Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-862

Allowed-with-Review

Missing Authorization

Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

15538 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-3P64-6GVH-82V5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-17 21:59 – Updated: 2026-08-17 21:59
VLAI
Summary
MLflow: LogInputs endpoint bypasses per-run UPDATE authorization in basic-auth
Details

Summary

When MLflow is deployed with the built-in basic-auth plugin (--app-name basic-auth), any authenticated user can inject arbitrary dataset records into another user's run by calling POST /api/2.0/mlflow/runs/log-inputs. The LogInputs proto handler is absent from the BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS map in mlflow/server/auth/__init__.py, so the before-request hook skips authorization entirely and the request succeeds. Standard write endpoints on the same run -- such as POST /api/2.0/mlflow/runs/log-metric -- correctly return HTTP 403.

Details

MLflow's basic-auth app gates every HTTP handler through a before-request hook (_before_request) that looks up the relevant permission validator in BEFORE_REQUEST_VALIDATORS. Validators are built from the BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS dictionary, which maps each protobuf request class to a callable. When a class is absent from the dict (or mapped to None), get_before_request_handler returns None, and the resulting entry in BEFORE_REQUEST_VALIDATORS is (path, method): None.

Inside _before_request:

# mlflow/server/auth/__init__.py  _before_request()
if validator := _find_validator(request):   # None is falsy -- branch skipped
    if not validator():
        return make_forbidden_response()
elif _is_proxy_artifact_path(request.path):  # not a proxy path
    ...
# falls through: any authenticated request is allowed

The LogInputs protobuf class is not present in BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS:

# mlflow/server/auth/__init__.py  BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS dict
# LogInputs is absent; all run-write operations below ARE present:
LogBatch: validate_can_update_run,
LogMetric: validate_can_update_run,
SetTag:    validate_can_update_run,
LogParam:  validate_can_update_run,
# LogInputs: <missing>

The route /api/2.0/mlflow/runs/log-inputs (and the identical /ajax-api/ variant) therefore admits any valid credential, regardless of which experiment or run is targeted. The LogInputs handler writes DatasetInput records directly to the run's lineage table without any ownership check.

PoC

Prerequisites: MLflow v3.13.0 running with --app-name basic-auth. Two accounts: alice (creates experiment 2 and run A) and bob (creates experiment 4 and run B).

  1. Confirm the authorized endpoint correctly denies alice's write to bob's run:
POST /api/2.0/mlflow/runs/log-metric HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Basic YWxpY2U6YWxpY2VfcGFzc3dvcmQxMjM=   (alice:alice_password123)
Content-Type: application/json

{"run_id": "<bob_run_id>", "key": "test", "value": 1.0, "timestamp": 0, "step": 0}

Response: HTTP 403 Permission denied

  1. Inject a dataset record into bob's run as alice:
POST /api/2.0/mlflow/runs/log-inputs HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Basic YWxpY2U6YWxpY2VfcGFzc3dvcmQxMjM=   (alice:alice_password123)
Content-Type: application/json

{"run_id": "<bob_run_id>", "datasets": [{"dataset": {"name": "ATTACKER_injected", "digest": "evil123", "profile": "attacker_controlled"}}]}

Response: HTTP 200 {}

  1. Confirm injection persisted:
GET /api/2.0/mlflow/runs/get?run_id=<bob_run_id> HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Basic Ym9iOmJvYl9wYXNzd29yZF9uZXcxMjM=   (bob:bob_password_new123)

Response: HTTP 200 -- dataset_inputs array contains {"name":"ATTACKER_injected","digest":"evil123","profile":"attacker_controlled"}.

