CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14188 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-9J6H-3GFW-P2QR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-12 03:30 – Updated: 2024-10-12 03:30The Easy PayPal Gift Certificate plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.2.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'wpppgc_plugin_options' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings and inject malicious JavaScript via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-9592"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-12T03:15:02Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Easy PayPal Gift Certificate plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.2.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the \u0027wpppgc_plugin_options\u0027 function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin\u0027s settings and inject malicious JavaScript via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-9j6h-3gfw-p2qr",
"modified": "2024-10-12T03:30:43Z",
"published": "2024-10-12T03:30:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-9592"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/paypal-gift-certificate/tags/1.2.3/paypal-gift-certificate.php#L200"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/72880e44-b0e0-47f4-82f0-c36c81091ba8?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9J6P-C76P-69C9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-04 12:30 – Updated: 2025-02-04 12:30The ShopSite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.10. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-13510"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-04T10:15:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The ShopSite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.10. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-9j6p-c76p-69c9",
"modified": "2025-02-04T12:30:58Z",
"published": "2025-02-04T12:30:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-13510"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026new=3226553%40shopsite-plugin%2Ftrunk\u0026old=3139879%40shopsite-plugin%2Ftrunk\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/c2fde092-0a12-42ab-abbb-7f5ff5de9af2?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9J76-3QV5-66RM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:07 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:07Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the User WebDialer page in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that dial calls, aka Bug ID CSCui13028.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-3450"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2013-08-05T13:22:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the User WebDialer page in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that dial calls, aka Bug ID CSCui13028.",
"id": "GHSA-9j76-3qv5-66rm",
"modified": "2022-05-17T05:07:04Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:07:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-3450"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityNotice/CVE-2013-3450"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-9J96-8P8G-J5GR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-08 00:00 – Updated: 2022-03-17 00:02The Email Subscribers & Newsletters WordPress plugin before 5.3.2 does not correctly escape the order and orderby parameters to the ajax_fetch_report_list action, making it vulnerable to blind SQL injection attacks by users with roles as low as Subscriber. Further, it does not have any CSRF protection in place for the action, allowing an attacker to trick any logged in user to perform the action by clicking a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-0439"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352",
"CWE-89"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-03-07T09:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Email Subscribers \u0026 Newsletters WordPress plugin before 5.3.2 does not correctly escape the `order` and `orderby` parameters to the `ajax_fetch_report_list` action, making it vulnerable to blind SQL injection attacks by users with roles as low as Subscriber. Further, it does not have any CSRF protection in place for the action, allowing an attacker to trick any logged in user to perform the action by clicking a link.",
"id": "GHSA-9j96-8p8g-j5gr",
"modified": "2022-03-17T00:02:56Z",
"published": "2022-03-08T00:00:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0439"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/729d3e67-d081-4a4e-ac1e-f6b0a184f095"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9JCR-HRFG-4R79
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-12 15:37 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:34Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tribulant Slideshow Gallery.This issue affects Slideshow Gallery: from n/a through 1.7.8.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-31354"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-12T13:15:19Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tribulant Slideshow Gallery.This issue affects Slideshow Gallery: from n/a through 1.7.8.",
"id": "GHSA-9jcr-hrfg-4r79",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:34:38Z",
"published": "2024-04-12T15:37:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31354"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/slideshow-gallery/wordpress-slideshow-gallery-lite-plugin-1-7-8-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9JG4-FXWC-3F69
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-16 21:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kelvin Ng Shortcode in Comment allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Shortcode in Comment: from n/a through 1.1.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-23569"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-16T20:15:40Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kelvin Ng Shortcode in Comment allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Shortcode in Comment: from n/a through 1.1.1.",
"id": "GHSA-9jg4-fxwc-3f69",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:33:12Z",
"published": "2025-01-16T21:31:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-23569"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/shortcode-in-comment/vulnerability/wordpress-shortcode-in-comment-plugin-1-1-1-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9JH7-R88X-QX8F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-16 09:30 – Updated: 2024-10-16 09:30The WP Lead Plus X plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.99. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform administrative actions, such as adding pages to the site and/or replacing site content with malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-36839"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-16T07:15:09Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The WP Lead Plus X plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.99. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform administrative actions, such as adding pages to the site and/or replacing site content with malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-9jh7-r88x-qx8f",
"modified": "2024-10-16T09:30:30Z",
"published": "2024-10-16T09:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36839"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/free-sales-funnel-squeeze-pages-landing-page-builder-templates-make/#developers"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2020/04/critical-vulnerabilities-in-the-wp-lead-plus-x-wordpress-plugin"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/ddb97db0-cbf3-42be-a5c7-12fc2a2bc9e8?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9JH8-CC8H-44V2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-01 00:00 – Updated: 2022-03-17 00:04The Customize WordPress Emails and Alerts WordPress plugin before 1.8.7 does not have authorisation and CSRF check in its bnfw_search_users AJAX action, allowing any authenticated users to call it and query for user e-mail prefixes (finding the first letter, then the second one, then the third one etc.).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-0345"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200",
"CWE-352",
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-02-28T09:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Customize WordPress Emails and Alerts WordPress plugin before 1.8.7 does not have authorisation and CSRF check in its bnfw_search_users AJAX action, allowing any authenticated users to call it and query for user e-mail prefixes (finding the first letter, then the second one, then the third one etc.).",
"id": "GHSA-9jh8-cc8h-44v2",
"modified": "2022-03-17T00:04:55Z",
"published": "2022-03-01T00:00:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0345"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/b3b523b9-6c92-4091-837a-d34e3174eb19"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9JJ4-X4F9-C6PQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-13 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Pukhraj Suthar Simple Responsive Menu allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Simple Responsive Menu: from n/a through 2.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-26543"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-13T14:16:19Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Pukhraj Suthar Simple Responsive Menu allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Simple Responsive Menu: from n/a through 2.1.",
"id": "GHSA-9jj4-x4f9-c6pq",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:33:37Z",
"published": "2025-02-13T15:31:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-26543"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/simple-responsive-menu/vulnerability/wordpress-simple-responsive-menu-plugin-2-1-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9JJ7-CH3R-H65G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:15 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:15An issue was discovered in Concrete CMS through 8.5.5. The Calendar is vulnerable to CSRF. ccm_token is not verified on the ccm/calendar/dialogs/event/add/save endpoint.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-40108"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-09-27T13:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in Concrete CMS through 8.5.5. The Calendar is vulnerable to CSRF. ccm_token is not verified on the ccm/calendar/dialogs/event/add/save endpoint.",
"id": "GHSA-9jj7-ch3r-h65g",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:15:51Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:15:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-40108"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/1102018"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://documentation.concretecms.org/developers/introduction/version-history/856-release-notes"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.