Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-77

Allowed-with-Review

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')

Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft

The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component.

5383 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-VJHC-HV8M-W466

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-09 00:00 – Updated: 2022-02-09 00:00
VLAI
Details

Tenda routers G1 and G3 v15.11.0.17(9502)_CN were discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability in the function formSetPppoeServer. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via the pppoeServerIP, pppoeServerStartIP, and pppoeServerEndIP parameters.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-24171"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-77"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-02-04T02:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Tenda routers G1 and G3 v15.11.0.17(9502)_CN were discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability in the function formSetPppoeServer. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via the pppoeServerIP, pppoeServerStartIP, and pppoeServerEndIP parameters.",
  "id": "GHSA-vjhc-hv8m-w466",
  "modified": "2022-02-09T00:00:39Z",
  "published": "2022-02-09T00:00:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-24171"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pjqwudi/my_vuln/blob/main/Tenda/vuln_35/35.md"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-VJPQ-XWHG-4JR4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:37 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:37
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability in certain system script files that are installed at boot time on Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controllers could allow an authenticated, local attacker to gain elevated privileges and execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on an affected host operating system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-controlled input that is supplied to certain script files of an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting crafted input to a script file on an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain elevated privileges and execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the affected system. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need to authenticate to the affected system by using valid administrator credentials. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvf57274.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-12352"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-77"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-11-30T09:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in certain system script files that are installed at boot time on Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controllers could allow an authenticated, local attacker to gain elevated privileges and execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on an affected host operating system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-controlled input that is supplied to certain script files of an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting crafted input to a script file on an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain elevated privileges and execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the affected system. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need to authenticate to the affected system by using valid administrator credentials. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvf57274.",
  "id": "GHSA-vjpq-xwhg-4jr4",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:37:49Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:37:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-12352"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20171129-apic"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101993"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039925"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-VJR9-VRJV-2G4H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-17 18:31 – Updated: 2025-03-17 18:31
VLAI
Details

Dell SmartFabric OS10 Software, version(s) 10.5.4.x, 10.5.5.x, 10.5.6.x, 10.6.0.x, contain(s) an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-22473"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-77"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-03-17T18:15:21Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Dell SmartFabric OS10 Software, version(s) 10.5.4.x, 10.5.5.x, 10.5.6.x, 10.6.0.x, contain(s) an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027) vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution.",
  "id": "GHSA-vjr9-vrjv-2g4h",
  "modified": "2025-03-17T18:31:53Z",
  "published": "2025-03-17T18:31:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22473"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000289970/dsa-2025-070-security-update-for-dell-networking-os10-vulnerabilities"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000293638/dsa-2025-069-security-update-for-dell-networking-os10-vulnerabilities"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000294091/dsa-2025-079-security-update-for-dell-networking-os10-vulnerabilities"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000295014/dsa-2025-068-security-update-for-dell-networking-os10-vulnerabilities"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-VJV4-2HJH-G5HP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-23 18:30 – Updated: 2025-11-23 18:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability was identified in D-Link DIR-852 1.00. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /gena.cgi. Such manipulation of the argument service leads to command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-13562"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-74",
      "CWE-77"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-11-23T18:15:54Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was identified in D-Link DIR-852 1.00. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /gena.cgi. Such manipulation of the argument service leads to command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.",
  "id": "GHSA-vjv4-2hjh-g5hp",
  "modified": "2025-11-23T18:30:27Z",
  "published": "2025-11-23T18:30:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-13562"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/YZS17/CVE/blob/main/DLink/DLink-DIR852/RCE2.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.333327"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.333327"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.697063"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.dlink.com"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-VM28-MRM7-FPJQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2017-10-24 18:33 – Updated: 2025-04-13 23:28
VLAI
Summary
sfpagent Command Injection vulnerability
Details

lib/sfpagent/bsig.rb in the sfpagent gem before 0.4.15 for Ruby allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the module name in a JSON request.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
        "name": "sfpagent"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.4.15"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2014-2888"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-77"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-16T21:57:58Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-04-23T15:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "`lib/sfpagent/bsig.rb` in the sfpagent gem before 0.4.15 for Ruby allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the module name in a JSON request.",
  "id": "GHSA-vm28-mrm7-fpjq",
  "modified": "2025-04-13T23:28:09Z",
  "published": "2017-10-24T18:33:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-2888"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/herry13/sfpagent"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/sfpagent/CVE-2014-2888.yml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20201029141944/http://www.vapid.dhs.org/advisories/spfagent-remotecmd.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Apr/243"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/04/16/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/04/18/4"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "sfpagent Command Injection vulnerability"
}