Impact

Any authenticated MLflow user can corrupt the dataset lineage metadata of any other user's run. In ML compliance workflows, dataset provenance records are audit evidence for model reproducibility and regulatory review. Injecting fake or misleading dataset entries into a competitor's runs can silently invalidate audit trails, cause misattribution of model training data, or introduce confusion about which datasets were used to train a model. The attacker needs only a valid credential; no elevated permissions are required.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "mlflow"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.15.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-69146"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-17T21:59:01Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nWhen MLflow is deployed with the built-in basic-auth plugin (`--app-name basic-auth`), any authenticated user can inject arbitrary dataset records into another user\u0027s run by calling `POST /api/2.0/mlflow/runs/log-inputs`. The `LogInputs` proto handler is absent from the `BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS` map in `mlflow/server/auth/__init__.py`, so the before-request hook skips authorization entirely and the request succeeds. Standard write endpoints on the same run -- such as `POST /api/2.0/mlflow/runs/log-metric` -- correctly return HTTP 403.\n\n### Details\n\nMLflow\u0027s basic-auth app gates every HTTP handler through a before-request hook (`_before_request`) that looks up the relevant permission validator in `BEFORE_REQUEST_VALIDATORS`. Validators are built from the `BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS` dictionary, which maps each protobuf request class to a callable. When a class is absent from the dict (or mapped to `None`), `get_before_request_handler` returns `None`, and the resulting entry in `BEFORE_REQUEST_VALIDATORS` is `(path, method): None`.\n\nInside `_before_request`:\n\n```python\n# mlflow/server/auth/__init__.py  _before_request()\nif validator := _find_validator(request):   # None is falsy -- branch skipped\n    if not validator():\n        return make_forbidden_response()\nelif _is_proxy_artifact_path(request.path):  # not a proxy path\n    ...\n# falls through: any authenticated request is allowed\n```\n\nThe `LogInputs` protobuf class is not present in `BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS`:\n\n```python\n# mlflow/server/auth/__init__.py  BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS dict\n# LogInputs is absent; all run-write operations below ARE present:\nLogBatch: validate_can_update_run,\nLogMetric: validate_can_update_run,\nSetTag:    validate_can_update_run,\nLogParam:  validate_can_update_run,\n# LogInputs: \u003cmissing\u003e\n```\n\nThe route `/api/2.0/mlflow/runs/log-inputs` (and the identical `/ajax-api/` variant) therefore admits any valid credential, regardless of which experiment or run is targeted. The `LogInputs` handler writes `DatasetInput` records directly to the run\u0027s lineage table without any ownership check.\n\n### PoC\n\nPrerequisites: MLflow v3.13.0 running with `--app-name basic-auth`. Two accounts: alice (creates experiment 2 and run A) and bob (creates experiment 4 and run B).\n\n1. Confirm the authorized endpoint correctly denies alice\u0027s write to bob\u0027s run:\n\n```\nPOST /api/2.0/mlflow/runs/log-metric HTTP/1.1\nAuthorization: Basic YWxpY2U6YWxpY2VfcGFzc3dvcmQxMjM=   (alice:alice_password123)\nContent-Type: application/json\n\n{\"run_id\": \"\u003cbob_run_id\u003e\", \"key\": \"test\", \"value\": 1.0, \"timestamp\": 0, \"step\": 0}\n```\n\nResponse: HTTP 403 Permission denied\n\n2. Inject a dataset record into bob\u0027s run as alice:\n\n```\nPOST /api/2.0/mlflow/runs/log-inputs HTTP/1.1\nAuthorization: Basic YWxpY2U6YWxpY2VfcGFzc3dvcmQxMjM=   (alice:alice_password123)\nContent-Type: application/json\n\n{\"run_id\": \"\u003cbob_run_id\u003e\", \"datasets\": [{\"dataset\": {\"name\": \"ATTACKER_injected\", \"digest\": \"evil123\", \"profile\": \"attacker_controlled\"}}]}\n```\n\nResponse: HTTP 200 {}\n\n3. Confirm injection persisted:\n\n```\nGET /api/2.0/mlflow/runs/get?run_id=\u003cbob_run_id\u003e HTTP/1.1\nAuthorization: Basic Ym9iOmJvYl9wYXNzd29yZF9uZXcxMjM=   (bob:bob_password_new123)\n```\n\nResponse: HTTP 200 -- dataset_inputs array contains `{\"name\":\"ATTACKER_injected\",\"digest\":\"evil123\",\"profile\":\"attacker_controlled\"}`.\n\n### Impact\n\nAny authenticated MLflow user can corrupt the dataset lineage metadata of any other user\u0027s run. In ML compliance workflows, dataset provenance records are audit evidence for model reproducibility and regulatory review. Injecting fake or misleading dataset entries into a competitor\u0027s runs can silently invalidate audit trails, cause misattribution of model training data, or introduce confusion about which datasets were used to train a model. The attacker needs only a valid credential; no elevated permissions are required.",
  "id": "GHSA-3p64-6gvh-82v5",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T21:59:01Z",
  "published": "2026-08-17T21:59:01Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/security/advisories/GHSA-3p64-6gvh-82v5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/pull/24291"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/commit/5c34aec5669e2386b38b5ee0855cd61174e27693"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/releases/tag/v3.15.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "MLflow: LogInputs endpoint bypasses per-run UPDATE authorization in basic-auth"
}

