CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14186 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-9MJH-488M-QP5F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-06 12:30 – Updated: 2026-03-06 12:30QuickCMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery across multiple endpoints. An attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the victim, will automatically send a POST request with victim's privileges. This software does not implement any protection against this type of attack. All forms available in this software are potentially vulnerable.
The vendor was notified early about this vulnerability, but didn't respond with the details of vulnerability or vulnerable version range. Only version 6.8 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable, other versions were not tested and might also be vulnerable.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-1468"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-06T11:16:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "QuickCMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery across multiple endpoints. An attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the victim, will automatically send a POST request with victim\u0027s privileges.\nThis software does not implement any protection against this type of attack. All forms available in this software are potentially vulnerable.\n\nThe vendor was notified early about this vulnerability, but didn\u0027t respond with the details of vulnerability or vulnerable version range. Only version 6.8 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable, other versions were not tested and might also be vulnerable.",
"id": "GHSA-9mjh-488m-qp5f",
"modified": "2026-03-06T12:30:31Z",
"published": "2026-03-06T12:30:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-1468"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert.pl/posts/2026/03/CVE-2026-1468"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://opensolution.org/cms-system-quick-cms.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-9MQ4-R9RH-XMC7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-12 15:37 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:34Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in aerin Loan Repayment Calculator and Application Form.This issue affects Loan Repayment Calculator and Application Form: from n/a through 2.9.4.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-31263"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-12T13:15:16Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in aerin Loan Repayment Calculator and Application Form.This issue affects Loan Repayment Calculator and Application Form: from n/a through 2.9.4.",
"id": "GHSA-9mq4-r9rh-xmc7",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:34:37Z",
"published": "2024-04-12T15:37:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31263"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/quick-interest-slider/wordpress-loan-repayment-calculator-and-application-form-plugin-2-9-4-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9MQF-3PQW-75GF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-20 09:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 08:50The BEAR for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.1.3.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the woobe_bulkoperations_delete function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-4923"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-10-20T08:15:12Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The BEAR for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.1.3.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the woobe_bulkoperations_delete function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-9mqf-3pqw-75gf",
"modified": "2024-04-04T08:50:44Z",
"published": "2023-10-20T09:30:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-4923"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/woo-bulk-editor/trunk/ext/bulkoperations/bulkoperations.php#L344"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2970262/woo-bulk-editor/trunk/ext/bulkoperations/bulkoperations.php?contextall=1\u0026old=2844667\u0026old_path=%2Fwoo-bulk-editor%2Ftrunk%2Fext%2Fbulkoperations%2Fbulkoperations.php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/7a4db03d-ec40-4145-aa95-fee78bda5205?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9MVG-27JR-H6M8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-05 00:29 – Updated: 2023-04-26 21:30{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-7053"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-02-04T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "D-Link DIR-100 4.03B07: cli.cgi CSRF",
"id": "GHSA-9mvg-27jr-h6m8",
"modified": "2023-04-26T21:30:30Z",
"published": "2022-05-05T00:29:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-7053"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/90905"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/65290/info"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://pigstarter.krebsco.de/report/2013-12-18_dir100.txt"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9MVG-93CF-893Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-03 12:34 – Updated: 2025-07-03 12:34The application is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery. An attacker can trick a valid, logged in user into submitting a web request that they did not intend. The request uses the victim's browser's saved authorization to execute the request.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-27454"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-03T12:15:23Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The application is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery. An attacker can trick a valid, logged in user into submitting a web request that they did not intend. The request uses the victim\u0027s browser\u0027s saved authorization to execute the request.",
"id": "GHSA-9mvg-93cf-893q",
"modified": "2025-07-03T12:34:58Z",
"published": "2025-07-03T12:34:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-27454"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sick.com/psirt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/ics-recommended-practices"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.endress.com"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.sick.com/.well-known/csaf/white/2025/sca-2025-0008.json"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.sick.com/.well-known/csaf/white/2025/sca-2025-0008.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9MVM-3JHF-4G7G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-23 03:30 – Updated: 2022-11-23 21:30A remote attacker can conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on OPTILINK OP-XT71000N Hardware Version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the "mgm_config_file.asp" because of which attacker can create a crafted "csrf form" which sends " malicious xml data" to "/boaform/admin/formMgmConfigUpload". the exploit allows attacker to "gain full privileges" and to "fully compromise of router & network".
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-23585"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-11-23T01:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A remote attacker can conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on OPTILINK OP-XT71000N Hardware Version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the \"mgm_config_file.asp\" because of which attacker can create a crafted \"csrf form\" which sends \" malicious xml data\" to \"/boaform/admin/formMgmConfigUpload\". the exploit allows attacker to \"gain full privileges\" and to \"fully compromise of router \u0026 network\".",
"id": "GHSA-9mvm-3jhf-4g7g",
"modified": "2022-11-23T21:30:32Z",
"published": "2022-11-23T03:30:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-23585"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/huzaifahussain98/CVE-2020-23585"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9MW4-FP5G-PCJ4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:28 – Updated: 2026-07-05 00:31Spiceworks Version <= 7.5.00107 is affected by CSRF which can lead to privilege escalation via "/settings/v1/users" function.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-23451"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-09-15T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Spiceworks Version \u003c= 7.5.00107 is affected by CSRF which can lead to privilege escalation via \"/settings/v1/users\" function.",
"id": "GHSA-9mw4-fp5g-pcj4",
"modified": "2026-07-05T00:31:13Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:28:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-23451"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://abuyv.com/cve/spiceworks-csrf-via-xss"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://spiceworks.com"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9P3G-WG4V-GP67
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-05 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:36Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in reimund Compact Admin allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Compact Admin: from n/a through 1.3.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-58865"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-05T14:16:02Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in reimund Compact Admin allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Compact Admin: from n/a through 1.3.0.",
"id": "GHSA-9p3g-wg4v-gp67",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:36:06Z",
"published": "2025-09-05T15:31:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-58865"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/compact-admin/vulnerability/wordpress-compact-admin-plugin-1-3-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9P3X-62Q9-WF32
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-11-09 21:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in LOKALYZE CALL ME NOW plugin <= 3.0 versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-32602"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-11-09T21:15:24Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in LOKALYZE CALL ME NOW plugin \u003c=\u00a03.0 versions.",
"id": "GHSA-9p3x-62q9-wf32",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:33:05Z",
"published": "2023-11-09T21:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-32602"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/lokalyze-call-now/vulnerability/wordpress-call-me-now-plugin-3-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/lokalyze-call-now/wordpress-call-me-now-plugin-3-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9P4J-GV3H-8Q29
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:57 – Updated: 2023-02-16 03:30A vulnerability in the web-based interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (SME), Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM and Presence (Unified CM IM&P) Service, and Cisco Unity Connection could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections by the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a targeted user to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary requests that could change the password of a targeted user. An attacker could then take unauthorized actions on behalf of the targeted user.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-1915"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-10-02T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability in the web-based interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (SME), Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM and Presence (Unified CM IM\u0026amp;P) Service, and Cisco Unity Connection could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections by the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a targeted user to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary requests that could change the password of a targeted user. An attacker could then take unauthorized actions on behalf of the targeted user.",
"id": "GHSA-9p4j-gv3h-8q29",
"modified": "2023-02-16T03:30:29Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:57:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-1915"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20191002-cucm-csrf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.