CWE-444
AllowedInconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination.
674 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-JRPM-956J-96JG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-15 20:01 – Updated: 2026-09-15 20:01Summary
Ember's chunk decoder parses the size token leniently: it strips leading and trailing whitespace and accepts a leading + or - sign. RFC9112 §7.1 defines chunk-size = 1*HEXDIG. An intermediary that parses the chunk boundary differently (or rejects it) will disagree with Ember on request framing, enabling HTTP request smuggling (TE.TE).
Impact
Server
Request smuggling (TE.TE) when ember-server is an origin behind an intermediary that forwards the body verbatim but interprets the malformed chunk sizes differently
- Front-end security bypass: the smuggled request reaches paths the intermediary might have blocked, with attacker-chosen method and headers.
- Cache poisoning: the smuggled response is associated with the next request key in a caching proxy.
- Request queue hijack:
Client
ember-client has the same leniencies on the response path, which enables response smuggling when http4s is used as a gateway. This is less severe, as it requires a malicious or compromised upstream rather than an anonymous remote client.
Preconditions
- Unauthenticated remote attacker (server)
- ember-server as origin behind a keep-alive intermediary
- Malicious or compromised upstream (client)
- Intermediary or upstream forwards chunked bodies without re-encoding and disagrees with Ember on
+prefix,-prefix, or leading and trailing octets rather than rejecting.
Workarounds
- Intermediary strictly rejects malformed chunk sizes
- Intermediary buffers and re-encodes request bodies
References
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.23.34"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_2.12"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.23.35"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.23.34"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_2.13"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.23.35"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.23.34"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.23.35"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.0.0-M46"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_2.13"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0-M1"
},
{
"fixed": "1.0.0-M47"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.0.0-M46"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0-M1"
},
{
"fixed": "1.0.0-M47"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-69216"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-444"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-15T20:01:00Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nEmber\u0027s chunk decoder parses the size token leniently: it strips leading and trailing whitespace and accepts a leading `+` or `-` sign. RFC9112 \u00a77.1 defines `chunk-size = 1*HEXDIG`. An intermediary that parses the chunk boundary differently (or rejects it) will disagree with Ember on request framing, enabling HTTP request smuggling (TE.TE).\n\n## Impact\n\n### Server\n\nRequest smuggling (TE.TE) when ember-server is an origin behind an intermediary that forwards the body verbatim but interprets the malformed chunk sizes differently\n\n- Front-end security bypass: the smuggled request reaches paths the intermediary might have blocked, with attacker-chosen method and headers.\n- Cache poisoning: the smuggled response is associated with the next request key in a caching proxy.\n- Request queue hijack:\n\n### Client\n\nember-client has the same leniencies on the response path, which enables response smuggling when http4s is used as a gateway. This is less severe, as it requires a malicious or compromised upstream rather than an anonymous remote client.\n\n## Preconditions\n\n- Unauthenticated remote attacker (server)\n- ember-server as origin behind a keep-alive intermediary\n- Malicious or compromised upstream (client)\n- Intermediary or upstream forwards chunked bodies without re-encoding and disagrees with Ember on `+` prefix, `-` prefix, or leading and trailing octets rather than rejecting.\n\n## Workarounds\n\n- Intermediary strictly rejects malformed chunk sizes\n- Intermediary buffers and re-encodes request bodies\n\n## References\n\n- [RFC9112 \u00a77.1: Chunked Transfer Coding](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112.html#name-chunked-transfer-coding)",
"id": "GHSA-jrpm-956j-96jg",
"modified": "2026-09-15T20:01:00Z",
"published": "2026-09-15T20:01:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/http4s/http4s/security/advisories/GHSA-jrpm-956j-96jg"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/http4s/http4s/commit/d78612a5abd5a2547487598d3342be05573e16f0"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/http4s/http4s"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/http4s/http4s/releases/tag/v0.23.35"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/http4s/http4s/releases/tag/v1.0.0-M47"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Http4s: Ember chunk parser lenience (TE.TE request smuggling)"
}
GHSA-JW78-2435-W3R6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:10 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:10Belledonne Belle-sip before 4.5.20, as used in Linphone and other products, can crash via an invalid From header in a SIP message.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-33056"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-444"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Belledonne Belle-sip before 4.5.20, as used in Linphone and other products, can crash via an invalid From header in a SIP message.",
