CWE-327
Allowed-with-ReviewUse of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft
The product uses a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm or protocol.
960 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-GX7F-9HJX-J92P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:01 – Updated: 2022-07-13 00:00The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that all fragments of a frame are encrypted under the same key. An adversary can abuse this to decrypt selected fragments when another device sends fragmented frames and the WEP, CCMP, or GCMP encryption key is periodically renewed.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-24587"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-326",
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-05-11T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn\u0027t require that all fragments of a frame are encrypted under the same key. An adversary can abuse this to decrypt selected fragments when another device sends fragmented frames and the WEP, CCMP, or GCMP encryption key is periodically renewed.",
"id": "GHSA-gx7f-9hjx-j92p",
"modified": "2022-07-13T00:00:49Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:01:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-24587"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/vanhoefm/fragattacks/blob/master/SUMMARY.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00019.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00020.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00002.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-wifi-faf-22epcEWu"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisories/12602-security-advisory-63"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.fragattacks.com"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00473.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/05/11/12"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-GXP5-MV27-VJCJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-13 14:56 – Updated: 2026-01-21 16:23Vulnerability
https://github.com/samrocketman/jervis/blob/157d2b63ffa5c4bb1d8ee2254950fd2231de2b05/src/main/groovy/net/gleske/jervis/tools/SecurityIO.groovy#L682-L684
https://github.com/samrocketman/jervis/blob/157d2b63ffa5c4bb1d8ee2254950fd2231de2b05/src/main/groovy/net/gleske/jervis/tools/SecurityIO.groovy#L720-L722
AES/CBC/PKCS5Padding lacks authentication, making it vulnerable to padding oracle attacks and ciphertext manipulation.
Impact
Severity is considered low for internal uses of this library but if there's any consumer using these methods directly then this is considered critical.
Unlikely to matter due to the design of how AES-256-CBC is used in conjunction with RSA and SHA-256 checksum within Jervis.
Jervis uses RSA to encrypt AES keys and a SHA-256 checksum of the encrypted data in local-only storage inaccessible from the web. After asymmetric decryption and before symmetric decryption, a SHA-256 checksum is performed on the metadata and encrypted data. All encrypted data is discarded if the checksum does not match without attempting to decrypt since the encrypted data is assumed invalid. The data stored is GitHub App authentication tokens which will expire within one hour.
Patches
Jervis patch will migrate from AES/CBC/PKCS5Padding to AES/GCM/NoPadding.
Upgrade to Jervis 2.2.
Workarounds
None
References
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "net.gleske:jervis"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-68931"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-287",
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-01-13T14:56:49Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-13T20:16:07Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Vulnerability\n\nhttps://github.com/samrocketman/jervis/blob/157d2b63ffa5c4bb1d8ee2254950fd2231de2b05/src/main/groovy/net/gleske/jervis/tools/SecurityIO.groovy#L682-L684\n\nhttps://github.com/samrocketman/jervis/blob/157d2b63ffa5c4bb1d8ee2254950fd2231de2b05/src/main/groovy/net/gleske/jervis/tools/SecurityIO.groovy#L720-L722\n\n`AES/CBC/PKCS5Padding` lacks authentication, making it vulnerable to padding oracle attacks and ciphertext manipulation.\n\n### Impact\n\nSeverity is considered low for internal uses of this library but if there\u0027s any consumer using these methods directly then this is considered critical.\n\nUnlikely to matter due to the design of how AES-256-CBC is used in conjunction with RSA and SHA-256 checksum within Jervis.\n\nJervis uses RSA to encrypt AES keys and a SHA-256 checksum of the encrypted data in local-only storage inaccessible from the web. After asymmetric decryption and before symmetric decryption, a SHA-256 checksum is performed on the metadata and encrypted data. All encrypted data is discarded if the checksum does not match without attempting to decrypt since the encrypted data is assumed invalid. The data stored is GitHub App authentication tokens which will expire within one hour.\n\n### Patches\n\nJervis patch will migrate from `AES/CBC/PKCS5Padding` to `AES/GCM/NoPadding`.\n\nUpgrade to Jervis 2.2.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nNone\n\n### References\n\n- [Padding Oracle Attacks](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padding_oracle_attack)",
"id": "GHSA-gxp5-mv27-vjcj",
"modified": "2026-01-21T16:23:42Z",
