Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-352

Allowed

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable

The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.

14157 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-F4FW-RJ48-WJ4Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:39 – Updated: 2025-04-11 04:04
VLAI
Details

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wlcms-plugin.php in the White Label CMS plugin before 1.5.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify the developer name via the wlcms_o_developer_name parameter in a save action to wp-admin/admin.php, as demonstrated by a developer name containing XSS sequences.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2012-5387"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-10-24T17:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wlcms-plugin.php in the White Label CMS plugin before 1.5.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify the developer name via the wlcms_o_developer_name parameter in a save action to wp-admin/admin.php, as demonstrated by a developer name containing XSS sequences.",
  "id": "GHSA-f4fw-rj48-wj4q",
  "modified": "2025-04-11T04:04:19Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:39:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-5387"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79520"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/86568"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.org/files/117590/White-Label-CMS-1.5-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery-Cross-Site-Scripting.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/white-label-cms/changelog"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/22156"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56166"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-F4HJ-3P7W-26GM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-06-06 03:30 – Updated: 2023-06-06 03:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in RealFaviconGenerator Favicon Plugin up to 1.2.12 on WordPress. This affects the function install_new_favicon of the file admin/class-favicon-by-realfavicongenerator-admin.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 1.2.13 is able to address this issue. The identifier of the patch is 949a1ae7216216350458844f50a72f100b56d4e7. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier VDB-230661 was assigned to this vulnerability.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-10116"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-06-06T01:15:40Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in RealFaviconGenerator Favicon Plugin up to 1.2.12 on WordPress. This affects the function install_new_favicon of the file admin/class-favicon-by-realfavicongenerator-admin.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 1.2.13 is able to address this issue. The identifier of the patch is 949a1ae7216216350458844f50a72f100b56d4e7. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier VDB-230661 was assigned to this vulnerability.",
  "id": "GHSA-f4hj-3p7w-26gm",
  "modified": "2023-06-06T03:30:16Z",
  "published": "2023-06-06T03:30:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-10116"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/wp-plugins/favicon-by-realfavicongenerator/commit/949a1ae7216216350458844f50a72f100b56d4e7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.230661"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.230661"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-F4M6-6RF4-XGC8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:58 – Updated: 2025-04-12 13:04
VLAI
Details

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on I-O DATA DEVICE HVL-A2.0, HVL-A3.0, HVL-A4.0, HVL-AT1.0S, HVL-AT2.0, HVL-AT3.0, HVL-AT4.0, HVL-AT2.0A, HVL-AT3.0A, and HVL-AT4.0A devices with firmware before 2.04 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that delete content.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-4845"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2016-09-24T10:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on I-O DATA DEVICE HVL-A2.0, HVL-A3.0, HVL-A4.0, HVL-AT1.0S, HVL-AT2.0, HVL-AT3.0, HVL-AT4.0, HVL-AT2.0A, HVL-AT3.0A, and HVL-AT4.0A devices with firmware before 2.04 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that delete content.",
  "id": "GHSA-f4m6-6rf4-xgc8",
  "modified": "2025-04-12T13:04:32Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T02:58:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-4845"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN35062083/index.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://jvndb.jvn.jp/jvndb/JVNDB-2016-000134"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.iodata.jp/support/information/2016/hvl-a_csrf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92352"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-F4V6-GQ8W-JR5Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:33 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:33
VLAI
Details

IBM Application Performance Management - Response Time Monitoring Agent (IBM Monitoring 8.1.4) is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 139598.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-1442"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-03-08T16:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "IBM Application Performance Management - Response Time Monitoring Agent (IBM Monitoring 8.1.4) is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 139598.",
  "id": "GHSA-f4v6-gq8w-jr5q",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:33:17Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:33:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-1442"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/139598"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22013500"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103368"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-F4VF-79GP-P96V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-12 15:31 – Updated: 2024-04-04 08:35
VLAI
Details

