CWE-306
AllowedMissing Authentication for Critical Function
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.
3465 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-M82F-XPCH-CX55
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:18 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:18The affected product is vulnerable to a missing permission validation on system backup restore, which could lead to account take over and unapproved settings change.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-42539"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-10-22T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The affected product is vulnerable to a missing permission validation on system backup restore, which could lead to account take over and unapproved settings change.",
"id": "GHSA-m82f-xpch-cx55",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:18:36Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:18:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-42539"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-21-278-02"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-M8WX-MF3R-7HFF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:48 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:48Missing authentication for critical function in DAP-1880AC firmware version 1.21 and earlier allows a remote attacker to login to the device as an authenticated user without the access privilege via unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-20697"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-04-26T01:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Missing authentication for critical function in DAP-1880AC firmware version 1.21 and earlier allows a remote attacker to login to the device as an authenticated user without the access privilege via unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-m8wx-mf3r-7hff",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:48:52Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:48:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20697"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU92898656/index.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.dlink-jp.com/support/release/jvnvu92898656_dap-1880ac.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-M93H-4HW7-5QCM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-10 19:32 – Updated: 2026-07-10 19:32Overview
The Hook Authentication feature in File Browser allows administrators to delegate login verification to an external shell command. User-supplied credentials (username and password) are interpolated into this command string using os.Expand without sanitization. An unauthenticated remote attacker can inject shell metacharacters in the username or password field at the login screen, causing the server to execute arbitrary OS commands before any authentication takes place. This is a critical pre-authentication RCE.
Affected Location
- File:
auth/hook.go - Function:
HookAuth.RunCommand
CVSS v4.0
| Metric | Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network (N) | Exploitable via the login endpoint over HTTP from any network |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low (L) | Single crafted HTTP request; no preparation needed |
| Attack Requirements (AT) | None (N) | No race condition or special timing required |
| Privileges Required (PR) | None (N) | No account required — pre-authentication attack |
| User Interaction (UI) | None (N) | Fully automated; no victim action needed |
| Vulnerable System Confidentiality (VC) | High (H) | Full read access to server filesystem and env |
| Vulnerable System Integrity (VI) | High (H) | Arbitrary file write/modification |
| Vulnerable System Availability (VA) | High (H) | Can kill processes, exhaust resources |
| Subsequent System Confidentiality (SC) | None (N) | No direct impact on downstream systems assumed |
| Subsequent System Integrity (SI) | None (N) | — |
| Subsequent System Availability (SA) | None (N) | — |
Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Base Score: 9.3 (Critical)
Note:
PR:Noneis the critical differentiator from vulnerabilities 01 and 02. Because the injection point is the unauthenticated login endpoint, no account or session is required. A single HTTP request to the login API is sufficient to achieve RCE.
CWE
| ID | Name | Role |
|---|---|---|
| CWE-78 | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') | Primary — attacker-supplied credentials embedded in shell command string via os.Expand |
| CWE-88 | Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection') | Secondary — $USERNAME/$PASSWORD expansion injects additional shell commands |
| CWE-306 | Missing Authentication for Critical Function | Secondary — OS command execution is reachable before any authentication is verified |
Technical Details
HookAuth.RunCommand builds the authentication command and substitutes credential values using os.Expand:
// auth/hook.go
envMapping := func(key string) string {
switch key {
case "USERNAME":
return a.Cred.Username // directly from the HTTP login request body
case "PASSWORD":
return a.Cred.Password // directly from the HTTP login request body
default:
return os.Getenv(key)
}
}
for i, arg := range command {
if i == 0 { continue }
command[i] = os.Expand(arg, envMapping) // no escaping applied
}
os.Expand performs plain text substitution. There is no escaping, quoting, or validation of the credential values before they are embedded into the command string.
If an admin has configured the hook authentication command as:
sh -c "test $USERNAME = 'admin'"
...and an attacker submits the username ; id # at the login screen, the expanded command becomes:
sh -c "test ; id # = 'admin'"
The ; terminates the test expression and the shell executes id. The # comments out the remainder, preventing a syntax error. The attacker's command runs with the privileges of the File Browser process — without needing a valid account or password.
