CWE-770
AllowedAllocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.
3023 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-99CQ-XR7G-H22W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:48 – Updated: 2023-08-16 15:30Jonathan Looney discovered that the Linux kernel default MSS is hard-coded to 48 bytes. This allows a remote peer to fragment TCP resend queues significantly more than if a larger MSS were enforced. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commits 967c05aee439e6e5d7d805e195b3a20ef5c433d6 and 5f3e2bf008c2221478101ee72f5cb4654b9fc363.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-11479"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-405",
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-06-19T00:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Jonathan Looney discovered that the Linux kernel default MSS is hard-coded to 48 bytes. This allows a remote peer to fragment TCP resend queues significantly more than if a larger MSS were enforced. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commits 967c05aee439e6e5d7d805e195b3a20ef5c433d6 and 5f3e2bf008c2221478101ee72f5cb4654b9fc363.",
"id": "GHSA-99cq-xr7g-h22w",
"modified": "2023-08-16T15:30:16Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:48:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11479"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.us-cert.gov/ics/advisories/icsma-20-170-06"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.us-cert.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-19-253-03"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.synology.com/security/advisory/Synology_SA_19_28"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/905115"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/KnowledgeBase/SACKPanic"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4041-2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4041-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K35421172?utm_source=f5support\u0026amp;utm_medium=RSS"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K35421172"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190625-0001"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2019-0008"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content\u0026id=SB10287"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44193"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Netflix/security-bulletins/blob/master/advisories/third-party/2019-001.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/?id=967c05aee439e6e5d7d805e195b3a20ef5c433d6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/?id=5f3e2bf008c2221478101ee72f5cb4654b9fc363"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-462066.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/tcpsack"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1699"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1602"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1594"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2020-010.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108818"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-99HJ-44VG-HFCP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-27 18:17 – Updated: 2026-03-27 21:47Summary
Fleet contained multiple unauthenticated HTTP endpoints that read request bodies without enforcing a size limit. An unauthenticated attacker could exploit this behavior by sending large or repeated HTTP payloads, causing excessive memory allocation and resulting in a denial-of-service (DoS) condition.
Impact
An unauthenticated attacker could cause the Fleet server process to exhaust available memory and restart by sending oversized or repeated HTTP requests to affected endpoints.
This vulnerability impacts availability only. There is:
- No exposure of sensitive data
- No authentication bypass
- No privilege escalation
- No integrity impact
Workarounds
If upgrading immediately is not possible, the following mitigations can reduce exposure:
- Apply request body size limits at a reverse proxy or load balancer (e.g., NGINX, Envoy).
- Restrict network access to endpoints to known IP ranges where feasible.
- Monitor memory usage and restart frequency for abnormal patterns.
For More Information
If there are any questions or concerns about this advisory, please contact us at:
Email Fleet at security@fleetdm.com
Credits
Fleet thanks @fuzzztf for responsibly reporting this issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/fleetdm/fleet/v4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.43.5-0.20260113202849-bbc1aef2987d"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-26061"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-27T18:17:42Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-27T19:16:42Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nFleet contained multiple unauthenticated HTTP endpoints that read request bodies without enforcing a size limit. An unauthenticated attacker could exploit this behavior by sending large or repeated HTTP payloads, causing excessive memory allocation and resulting in a denial-of-service (DoS) condition.\n\n### Impact\n\nAn unauthenticated attacker could cause the Fleet server process to exhaust available memory and restart by sending oversized or repeated HTTP requests to affected endpoints.\n\nThis vulnerability impacts **availability only**. There is:\n\n- No exposure of sensitive data\n- No authentication bypass\n- No privilege escalation\n- No integrity impact\n\n### Workarounds\n\nIf upgrading immediately is not possible, the following mitigations can reduce exposure:\n\n- Apply request body size limits at a reverse proxy or load balancer (e.g., NGINX, Envoy).\n- Restrict network access to endpoints to known IP ranges where feasible.\n- Monitor memory usage and restart frequency for abnormal patterns.\n\n### For More Information\n\nIf there are any questions or concerns about this advisory, please contact us at:\n\nEmail Fleet at [security@fleetdm.com](mailto:security@fleetdm.com)\n\n### Credits\n\nFleet thanks @fuzzztf for responsibly reporting this issue.",
"id": "GHSA-99hj-44vg-hfcp",
"modified": "2026-03-27T21:47:50Z",
"published": "2026-03-27T18:17:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fleetdm/fleet/security/advisories/GHSA-99hj-44vg-hfcp"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-26061"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/fleetdm/fleet"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Fleet\u0027s unbounded request body read allows remote Denial of Service"
}
GHSA-99J5-XJ2Q-86W3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-06-22 15:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:00An issue in the sql_trans_copy_key component of MonetDB Server v11.45.17 and v11.46.0 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via crafted SQL statements.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-36365"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-06-22T14:15:09Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue in the sql_trans_copy_key component of MonetDB Server v11.45.17 and v11.46.0 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via crafted SQL statements.",
"id": "GHSA-99j5-xj2q-86w3",
"modified": "2024-04-04T05:00:56Z",
"published": "2023-06-22T15:30:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-36365"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/MonetDB/MonetDB/issues/7378"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-99J9-JF36-9747
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-09-15 06:30 – Updated: 2024-04-01 18:30When curl retrieves an HTTP response, it stores the incoming headers so that they can be accessed later via the libcurl headers API.