"id": "GHSA-jw78-2435-w3r6",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:10:48Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:10:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-33056"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/BelledonneCommunications/belle-sip/commit/116e3eb48fe43ea63eb9f3c4b4b30c48d58d6ff0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/BelledonneCommunications/belle-sip/compare/4.5.15...4.5.20"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-JX9R-X782-9R4M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-20 12:32 – Updated: 2025-03-20 12:32HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability in netease-youdao/qanything version 1.4.1 allows attackers to exploit inconsistencies in the interpretation of HTTP requests between a proxy and a server. This can lead to unauthorized access, bypassing security controls, session hijacking, data leakage, and potentially arbitrary code execution.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-10264"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-444"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-20T10:15:15Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability in netease-youdao/qanything version 1.4.1 allows attackers to exploit inconsistencies in the interpretation of HTTP requests between a proxy and a server. This can lead to unauthorized access, bypassing security controls, session hijacking, data leakage, and potentially arbitrary code execution.",
"id": "GHSA-jx9r-x782-9r4m",
"modified": "2025-03-20T12:32:38Z",
"published": "2025-03-20T12:32:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-10264"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/988247d5-fd60-4d85-845a-e867d62c0d02"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-M3HQ-GRV6-H853
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-14 19:00 – Updated: 2022-10-18 19:00Requests forwarded by ReverseProxy include the raw query parameters from the inbound request, including unparseable parameters rejected by net/http. This could permit query parameter smuggling when a Go proxy forwards a parameter with an unparseable value. After fix, ReverseProxy sanitizes the query parameters in the forwarded query when the outbound request's Form field is set after the ReverseProxy. Director function returns, indicating that the proxy has parsed the query parameters. Proxies which do not parse query parameters continue to forward the original query parameters unchanged.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-2880"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-444"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-10-14T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Requests forwarded by ReverseProxy include the raw query parameters from the inbound request, including unparseable parameters rejected by net/http. This could permit query parameter smuggling when a Go proxy forwards a parameter with an unparseable value. After fix, ReverseProxy sanitizes the query parameters in the forwarded query when the outbound request\u0027s Form field is set after the ReverseProxy. Director function returns, indicating that the proxy has parsed the query parameters. Proxies which do not parse query parameters continue to forward the original query parameters unchanged.",
"id": "GHSA-m3hq-grv6-h853",
"modified": "2022-10-18T19:00:31Z",
"published": "2022-10-14T19:00:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2880"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://go.dev/cl/432976"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://go.dev/issue/54663"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/xtuG5faxtaU"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/THKJHFMX4DAZXJ5MFPN3BNHZDN7BW5RI"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2022-1038"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202311-09"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oxeye.io/blog/golang-parameter-smuggling-attack"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-M454-3XV7-QJ85
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-12 03:41 – Updated: 2025-04-23 15:06Impact
When using the ch-go library, under a specific condition when the query includes a large, uncompressed malicious external data, it is possible for an attacker in control of such data to smuggle another query packet into the connection stream.
Patches
If you are using ch-go library, we recommend you to update to at least version 0.65.0.
Credit
This issue was found by lixts and reported through our bugcrowd program.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/ClickHouse/ch-go"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.65.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-1386"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-444"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-04-12T03:41:21Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-11T05:15:29Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nWhen using the ch-go library, under a specific condition when the query includes a large, uncompressed malicious external data, it is possible for an attacker in control of such data to smuggle another query packet into the connection stream.\n\n### Patches\n\nIf you are using ch-go library, we recommend you to update to at least version 0.65.0.\n\n### Credit\n\nThis issue was found by lixts and reported through our bugcrowd program.",
"id": "GHSA-m454-3xv7-qj85",
"modified": "2025-04-23T15:06:50Z",
"published": "2025-04-12T03:41:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ClickHouse/ch-go/security/advisories/GHSA-m454-3xv7-qj85"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-1386"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ClickHouse/ch-go/commit/0e835663df32b09b828528c07a5507686e6d975e"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/ClickHouse/ch-go"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-3603"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "CVE-2025-1386- Query smuggling in ch-go library"
}
GHSA-M4CV-J2PX-7723
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-07 00:13 – Updated: 2026-05-14 20:41Summary
Netty's chunk size parser silently overflows int, enabling request smuggling attacks.