GHSA-3P7M-5559-6P23

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-11 03:30 – Updated: 2025-03-11 03:30
VLAI
Details

SAP Business Warehouse (Process Chains) allows an attacker to manipulate the process execution due to missing authorization check. An attacker with display authorization for the process chain object could set one or all processes to be skipped. This means corresponding activities, such as data loading, activation, or deletion, will not be executed as initially modeled. This could lead to unexpected results in business reporting leading to a significant impact on integrity. However, there is no impact on confidentiality or availability.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-25244"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-03-11T01:15:34Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "SAP Business Warehouse (Process Chains) allows an attacker to manipulate the process execution due to missing authorization check. An attacker with display authorization for the process chain object could set one or all processes to be skipped. This means corresponding activities, such as data loading, activation, or deletion, will not be executed as initially modeled. This could lead to unexpected results in business reporting leading to a significant impact on integrity. However, there is no impact on confidentiality or availability.",
  "id": "GHSA-3p7m-5559-6p23",
  "modified": "2025-03-11T03:30:50Z",
  "published": "2025-03-11T03:30:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-25244"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://me.sap.com/notes/3552144"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://url.sap/sapsecuritypatchday"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3P89-8HM7-44H4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-21 03:36 – Updated: 2026-04-08 18:32
VLAI
Details

The Tutor LMS – eLearning and online course solution plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized loss of data due to a missing capability check on the tutor_delete_announcement() function in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to delete arbitrary posts.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-1502"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-03-21T02:51:43Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Tutor LMS \u2013 eLearning and online course solution plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized loss of data due to a missing capability check on the tutor_delete_announcement() function in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to delete arbitrary posts.",
  "id": "GHSA-3p89-8hm7-44h4",
  "modified": "2026-04-08T18:32:48Z",
  "published": "2024-03-21T03:36:46Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1502"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3049105%40tutor\u0026new=3049105%40tutor\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/834c4ca9-7173-4c84-8287-9916ec72935d?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3P95-Q82M-F2FV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-31 21:31 – Updated: 2025-10-31 21:31
VLAI
Details

ELOG allows an authenticated user to modify or overwrite the configuration file, resulting in denial of service. If the execute facility is specifically enabled with the "-x" command line flag, attackers could execute OS commands on the host machine. By default, ELOG is not configured to allow shell commands or self-registration.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-64348"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-10-31T19:15:51Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "ELOG allows an authenticated user to modify or overwrite the configuration file, resulting in denial of service. If the execute facility is specifically enabled with the \"-x\" command line flag, attackers could execute OS commands on the host machine. By default, ELOG is not configured to allow shell commands or self-registration.",
  "id": "GHSA-3p95-q82m-f2fv",
  "modified": "2025-10-31T21:31:03Z",
  "published": "2025-10-31T21:31:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-64348"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bitbucket.org/ritt/elog/commits/7092ff64f6eb9521f8cc8c52272a020bf3730946"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bitbucket.org/ritt/elog/commits/f81e5695c40997322fe2713bfdeba459d9de09dc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cisagov/CSAF/develop/csaf_files/IT/white/2025/va-25-304-01.json"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64348"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:N/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:H/MSI:H/MSA:H/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3P98-4WM7-QJ6W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-22 21:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:36
VLAI
Details

Missing Authorization vulnerability in ThimPress WP Events Manager allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects WP Events Manager: from n/a through 2.2.1.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-57987"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-22T19:15:59Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in ThimPress WP Events Manager allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects WP Events Manager: from n/a through 2.2.1.",
  "id": "GHSA-3p98-4wm7-qj6w",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T18:36:12Z",
  "published": "2025-09-22T21:30:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-57987"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/wp-events-manager/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-events-manager-plugin-2-2-1-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3P9W-PV5H-CRRP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-12-14 00:01 – Updated: 2022-10-24 19:00
VLAI
Details