However, curl did not have a limit in how many or how large headers it would accept in a response, allowing a malicious server to stream an endless series of headers and eventually cause curl to run out of heap memory.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-38039"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-09-15T04:15:10Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "When curl retrieves an HTTP response, it stores the incoming headers so that\nthey can be accessed later via the libcurl headers API.\n\nHowever, curl did not have a limit in how many or how large headers it would\naccept in a response, allowing a malicious server to stream an endless series\nof headers and eventually cause curl to run out of heap memory.",
"id": "GHSA-99j9-jf36-9747",
"modified": "2024-04-01T18:30:55Z",
"published": "2023-09-15T06:30:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-38039"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/2072338"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5DCZMYODALBLVOXVJEN2LF2MLANEYL4F"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/M6KGKB2JNZVT276JYSKI6FV2VFJUGDOJ"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TEAWTYHC3RT6ZRS5OZRHLAIENVN6CCIS"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202310-12"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231013-0005"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/kb/HT214036"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/kb/HT214057"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/kb/HT214058"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.apple.com/kb/HT214063"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.insyde.com/security-pledge/SA-2023064"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Oct/17"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Jan/34"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Jan/37"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Jan/38"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-99JJ-MRWR-6CRM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-10 21:31 – Updated: 2026-02-10 21:31Improper system call parameter validation in the Trusted OS may allow a malicious driver to perform mapping or unmapping operations on a large number of pages, potentially resulting in kernel memory corruption.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-26381"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-10T20:16:41Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Improper system call parameter validation in the Trusted OS may allow a malicious driver to perform mapping or unmapping operations on a large number of pages, potentially resulting in kernel memory corruption.",
"id": "GHSA-99jj-mrwr-6crm",
"modified": "2026-02-10T21:31:30Z",
"published": "2026-02-10T21:31:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26381"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.amd.com/en/resources/product-security/bulletin/AMD-SB-4013.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.amd.com/en/resources/product-security/bulletin/AMD-SB-6024.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-99VC-2JX2-688P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-21 20:35 – Updated: 2026-05-21 20:35Summary
The uploadViaURL path in the v1/v2 attachment API did not enforce NC_ATTACHMENT_FIELD_SIZE against the remote content-length or against the response stream. An authenticated user (Editor+) could direct the server to download arbitrarily large files, exhausting disk space and causing denial of service.
Details
In packages/nocodb/src/services/attachments.service.ts, the HEAD probe read content-length but never compared it to NC_ATTACHMENT_FIELD_SIZE; the subsequent storageAdapter.fileCreateByUrl() performed the download without maxContentLength. The v3 service (v3/data-attachment-v3.service.ts) already enforced the limit, but the v1/v2 endpoints (POST /api/v1/db/storage/upload-by-url, POST /api/v2/storage/upload-by-url) did not.
This is distinct from GHSA-xr7v-j379-34v9 (blind SSRF via HEAD) — same code area, different class.
Impact
- Authenticated DoS via disk exhaustion. Editor role suffices.
- Cascading failures once disk fills: blocked DB writes, log rotation, application crash.