GHSA-VM5X-PCV8-R553

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-02 09:30 – Updated: 2025-06-02 09:30
VLAI
Details

The Netcom NTC 6200 and NWL 222 series expose a web interface to be configured and set up by operators. Multiple endpoints of the web interface are vulnerable to arbitrary command injection and use insecure hardcoded passwords. Remote authenticated attackers can gain arbitrary code execution with elevated privileges.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-4010"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-77"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-06-02T07:15:21Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The Netcom NTC 6200 and NWL 222 series expose a web interface to be configured and set up by operators. Multiple\u00a0endpoints of the web interface are vulnerable to arbitrary command injection and use insecure hardcoded passwords. Remote authenticated attackers can gain arbitrary code execution with elevated privileges.",
  "id": "GHSA-vm5x-pcv8-r553",
  "modified": "2025-06-02T09:30:59Z",
  "published": "2025-06-02T09:30:59Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-4010"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.onekey.com/resource/security-advisory-remote-command-execution-on-netcomm-ntc-6200-and-nwl-222"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-VM67-7VMG-66VM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-04-06 17:24 – Updated: 2021-03-31 17:50
VLAI
Summary
Arbitrary Command Injection in portprocesses
Details

Impact

An Arbitrary Command Injection vulnerability was reported in portprocesses impacting versions <= 1.0.4.

Example (Proof of Concept)

The following example demonstrates the vulnerability and will run touch success therefore creating a file named success.

const portprocesses = require("portprocesses");

portprocesses.killProcess("$(touch success)");
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "portprocesses"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.0.5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-23348"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-77",
      "CWE-78"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2021-03-31T17:50:32Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-03-31T15:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nAn Arbitrary Command Injection vulnerability was reported in `portprocesses` impacting versions \u003c= 1.0.4.\n\n### Example (Proof of Concept)\n\nThe following example demonstrates the vulnerability and will run `touch success` therefore creating a file named `success`.\n\n```js\nconst portprocesses = require(\"portprocesses\");\n\nportprocesses.killProcess(\"$(touch success)\");\n```",
  "id": "GHSA-vm67-7vmg-66vm",
  "modified": "2021-03-31T17:50:32Z",
  "published": "2021-04-06T17:24:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rrainn/PortProcesses/security/advisories/GHSA-vm67-7vmg-66vm"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-23348"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rrainn/PortProcesses/commit/86811216c9b97b01b5722f879f8c88a7aa4214e1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rrainn/PortProcesses/blob/fffceb09aff7180afbd0bd172e820404b33c8299/index.js%23L23"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-PORTPROCESSES-1078536"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Arbitrary Command Injection in portprocesses"
}

GHSA-VM6C-RQG9-5QQR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-13 00:33 – Updated: 2025-10-22 15:31
VLAI
Details

A command injection vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® enables an authenticated administrative user to perform actions as the root user.

The attacker must have network access to the management web interface and successfully authenticate to exploit this issue.

Cloud NGFW and Prisma Access are not impacted by this vulnerability.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-4231"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-77"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-06-13T00:15:23Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A command injection vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS\u00ae enables an authenticated administrative user to perform actions as the root user.\n\nThe attacker must have network access to the management web interface and successfully authenticate to exploit this issue.\n\nCloud NGFW and Prisma Access are not impacted by this vulnerability.",
  "id": "GHSA-vm6c-rqg9-5qqr",
  "modified": "2025-10-22T15:31:04Z",
  "published": "2025-06-13T00:33:18Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-4231"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2025-4231"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-VM8M-8VM4-X33V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-03-06 21:30 – Updated: 2025-03-06 21:31
VLAI
Details