"published": "2026-01-13T14:56:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/samrocketman/jervis/security/advisories/GHSA-gxp5-mv27-vjcj"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68931"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/samrocketman/jervis/commit/c3981ff71de7b0f767dfe7b37a2372cb2a51974a"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/samrocketman/jervis"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/samrocketman/jervis/blob/157d2b63ffa5c4bb1d8ee2254950fd2231de2b05/src/main/groovy/net/gleske/jervis/tools/SecurityIO.groovy#L682-L684"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/samrocketman/jervis/blob/157d2b63ffa5c4bb1d8ee2254950fd2231de2b05/src/main/groovy/net/gleske/jervis/tools/SecurityIO.groovy#L720-L722"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://github.com/samrocketman/jervis/commit/c3981ff71de7b0f767dfe7b37a2372cb2a51974a"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Jervis\u0027s AES CBC Mode is Without Authentication"
}
GHSA-H33Q-QGGG-PQMJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-13 21:30 – Updated: 2024-07-16 15:30There is a possible escalation of privilege due to improperly used crypto. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-32911"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-327",
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-13T21:15:55Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "There is a possible escalation of privilege due to improperly used crypto. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.",
"id": "GHSA-h33q-qggg-pqmj",
"modified": "2024-07-16T15:30:44Z",
"published": "2024-06-13T21:30:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-32911"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/pixel/2024-06-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-H362-M8F2-5X7C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2020-01-30 21:21 – Updated: 2021-01-08 20:31Impact
User passwords are stored in the database using the rather outdated and cryptographically insecure MD5 hash algorithm. Furthermore, the hashes are salted using the username instead of a random salt, causing hashes for users with the same username and password to collide which is problematic especially for popular users like the default admin user.
This essentially means that for an attacker, it might be feasible to reconstruct a user's password given access to these hashes.
Note that attackers needing access to the hashes means that they must gain access to the database in which these are stored first to be able to start cracking the passwords.
Patches
The problem is addressed in Opencast 8.1 which now uses the modern and much stronger bcrypt password hashing algorithm for storing passwords. Note, that old hashes remain MD5 until the password is updated.
For a list of users whose password hashes are stored using MD5, take a look at the /user-utils/users/md5.json REST endpoint.
Workarounds
There is no workaround.
References
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open an issue in opencast/opencast
- For security-relevant information, email us at security@opencast.org
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.opencastproject:opencast-common-jpa-impl"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "7.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.opencastproject:opencast-common-jpa-impl"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "8.0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-5229"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2020-01-30T19:59:06Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nUser passwords are stored in the database using the rather outdated and cryptographically insecure MD5 hash algorithm. Furthermore, the hashes are salted using the username instead of a random salt, causing hashes for users with the same username and password to collide which is problematic especially for popular users like the default `admin` user.\n\nThis essentially means that for an attacker, it might be feasible to reconstruct a user\u0027s password given access to these hashes.\n\nNote that attackers needing access to the hashes means that they must gain access to the database in which these are stored first to be able to start cracking the passwords.\n\n\n### Patches\n\nThe problem is addressed in Opencast 8.1 which now uses the modern and much stronger bcrypt password hashing algorithm for storing passwords. Note, that old hashes remain MD5 until the password is updated.\n\nFor a list of users whose password hashes are stored using MD5, take a look at the `/user-utils/users/md5.json` REST endpoint.\n\n\n### Workarounds\n\nThere is no workaround.\n\n### References\n\n- [MD5 (Wikipedia)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD5)\n- [bcrypt (Wikipedia)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bcrypt)\n- [How weak is MD5 as a password hashing function?](https://security.stackexchange.com/q/52461)\n\n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\n- Open an issue in [opencast/opencast](https://github.com/opencast/opencast/issues)\n- For security-relevant information, email us at security@opencast.org",
"id": "GHSA-h362-m8f2-5x7c",
"modified": "2021-01-08T20:31:50Z",
"published": "2020-01-30T21:21:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencast/opencast/security/advisories/GHSA-h362-m8f2-5x7c"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-5229"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencast/opencast/commit/32bfbe5f78e214e2d589f92050228b91d704758e"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Password Hashing: Do not use MD5"
}
GHSA-H3P9-WRGX-82CM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-05-18 18:18 – Updated: 2024-09-06 21:46When using the Azure backend with a shared access signature (SAS), Terraform versions prior to 0.12.17 may transmit the token and state snapshot using cleartext HTTP.