Credit
This issue was reported by @ik0z.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "nocodb"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "0.301.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-46551"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-21T20:35:41Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nThe `uploadViaURL` path in the v1/v2 attachment API did not enforce `NC_ATTACHMENT_FIELD_SIZE` against the remote `content-length` or against the response stream. An authenticated user (Editor+) could direct the server to download arbitrarily large files, exhausting disk space and causing denial of service.\n\n### Details\n\nIn `packages/nocodb/src/services/attachments.service.ts`, the HEAD probe read `content-length` but never compared it to `NC_ATTACHMENT_FIELD_SIZE`; the subsequent `storageAdapter.fileCreateByUrl()` performed the download without `maxContentLength`. The v3 service (`v3/data-attachment-v3.service.ts`) already enforced the limit, but the v1/v2 endpoints (`POST /api/v1/db/storage/upload-by-url`, `POST /api/v2/storage/upload-by-url`) did not.\n\nThis is distinct from GHSA-xr7v-j379-34v9 (blind SSRF via HEAD) \u2014 same code area, different class.\n\n### Impact\n\n- Authenticated DoS via disk exhaustion. Editor role suffices.\n- Cascading failures once disk fills: blocked DB writes, log rotation, application crash.\n\n### Credit\n\nThis issue was reported by [@ik0z](https://github.com/ik0z).",
"id": "GHSA-99vc-2jx2-688p",
"modified": "2026-05-21T20:35:41Z",
"published": "2026-05-21T20:35:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/security/advisories/GHSA-99vc-2jx2-688p"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "NocoDB: Missing File Size Enforcement in Upload-by-URL Allows Denial of Service via Disk Exhaustion"
}
GHSA-9C34-92QM-J7FF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-12 12:32 – Updated: 2025-06-12 12:32An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 8.13 before 17.10.7, 17.11 before 17.11.3, and 18.0 before 18.0.1. A lack of input validation in Board Names could be used to trigger a denial of service.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-1478"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-12T10:16:28Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 8.13 before 17.10.7, 17.11 before 17.11.3, and 18.0 before 18.0.1. A lack of input validation in Board Names could be used to trigger a denial of service.",
"id": "GHSA-9c34-92qm-j7ff",
"modified": "2025-06-12T12:32:03Z",
"published": "2025-06-12T12:32:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-1478"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/2987444"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/520354"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9C54-X2G4-V92J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-30 18:40 – Updated: 2026-06-30 18:40Impact
An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger unbounded memory growth on the timestamp authority server.
This vulnerability exists because the global wrapMetrics middleware records the raw HTTP request path (r.URL.Path) and raw HTTP request method (r.Method) as Prometheus labels for latency and request count metric vectors. Since this middleware runs before standard routing occurs, it executes for all incoming requests, including those for unmatched paths (yielding 404 responses) or arbitrary request methods. The Prometheus library registers a new, permanent time-series entry for every distinct label combination. An attacker can continuously issue requests containing random paths (e.g., /api/v1/timestamp/<uuid>) or random HTTP methods to exhaust system memory.
Patches
This issue has been patched by limiting the metric label values to a strict allowlist of expected paths (/ping, /api/v1/timestamp, /api/v1/timestamp/certchain) and expected HTTP methods (GET, POST, HEAD, OPTIONS). Unrecognized paths or methods are normalized to a static string ("unrecognized").
Users should update to version v2.0.7 or later.
Workarounds
- Block or drop incoming requests with invalid HTTP methods or unknown request paths at a reverse proxy or load balancer before they reach the timestamp authority server.