Details
io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpObjectDecoder#getChunkSize silently overflows int.
The size is accumulated as follows:
result *= 16; result += digit;
The result is checked only for negative values. However, with a carefully crafted chunk size, the result can be a valid size.
PoC
The test below shows Netty successfully parsing the second request, demonstrating how an attacker can smuggle a second request inside a chunked body.
@Test
public void test() {
String requestStr = "POST / HTTP/1.1\r\n" +
"Host: localhost\r\n" +
"Transfer-Encoding: chunked\r\n\r\n" +
"100000004\r\n" +
"test\r\n" +
"0\r\n" +
"\r\n" +
"GET /smuggled HTTP/1.1\r\n" +
"Host: localhost\r\n" +
"Content-Length: 0\r\n" +
"\r\n";
EmbeddedChannel channel = new EmbeddedChannel(new HttpRequestDecoder());
assertTrue(channel.writeInbound(Unpooled.copiedBuffer(requestStr, CharsetUtil.US_ASCII)));
// Request 1
HttpRequest request = channel.readInbound();
assertTrue(request.decoderResult().isSuccess());
HttpContent content = channel.readInbound();
assertTrue(content.decoderResult().isSuccess());
assertEquals("test", content.content().toString(CharsetUtil.US_ASCII));
content.release();
LastHttpContent last = channel.readInbound();
assertTrue(last.decoderResult().isSuccess());
last.release();
// Request 2
request = channel.readInbound();
assertTrue(request.decoderResult().isSuccess());
last = channel.readInbound();
assertTrue(last.decoderResult().isSuccess());
last.release();
}
Impact
HTTP Request Smuggling: Attacker injects arbitrary HTTP requests
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.2.12.Final"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "io.netty:netty-codec-http"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.2.0.Alpha1"
},
{
"fixed": "4.2.13.Final"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.1.132.Final"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "io.netty:netty-codec-http"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.1.133.Final"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42580"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-190",
"CWE-444"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-07T00:13:05Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-13T19:17:23Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\nNetty\u0027s chunk size parser silently overflows int, enabling request smuggling attacks.\n\n### Details\nio.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpObjectDecoder#getChunkSize silently overflows int.\n\nThe size is accumulated as follows:\n\nresult *= 16;\nresult += digit;\n\nThe result is checked only for negative values. However, with a carefully crafted chunk size, the result can be a valid size.\n\n### PoC\nThe test below shows Netty successfully parsing the second request, demonstrating how an attacker can smuggle a second request inside a chunked body.\n\n```java\n@Test\npublic void test() {\n String requestStr = \"POST / HTTP/1.1\\r\\n\" +\n \"Host: localhost\\r\\n\" +\n \"Transfer-Encoding: chunked\\r\\n\\r\\n\" +\n \"100000004\\r\\n\" +\n \"test\\r\\n\" +\n \"0\\r\\n\" +\n \"\\r\\n\" +\n \"GET /smuggled HTTP/1.1\\r\\n\" +\n \"Host: localhost\\r\\n\" +\n \"Content-Length: 0\\r\\n\" +\n \"\\r\\n\";\n\n EmbeddedChannel channel = new EmbeddedChannel(new HttpRequestDecoder());\n assertTrue(channel.writeInbound(Unpooled.copiedBuffer(requestStr, CharsetUtil.US_ASCII)));\n\n // Request 1\n HttpRequest request = channel.readInbound();\n assertTrue(request.decoderResult().isSuccess());\n HttpContent content = channel.readInbound();\n assertTrue(content.decoderResult().isSuccess());\n assertEquals(\"test\", content.content().toString(CharsetUtil.US_ASCII));\n content.release();\n LastHttpContent last = channel.readInbound();\n assertTrue(last.decoderResult().isSuccess());\n last.release();\n\n // Request 2\n request = channel.readInbound();\n assertTrue(request.decoderResult().isSuccess());\n last = channel.readInbound();\n assertTrue(last.decoderResult().isSuccess());\n last.release();\n}\n```\n\n### Impact\nHTTP Request Smuggling: Attacker injects arbitrary HTTP requests",
