.2R3-S3;
- 22.3 versions earlier than 22.3R3-S1;
- 22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R2-S2, 22.4R3;
- 23.2 versions earlier than 23.2R1-S1, 23.2R2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-21616"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1286"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-01-12T01:15:50Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "\nAn Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause Denial of Service (DoS).\n\nOn all Junos OS MX Series and SRX Series platforms, when SIP ALG is enabled, and a specific SIP packet is received and processed, NAT IP allocation fails for genuine traffic, which causes Denial of Service (DoS). Continuous receipt of this specific SIP ALG packet will cause a sustained DoS condition.\n\nNAT IP usage can be monitored by running the following command.\n\nuser@srx\u003e show security nat resource-usage source-pool \u003csource_pool_name\u003e\n\n\nPool name: source_pool_name\n..\nAddress Factor-index Port-range Used Avail Total Usage\nX.X.X.X\n0 Single Ports 50258 52342 62464 96% \u003c\u003c\u003c\u003c\u003c\n- Alg Ports 0 2048 2048 0%\nThis issue affects:\n\nJuniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series and SRX Series\n\n\n\n * All versions earlier than 21.2R3-S6;\n * 21.3 versions earlier than 21.3R3-S5;\n * 21.4 versions earlier than 21.4R3-S5;\n * 22.1 versions earlier than 22.1R3-S4;\n * 22.2 versions earlier than 22.2R3-S3;\n * 22.3 versions earlier than 22.3R3-S1;\n * 22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R2-S2, 22.4R3;\n * 23.2 versions earlier than 23.2R1-S1, 23.2R2.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
"id": "GHSA-355p-vp22-pp2v",
"modified": "2024-01-12T03:30:49Z",
"published": "2024-01-12T03:30:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-21616"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA75757"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-35M6-RF3V-8CXX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-10 18:30 – Updated: 2024-09-20 15:30A Denial of Service (Dos) vulnerability in Nozomi Networks Guardian, caused by improper input validation in certain fields used in the Radius parsing functionality of our IDS, allows an unauthenticated attacker sending specially crafted malformed network packets to cause the IDS module to stop updating nodes, links, and assets.
Network traffic may not be analyzed until the IDS module is restarted.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-0218"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1286",
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-10T16:15:09Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A Denial of Service (Dos) vulnerability in Nozomi Networks Guardian, caused by improper input validation in certain fields used in the Radius parsing functionality of our IDS, allows an unauthenticated attacker sending specially crafted malformed network packets to cause the IDS module to stop updating nodes, links, and assets.\n\nNetwork traffic may not be analyzed until the IDS module is restarted.\n\n",
"id": "GHSA-35m6-rf3v-8cxx",
"modified": "2024-09-20T15:30:36Z",
"published": "2024-04-10T18:30:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-0218"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.nozominetworks.com/NN-2024:1-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-3855-FJJH-9XH2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-25 18:31 – Updated: 2026-03-25 18:31A vulnerability in the Lobby Ambassador web-based management API of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to elevate their privileges and access management APIs that would not normally be available for Lobby Ambassador users.
This vulnerability exists because parameters that are received by an API endpoint are not sufficiently validated. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating as a Lobby Ambassador user and sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to create a new user with privilege level 1 access to the web-based management API. The attacker would then be able to access the device with these new credentials and privileges.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-20114"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1286"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-25T16:16:16Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability in the Lobby Ambassador web-based management API of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to elevate their privileges and access management APIs that would not normally be available for Lobby Ambassador users. \n\n This vulnerability exists because parameters that are received by an API endpoint are not sufficiently validated. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating as a Lobby Ambassador user and sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to create a new user with privilege level 1 access to the web-based management API. The attacker would then be able to access the device with these new credentials and privileges.",
"id": "GHSA-3855-fjjh-9xh2",
"modified": "2026-03-25T18:31:47Z",
"published": "2026-03-25T18:31:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-20114"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-iosxe-lobby-privesc-KwxBqJy"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-38GM-M6WW-X846
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-12 03:30 – Updated: 2024-01-12 03:30An Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows a network-based, unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS).
If an attacker sends high rate of specific ICMP traffic to a device with VXLAN configured, this causes a deadlock of the PFE and results in the device becoming unresponsive. A manual restart will be required to recover the device.
This issue only affects EX4100, EX4400, EX4600, QFX5000 Series devices.
This issue affects:
Juniper Networks Junos OS
- 21.4R3 versions earlier than 21.4R3-S4;
- 22.1R3 versions earlier than 22.1R3-S3;
- 22.2R2 versions earlier than 22.2R3-S1;
- 22.3 versions earlier than 22.3R2-S2, 22.3R3;
- 22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R2;
- 23.1 versions earlier than 23.1R2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-21595"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1286"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-01-12T01:15:47Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "\nAn Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows a network-based, unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS).\n\nIf an attacker sends high rate of specific ICMP traffic to a device with VXLAN configured, this causes a deadlock of the PFE and results in the device becoming unresponsive. A manual restart will be required to recover the device.\n\nThis issue only affects EX4100, EX4400, EX4600, QFX5000 Series devices.\n\nThis issue affects:\n\nJuniper Networks Junos OS\n\n\n\n * 21.4R3 versions earlier than 21.4R3-S4;\n * 22.1R3 versions earlier than 22.1R3-S3;\n * 22.2R2 versions earlier than 22.2R3-S1;\n * 22.3 versions earlier than 22.3R2-S2, 22.3R3;\n * 22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R2;\n * 23.1 versions earlier than 23.1R2.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n",
"id": "GHSA-38gm-m6ww-x846",
"modified": "2024-01-12T03:30:48Z",
"published": "2024-01-12T03:30:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-21595"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://advisory.juniper.net/JSA75734"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3V44-23HF-Q5WP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-26 09:30 – Updated: 2024-11-26 09:3051l3nc3, member of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found that the VAPIX API managedoverlayimages.cgi was vulnerable to a race condition attack allowing for an attacker to block access to the overlay configuration page in the web interface of the Axis device. This flaw can only be exploited after authenticating with an operator- or administrator-privileged service account. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-8772"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1286"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-26T08:15:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "51l3nc3, member of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found that the VAPIX API managedoverlayimages.cgi was vulnerable to a race condition attack allowing for an attacker to block access to the overlay configuration page in the web interface of the Axis device. This flaw can only be exploited after authenticating with an operator- or administrator-privileged service account. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution.",
"id": "GHSA-3v44-23hf-q5wp",
"modified": "2024-11-26T09:30:49Z",
"published": "2024-11-26T09:30:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-8772"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.axis.com/dam/public/permalink/231072/cve-2024-8772pdf-en-US_InternalID-231072.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3WQC-MWFX-672P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-18 19:32 – Updated: 2025-07-17 21:10Summary
We have encountered a security vulnerability being reported by our scanners for Traefik 2.11.22. - https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-CHAINGUARDLATEST-TRAEFIK33-9403297
Details
It seems to target oauth2/jws library.