Okta Advanced Server Access Client versions 1.13.1 through 1.65.0 are vulnerable to command injection due to the third party library webbrowser. An outdated library, webbrowser, used by the ASA client was found to be vulnerable to command injection. To exploit this issue, an attacker would need to phish the user to enter an attacker controlled server URL during enrollment.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-0093"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-77"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-03-06T21:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Okta Advanced Server Access Client versions 1.13.1 through 1.65.0 are vulnerable to command injection due to the third party library webbrowser. An outdated library, webbrowser, used by the ASA client was found to be vulnerable to command injection. To exploit this issue, an attacker would need to phish the user to enter an attacker controlled server URL during enrollment.",
  "id": "GHSA-vm8m-8vm4-x33v",
  "modified": "2025-03-06T21:31:19Z",
  "published": "2023-03-06T21:30:18Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0093"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://trust.okta.com/security-advisories/okta-advanced-server-access-client-cve-2023-0093"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-VM9R-3QXR-CXXP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-09-18 12:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 07:43
VLAI
Details

A command injection vulnerability exists in RTS VLink Virtual Matrix Software Versions v5 (< 5.7.6) and v6 (< 6.5.0) that allows an attacker to perform arbitrary code execution via the admin web interface.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-34999"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-77",
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-09-18T11:15:41Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A command injection vulnerability exists in RTS VLink Virtual Matrix Software Versions v5 (\u003c 5.7.6) and v6 (\u003c 6.5.0) that allows an attacker to perform arbitrary code execution via the admin web interface.",
  "id": "GHSA-vm9r-3qxr-cxxp",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T07:43:09Z",
  "published": "2023-09-18T12:30:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-34999"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://psirt.bosch.com/security-advisories/BOSCH-SA-893251-BT.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.

Mitigation
Implementation

If possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.

Mitigation MIT-5
Implementation

Strategy: Input Validation

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation
Operation

Run time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.

Mitigation
System Configuration

Assign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.

CAPEC-136: LDAP Injection

An attacker manipulates or crafts an LDAP query for the purpose of undermining the security of the target. Some applications use user input to create LDAP queries that are processed by an LDAP server. For example, a user might provide their username during authentication and the username might be inserted in an LDAP query during the authentication process. An attacker could use this input to inject additional commands into an LDAP query that could disclose sensitive information. For example, entering a * in the aforementioned query might return information about all users on the system. This attack is very similar to an SQL injection attack in that it manipulates a query to gather additional information or coerce a particular return value.

CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters

An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.

CAPEC-183: IMAP/SMTP Command Injection

An adversary exploits weaknesses in input validation on web-mail servers to execute commands on the IMAP/SMTP server. Web-mail servers often sit between the Internet and the IMAP or SMTP mail server. User requests are received by the web-mail servers which then query the back-end mail server for the requested information and return this response to the user. In an IMAP/SMTP command injection attack, mail-server commands are embedded in parts of the request sent to the web-mail server. If the web-mail server fails to adequately sanitize these requests, these commands are then sent to the back-end mail server when it is queried by the web-mail server, where the commands are then executed. This attack can be especially dangerous since administrators may assume that the back-end server is protected against direct Internet access and therefore may not secure it adequately against the execution of malicious commands.

CAPEC-248: Command Injection

An adversary looking to execute a command of their choosing, injects new items into an existing command thus modifying interpretation away from what was intended. Commands in this context are often standalone strings that are interpreted by a downstream component and cause specific responses. This type of attack is possible when untrusted values are used to build these command strings. Weaknesses in input validation or command construction can enable the attack and lead to successful exploitation.

CAPEC-40: Manipulating Writeable Terminal Devices

This attack exploits terminal devices that allow themselves to be written to by other users. The attacker sends command strings to the target terminal device hoping that the target user will hit enter and thereby execute the malicious command with their privileges. The attacker can send the results (such as copying /etc/passwd) to a known directory and collect once the attack has succeeded.

CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers

An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.

CAPEC-75: Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files

Generally these are manually edited files that are not in the preview of the system administrators, any ability on the attackers' behalf to modify these files, for example in a CVS repository, gives unauthorized access directly to the application, the same as authorized users.

CAPEC-76: Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls

An attacker manipulates inputs to the target software which the target software passes to file system calls in the OS. The goal is to gain access to, and perhaps modify, areas of the file system that the target software did not intend to be accessible.