"id": "GHSA-m4cv-j2px-7723",
"modified": "2026-05-14T20:41:01Z",
"published": "2026-05-07T00:13:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-m4cv-j2px-7723"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42580"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/netty/netty"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Netty vulnerable to HTTP Request Smuggling due to incorrect chunk size parsing"
}
GHSA-M56V-PQJG-V632
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-01 21:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 21:30IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 IBM Security Verify could allow a remote attacker to access sensitive information due to an inconsistent interpretation of an HTTP request by a reverse proxy.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-1491"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-444"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-01T21:16:58Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 IBM Security Verify could allow a remote attacker to access sensitive information due to an inconsistent interpretation of an HTTP request by a reverse proxy.",
"id": "GHSA-m56v-pqjg-v632",
"modified": "2026-04-01T21:30:31Z",
"published": "2026-04-01T21:30:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-1491"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7268253"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-M5FF-3WJ3-8PH4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2019-12-26 16:34 – Updated: 2019-12-26 16:34Impact
If a proxy server is used in front of waitress, an invalid request may be sent by an attacker that bypasses the front-end and is parsed differently by waitress leading to a potential for HTTP request smuggling.
Content-Length: 10
Transfer-Encoding: [\x0b]chunked
For clarity:
0x0b == vertical tab
Would get parsed by Waitress as being a chunked request, but a front-end server would use the Content-Length instead as the Transfer-Encoding header is considered invalid due to containing invalid characters.
If a front-end server does HTTP pipelining to a backend Waitress server this could lead to HTTP request splitting which may lead to potential cache poisoning or unexpected information disclosure.
Patches
Please upgrade to Waitress 1.4.1 which fixes this issue with stricter HTTP field validation.
Waitress 1.4.1 due to this change has become much more strict in what is allowed in header values, while the maintainers don't believe that these changes will cause any issues, it may cause failures with non-conformist reverse proxies or clients, and it is highly recommend that users validate the changes in their environment and make sure it won't cause any unacceptable failures.
Workarounds
You may enable additional protections on front-end servers, those that follow RFC7230 correctly would drop the request with a 400 Bad Request.
Waitress will now correctly responds to the request with a 400 Bad Request, and will drop the connection to avoid any potential HTTP pipelining issues.
References
This was mentioned in https://portswigger.net/research/http-desync-attacks-what-happened-next and was specifically mentioned as being an issue in HAProxy which did not properly filter it in this article: https://nathandavison.com/blog/haproxy-http-request-smuggling
Thanks
The Pylons Project would like to thank ZeddYu Lu for doing extended testing against Waitress 1.4.0 and bringing this to our attention!