Specific Go Packages Affected
github.com/hashicorp/terraform/backend/remote-state/azure
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/hashicorp/terraform"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.12.17"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-19316"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20",
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-05-13T15:15:38Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2019-12-02T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "When using the Azure backend with a shared access signature (SAS), Terraform versions prior to 0.12.17 may transmit the token and state snapshot using cleartext HTTP.\n\n### Specific Go Packages Affected\ngithub.com/hashicorp/terraform/backend/remote-state/azure",
"id": "GHSA-h3p9-wrgx-82cm",
"modified": "2024-09-06T21:46:01Z",
"published": "2021-05-18T18:18:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/security/advisories/GHSA-4rvg-555h-r626"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-19316"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/23493"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/commit/6db3cf8e5b4cfb2a3cd1d99a813b50b2d5d363bb"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2022-0839"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm in Terraform"
}
GHSA-H452-4RXP-PX5R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:41 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:41A Padding Oracle exists in OSCI-Transport 1.2 as used in OSCI Transport Library 1.6.1 (Java) and OSCI Transport Library 1.6 (.NET). Under an MITM condition within the OSCI infrastructure, an attacker needs to send crafted protocol messages to analyse the CBC mode padding in order to decrypt the transport encryption.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-10668"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-06-30T12:29:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A Padding Oracle exists in OSCI-Transport 1.2 as used in OSCI Transport Library 1.6.1 (Java) and OSCI Transport Library 1.6 (.NET). Under an MITM condition within the OSCI infrastructure, an attacker needs to send crafted protocol messages to analyse the CBC mode padding in order to decrypt the transport encryption.",
"id": "GHSA-h452-4rxp-px5r",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:41:56Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:41:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-10668"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://blog.sec-consult.com/2017/06/german-e-government-details-vulnerabilities.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Jun/44"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-H4P6-C3XJ-992M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-17 18:35 – Updated: 2026-06-17 18:35Dell PowerFlex Manager, version(s) 4.6.0.1, contain(s) an Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure and Information tampering.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-40641"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-17T15:16:49Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Dell PowerFlex Manager, version(s) 4.6.0.1, contain(s) an Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure and Information tampering.",
"id": "GHSA-h4p6-c3xj-992m",
"modified": "2026-06-17T18:35:56Z",
"published": "2026-06-17T18:35:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-40641"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000477538/dsa-2026-066-security-update-for-powerflex-software-multiple-vulnerabilities"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-H5XG-P4CH-38QF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:33 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:33The default configuration of the Wi-Fi component on the Huawei D100 does not use encryption, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-2273"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-07-01T13:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The default configuration of the Wi-Fi component on the Huawei D100 does not use encryption, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network.",
"id": "GHSA-h5xg-p4ch-38qf",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:33:30Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:33:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-2273"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/504645/100/0/threaded"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-H63V-HW6G-X8HP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-09 21:31 – Updated: 2024-12-11 21:35due to a weakness in the encryption method used in cookie-encrypter an attack can use the world visible IV to edit encrypted cookies without decrypting the cookie itself. This is known as an AES CBC bit flipping attack.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "cookie-encrypter"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "1.0.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-53441"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-325",
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-12-11T21:35:13Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-09T20:15:20Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "due to a weakness in the encryption method used in cookie-encrypter an attack can use the world visible IV to edit encrypted cookies without decrypting the cookie itself. This is known as an AES CBC bit flipping attack.",
"id": "GHSA-h63v-hw6g-x8hp",
"modified": "2024-12-11T21:35:13Z",
"published": "2024-12-09T21:31:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53441"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ebourmalo/cookie-encrypter/issues/9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/66085/bit-flipping-attack-on-cbc-mode"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gist.github.com/mathysEthical/f45f1503f87381090e38a33c50eec971"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/ebourmalo/cookie-encrypter"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mathys.reboux.pro/CVE/2024/53441"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Bit flip attack vulnerability in cookie-encrypter"
}
GHSA-H6W2-V77H-V84W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 00:03 – Updated: 2024-02-09 03:32Folder Lock 5.9.5 and earlier uses weak encryption (ROT-25) for the password, which allows local administrators to obtain sensitive information by reading and decrypting the QualityControl_pack registry value.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-3775"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-08-22T16:41:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Folder Lock 5.9.5 and earlier uses weak encryption (ROT-25) for the password, which allows local administrators to obtain sensitive information by reading and decrypting the QualityControl\\_pack registry value.",
"id": "GHSA-h6w2-v77h-v84w",
"modified": "2024-02-09T03:32:53Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T00:03:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-3775"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/44575"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/31559"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4183"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/495612/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30771"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-24
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- When there is a need to store or transmit sensitive data, use strong, up-to-date cryptographic algorithms to encrypt that data. Select a well-vetted algorithm that is currently considered to be strong by experts in the field, and use well-tested implementations. As with all cryptographic mechanisms, the source code should be available for analysis.