Attack Scenario / Reproduction Steps
- Admin enables Hook Authentication and sets the command to:
sh -c "test $USERNAME = 'admin'" - An unauthenticated attacker sends a login request (e.g., via
curlor the web UI) with: - Username:
; id # - Password: (any value)
- The server executes:
sh sh -c "test ; id # = 'admin'" - The
idcommand runs on the server, confirming pre-authentication RCE.
No account is needed. The attacker does not need to know any valid credentials. A single request is sufficient.
Impact
An unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary OS commands on the server under the privilege level of the File Browser process. This is the most severe class of vulnerability in this codebase:
- No authentication required — exposed to the entire internet if the service is public-facing.
- Single request — no setup, no enumeration, no prior foothold.
- Full server compromise: data exfiltration, persistent backdoor installation, lateral movement to internal networks.
Any internet-facing File Browser instance with Hook Authentication enabled is fully compromised by a single malformed login attempt.
Proof of Concept
package auth
import (
"os"
"strings"
"testing"
)
func TestPoC_AuthHookInjection(t *testing.T) {
// Simulate the admin-configured hook authentication command.
// This represents a realistic configuration: verify the username via a shell expression.
a := &HookAuth{
Command: "sh -c $USERNAME",
Cred: hookCred{
// Attacker-supplied username from the login form.
// The password is irrelevant.
Username: "id ; echo injected",
Password: "anything",
},
}
// Simulate the RunCommand logic in auth/hook.go
command := strings.Split(a.Command, " ")
envMapping := func(key string) string {
if key == "USERNAME" {
return a.Cred.Username
}
return os.Getenv(key)
}
for i, arg := range command {
if i == 0 {
continue
}
// os.Expand substitutes $USERNAME with the attacker's input.
// The result is treated as a shell script — no escaping is applied.
command[i] = os.Expand(arg, envMapping)
}
// The shell will execute: sh -c "id ; echo injected"
expectedArg := "id ; echo injected"
if command[2] != expectedArg {
t.Errorf("Expected command argument %q, got %q", expectedArg, command[2])
}
t.Logf("Confirmed: malicious username was injected as a shell script. Executing: %v", command)
}
Remediation
Pass credentials exclusively as environment variables, not as shell string substitutions. This feature is undocumented, so removing it should not cause issues.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.63.5"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.63.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-54088"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306",
"CWE-78",
"CWE-88"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-10T19:32:32Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-25T19:16:40Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "## Overview\n\nThe Hook Authentication feature in File Browser allows administrators to delegate login verification to an external shell command. User-supplied credentials (username and password) are interpolated into this command string using `os.Expand` without sanitization. An **unauthenticated remote attacker** can inject shell metacharacters in the username or password field at the login screen, causing the server to execute arbitrary OS commands before any authentication takes place. This is a **critical pre-authentication RCE**.\n\n## Affected Location\n\n- **File:** `auth/hook.go`\n- **Function:** `HookAuth.RunCommand`\n\n## CVSS v4.0\n\n| Metric | Value | Rationale |\n|---|---|---|\n| Attack Vector (AV) | Network (N) | Exploitable via the login endpoint over HTTP from any network |\n| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low (L) | Single crafted HTTP request; no preparation needed |\n| Attack Requirements (AT) | None (N) | No race condition or special timing required |\n| Privileges Required (PR) | **None (N)** | **No account required \u2014 pre-authentication attack** |\n| User Interaction (UI) | None (N) | Fully automated; no victim action needed |\n| Vulnerable System Confidentiality (VC) | High (H) | Full read access to server filesystem and env |\n| Vulnerable System Integrity (VI) | High (H) | Arbitrary file write/modification |\n| Vulnerable System Availability (VA) | High (H) | Can kill processes, exhaust resources |\n| Subsequent System Confidentiality (SC) | None (N) | No direct impact on downstream systems assumed |\n| Subsequent System Integrity (SI) | None (N) | \u2014 |\n| Subsequent System Availability (SA) | None (N) | \u2014 |\n\n**Vector String:** `CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N`\n**Base Score: 9.3 (Critical)**\n\n\u003e **Note:** `PR:None` is the critical differentiator from vulnerabilities 01 and 02. Because the injection point is the unauthenticated login endpoint, no account or session is required. A single HTTP request to the login API is sufficient to achieve RCE.