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- open an issue at https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/issues (if not sensitive or security related)
- email the Pylons Security mailing list: pylons-project-security@googlegroups.com (if security related)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "waitress"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.4.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-444"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2019-12-26T16:34:06Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nIf a proxy server is used in front of waitress, an invalid request may be sent by an attacker that bypasses the front-end and is parsed differently by waitress leading to a potential for HTTP request smuggling.\n\n```\nContent-Length: 10\nTransfer-Encoding: [\\x0b]chunked\n```\n\nFor clarity:\n\n```\n0x0b == vertical tab\n```\n\nWould get parsed by Waitress as being a `chunked` request, but a front-end server would use the `Content-Length` instead as the `Transfer-Encoding` header is considered invalid due to containing invalid characters.\n\nIf a front-end server does HTTP pipelining to a backend Waitress server this could lead to HTTP request splitting which may lead to potential cache poisoning or unexpected information disclosure.\n\n### Patches\n\nPlease upgrade to Waitress 1.4.1 which fixes this issue with stricter HTTP field validation.\n\nWaitress 1.4.1 due to this change has become much more strict in what is allowed in header values, while the maintainers don\u0027t believe that these changes will cause any issues, it may cause failures with non-conformist reverse proxies or clients, and it is highly recommend that users validate the changes in their environment and make sure it won\u0027t cause any unacceptable failures.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nYou may enable additional protections on front-end servers, those that follow RFC7230 correctly would drop the request with a 400 Bad Request.\n\nWaitress will now correctly responds to the request with a 400 Bad Request, and will drop the connection to avoid any potential HTTP pipelining issues.\n\n### References\n\nThis was mentioned in https://portswigger.net/research/http-desync-attacks-what-happened-next and was specifically mentioned as being an issue in HAProxy which did not properly filter it in this article: https://nathandavison.com/blog/haproxy-http-request-smuggling\n\n### Thanks\n\nThe Pylons Project would like to thank ZeddYu Lu for doing extended testing against Waitress 1.4.0 and bringing this to our attention!\n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\n* open an issue at https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/issues (if not sensitive or security related)\n* email the Pylons Security mailing list: pylons-project-security@googlegroups.com (if security related)",
"id": "GHSA-m5ff-3wj3-8ph4",
"modified": "2019-12-26T16:34:06Z",
"published": "2019-12-26T16:34:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/security/advisories/GHSA-m5ff-3wj3-8ph4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Pylons/waitress/commit/11d9e138125ad46e951027184b13242a3c1de017"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "HTTP Request Smuggling: Invalid whitespace characters in headers in Waitress"
}
GHSA-M6M2-J477-JFG8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:06 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:06Incorrect handling of url fragment vulnerability of Apache Traffic Server allows an attacker to poison the cache. This issue affects Apache Traffic Server 7.0.0 to 7.1.12, 8.0.0 to 8.1.1, 9.0.0 to 9.0.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-27577"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-444"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-06-29T12:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Incorrect handling of url fragment vulnerability of Apache Traffic Server allows an attacker to poison the cache. This issue affects Apache Traffic Server 7.0.0 to 7.1.12, 8.0.0 to 8.1.1, 9.0.0 to 9.0.1.",
"id": "GHSA-m6m2-j477-jfg8",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:06:34Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:06:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27577"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra1a41ff92a70d25bf576d7da2590575e8ff430393a3f4a0c34de4277%40%3Cusers.trafficserver.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4957"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-M9F2-W9FV-J46G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-15 15:31 – Updated: 2024-07-15 15:31This vulnerability allows a high-privileged authenticated PAM user to achieve remote command execution on the affected PAM system by sending a specially crafted HTTP request.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-38494"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-444"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-15T14:15:03Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "This vulnerability allows a high-privileged authenticated PAM user to achieve remote command execution on the affected PAM system by sending a specially crafted HTTP request.",
"id": "GHSA-m9f2-w9fv-j46g",
"modified": "2024-07-15T15:31:00Z",
"published": "2024-07-15T15:31:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38494"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/24678"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Mitigation
Use a web server that employs a strict HTTP parsing procedure, such as Apache [REF-433].
Mitigation
Use only SSL communication.
Mitigation
Terminate the client session after each request.
Mitigation
Turn all pages to non-cacheable.
CAPEC-273: HTTP Response Smuggling
An adversary manipulates and injects malicious content in the form of secret unauthorized HTTP responses, into a single HTTP response from a vulnerable or compromised back-end HTTP agent (e.g., server).
See CanPrecede relationships for possible consequences.
CAPEC-33: HTTP Request Smuggling
An adversary abuses the flexibility and discrepancies in the parsing and interpretation of HTTP Request messages using various HTTP headers, request-line and body parameters as well as message sizes (denoted by the end of message signaled by a given HTTP header) by different intermediary HTTP agents (e.g., load balancer, reverse proxy, web caching proxies, application firewalls, etc.) to secretly send unauthorized and malicious HTTP requests to a back-end HTTP agent (e.g., web server).
See CanPrecede relationships for possible consequences.