PoC
No steps to replicate this vulnerability
Impact
We have a strict control on security and we always try to stay up-to-date with the fixes received for third-party solutions.
Patches
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.24
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.3.6
- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.4.0-rc2
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/traefik/traefik/v3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.3.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/traefik/traefik/v2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.11.24"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/traefik/traefik/v3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.4.0-rc1"
},
{
"fixed": "3.4.0-rc2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"3.4.0-rc1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1286"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-04-18T19:32:23Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-26T08:14:24Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\nWe have encountered a security vulnerability being reported by our scanners for Traefik 2.11.22.\n- https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-CHAINGUARDLATEST-TRAEFIK33-9403297\n\n### Details\nIt seems to target oauth2/jws library.\n\n### PoC\nNo steps to replicate this vulnerability\n\n### Impact\nWe have a strict control on security and we always try to stay up-to-date with the fixes received for third-party solutions.\n\n## Patches\n\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.24\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.3.6\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.4.0-rc2",
"id": "GHSA-3wqc-mwfx-672p",
"modified": "2025-07-17T21:10:43Z",
"published": "2025-04-18T19:32:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-3wqc-mwfx-672p"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.24"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.3.6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.4.0-rc2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-CHAINGUARDLATEST-TRAEFIK33-9403297"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Traefik affected by Go oauth2/jws Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability"
}
GHSA-44RG-9789-64X6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-02 00:31 – Updated: 2026-06-02 00:31Memory corruption while processing fastboot commands with invalid input.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-24089"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1286"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-01T23:16:19Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Memory corruption while processing fastboot commands with invalid input.",
"id": "GHSA-44rg-9789-64x6",
"modified": "2026-06-02T00:31:58Z",
"published": "2026-06-02T00:31:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-24089"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.qualcomm.com/product/publicresources/securitybulletin/june-2026-bulletin.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-4F29-G223-2GRV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-01-20 00:01 – Updated: 2022-01-27 00:03An Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in the Juniper DHCP daemon (jdhcpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an adjacent unauthenticated attacker sending a malformed DHCP packet to cause a crash of jdhcpd and thereby a Denial of Service (DoS). If option-82 is configured in a DHCP snooping / -security scenario, jdhcpd crashes if a specific malformed DHCP request packet is received. The DHCP functionality is impacted while jdhcpd restarts, and continued exploitation of the vulnerability will lead to the unavailability of the DHCP service and thereby a sustained DoS. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS 13.2 version 13.2R1 and later versions prior to 15.1R7-S11; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S6; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R2-S9, 18.4R3-S10; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R2-S3, 19.1R3-S7; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S8, 19.2R3-S4; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S7, 19.3R3-S4; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3-S6; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R3-S3; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S1; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R2-S1, 21.1R3; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R1-S1, 21.2R2. This issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS version 12.3R12 and prior versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-22176"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1286",
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-01-19T01:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in the Juniper DHCP daemon (jdhcpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an adjacent unauthenticated attacker sending a malformed DHCP packet to cause a crash of jdhcpd and thereby a Denial of Service (DoS). If option-82 is configured in a DHCP snooping / -security scenario, jdhcpd crashes if a specific malformed DHCP request packet is received. The DHCP functionality is impacted while jdhcpd restarts, and continued exploitation of the vulnerability will lead to the unavailability of the DHCP service and thereby a sustained DoS. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS 13.2 version 13.2R1 and later versions prior to 15.1R7-S11; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S6; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R2-S9, 18.4R3-S10; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R2-S3, 19.1R3-S7; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S8, 19.2R3-S4; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S7, 19.3R3-S4; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3-S6; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R3-S3; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S1; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R2-S1, 21.1R3; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R1-S1, 21.2R2. This issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS version 12.3R12 and prior versions.",
"id": "GHSA-4f29-g223-2grv",
"modified": "2022-01-27T00:03:41Z",
"published": "2022-01-20T00:01:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-22176"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://kb.juniper.net/JSA11282"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
CAPEC-66: SQL Injection
This attack exploits target software that constructs SQL statements based on user input. An attacker crafts input strings so that when the target software constructs SQL statements based on the input, the resulting SQL statement performs actions other than those the application intended. SQL Injection results from failure of the application to appropriately validate input.
CAPEC-676: NoSQL Injection
An adversary targets software that constructs NoSQL statements based on user input or with parameters vulnerable to operator replacement in order to achieve a variety of technical impacts such as escalating privileges, bypassing authentication, and/or executing code.