- Configure rate-limiting on the public interface to prevent remote attackers from issuing millions of unique requests in a short duration.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.0.6"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority/v2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.1.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "1.2.9"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-49835"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-30T18:40:39Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nAn unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger unbounded memory growth on the timestamp authority server.\n\nThis vulnerability exists because the global `wrapMetrics` middleware records the raw HTTP request path (`r.URL.Path`) and raw HTTP request method (`r.Method`) as Prometheus labels for latency and request count metric vectors. Since this middleware runs before standard routing occurs, it executes for all incoming requests, including those for unmatched paths (yielding 404 responses) or arbitrary request methods. The Prometheus library registers a new, permanent time-series entry for every distinct label combination. An attacker can continuously issue requests containing random paths (e.g., `/api/v1/timestamp/\u003cuuid\u003e`) or random HTTP methods to exhaust system memory.\n\n### Patches\n\nThis issue has been patched by limiting the metric label values to a strict allowlist of expected paths (`/ping`, `/api/v1/timestamp`, `/api/v1/timestamp/certchain`) and expected HTTP methods (`GET`, `POST`, `HEAD`, `OPTIONS`). Unrecognized paths or methods are normalized to a static string (`\"unrecognized\"`).\n\nUsers should update to version `v2.0.7` or later.\n\n### Workarounds\n\n1. Block or drop incoming requests with invalid HTTP methods or unknown request paths at a reverse proxy or load balancer before they reach the timestamp authority server.\n2. Configure rate-limiting on the public interface to prevent remote attackers from issuing millions of unique requests in a short duration.",
"id": "GHSA-9c54-x2g4-v92j",
"modified": "2026-06-30T18:40:39Z",
"published": "2026-06-30T18:40:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority/security/advisories/GHSA-9c54-x2g4-v92j"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Sigstore Timestamp Authority has OOM due to unbounded metric label cardinality"
}
GHSA-9CC6-43CM-MF7X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:52 – Updated: 2022-11-30 21:30It was found that the fix for CVE-2018-14648 in 389-ds-base, versions 1.4.0.x before 1.4.0.17, was incorrectly applied in RHEL 7.5. An attacker would still be able to provoke excessive CPU consumption leading to a denial of service.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-10171"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-08-02T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "It was found that the fix for CVE-2018-14648 in 389-ds-base, versions 1.4.0.x before 1.4.0.17, was incorrectly applied in RHEL 7.5. An attacker would still be able to provoke excessive CPU consumption leading to a denial of service.",
"id": "GHSA-9cc6-43cm-mf7x",
"modified": "2022-11-30T21:30:22Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:52:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-10171"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10171"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9CFV-9463-8GQV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-30 18:43 – Updated: 2024-08-30 18:43Impact
A user could create a large file that freewvs will try to read, which will terminate a scan process.
Patches
This has been patched by limiting the data freewvs reads: https://github.com/schokokeksorg/freewvs/commit/18bbf2043e53f69e0119d24f8ae4edb274afb9b2
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "freewvs"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.1.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-15100"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-08-30T18:43:57Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2020-07-14T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "### Impact\nA user could create a large file that freewvs will try to read, which will terminate a scan process.\n\n### Patches\nThis has been patched by limiting the data freewvs reads:\nhttps://github.com/schokokeksorg/freewvs/commit/18bbf2043e53f69e0119d24f8ae4edb274afb9b2",
"id": "GHSA-9cfv-9463-8gqv",
"modified": "2024-08-30T18:43:58Z",
"published": "2024-08-30T18:43:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/schokokeksorg/freewvs/security/advisories/GHSA-9cfv-9463-8gqv"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15100"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/schokokeksorg/freewvs/commit/18bbf2043e53f69e0119d24f8ae4edb274afb9b2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/freewvs/PYSEC-2020-232.yaml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/schokokeksorg/freewvs"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "freewvs vulnerable to denial of service through large files"
}
Mitigation
Clearly specify the minimum and maximum expectations for capabilities, and dictate which behaviors are acceptable when resource allocation reaches limits.
Mitigation
Limit the amount of resources that are accessible to unprivileged users. Set per-user limits for resources. Allow the system administrator to define these limits. Be careful to avoid CWE-410.
Mitigation
Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place, and it will help the administrator to identify who is committing the abuse. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation MIT-15
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation
- Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:
- The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.
- The second solution can be difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply requires more resources on the part of the attacker.
- recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, typically by using increasing time delays
- uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed.
Mitigation
Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
Mitigation MIT-38.1
- If the program must fail, ensure that it fails gracefully (fails closed). There may be a temptation to simply let the program fail poorly in cases such as low memory conditions, but an attacker may be able to assert control before the software has fully exited. Alternately, an uncontrolled failure could cause cascading problems with other downstream components; for example, the program could send a signal to a downstream process so the process immediately knows that a problem has occurred and has a better chance of recovery.
- Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
Mitigation MIT-47
Strategy: Resource Limitation
- Use quotas or other resource-limiting settings provided by the operating system or environment. For example, when managing system resources in POSIX, setrlimit() can be used to set limits for certain types of resources, and getrlimit() can determine how many resources are available. However, these functions are not available on all operating systems.
