Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-284

Discouraged

Improper Access Control

Abstraction: Pillar · Status: Incomplete

API response cwe.mitre.org

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

7855 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-M679-XXWC-93QV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-05 03:30 – Updated: 2026-04-08 18:32
VLAI
Details

The Password Protected Store for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.9 via the REST API. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including post titles and content.

Severity
5.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-1088"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-03-05T02:15:25Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Password Protected Store for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.9 via the REST API. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including post titles and content.",
  "id": "GHSA-m679-xxwc-93qv",
  "modified": "2026-04-08T18:32:41Z",
  "published": "2024-03-05T03:30:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1088"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3046244%40password-protected-woo-store\u0026new=3046244%40password-protected-woo-store\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/password-protected-woo-store"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/7ae1e8fd-4d1b-4590-a141-f93d6347c0f2?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-M6CQ-73G8-W4JH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-11 03:31 – Updated: 2025-02-11 03:31
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Food Menu Manager 1.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file endpoint/update.php. The manipulation leads to unrestricted upload. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Severity
6.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
5.3 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-1166"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284",
      "CWE-434"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-11T02:15:37Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Food Menu Manager 1.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file endpoint/update.php. The manipulation leads to unrestricted upload. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.",
  "id": "GHSA-m6cq-73g8-w4jh",
  "modified": "2025-02-11T03:31:00Z",
  "published": "2025-02-11T03:31:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-1166"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gist.github.com/jmx0hxq/0ce2c97ca11b2423a203b5719438c9f8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.295069"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.295069"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.494567"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.sourcecodester.com"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-M6F4-F47C-5G37

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:16 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:16
VLAI
Details

Labtech before 100.237 on Linux uses world-writable permissions for root-executed scripts, which allows local users to gain privileges by modifying a script file.

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-0926"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-02-01T02:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Labtech before 100.237 on Linux uses world-writable permissions for root-executed scripts, which allows local users to gain privileges by modifying a script file.",
  "id": "GHSA-m6f4-f47c-5g37",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T04:16:36Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T04:16:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-0926"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/637068"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-M6QJ-HPPX-F3W8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:49 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:49
VLAI
Details

The Camera driver in Huawei Honor 4C smartphones with software CHM-UL00C00 before CHM-UL00C00B564, CHM-TL00C01 before CHM-TL00C01B564, and CHM-TL00C00 before CHM-TL00HC00B564 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (system crash) or gain privileges via a crafted application, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-6180, CVE-2016-6181, CVE-2016-6183, and CVE-2016-6184.

Severity
7.0 (High)
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-6182"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2016-09-07T19:28:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The Camera driver in Huawei Honor 4C smartphones with software CHM-UL00C00 before CHM-UL00C00B564, CHM-TL00C01 before CHM-TL00C01B564, and CHM-TL00C00 before CHM-TL00HC00B564 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (system crash) or gain privileges via a crafted application, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-6180, CVE-2016-6181, CVE-2016-6183, and CVE-2016-6184.",
  "id": "GHSA-m6qj-hppx-f3w8",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:49:14Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:49:14Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-6182"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20160716-01-smartphone-en"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-M6R4-FWMH-RVRM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-07 06:31 – Updated: 2025-10-07 06:31
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability was detected in code-projects Online Hotel Reservation System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /admin/addgalleryexec.php. Performing manipulation of the argument image results in unrestricted upload. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

Severity
6.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
2.1 (Low)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-11353"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-10-07T06:15:36Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was detected in code-projects Online Hotel Reservation System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /admin/addgalleryexec.php. Performing manipulation of the argument image results in unrestricted upload. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.",
  "id": "GHSA-m6r4-fwmh-rvrm",
  "modified": "2025-10-07T06:31:12Z",
  "published": "2025-10-07T06:31:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-11353"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/zhicat/C/issues/30"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://code-projects.org"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.327238"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.327238"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.664920"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-M6RX-7PVW-2F73

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-21 15:16 – Updated: 2026-04-21 15:16
VLAI
Summary
OpenClaude: Sandbox Bypass via Early-Exit Logic Flaw Allows Path Traversal
Details

A logic flaw exists in bashToolHasPermission() inside src/tools/BashTool/bashPermissions.ts. When the sandbox auto-allow feature is active and no explicit deny rule is configured, the function returns an allow result immediately — before the path constraint filter (checkPathConstraints) is ever evaluated. This allows commands containing path traversal sequences (e.g., ../../../../../etc/passwd) to bypass directory restrictions entirely.