The Contact Form Advanced Database WordPress plugin through 1.0.8 does not have any authorisation as well as CSRF checks in its delete_cf7_data and export_cf7_data AJAX actions, available to any authenticated users, which could allow users with a role as low as subscriber to call them. The delete_cf7_data would lead to arbitrary metadata deletion, as well as PHP Object Injection if a suitable gadget chain is present in another plugin, as user data is passed to the maybe_unserialize() function without being first validated.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-24790"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352",
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-12-13T11:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Contact Form Advanced Database WordPress plugin through 1.0.8 does not have any authorisation as well as CSRF checks in its delete_cf7_data and export_cf7_data AJAX actions, available to any authenticated users, which could allow users with a role as low as subscriber to call them. The delete_cf7_data would lead to arbitrary metadata deletion, as well as PHP Object Injection if a suitable gadget chain is present in another plugin, as user data is passed to the maybe_unserialize() function without being first validated.",
  "id": "GHSA-3p9w-pv5h-crrp",
  "modified": "2022-10-24T19:00:20Z",
  "published": "2021-12-14T00:01:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-24790"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/adc5dd9b-0781-4cea-8cc5-2c10ac35b968"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3PF7-72Q3-3VG2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-01 06:31 – Updated: 2025-08-01 06:31
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability was found in code-projects Online Movie Streaming 1.0. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin.php. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to missing authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-8434"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-08-01T04:16:22Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was found in code-projects Online Movie Streaming 1.0. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the file /admin.php. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to missing authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.",
  "id": "GHSA-3pf7-72q3-3vg2",
  "modified": "2025-08-01T06:31:37Z",
  "published": "2025-08-01T06:31:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-8434"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/i-Corner/cve/issues/15"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://code-projects.org"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.318462"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.318462"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.625534"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3PGW-PP6M-PGH6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-12-19 21:30 – Updated: 2022-12-19 21:30
VLAI
Details

In multiple functions of AdapterService.java, there is a possible way to manipulate Bluetooth state due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-240301753

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-20547"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-12-16T16:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In multiple functions of AdapterService.java, there is a possible way to manipulate Bluetooth state due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-240301753",
  "id": "GHSA-3pgw-pp6m-pgh6",
  "modified": "2022-12-19T21:30:28Z",
  "published": "2022-12-19T21:30:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-20547"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/pixel/2022-12-01"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3PHR-P473-VC8Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-16 06:31 – Updated: 2026-04-16 06:31
VLAI
Details

The AcyMailing plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation in all versions From 9.11.0 up to, and including, 10.8.1 due to a missing capability check on the wp_ajax_acymailing_router AJAX handler. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to access admin-only controllers (including configuration management), enable the autologin feature, create a malicious newsletter subscriber with an injected cms_id pointing to any WordPress user, and then use the autologin URL to authenticate as that user, including administrators.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-3614"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-16T06:16:18Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The AcyMailing plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation in all versions From 9.11.0 up to, and including, 10.8.1 due to a missing capability check on the `wp_ajax_acymailing_router` AJAX handler. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to access admin-only controllers (including configuration management), enable the autologin feature, create a malicious newsletter subscriber with an injected `cms_id` pointing to any WordPress user, and then use the autologin URL to authenticate as that user, including administrators.",
  "id": "GHSA-3phr-p473-vc8q",
  "modified": "2026-04-16T06:31:23Z",
  "published": "2026-04-16T06:31:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-3614"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/acymailing/tags/10.7.1/WpInit/Router.php#L11"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/acymailing/tags/10.7.1/WpInit/Router.php#L122"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/acymailing/tags/10.7.1/WpInit/Router.php#L230"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/acymailing/tags/10.7.1/back/Core/AcymController.php#L92"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/acymailing/tags/10.8.1/back/Core/AcymController.php#L99"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/acymailing/trunk/WpInit/Router.php#L11"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/a895e2cf-9eba-4c46-b19f-d008e1058f64?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3PHX-J4JX-M3FR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-13 21:31 – Updated: 2026-03-13 21:31
VLAI
Details

Missing Authorization vulnerability in vowelweb VW Photography vw-photography allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects VW Photography: from n/a through <= 1.3.8.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-32436"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-13T19:55:03Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in vowelweb VW Photography vw-photography allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects VW Photography: from n/a through \u003c= 1.3.8.",
  "id": "GHSA-3phx-j4jx-m3fr",
  "modified": "2026-03-13T21:31:50Z",
  "published": "2026-03-13T21:31:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32436"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Theme/vw-photography/vulnerability/wordpress-vw-photography-theme-1-3-8-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
  • Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].

Mitigation MIT-4.4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
  • One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
System Configuration Installation

Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws

An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.