\n\n## CWE\n\n| ID | Name | Role |\n|---|---|---|\n| [CWE-78](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html) | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027) | Primary \u2014 attacker-supplied credentials embedded in shell command string via `os.Expand` |\n| [CWE-88](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/88.html) | Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command (\u0027Argument Injection\u0027) | Secondary \u2014 `$USERNAME`/`$PASSWORD` expansion injects additional shell commands |\n| [CWE-306](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/306.html) | Missing Authentication for Critical Function | Secondary \u2014 OS command execution is reachable before any authentication is verified |\n\n## Technical Details\n\n`HookAuth.RunCommand` builds the authentication command and substitutes credential values using `os.Expand`:\n\n```go\n// auth/hook.go\nenvMapping := func(key string) string {\n switch key {\n case \"USERNAME\":\n return a.Cred.Username // directly from the HTTP login request body\n case \"PASSWORD\":\n return a.Cred.Password // directly from the HTTP login request body\n default:\n return os.Getenv(key)\n }\n}\n\nfor i, arg := range command {\n if i == 0 { continue }\n command[i] = os.Expand(arg, envMapping) // no escaping applied\n}\n```\n\n`os.Expand` performs plain text substitution. There is no escaping, quoting, or validation of the credential values before they are embedded into the command string.\n\nIf an admin has configured the hook authentication command as:\n\n```\nsh -c \"test $USERNAME = \u0027admin\u0027\"\n```\n\n...and an attacker submits the username `; id #` at the login screen, the expanded command becomes:\n\n```sh\nsh -c \"test ; id # = \u0027admin\u0027\"\n```\n\nThe `;` terminates the `test` expression and the shell executes `id`. The `#` comments out the remainder, preventing a syntax error. The attacker\u0027s command runs with the privileges of the File Browser process \u2014 **without needing a valid account or password**.\n\n## Attack Scenario / Reproduction Steps\n\n1. Admin enables Hook Authentication and sets the command to:\n ```\n sh -c \"test $USERNAME = \u0027admin\u0027\"\n ```\n2. An unauthenticated attacker sends a login request (e.g., via `curl` or the web UI) with:\n - **Username:** `; id #`\n - **Password:** (any value)\n3. The server executes:\n ```sh\n sh -c \"test ; id # = \u0027admin\u0027\"\n ```\n4. The `id` command runs on the server, confirming pre-authentication RCE.\n\nNo account is needed. The attacker does not need to know any valid credentials. A single request is sufficient.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary OS commands on the server under the privilege level of the File Browser process. This is the most severe class of vulnerability in this codebase:\n\n- **No authentication required** \u2014 exposed to the entire internet if the service is public-facing.\n- **Single request** \u2014 no setup, no enumeration, no prior foothold.\n- Full server compromise: data exfiltration, persistent backdoor installation, lateral movement to internal networks.\n\nAny internet-facing File Browser instance with Hook Authentication enabled is fully compromised by a single malformed login attempt.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n```go\npackage auth\n\nimport (\n \"os\"\n \"strings\"\n \"testing\"\n)\n\nfunc TestPoC_AuthHookInjection(t *testing.T) {\n // Simulate the admin-configured hook authentication command.\n // This represents a realistic configuration: verify the username via a shell expression.\n a := \u0026HookAuth{\n Command: \"sh -c $USERNAME\",\n Cred: hookCred{\n // Attacker-supplied username from the login form.\n // The password is irrelevant.\n Username: \"id ; echo injected\",\n Password: \"anything\",\n },\n }\n\n // Simulate the RunCommand logic in auth/hook.go\n command := strings.Split(a.Command, \" \")\n\n envMapping := func(key string) string {\n if key == \"USERNAME\" {\n return a.Cred.Username\n }\n return os.Getenv(key)\n }\n\n for i, arg := range command {\n if i == 0 {\n continue\n }\n // os.Expand substitutes $USERNAME with the attacker\u0027s input.\n // The result is treated as a shell script \u2014 no escaping is applied.\n command[i] = os.Expand(arg, envMapping)\n }\n\n // The shell will execute: sh -c \"id ; echo injected\"\n expectedArg := \"id ; echo injected\"\n if command[2] != expectedArg {\n t.Errorf(\"Expected command argument %q, got %q\", expectedArg, command[2])\n }\n\n t.Logf(\"Confirmed: malicious username was injected as a shell script. Executing: %v\", command)\n}\n```\n\n## Remediation\n\nPass credentials exclusively as environment variables, not as shell string substitutions. This feature is undocumented, so removing it should not cause issues.",
"id": "GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm",
"modified": "2026-07-10T19:32:32Z",
"published": "2026-07-10T19:32:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/security/advisories/GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54088"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "File Browser: Command Injection via Authentication Hook Shell Substitution (Pre-Authentication RCE)"
}
GHSA-M944-5QPV-G8WV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:36 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:36The official influxdb docker images before 1.7.3-meta-alpine (Alpine specific) contain a blank password for a root user. System using the influxdb docker container deployed by affected versions of the docker image may allow a remote attacker to achieve root access with a blank password.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-35194"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-12-17T02:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The official influxdb docker images before 1.7.3-meta-alpine (Alpine specific) contain a blank password for a root user. System using the influxdb docker container deployed by affected versions of the docker image may allow a remote attacker to achieve root access with a blank password.",
