GHSA-XV64-WPFR-X2M3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:47 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:47
VLAI?
Details
The TLS stack in Mono before 3.12.1 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct message skipping attacks and consequently impersonate clients by leveraging missing handshake state validation, aka a "SMACK SKIP-TLS" issue.
Severity ?
8.1 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-2318"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-01-08T19:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The TLS stack in Mono before 3.12.1 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct message skipping attacks and consequently impersonate clients by leveraging missing handshake state validation, aka a \"SMACK SKIP-TLS\" issue.",
"id": "GHSA-xv64-wpfr-x2m3",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:47:43Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:47:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-2318"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mono/mono/commit/1509226c41d74194c146deb173e752b8d3cdeec4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202869"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mitls.org/pages/attacks/SMACK#skip"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3202"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.mono-project.com/news/2015/03/07/mono-tls-vulnerability"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/03/17/9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/73253"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2547-1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…