Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-295

Allowed

Improper Certificate Validation

Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft

The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.

2021 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-XV64-WPFR-X2M3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:47 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:47
VLAI
Details

The TLS stack in Mono before 3.12.1 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct message skipping attacks and consequently impersonate clients by leveraging missing handshake state validation, aka a "SMACK SKIP-TLS" issue.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-2318"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-01-08T19:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The TLS stack in Mono before 3.12.1 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct message skipping attacks and consequently impersonate clients by leveraging missing handshake state validation, aka a \"SMACK SKIP-TLS\" issue.",
  "id": "GHSA-xv64-wpfr-x2m3",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T03:47:43Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T03:47:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-2318"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/mono/mono/commit/1509226c41d74194c146deb173e752b8d3cdeec4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202869"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://mitls.org/pages/attacks/SMACK#skip"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3202"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mono-project.com/news/2015/03/07/mono-tls-vulnerability"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/03/17/9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/73253"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2547-1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-XVCH-R4WF-H8W9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2018-11-21 22:22 – Updated: 2024-03-04 21:32
VLAI
Summary
Improper Certificate Validation in proton-j
Details

The Apache Qpid Proton-J transport includes an optional wrapper layer to perform TLS, enabled by use of the 'transport.ssl(...)' methods. Unless a verification mode was explicitly configured, client and server modes previously defaulted as documented to not verifying a peer certificate, with options to configure this explicitly or select a certificate verification mode with or without hostname verification being performed. The latter hostname verifying mode was not implemented in Apache Qpid Proton-J versions 0.3 to 0.29.0, with attempts to use it resulting in an exception. This left only the option to verify the certificate is trusted, leaving such a client vulnerable to Man In The Middle (MITM) attack. Uses of the Proton-J protocol engine which do not utilise the optional transport TLS wrapper are not impacted, e.g. usage within Qpid JMS. Uses of Proton-J utilising the optional transport TLS wrapper layer that wish to enable hostname verification must be upgraded to version 0.30.0 or later and utilise the VerifyMode#VERIFY_PEER_NAME configuration, which is now the default for client mode usage unless configured otherwise.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.29.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.apache.qpid:proton-j"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.3"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.30.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-17187"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-16T22:04:36Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The Apache Qpid Proton-J transport includes an optional wrapper layer to perform TLS, enabled by use of the \u0027transport.ssl(...)\u0027 methods. Unless a verification mode was explicitly configured, client and server modes previously defaulted as documented to not verifying a peer certificate, with options to configure this explicitly or select a certificate verification mode with or without hostname verification being performed. The latter hostname verifying mode was not implemented in Apache Qpid Proton-J versions 0.3 to 0.29.0, with attempts to use it resulting in an exception. This left only the option to verify the certificate is trusted, leaving such a client vulnerable to Man In The Middle (MITM) attack. Uses of the Proton-J protocol engine which do not utilise the optional transport TLS wrapper are not impacted, e.g. usage within Qpid JMS. Uses of Proton-J utilising the optional transport TLS wrapper layer that wish to enable hostname verification must be upgraded to version 0.30.0 or later and utilise the VerifyMode#VERIFY_PEER_NAME configuration, which is now the default for client mode usage unless configured otherwise.",
  "id": "GHSA-xvch-r4wf-h8w9",
  "modified": "2024-03-04T21:32:08Z",
  "published": "2018-11-21T22:22:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-17187"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton-j/commit/0cb8ca03cec42120dcfc434561592d89a89a805e"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-xvch-r4wf-h8w9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1962"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/qpid-users/201811.mbox/%3CCAFitrpQSV73Vz7rJYfLJK7gvEymZSCR5ooWUeU8j4jzRydk-eg%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://qpid.apache.org/cves/CVE-2018-17187.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105935"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Improper Certificate Validation in proton-j"
}

GHSA-XVFC-W3VV-PGJP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:52 – Updated: 2024-04-04 01:32
VLAI
Details

In cPanel before 62.0.4, WHM SSL certificate generation uses an unreserved e-mail address (SEC-209).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-18479"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-08-05T13:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In cPanel before 62.0.4, WHM SSL certificate generation uses an unreserved e-mail address (SEC-209).",
  "id": "GHSA-xvfc-w3vv-pgjp",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T01:32:52Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T16:52:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-18479"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://documentation.cpanel.net/display/CL/62+Change+Log"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-XVFG-5FQF-M93J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-11 00:00 – Updated: 2022-03-17 00:05
VLAI
Details

A CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability exists that could allow a Man-in-theMiddle attack when communications between the client and Geo SCADA web server are intercepted. Affected Product: ClearSCADA (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2019 (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2020 (All Versions)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-24319"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-02-09T23:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability exists that could allow a Man-in-theMiddle attack when communications between the client and Geo SCADA web server are intercepted. Affected Product: ClearSCADA (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2019 (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2020 (All Versions)",
  "id": "GHSA-xvfg-5fqf-m93j",
  "modified": "2022-03-17T00:05:45Z",
  "published": "2022-02-11T00:00:46Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-24319"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://download.schneider-electric.com/files?p_Doc_Ref=SEVD-2022-039-05"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/mandiant/Vulnerability-Disclosures/blob/master/2022/MNDT-2022-0018/MNDT-2022-0018.md"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-XVFQ-F68M-7MWG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:16 – Updated: 2024-04-04 02:50
VLAI
Details

