CWE-269
DiscouragedImproper Privilege Management
Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft
The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.
5632 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-MH75-HRG8-8QHX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-12-29 03:30 – Updated: 2026-01-27 18:32Some Honor products are affected by incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability, successful exploitation could cause device service exceptions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-23428"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-269"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-12-29T03:15:09Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Some Honor products are affected by incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability, successful exploitation could cause device service exceptions.",
"id": "GHSA-mh75-hrg8-8qhx",
"modified": "2026-01-27T18:32:04Z",
"published": "2023-12-29T03:30:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-23428"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.hihonor.com/global/security/cve-2023-23428"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MH84-F3MW-WVJC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:27 – Updated: 2024-01-01 00:30An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the ssdpsrv.dll handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1159, CVE-2020-1376.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-1052"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-269"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-09-11T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the ssdpsrv.dll handles objects in memory, aka \u0027Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\u0027. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1159, CVE-2020-1376.",
"id": "GHSA-mh84-f3mw-wvjc",
"modified": "2024-01-01T00:30:40Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:27:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-1052"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1052"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MHFC-J5XQ-QMGP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-15 21:31 – Updated: 2025-05-15 21:31Dell PowerScale InsightIQ, versions 5.0 through 5.2, contains an improper privilege management vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to elevation of privileges.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-30475"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-269"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-15T19:15:56Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Dell PowerScale InsightIQ, versions 5.0 through 5.2, contains an improper privilege management vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to elevation of privileges.",
"id": "GHSA-mhfc-j5xq-qmgp",
"modified": "2025-05-15T21:31:26Z",
"published": "2025-05-15T21:31:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30475"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000317889/dsa-2025-186-security-update-for-dell-powerscale-inightiq-multiple-security-vulnerabilities"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MHFV-9H99-JWG7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:31 – Updated: 2024-05-15 22:56Mediawiki 1.31 before 1.31.1, 1.30.1, 1.29.3 and 1.27.5 contains a flaw where contrary to the documentation, $wgRateLimits entry for 'user' overrides that for 'newbie'.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "mediawiki/core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.27.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.27.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "mediawiki/core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.29.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.29.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "mediawiki/core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.30.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.30.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "mediawiki/core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.31.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.31.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-0503"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-269"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-05-15T22:56:26Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2018-10-04T20:29:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Mediawiki 1.31 before 1.31.1, 1.30.1, 1.29.3 and 1.27.5 contains a flaw where contrary to the documentation, $wgRateLimits entry for \u0027user\u0027 overrides that for \u0027newbie\u0027.",
"id": "GHSA-mhfv-9h99-jwg7",
"modified": "2024-05-15T22:56:26Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:31:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-0503"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3142"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3238"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3813"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/mediawiki/core/CVE-2018-0503.yaml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2018-September/090849.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T169545"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4301"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041695"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Mediawiki Improper Privilege Management"
}
GHSA-MHGM-52VG-PVVC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-02-16 14:12 – Updated: 2023-02-16 14:12Impact
An attacker with read-only access to a Strongbox secret could craft a valid encrypted secret (same id/version). It also makes the audit logs from KMS less useful. The issue is caused by a bug in the underlying AWS Encryption SDK.
By default, the encrypted secrets are stored in DynamoDB and an attacker with read-only access would not be able to write the encrypted secret to DynamoDB. So in practice the impact should be limited for most users.
Strongbox supports storing data in files as an alternative to DynamoDB. If the attacker had write access to where the files are stored they could make the attack work end-to-end. Similarly, any custom storage backend could also be affected.
In order to be backwards compatible Strongbox will not make use of key commitments (another improvement to the AWS Encryption SDK). Strongbox enforces that only one KMS key can be used, and it must match the expected one. This means that an attacker needs write access to both KMS and DynamoDB (or other storage backend) to stage an attack, which is not a scenario Strongbox is designed to protect against.
Patches
Fixed in version 0.5.0.