- When the current levels get close to the maximum that is defined for the application (see CWE-770), then limit the allocation of further resources to privileged users; alternately, begin releasing resources for less-privileged users. While this mitigation may protect the system from attack, it will not necessarily stop attackers from adversely impacting other users.
- Ensure that the application performs the appropriate error checks and error handling in case resources become unavailable (CWE-703).
CAPEC-125: Flooding
An adversary consumes the resources of a target by rapidly engaging in a large number of interactions with the target. This type of attack generally exposes a weakness in rate limiting or flow. When successful this attack prevents legitimate users from accessing the service and can cause the target to crash. This attack differs from resource depletion through leaks or allocations in that the latter attacks do not rely on the volume of requests made to the target but instead focus on manipulation of the target's operations. The key factor in a flooding attack is the number of requests the adversary can make in a given period of time. The greater this number, the more likely an attack is to succeed against a given target.
CAPEC-130: Excessive Allocation
An adversary causes the target to allocate excessive resources to servicing the attackers' request, thereby reducing the resources available for legitimate services and degrading or denying services. Usually, this attack focuses on memory allocation, but any finite resource on the target could be the attacked, including bandwidth, processing cycles, or other resources. This attack does not attempt to force this allocation through a large number of requests (that would be Resource Depletion through Flooding) but instead uses one or a small number of requests that are carefully formatted to force the target to allocate excessive resources to service this request(s). Often this attack takes advantage of a bug in the target to cause the target to allocate resources vastly beyond what would be needed for a normal request.
CAPEC-147: XML Ping of the Death
An attacker initiates a resource depletion attack where a large number of small XML messages are delivered at a sufficiently rapid rate to cause a denial of service or crash of the target. Transactions such as repetitive SOAP transactions can deplete resources faster than a simple flooding attack because of the additional resources used by the SOAP protocol and the resources necessary to process SOAP messages. The transactions used are immaterial as long as they cause resource utilization on the target. In other words, this is a normal flooding attack augmented by using messages that will require extra processing on the target.
CAPEC-197: Exponential Data Expansion
An adversary submits data to a target application which contains nested exponential data expansion to produce excessively large output. Many data format languages allow the definition of macro-like structures that can be used to simplify the creation of complex structures. However, this capability can be abused to create excessive demands on a processor's CPU and memory. A small number of nested expansions can result in an exponential growth in demands on memory.
CAPEC-229: Serialized Data Parameter Blowup
This attack exploits certain serialized data parsers (e.g., XML, YAML, etc.) which manage data in an inefficient manner. The attacker crafts an serialized data file with multiple configuration parameters in the same dataset. In a vulnerable parser, this results in a denial of service condition where CPU resources are exhausted because of the parsing algorithm. The weakness being exploited is tied to parser implementation and not language specific.
CAPEC-230: Serialized Data with Nested Payloads
Applications often need to transform data in and out of a data format (e.g., XML and YAML) by using a parser. It may be possible for an adversary to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the parser when it is being processed. Many data format languages allow the definition of macro-like structures that can be used to simplify the creation of complex structures. By nesting these structures, causing the data to be repeatedly substituted, an adversary can cause the parser to consume more resources while processing, causing excessive memory consumption and CPU utilization.
CAPEC-231: Oversized Serialized Data Payloads
An adversary injects oversized serialized data payloads into a parser during data processing to produce adverse effects upon the parser such as exhausting system resources and arbitrary code execution.
CAPEC-469: HTTP DoS
An attacker performs flooding at the HTTP level to bring down only a particular web application rather than anything listening on a TCP/IP connection. This denial of service attack requires substantially fewer packets to be sent which makes DoS harder to detect. This is an equivalent of SYN flood in HTTP. The idea is to keep the HTTP session alive indefinitely and then repeat that hundreds of times. This attack targets resource depletion weaknesses in web server software. The web server will wait to attacker's responses on the initiated HTTP sessions while the connection threads are being exhausted.
CAPEC-482: TCP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the TCP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service. These attacks exploit the weakness within the TCP protocol where there is some state information for the connection the server needs to maintain. This often involves the use of TCP SYN messages.