Affected Component

  • File: src/tools/BashTool/bashPermissions.ts
  • Function: bashToolHasPermission
  • Location: ~line 1445 (sandbox auto-allow block)

Vulnerable Code Flow

bashToolHasPermission()
    │
    ├─ [~1445] Sandbox auto-allow block
    │       └─ No deny rule found → return ALLOW  ⚠️ Early exit
    │
    └─ [~1644] checkPathConstraints()             ❌ Never reached

The sandbox block was designed to skip interactive permission prompts in sandboxed environments. However, it unintentionally also skips the path traversal filter, which is a separate and critical security control.

Impact

Any process or user operating in a sandboxed session with no explicit deny rules can:

  • Read arbitrary files outside the sandbox boundary (e.g., /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, .env files, SSH private keys)
  • Write to arbitrary paths (subject to OS-level permissions)
  • Fully defeat the filesystem isolation that the sandbox is intended to enforce

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Enable sandbox mode: SandboxManager.isSandboxingEnabled() = true
  2. Enable auto-allow: SandboxManager.isAutoAllowBashIfSandboxedEnabled() = true
  3. Ensure no explicit deny rules are configured for the session
  4. Submit a bash command with a path traversal payload: cat ../../../../../etc/passwd
  5. Observe that the command receives behavior: allow without triggering checkPathConstraints

Recommended Fix

The sandbox auto-allow block should never short-circuit the full permission pipeline. It may suppress interactive prompts, but path constraint validation must always execute.

Option 1 — Preferred: Continue pipeline on allow

Only return early for deny or ask behaviors. Let allow fall through to checkPathConstraints:

if (
  SandboxManager.isSandboxingEnabled() &&
  SandboxManager.isAutoAllowBashIfSandboxedEnabled() &&
  shouldUseSandbox(input)
) {
  const sandboxAutoAllowResult = checkSandboxAutoAllow(
    input,
    appState.toolPermissionContext,
  );
  if (sandboxAutoAllowResult.behavior !== 'allow') {
    // Only block or prompt — never skip path checks on allow
    return sandboxAutoAllowResult;
  }
  // If 'allow', continue to checkPathConstraints below
}

Option 2 — Defense in depth: Run path check before returning

Run checkPathConstraints explicitly inside the sandbox block before returning:

if (sandboxAutoAllowResult.behavior !== 'passthrough') {
  const pathCheck = checkPathConstraints(input, appState.toolPermissionContext);
  if (pathCheck.behavior !== 'allow') {
    return pathCheck; // Block traversal attempts even in sandbox
  }
  return sandboxAutoAllowResult;
}

Option 3 — Minimal change: Move sandbox block after path check

Reorder the function so checkPathConstraints always runs first, and the sandbox block only handles the prompt-suppression logic afterward.

Credit: Elvin Latifli (@Rickidevs )