Workarounds
None
References
- https://github.com/aws/aws-encryption-sdk-java/security/advisories/GHSA-55xh-53m6-936r
- https://docs.aws.amazon.com/encryption-sdk/latest/developer-guide/concepts.html#key-commitment
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.schibsted.security:strongbox-sdk"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.5.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-269"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-02-16T14:12:04Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\nAn attacker with read-only access to a Strongbox secret could craft a valid encrypted secret (same id/version). It also makes the audit logs from KMS less useful. The issue is caused by a bug in the underlying AWS Encryption SDK.\n\nBy default, the encrypted secrets are stored in DynamoDB and an attacker with read-only access would not be able to write the encrypted secret to DynamoDB. So in practice the impact should be limited for most users.\n\nStrongbox supports storing data in files as an alternative to DynamoDB. If the attacker had write access to where the files are stored they could make the attack work end-to-end. Similarly, any custom storage backend could also be affected.\n\nIn order to be backwards compatible Strongbox will not make use of key commitments (another improvement to the AWS Encryption SDK). Strongbox enforces that only one KMS key can be used, and it must match the expected one. This means that an attacker needs write access to both KMS and DynamoDB (or other storage backend) to stage an attack, which is not a scenario Strongbox is designed to protect against.\n\n### Patches\nFixed in version 0.5.0.\n\n### Workarounds\nNone\n\n### References\n- https://github.com/aws/aws-encryption-sdk-java/security/advisories/GHSA-55xh-53m6-936r\n- https://docs.aws.amazon.com/encryption-sdk/latest/developer-guide/concepts.html#key-commitment",
"id": "GHSA-mhgm-52vg-pvvc",
"modified": "2023-02-16T14:12:04Z",
"published": "2023-02-16T14:12:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/schibsted/strongbox/security/advisories/GHSA-mhgm-52vg-pvvc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/schibsted/strongbox/commit/e61f7c36efa898e8b44de6222cd66d2bcdd073e6"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/schibsted/strongbox"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "Privilege escalation in Strongbox"
}
GHSA-MHGQ-RP37-738W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:48 – Updated: 2023-03-04 03:30Dell SupportAssist for Business PCs version 2.0 and Dell SupportAssist for Home PCs version 2.2, 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.3, 3.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2, 3.1, 3.2, and 3.2.1 contain an Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability. A malicious local user can exploit this vulnerability by inheriting a system thread using a leaked thread handle to gain system privileges on the affected machine.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-3735"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-269"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-06-20T22:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Dell SupportAssist for Business PCs version 2.0 and Dell SupportAssist for Home PCs version 2.2, 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.3, 3.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2, 3.1, 3.2, and 3.2.1 contain an Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability. A malicious local user can exploit this vulnerability by inheriting a system thread using a leaked thread handle to gain system privileges on the affected machine.",
"id": "GHSA-mhgq-rp37-738w",
"modified": "2023-03-04T03:30:20Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:48:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-3735"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.dell.com/support/article/sln317453"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MHGQ-XPFQ-6R66
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-02 20:46 – Updated: 2026-05-06 02:38Summary
Unauthenticated plugin-auth HTTP routes receive operator runtime scopes
Current Maintainer Triage
- Status: narrow
- Normalized severity: medium
- Assessment: v2026.3.28 still gives auth:"plugin" routes operator WRITE_SCOPE, but impact should stay limited to plugin routes that actually touch privileged runtime actions before plugin auth completes.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw(npm) - Latest published npm version:
2026.3.31 - Vulnerable version range:
<=2026.3.28 - Patched versions:
>= 2026.3.31 - First stable tag containing the fix:
v2026.3.31
Fix Commit(s)
2a1db0c0f1fa375004a95ba0ef030534790a6d47— 2026-04-01T00:20:49+09:00
OpenClaw thanks @davidluzsilva for reporting.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.3.28"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.3.31"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-41394"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-269",
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-02T20:46:03Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-28T19:37:42Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\nUnauthenticated plugin-auth HTTP routes receive operator runtime scopes\n\n## Current Maintainer Triage\n- Status: narrow\n- Normalized severity: medium\n- Assessment: v2026.3.28 still gives auth:\"plugin\" routes operator WRITE_SCOPE, but impact should stay limited to plugin routes that actually touch privileged runtime actions before plugin auth completes.\n\n## Affected Packages / Versions\n- Package: `openclaw` (npm)\n- Latest published npm version: `2026.3.31`\n- Vulnerable version range: `\u003c=2026.3.28`\n- Patched versions: `\u003e= 2026.3.31`\n- First stable tag containing the fix: `v2026.3.31`\n\n## Fix Commit(s)\n- `2a1db0c0f1fa375004a95ba0ef030534790a6d47` \u2014 2026-04-01T00:20:49+09:00\n\nOpenClaw thanks @davidluzsilva for reporting.",