"id": "GHSA-m944-5qpv-g8wv",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:36:46Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:36:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-35194"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/koharin/koharin2/blob/main/CVE-2020-35194"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-MC6X-CW9H-WFR5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-08 03:47 – Updated: 2026-06-08 03:47WordPress Seotheme contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code by uploading malicious files to the theme directory. Attackers can access the uploaded PHP shell at /wp-content/themes/seotheme/mar.php to execute system commands and upload additional files for persistent access.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-54352"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-08T02:16:23Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "WordPress Seotheme contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code by uploading malicious files to the theme directory. Attackers can access the uploaded PHP shell at /wp-content/themes/seotheme/mar.php to execute system commands and upload additional files for persistent access.",
"id": "GHSA-mc6x-cw9h-wfr5",
"modified": "2026-06-08T03:47:24Z",
"published": "2026-06-08T03:47:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-54352"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51789"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/wordpress-seotheme-remote-code-execution-unauthenticated"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-MCPF-9J38-2VMQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-14 15:30 – Updated: 2025-01-14 18:31An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the testsave.sh functionality of Wavlink AC3000 M33A8.V5030.210505. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to a disclosure of sensitive information. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-39773"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-14T15:15:22Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the testsave.sh functionality of Wavlink AC3000 M33A8.V5030.210505. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to a disclosure of sensitive information. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-mcpf-9j38-2vmq",
"modified": "2025-01-14T18:31:57Z",
"published": "2025-01-14T15:30:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39773"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2024-2035"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2024-2035"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MCPJ-7FM2-56JR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:23 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:23Buffalo WZR-1750DHP2 Ver.2.30 and earlier allows an attacker to bypass authentication and execute arbitrary commands on the device via unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-0554"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-04-09T13:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Buffalo WZR-1750DHP2 Ver.2.30 and earlier allows an attacker to bypass authentication and execute arbitrary commands on the device via unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-mcpj-7fm2-56jr",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:23:39Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:23:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-0554"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://buffalo.jp/support_s/s20180328.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN93397125/index.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MCVC-Q94V-X785
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 12:31 – Updated: 2026-05-05 12:31Eclipse Equinox OSGi versions 3.8 through 3.18 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the console interface that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code by exploiting the fork command functionality. Attackers can establish a telnet connection to the OSGi console, perform a telnet handshake, and send fork commands to download and execute malicious Java code, establishing a reverse shell connection.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-54342"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-05T12:16:15Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Eclipse Equinox OSGi versions 3.8 through 3.18 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the console interface that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code by exploiting the fork command functionality. Attackers can establish a telnet connection to the OSGi console, perform a telnet handshake, and send fork commands to download and execute malicious Java code, establishing a reverse shell connection.",
"id": "GHSA-mcvc-q94v-x785",
"modified": "2026-05-05T12:31:38Z",
