CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14184 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-V73C-376G-V9QJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-11-19 00:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in James Mehorter Device Theme Switcher.This issue affects Device Theme Switcher: from n/a through 3.0.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-47556"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-11-18T22:15:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in James Mehorter Device Theme Switcher.This issue affects Device Theme Switcher: from n/a through 3.0.2.",
"id": "GHSA-v73c-376g-v9qj",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:33:11Z",
"published": "2023-11-19T00:30:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-47556"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/device-theme-switcher/wordpress-plugin-name-device-theme-switcher-plugin-3-0-2-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-V74G-7HWM-JPJC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-10 15:30 – Updated: 2025-03-14 18:30The WordPress Ping Optimizer WordPress plugin through 2.35.1.3.0 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks such as clearing logs.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-6385"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-10T05:15:47Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The WordPress Ping Optimizer WordPress plugin through 2.35.1.3.0 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks such as clearing logs.",
"id": "GHSA-v74g-7hwm-jpjc",
"modified": "2025-03-14T18:30:39Z",
"published": "2024-04-10T15:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-6385"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/362c56ff-85eb-480f-a825-9670d4c0e3d0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-V755-R9FP-W5GJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-26 00:33 – Updated: 2024-11-26 00:33A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in 1000 Projects Bookstore Management System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-11673"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-25T23:15:04Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in 1000 Projects Bookstore Management System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.",
"id": "GHSA-v755-r9fp-w5gj",
"modified": "2024-11-26T00:33:32Z",
"published": "2024-11-26T00:33:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-11673"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Hacker0xone/CVE/issues/16"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://1000projects.org"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.286013"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.286013"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.448470"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-V772-P336-GR44
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-06-28 00:01 – Updated: 2022-07-07 00:00The MailPress WordPress plugin through 7.2.1 does not have CSRF checks in various places, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change the settings, purge log files and more via CSRF attacks
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-1843"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-06-27T09:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The MailPress WordPress plugin through 7.2.1 does not have CSRF checks in various places, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change the settings, purge log files and more via CSRF attacks",
"id": "GHSA-v772-p336-gr44",
"modified": "2022-07-07T00:00:24Z",
"published": "2022-06-28T00:01:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1843"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/aa59f811-2375-4593-93d4-f587f9870ed1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-V774-FR36-5478
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:03 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:03An issue was discovered in Joomla! 3.0.0 through 3.9.26. A missing token check causes a CSRF vulnerability in data download endpoints in com_banners and com_sysinfo.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-26034"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-05-26T11:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in Joomla! 3.0.0 through 3.9.26. A missing token check causes a CSRF vulnerability in data download endpoints in com_banners and com_sysinfo.",
"id": "GHSA-v774-fr36-5478",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:03:22Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:03:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26034"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://developer.joomla.org/security-centre/854-20210503-core-csrf-in-data-download-endpoints.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-V77G-284C-R623
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-06 19:24 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:29A vulnerability has been identified in Desigo PXM30-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM30.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM40-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM40.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM50-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM50.E (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), PXG3.W100-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-37), PXG3.W100-2 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41), PXG3.W200-1 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-37), PXG3.W200-2 (All versions < V02.20.126.11-41). A Cross-Site Request Forgery exists in the “Import Files“ functionality of the “Operation” web application due to the missing validation of anti-CSRF tokens or other origin checks. A remote unauthenticated attacker can upload and enable permanent arbitrary JavaScript code into the device just by convincing a victim to visit a specifically crafted webpage while logged-in to the device web application.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-40180"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-10-11T11:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability has been identified in Desigo PXM30-1 (All versions \u003c V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM30.E (All versions \u003c V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM40-1 (All versions \u003c V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM40.E (All versions \u003c V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM50-1 (All versions \u003c V02.20.126.11-41), Desigo PXM50.E (All versions \u003c V02.20.126.11-41), PXG3.W100-1 (All versions \u003c V02.20.126.11-37), PXG3.W100-2 (All versions \u003c V02.20.126.11-41), PXG3.W200-1 (All versions \u003c V02.20.126.11-37), PXG3.W200-2 (All versions \u003c V02.20.126.11-41). A Cross-Site Request Forgery exists in the \u201cImport Files\u201c functionality of the \u201cOperation\u201d web application due to the missing validation of anti-CSRF tokens or other origin checks. A remote unauthenticated attacker can upload and enable permanent arbitrary JavaScript code into the device just by convincing a victim to visit a specifically crafted webpage while logged-in to the device web application.",
"id": "GHSA-v77g-284c-r623",
"modified": "2024-04-04T05:29:07Z",
"published": "2023-07-06T19:24:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-40180"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-360783.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-V77W-MGQ7-VJJ2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-06-14 00:00 – Updated: 2022-06-23 00:00Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Easy Blog for EC-CUBE4 Ver.1.0.1 and earlier allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of the administrator and delete a blog article or a category via a specially crafted page.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-27174"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-06-13T05:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Easy Blog for EC-CUBE4 Ver.1.0.1 and earlier allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of the administrator and delete a blog article or a category via a specially crafted page.",
"id": "GHSA-v77w-mgq7-vjj2",
"modified": "2022-06-23T00:00:33Z",
"published": "2022-06-14T00:00:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-27174"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN46241173/index.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ec-cube.net/products/detail.php?product_id=2217"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-V78P-R437-XCQ2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:13 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:13Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the (1) DataMappingEditorCommands, (2) DatastoreEditorCommands, and (3) IEGEditorCommands servlets in IBM Curam Social Program Management (SPM) 5.2 SP6 before EP6, 6.0 SP2 before EP26, 6.0.3 before 6.0.3.0 iFix8, 6.0.4 before 6.0.4.5 iFix10, and 6.0.5 before 6.0.5.6 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-6090"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-04-27T11:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the (1) DataMappingEditorCommands, (2) DatastoreEditorCommands, and (3) IEGEditorCommands servlets in IBM Curam Social Program Management (SPM) 5.2 SP6 before EP6, 6.0 SP2 before EP26, 6.0.3 before 6.0.3.0 iFix8, 6.0.4 before 6.0.4.5 iFix10, and 6.0.5 before 6.0.5.6 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences.",
"id": "GHSA-v78p-r437-xcq2",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:13:43Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:13:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-6090"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21697726"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-V792-WXJQ-P469
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-09-15 15:30 – Updated: 2024-02-02 18:30Grocy <= 4.0.2 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-42270"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-09-15T14:15:11Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Grocy \u003c= 4.0.2 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF).",
"id": "GHSA-v792-wxjq-p469",
"modified": "2024-02-02T18:30:24Z",
"published": "2023-09-15T15:30:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-42270"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/176958/Grocy-4.0.2-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://xploit.sh/posts/cve-2023-xxxxx"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-V795-9668-64P8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:54 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:54Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in PyForum 1.0.3 and possibly earlier versions, and possibly zForum, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of victims for requests that change passwords, and other unspecified requests, via unknown vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-4407"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-12-23T21:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in PyForum 1.0.3 and possibly earlier versions, and possibly zForum, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of victims for requests that change passwords, and other unspecified requests, via unknown vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-v795-9668-64p8",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:54:24Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:54:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-4407"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/54853"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/37764"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/61050"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/508478/100/0/threaded"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.