- For example, US government systems require FIPS 140-2 certification [REF-1192].
- Do not develop custom or private cryptographic algorithms. They will likely be exposed to attacks that are well-understood by cryptographers. Reverse engineering techniques are mature. If the algorithm can be compromised if attackers find out how it works, then it is especially weak.
- Periodically ensure that the cryptography has not become obsolete. Some older algorithms, once thought to require a billion years of computing time, can now be broken in days or hours. This includes MD4, MD5, SHA1, DES, and other algorithms that were once regarded as strong. [REF-267]
Mitigation MIT-52
Ensure that the design allows one cryptographic algorithm to be replaced with another in the next generation or version. Where possible, use wrappers to make the interfaces uniform. This will make it easier to upgrade to stronger algorithms. With hardware, design the product at the Intellectual Property (IP) level so that one cryptographic algorithm can be replaced with another in the next generation of the hardware product.
Mitigation
Carefully manage and protect cryptographic keys (see CWE-320). If the keys can be guessed or stolen, then the strength of the cryptography itself is irrelevant.
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- Industry-standard implementations will save development time and may be more likely to avoid errors that can occur during implementation of cryptographic algorithms. Consider the ESAPI Encryption feature.
Mitigation MIT-25
When using industry-approved techniques, use them correctly. Don't cut corners by skipping resource-intensive steps (CWE-325). These steps are often essential for preventing common attacks.
CAPEC-20: Encryption Brute Forcing
An attacker, armed with the cipher text and the encryption algorithm used, performs an exhaustive (brute force) search on the key space to determine the key that decrypts the cipher text to obtain the plaintext.
CAPEC-459: Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate
An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.
CAPEC-473: Signature Spoof
An attacker generates a message or datablock that causes the recipient to believe that the message or datablock was generated and cryptographically signed by an authoritative or reputable source, misleading a victim or victim operating system into performing malicious actions.
CAPEC-475: Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation
An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.
CAPEC-608: Cryptanalysis of Cellular Encryption
The use of cryptanalytic techniques to derive cryptographic keys or otherwise effectively defeat cellular encryption to reveal traffic content. Some cellular encryption algorithms such as A5/1 and A5/2 (specified for GSM use) are known to be vulnerable to such attacks and commercial tools are available to execute these attacks and decrypt mobile phone conversations in real-time. Newer encryption algorithms in use by UMTS and LTE are stronger and currently believed to be less vulnerable to these types of attacks. Note, however, that an attacker with a Cellular Rogue Base Station can force the use of weak cellular encryption even by newer mobile devices.
CAPEC-614: Rooting SIM Cards
SIM cards are the de facto trust anchor of mobile devices worldwide. The cards protect the mobile identity of subscribers, associate devices with phone numbers, and increasingly store payment credentials, for example in NFC-enabled phones with mobile wallets. This attack leverages over-the-air (OTA) updates deployed via cryptographically-secured SMS messages to deliver executable code to the SIM. By cracking the DES key, an attacker can send properly signed binary SMS messages to a device, which are treated as Java applets and are executed on the SIM. These applets are allowed to send SMS, change voicemail numbers, and query the phone location, among many other predefined functions. These capabilities alone provide plenty of potential for abuse.
CAPEC-97: Cryptanalysis
Cryptanalysis is a process of finding weaknesses in cryptographic algorithms and using these weaknesses to decipher the ciphertext without knowing the secret key (instance deduction). Sometimes the weakness is not in the cryptographic algorithm itself, but rather in how it is applied that makes cryptanalysis successful. An attacker may have other goals as well, such as: Total Break (finding the secret key), Global Deduction (finding a functionally equivalent algorithm for encryption and decryption that does not require knowledge of the secret key), Information Deduction (gaining some information about plaintexts or ciphertexts that was not previously known) and Distinguishing Algorithm (the attacker has the ability to distinguish the output of the encryption (ciphertext) from a random permutation of bits).