"published": "2026-05-05T12:31:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-54342"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51878"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/eclipse-equinox-osgi-console-remote-code-execution"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-MF6G-8599-MM62
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:57 – Updated: 2022-10-14 12:00Online Store System v1.0 delete_product.php doesn't check to see if a user authtenticated or has administrative rights allowing arbitrary product deletion.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-8292"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-10-01T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Online Store System v1.0 delete_product.php doesn\u0027t check to see if a user authtenticated or has administrative rights allowing arbitrary product deletion.",
"id": "GHSA-mf6g-8599-mm62",
"modified": "2022-10-14T12:00:19Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:57:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-8292"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.abcprintf.com/view_download.php?id=17"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/10/02/1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/23/1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/23/2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vapidlabs.com/advisory.php?v=210"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MF6M-M52M-43JC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-02 12:00 – Updated: 2022-11-03 19:00Password recovery vulnerability in SICK SIM1004 Partnumber 1098148 with firmware version < 2.0.0 allows an unprivileged remote attacker to gain access to the userlevel defined as RecoverableUserLevel by invocating the password recovery mechanism method. This leads to a increase in their privileges on the system and thereby affecting the confidentiality integrity and availability of the system. An attacker can expect repeatable success by exploiting the vulnerability. The recommended solution is to update the firmware to a version >= 2.0.0 as soon as possible.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-27586"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-306"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-11-01T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Password recovery vulnerability in SICK SIM1004 Partnumber 1098148 with firmware version \u003c 2.0.0 allows an unprivileged remote attacker to gain access to the userlevel defined as RecoverableUserLevel by invocating the password recovery mechanism method. This leads to a increase in their privileges on the system and thereby affecting the confidentiality integrity and availability of the system. An attacker can expect repeatable success by exploiting the vulnerability. The recommended solution is to update the firmware to a version \u003e= 2.0.0 as soon as possible.",
"id": "GHSA-mf6m-m52m-43jc",
"modified": "2022-11-03T19:00:26Z",
"published": "2022-11-02T12:00:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-27586"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sick.com/psirt"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
- Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability.
- Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port.
- In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
Mitigation MIT-15
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation
- Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks.
- In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
Mitigation MIT-4.5
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
Mitigation
When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].
CAPEC-12: Choosing Message Identifier
This pattern of attack is defined by the selection of messages distributed via multicast or public information channels that are intended for another client by determining the parameter value assigned to that client. This attack allows the adversary to gain access to potentially privileged information, and to possibly perpetrate other attacks through the distribution means by impersonation. If the channel/message being manipulated is an input rather than output mechanism for the system, (such as a command bus), this style of attack could be used to change the adversary's identifier to more a privileged one.
CAPEC-166: Force the System to Reset Values
An attacker forces the target into a previous state in order to leverage potential weaknesses in the target dependent upon a prior configuration or state-dependent factors. Even in cases where an attacker may not be able to directly control the configuration of the targeted application, they may be able to reset the configuration to a prior state since many applications implement reset functions.
CAPEC-216: Communication Channel Manipulation
An adversary manipulates a setting or parameter on communications channel in order to compromise its security. This can result in information exposure, insertion/removal of information from the communications stream, and/or potentially system compromise.
CAPEC-36: Using Unpublished Interfaces or Functionality
An adversary searches for and invokes interfaces or functionality that the target system designers did not intend to be publicly available. If interfaces fail to authenticate requests, the attacker may be able to invoke functionality they are not authorized for.
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.