"id": "GHSA-mhgq-xpfq-6r66",
"modified": "2026-05-06T02:38:51Z",
"published": "2026-04-02T20:46:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-mhgq-xpfq-6r66"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41394"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/2a1db0c0f1fa375004a95ba0ef030534790a6d47"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-unauthorized-operator-scope-access-in-unauthenticated-plugin-auth-routes"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw: Unauthenticated plugin-auth HTTP routes receive operator runtime scopes"
}
GHSA-MHM5-5WF9-WH5M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:56 – Updated: 2024-04-04 01:57The peepso-core plugin before 1.6.1 for WordPress has PeepSoProfilePreferencesAjax->save() privilege escalation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-10968"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-269"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-09-16T13:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The peepso-core plugin before 1.6.1 for WordPress has PeepSoProfilePreferencesAjax-\u003esave() privilege escalation.",
"id": "GHSA-mhm5-5wf9-wh5m",
"modified": "2024-04-04T01:57:20Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:56:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-10968"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/peepso-core/#developers"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.pritect.net/blog/peepso-1-6-0-logged-user-privilege-escalation"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MHMR-259V-FCWQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:31 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:31A remote operatoronlinelist_content privilege escalation vulnerability was discovered in HPE Intelligent Management Center (iMC) version(s): Prior to iMC PLAT 7.3 (E0705P07).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-24630"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-269"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-10-19T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A remote operatoronlinelist_content privilege escalation vulnerability was discovered in HPE Intelligent Management Center (iMC) version(s): Prior to iMC PLAT 7.3 (E0705P07).",
"id": "GHSA-mhmr-259v-fcwq",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:31:13Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:31:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-24630"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US\u0026docId=emr_na-hpesbnw04036en_us"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-MHP5-2JM9-QW86
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-25 00:00 – Updated: 2022-06-09 00:00A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Cardo Systems Scala Rider Q3. Affected is the file /cardo/api of the Cardo-Updater. Unauthenticated remote code execution with root permissions is possible. Firewalling or disabling the service is recommended.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-125001"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-269"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-05-24T16:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Cardo Systems Scala Rider Q3. Affected is the file /cardo/api of the Cardo-Updater. Unauthenticated remote code execution with root permissions is possible. Firewalling or disabling the service is recommended.",
"id": "GHSA-mhp5-2jm9-qw86",
"modified": "2022-06-09T00:00:26Z",
"published": "2022-05-25T00:00:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-125001"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.13428"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.remote-exploit.org/archives/2014/06/03/ride_with_the_devil"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-1
Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
Mitigation MIT-48
Strategy: Separation of Privilege
Follow the principle of least privilege when assigning access rights to entities in a software system.
Mitigation MIT-49
Strategy: Separation of Privilege
Consider following the principle of separation of privilege. Require multiple conditions to be met before permitting access to a system resource.
CAPEC-122: Privilege Abuse
An adversary is able to exploit features of the target that should be reserved for privileged users or administrators but are exposed to use by lower or non-privileged accounts. Access to sensitive information and functionality must be controlled to ensure that only authorized users are able to access these resources.
CAPEC-233: Privilege Escalation
An adversary exploits a weakness enabling them to elevate their privilege and perform an action that they are not supposed to be authorized to perform.
CAPEC-58: Restful Privilege Elevation
An adversary identifies a Rest HTTP (Get, Put, Delete) style permission method allowing them to perform various malicious actions upon server data due to lack of access control mechanisms implemented within the application service accepting HTTP messages.