Severity
8.4 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@gitlawb/openclaude"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.5.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-35570"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22",
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-21T15:16:16Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-21T00:16:28Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A logic flaw exists in `bashToolHasPermission()` inside `src/tools/BashTool/bashPermissions.ts`. When the sandbox auto-allow feature is active and no explicit deny rule is configured, the function returns an `allow` result immediately \u2014 before the path constraint filter (`checkPathConstraints`) is ever evaluated. This allows commands containing path traversal sequences (e.g., `../../../../../etc/passwd`) to bypass directory restrictions entirely.\n\n## Affected Component\n\n- **File:** `src/tools/BashTool/bashPermissions.ts`\n- **Function:** `bashToolHasPermission`\n- **Location:** ~line 1445 (sandbox auto-allow block)\n\n## Vulnerable Code Flow\n\n```\nbashToolHasPermission()\n    \u2502\n    \u251c\u2500 [~1445] Sandbox auto-allow block\n    \u2502       \u2514\u2500 No deny rule found \u2192 return ALLOW  \u26a0\ufe0f Early exit\n    \u2502\n    \u2514\u2500 [~1644] checkPathConstraints()             \u274c Never reached\n```\n\nThe sandbox block was designed to skip interactive permission prompts in sandboxed environments. However, it unintentionally also skips the path traversal filter, which is a separate and critical security control.\n\n## Impact\n\nAny process or user operating in a sandboxed session with no explicit deny rules can:\n\n- Read arbitrary files outside the sandbox boundary (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, `/etc/shadow`, `.env` files, SSH private keys)\n- Write to arbitrary paths (subject to OS-level permissions)\n- Fully defeat the filesystem isolation that the sandbox is intended to enforce\n\n## Steps to Reproduce\n\n1. Enable sandbox mode: `SandboxManager.isSandboxingEnabled() = true`\n2. Enable auto-allow: `SandboxManager.isAutoAllowBashIfSandboxedEnabled() = true`\n3. Ensure no explicit deny rules are configured for the session\n4. Submit a bash command with a path traversal payload:\n   ```\n   cat ../../../../../etc/passwd\n   ```\n5. Observe that the command receives `behavior: allow` without triggering `checkPathConstraints`\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nThe sandbox auto-allow block should **never short-circuit the full permission pipeline**. It may suppress interactive prompts, but path constraint validation must always execute.\n\n### Option 1 \u2014 Preferred: Continue pipeline on `allow`\n\nOnly return early for `deny` or `ask` behaviors. Let `allow` fall through to `checkPathConstraints`:\n\n```typescript\nif (\n  SandboxManager.isSandboxingEnabled() \u0026\u0026\n  SandboxManager.isAutoAllowBashIfSandboxedEnabled() \u0026\u0026\n  shouldUseSandbox(input)\n) {\n  const sandboxAutoAllowResult = checkSandboxAutoAllow(\n    input,\n    appState.toolPermissionContext,\n  );\n  if (sandboxAutoAllowResult.behavior !== \u0027allow\u0027) {\n    // Only block or prompt \u2014 never skip path checks on allow\n    return sandboxAutoAllowResult;\n  }\n  // If \u0027allow\u0027, continue to checkPathConstraints below\n}\n```\n\n### Option 2 \u2014 Defense in depth: Run path check before returning\n\nRun `checkPathConstraints` explicitly inside the sandbox block before returning:\n\n```typescript\nif (sandboxAutoAllowResult.behavior !== \u0027passthrough\u0027) {\n  const pathCheck = checkPathConstraints(input, appState.toolPermissionContext);\n  if (pathCheck.behavior !== \u0027allow\u0027) {\n    return pathCheck; // Block traversal attempts even in sandbox\n  }\n  return sandboxAutoAllowResult;\n}\n```\n\n### Option 3 \u2014 Minimal change: Move sandbox block after path check\n\nReorder the function so `checkPathConstraints` always runs first, and the sandbox block only handles the prompt-suppression logic afterward.\n\n---\n\nCredit: Elvin Latifli (@Rickidevs )",
  "id": "GHSA-m6rx-7pvw-2f73",
  "modified": "2026-04-21T15:16:16Z",
  "published": "2026-04-21T15:16:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Gitlawb/openclaude/security/advisories/GHSA-m6rx-7pvw-2f73"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35570"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Gitlawb/openclaude/commit/7002cb302b78ea2a19da3f26226de24e2903fa1d"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/Gitlawb/openclaude"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "OpenClaude: Sandbox Bypass via Early-Exit Logic Flaw Allows Path Traversal "
}

GHSA-M6VV-4WPW-VQFC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-15 21:30 – Updated: 2025-12-16 15:30
VLAI
Details

TOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 and N200RE V9.3.5u.6448_B20240521 and V9.3.5u.6437_B20230519 are vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. Attackers can send payloads to the interface without logging in (remote).