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Igor Buyanov WP Power Stats plugin <= 2.2.3 versions.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-45011"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-10-12T13:15:10Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Igor Buyanov WP Power Stats plugin \u003c=\u00a02.2.3 versions.",
  "id": "GHSA-f4vf-79gp-p96v",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T08:35:23Z",
  "published": "2023-10-12T15:31:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-45011"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/wp-power-stats/wordpress-wp-power-stats-plugin-2-2-3-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-F4W6-V8VF-9R8V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-13 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:33
VLAI
Details

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kunal Shivale Global Meta Keyword & Description allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Global Meta Keyword & Description: from n/a through 2.3.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-26550"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-13T14:16:20Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kunal Shivale Global Meta Keyword \u0026 Description allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Global Meta Keyword \u0026 Description: from n/a through 2.3.",
  "id": "GHSA-f4w6-v8vf-9r8v",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T18:33:37Z",
  "published": "2025-02-13T15:31:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-26550"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/global-meta-keyword-and-description/vulnerability/wordpress-global-meta-keyword-description-plugin-2-3-csrf-to-cross-site-scripting-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-F4X4-CPMC-GHQ4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-07 12:00 – Updated: 2022-11-10 12:01
VLAI
Details

The WP Hide WordPress plugin through 0.0.2 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks in place when updating the custom_wpadmin_slug settings, allowing unauthenticated attackers to update it with a crafted request

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-3489"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-11-07T10:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The WP Hide WordPress plugin through 0.0.2 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks in place when updating the custom_wpadmin_slug settings, allowing unauthenticated attackers to update it with a crafted request",
  "id": "GHSA-f4x4-cpmc-ghq4",
  "modified": "2022-11-10T12:01:04Z",
  "published": "2022-11-07T12:00:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-3489"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/36d78b6c-0da5-44f8-b7b3-eae78edac505"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-F524-3Q83-83V9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:46 – Updated: 2025-04-09 03:54
VLAI
Details

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the WHM interface 11.15.0 for cPanel 11.18 before 11.18.4 and 11.22 before 11.22.3 allow remote attackers to perform unauthorized actions as cPanel administrators via requests to cpanel/whm/webmail and other unspecified vectors.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2008-2071"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2008-05-12T16:20:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the WHM interface 11.15.0 for cPanel 11.18 before 11.18.4 and 11.22 before 11.22.3 allow remote attackers to perform unauthorized actions as cPanel administrators via requests to cpanel/whm/webmail and other unspecified vectors.",
  "id": "GHSA-f524-3q83-83v9",
  "modified": "2025-04-09T03:54:22Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T23:46:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-2071"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/42306"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://changelog.cpanel.net/?revision=0%3Btree=%3Btreeview=%3Bshow=html%3Bpp=25%3Bte=1314%3Bpg=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://changelog.cpanel.net/?revision=0;tree=;treeview=;show=html;pp=25;te=1314;pg=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2008-May/062197.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30166"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3866"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/491864/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29125"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1522/references"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-F54P-X8GH-X27V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-26 09:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:36
VLAI
Details

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Shahjada Download Manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Download Manager: from n/a through 3.3.24.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-60093"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-26T09:15:34Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Shahjada Download Manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Download Manager: from n/a through 3.3.24.",
  "id": "GHSA-f54p-x8gh-x27v",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T18:36:21Z",
  "published": "2025-09-26T09:31:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-60093"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/download-manager/vulnerability/wordpress-download-manager-plugin-3-3-24-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-F56Q-M7XC-R227

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:30 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:30
VLAI
Details

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Contact Form Fields module before 6.x-2.3 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete fields via unspecified vectors.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-3363"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-04-21T16:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Contact Form Fields module before 6.x-2.3 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that delete fields via unspecified vectors.",
  "id": "GHSA-f56q-m7xc-r227",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:30:21Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:30:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-3363"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.drupal.org/node/2407147"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.drupal.org/node/2407357"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/01/29/6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72118"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

Mitigation MIT-4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
  • For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
  • Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Implementation

Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
  • When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
  • Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
  • This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.

Mitigation
Implementation

Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.

CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)

An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.

CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing

An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.

CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification

An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).

CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery

An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.