CAPEC-486: UDP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the UDP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming the available network bandwidth. Additionally, firewalls often open a port for each UDP connection destined for a service with an open UDP port, meaning the firewalls in essence save the connection state thus the high packet nature of a UDP flood can also overwhelm resources allocated to the firewall. UDP attacks can also target services like DNS or VoIP which utilize these protocols. Additionally, due to the session-less nature of the UDP protocol, the source of a packet is easily spoofed making it difficult to find the source of the attack.
CAPEC-487: ICMP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the ICMP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming the available network bandwidth. A typical attack involves a victim server receiving ICMP packets at a high rate from a wide range of source addresses. Additionally, due to the session-less nature of the ICMP protocol, the source of a packet is easily spoofed making it difficult to find the source of the attack.
CAPEC-488: HTTP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the HTTP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming resources at the application layer such as web services and their infrastructure. These attacks use legitimate session-based HTTP GET requests designed to consume large amounts of a server's resources. Since these are legitimate sessions this attack is very difficult to detect.
CAPEC-489: SSL Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the SSL protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming all the available resources on the server side. These attacks take advantage of the asymmetric relationship between the processing power used by the client and the processing power used by the server to create a secure connection. In this manner the attacker can make a large number of HTTPS requests on a low provisioned machine to tie up a disproportionately large number of resources on the server. The clients then continue to keep renegotiating the SSL connection. When multiplied by a large number of attacking machines, this attack can result in a crash or loss of service to legitimate users.
CAPEC-490: Amplification
An adversary may execute an amplification where the size of a response is far greater than that of the request that generates it. The goal of this attack is to use a relatively few resources to create a large amount of traffic against a target server. To execute this attack, an adversary send a request to a 3rd party service, spoofing the source address to be that of the target server. The larger response that is generated by the 3rd party service is then sent to the target server. By sending a large number of initial requests, the adversary can generate a tremendous amount of traffic directed at the target. The greater the discrepancy in size between the initial request and the final payload delivered to the target increased the effectiveness of this attack.
CAPEC-491: Quadratic Data Expansion
An adversary exploits macro-like substitution to cause a denial of service situation due to excessive memory being allocated to fully expand the data. The result of this denial of service could cause the application to freeze or crash. This involves defining a very large entity and using it multiple times in a single entity substitution. CAPEC-197 is a similar attack pattern, but it is easier to discover and defend against. This attack pattern does not perform multi-level substitution and therefore does not obviously appear to consume extensive resources.
CAPEC-493: SOAP Array Blowup
An adversary may execute an attack on a web service that uses SOAP messages in communication. By sending a very large SOAP array declaration to the web service, the attacker forces the web service to allocate space for the array elements before they are parsed by the XML parser. The attacker message is typically small in size containing a large array declaration of say 1,000,000 elements and a couple of array elements. This attack targets exhaustion of the memory resources of the web service.
CAPEC-494: TCP Fragmentation
An adversary may execute a TCP Fragmentation attack against a target with the intention of avoiding filtering rules of network controls, by attempting to fragment the TCP packet such that the headers flag field is pushed into the second fragment which typically is not filtered.
CAPEC-495: UDP Fragmentation
An attacker may execute a UDP Fragmentation attack against a target server in an attempt to consume resources such as bandwidth and CPU. IP fragmentation occurs when an IP datagram is larger than the MTU of the route the datagram has to traverse. Typically the attacker will use large UDP packets over 1500 bytes of data which forces fragmentation as ethernet MTU is 1500 bytes. This attack is a variation on a typical UDP flood but it enables more network bandwidth to be consumed with fewer packets. Additionally it has the potential to consume server CPU resources and fill memory buffers associated with the processing and reassembling of fragmented packets.
CAPEC-496: ICMP Fragmentation
An attacker may execute a ICMP Fragmentation attack against a target with the intention of consuming resources or causing a crash. The attacker crafts a large number of identical fragmented IP packets containing a portion of a fragmented ICMP message. The attacker these sends these messages to a target host which causes the host to become non-responsive. Another vector may be sending a fragmented ICMP message to a target host with incorrect sizes in the header which causes the host to hang.
CAPEC-528: XML Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using XML messages with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a web service. These attacks are accomplished by sending a large number of XML based requests and letting the service attempt to parse each one. In many cases this type of an attack will result in a XML Denial of Service (XDoS) due to an application becoming unstable, freezing, or crashing.