Severity
9.1 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-55895"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-15T21:15:59Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "TOTOLINK A3300R V17.0.0cu.557_B20221024 and N200RE V9.3.5u.6448_B20240521 and V9.3.5u.6437_B20230519 are vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. Attackers can send payloads to the interface without logging in (remote).",
  "id": "GHSA-m6vv-4wpw-vqfc",
  "modified": "2025-12-16T15:30:34Z",
  "published": "2025-12-15T21:30:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-55895"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/l0tk3/CVES/blob/main/CVE-2025-55895.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.totolink.net"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-M73G-4QVW-9RWM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-28 18:30 – Updated: 2026-03-28 18:30
VLAI
Details

A flaw has been found in PromtEngineer localGPT up to 4d41c7d1713b16b216d8e062e51a5dd88b20b054. The affected element is the function do_POST of the file backend/server.py. This manipulation causes unrestricted upload. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Severity
7.3 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
5.5 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-5001"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-28T16:15:58Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A flaw has been found in PromtEngineer localGPT up to 4d41c7d1713b16b216d8e062e51a5dd88b20b054. The affected element is the function do_POST of the file backend/server.py. This manipulation causes unrestricted upload. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.",
  "id": "GHSA-m73g-4qvw-9rwm",
  "modified": "2026-03-28T18:30:19Z",
  "published": "2026-03-28T18:30:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-5001"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/August829/CVEP/issues/7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/778316"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/353888"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/353888/cti"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-M765-QG53-C8V8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:53 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:53
VLAI
Details

NetCommons 2.4.2.1 and earlier allows remote authenticated secretariat (aka CLERK) users to gain privileges by creating a SYSTEM_ADMIN account.

Severity
8.8 (High)
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-4813"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2016-06-19T01:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "NetCommons 2.4.2.1 and earlier allows remote authenticated secretariat (aka CLERK) users to gain privileges by creating a SYSTEM_ADMIN account.",
  "id": "GHSA-m765-qg53-c8v8",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:53:05Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:53:05Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-4813"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN00460236/index.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://jvndb.jvn.jp/jvndb/JVNDB-2016-000075"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.netcommons.org/muer4mz6s-6669"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-M767-Q4RP-7H89

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-06 00:30 – Updated: 2026-02-06 00:30
VLAI
Details

Azure Arc Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Severity
8.6 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-24302"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-02-05T23:15:54Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Azure Arc Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability",
  "id": "GHSA-m767-q4rp-7h89",
  "modified": "2026-02-06T00:30:26Z",
  "published": "2026-02-06T00:30:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-24302"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24302"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}
Mitigation MIT-1
Architecture and Design Operation

Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.

Mitigation MIT-46
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Separation of Privilege

  • Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
  • Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CAPEC-19: Embedding Scripts within Scripts

An adversary leverages the capability to execute their own script by embedding it within other scripts that the target software is likely to execute due to programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute scripts.

CAPEC-441: Malicious Logic Insertion

An adversary installs or adds malicious logic (also known as malware) into a seemingly benign component of a fielded system. This logic is often hidden from the user of the system and works behind the scenes to achieve negative impacts. With the proliferation of mass digital storage and inexpensive multimedia devices, Bluetooth and 802.11 support, new attack vectors for spreading malware are emerging for things we once thought of as innocuous greeting cards, picture frames, or digital projectors. This pattern of attack focuses on systems already fielded and used in operation as opposed to systems and their components that are still under development and part of the supply chain.

CAPEC-478: Modification of Windows Service Configuration

An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to modify the execution parameters of a Windows service. The goal of this attack is to execute a malicious binary in place of an existing service.