In MailStore Outlook Add-in (and Email Archive Outlook Add-in) through 12.1.2, the login process does not validate the validity of the certificate presented by the server.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-11806"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-04-23T15:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In MailStore Outlook Add-in (and Email Archive Outlook Add-in) through 12.1.2, the login process does not validate the validity of the certificate presented by the server.",
  "id": "GHSA-xvfq-f68m-7mwg",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T02:50:04Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:16:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-11806"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://help.mailstore.com/security/MAILSTORE-SA-2020-01.txt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-XVV8-8WH9-9FH2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:34 – Updated: 2023-10-06 17:25
VLAI
Summary
Keycloak Authentication Error
Details

It was found that SAML authentication in Keycloak 3.4.3.Final incorrectly authenticated expired certificates. A malicious user could use this to access unauthorized data or possibly conduct further attacks.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.keycloak:keycloak-saml-adapter-core"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.4.0.Final"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.keycloak:keycloak-services"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.4.0.Final"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-10894"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-07-21T21:34:55Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-08-01T17:29:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "It was found that SAML authentication in Keycloak 3.4.3.Final incorrectly authenticated expired certificates. A malicious user could use this to access unauthorized data or possibly conduct further attacks.",
  "id": "GHSA-xvv8-8wh9-9fh2",
  "modified": "2023-10-06T17:25:01Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:34:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-10894"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/commit/812e76c39b1e693e8f11e5549cca2c90631f372e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3592"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3593"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3595"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0877"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-10894"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Keycloak Authentication Error"
}

GHSA-XVX4-V362-295F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-14 12:31 – Updated: 2025-10-01 21:30
VLAI
Details

An improper certificate validation vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software enables an authorized user with a specially crafted client certificate to connect to an impacted GlobalProtect portal or GlobalProtect gateway as a different legitimate user. This attack is possible only if you "Allow Authentication with User Credentials OR Client Certificate."

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-5918"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-14T10:15:08Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An improper certificate validation vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software enables an authorized user with a specially crafted client certificate to connect to an impacted GlobalProtect portal or GlobalProtect gateway as a different legitimate user. This attack is possible only if you \"Allow Authentication with User Credentials OR Client Certificate.\"",
  "id": "GHSA-xvx4-v362-295f",
  "modified": "2025-10-01T21:30:34Z",
  "published": "2024-11-14T12:31:01Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-5918"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2024-5918"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:N/R:A/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-XWHX-6G69-79WC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-12-14 00:00 – Updated: 2021-12-16 00:02
VLAI
Details

The IBM Spectrum Protect Plus 10.1.0.0 through 10.1.8.x server connection to an IBM Spectrum Protect Plus workload agent is subject to a man-in-the-middle attack due to improper certificate validation. IBM X-Force ID: 182046.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-4496"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-12-13T19:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The IBM Spectrum Protect Plus 10.1.0.0 through 10.1.8.x server connection to an IBM Spectrum Protect Plus workload agent is subject to a man-in-the-middle attack due to improper certificate validation. IBM X-Force ID: 182046.",
  "id": "GHSA-xwhx-6g69-79wc",
  "modified": "2021-12-16T00:02:39Z",
  "published": "2021-12-14T00:00:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-4496"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/182046"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6525346"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-XWMR-CCG5-4JF3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:58 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:58
VLAI
Details

The DHC Online Shop App for Android version 3.2.0 and earlier does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-0622"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-07-26T17:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The DHC Online Shop App for Android version 3.2.0 and earlier does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.",
  "id": "GHSA-xwmr-ccg5-4jf3",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T02:58:25Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T02:58:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-0622"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN77409513/index.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-XXF4-WG2G-58CH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-12-10 21:30 – Updated: 2023-12-13 18:31
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered in Zammad before 6.2.0. In several subsystems, SSL/TLS was used to establish connections to external services without proper validation of hostname and certificate authority. This is exploitable by man-in-the-middle attackers.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-50454"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-12-10T19:15:07Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in Zammad before 6.2.0. In several subsystems, SSL/TLS was used to establish connections to external services without proper validation of hostname and certificate authority. This is exploitable by man-in-the-middle attackers.",
  "id": "GHSA-xxf4-wg2g-58ch",
  "modified": "2023-12-13T18:31:03Z",
  "published": "2023-12-10T21:30:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-50454"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://zammad.com/en/advisories/zaa-2023-04"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design Implementation

Certificates should be carefully managed and checked to assure that data are encrypted with the intended owner's public key.

Mitigation
Implementation

If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the hostname.

CAPEC-459: Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate

An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.

CAPEC-475: Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation

An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.