CAPEC-479: Malicious Root Certificate

An adversary exploits a weakness in authorization and installs a new root certificate on a compromised system. Certificates are commonly used for establishing secure TLS/SSL communications within a web browser. When a user attempts to browse a website that presents a certificate that is not trusted an error message will be displayed to warn the user of the security risk. Depending on the security settings, the browser may not allow the user to establish a connection to the website. Adversaries have used this technique to avoid security warnings prompting users when compromised systems connect over HTTPS to adversary controlled web servers that spoof legitimate websites in order to collect login credentials.

CAPEC-502: Intent Spoof

An adversary, through a previously installed malicious application, issues an intent directed toward a specific trusted application's component in an attempt to achieve a variety of different objectives including modification of data, information disclosure, and data injection. Components that have been unintentionally exported and made public are subject to this type of an attack. If the component trusts the intent's action without verififcation, then the target application performs the functionality at the adversary's request, helping the adversary achieve the desired negative technical impact.

CAPEC-503: WebView Exposure

An adversary, through a malicious web page, accesses application specific functionality by leveraging interfaces registered through WebView's addJavascriptInterface API. Once an interface is registered to WebView through addJavascriptInterface, it becomes global and all pages loaded in the WebView can call this interface.

CAPEC-536: Data Injected During Configuration

An attacker with access to data files and processes on a victim's system injects malicious data into critical operational data during configuration or recalibration, causing the victim's system to perform in a suboptimal manner that benefits the adversary.

CAPEC-546: Incomplete Data Deletion in a Multi-Tenant Environment

An adversary obtains unauthorized information due to insecure or incomplete data deletion in a multi-tenant environment. If a cloud provider fails to completely delete storage and data from former cloud tenants' systems/resources, once these resources are allocated to new, potentially malicious tenants, the latter can probe the provided resources for sensitive information still there.

CAPEC-550: Install New Service

When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Adversaries may install a new service which will be executed at startup (on a Windows system, by modifying the registry). The service name may be disguised by using a name from a related operating system or benign software. Services are usually run with elevated privileges.

CAPEC-551: Modify Existing Service

When an operating system starts, it also starts programs called services or daemons. Modifying existing services may break existing services or may enable services that are disabled/not commonly used.

CAPEC-552: Install Rootkit

An adversary exploits a weakness in authentication to install malware that alters the functionality and information provide by targeted operating system API calls. Often referred to as rootkits, it is often used to hide the presence of programs, files, network connections, services, drivers, and other system components.

CAPEC-556: Replace File Extension Handlers

When a file is opened, its file handler is checked to determine which program opens the file. File handlers are configuration properties of many operating systems. Applications can modify the file handler for a given file extension to call an arbitrary program when a file with the given extension is opened.

CAPEC-558: Replace Trusted Executable

An adversary exploits weaknesses in privilege management or access control to replace a trusted executable with a malicious version and enable the execution of malware when that trusted executable is called.

CAPEC-562: Modify Shared File

An adversary manipulates the files in a shared location by adding malicious programs, scripts, or exploit code to valid content. Once a user opens the shared content, the tainted content is executed.

CAPEC-563: Add Malicious File to Shared Webroot

An adversaries may add malicious content to a website through the open file share and then browse to that content with a web browser to cause the server to execute the content. The malicious content will typically run under the context and permissions of the web server process, often resulting in local system or administrative privileges depending on how the web server is configured.

CAPEC-564: Run Software at Logon

Operating system allows logon scripts to be run whenever a specific user or users logon to a system. If adversaries can access these scripts, they may insert additional code into the logon script. This code can allow them to maintain persistence or move laterally within an enclave because it is executed every time the affected user or users logon to a computer. Modifying logon scripts can effectively bypass workstation and enclave firewalls. Depending on the access configuration of the logon scripts, either local credentials or a remote administrative account may be necessary.

CAPEC-578: Disable Security Software

An adversary exploits a weakness in access control to disable security tools so that detection does not occur. This can take the form of killing processes, deleting registry keys so that tools do not start at run time, deleting log files, or other methods.

← Back to the CWE list