GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration
Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-918

Allowed

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete

API response cwe.mitre.org

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.

5863 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-3M9M-24VH-39WX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-14 23:35 – Updated: 2026-04-24 20:42
VLAI
Summary
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Craft CMS with Asset Uploads Mutations
Details

Required Permissions

The exploitation requires a few permissions to be enabled in the used GraphQL schema:

  • "Edit assets in the volume"
  • "Create assets in the volume"

Details

The implementation fails to restrict the URL Scheme. While the application is intended to "upload assets", there is no whitelist forcing http or https. This allows attackers to use the Gopher protocol to wrap raw TCP commands.

Impact: Combined with the DWORD bypass, an attacker can hit internal services without triggering any "127.0.0.1" string-matching filters.

Example Payload: gopher://2130706433:6379/_FLUSHALL (Targets local Redis via DWORD).

Remediation Strategy

To prevent mathematical IP obfuscation, the application must normalize the hostname before validation.

Severity
5.5 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 5.9.14"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "craftcms/cms"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "5.0.0-RC1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.9.15"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.17.8"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "craftcms/cms"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.0.0-RC1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.17.9"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-41129"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-14T23:35:16Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-22T00:16:28Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Required Permissions\n\nThe exploitation requires a few permissions to be enabled in the used GraphQL schema:\n\n* \"Edit assets in the \u003cVolumeName\u003e volume\"\n* \"Create assets in the \u003cVolumeName\u003e volume\"\n\n## Details\n\nThe implementation fails to restrict the URL Scheme. While the application is intended to \"upload assets\", there is no whitelist forcing `http` or `https`. This allows attackers to use the Gopher protocol to wrap raw TCP commands.\n\n**Impact:** Combined with the DWORD bypass, an attacker can hit internal services without triggering any \"127.0.0.1\" string-matching filters.\n\n**Example Payload:** gopher://2130706433:6379/_FLUSHALL (Targets local Redis via DWORD).\n\n**Remediation Strategy**\n\nTo prevent mathematical IP obfuscation, the application must normalize the hostname before validation.",
  "id": "GHSA-3m9m-24vh-39wx",
  "modified": "2026-04-24T20:42:13Z",
  "published": "2026-04-14T23:35:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/craftcms/cms/security/advisories/GHSA-3m9m-24vh-39wx"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41129"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/craftcms/cms/commit/d20aecfaa0eae076c4154be3b17e1f9fa05ce46f"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/craftcms/cms"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Craft CMS with Asset Uploads Mutations"
}

GHSA-3MC6-PQ7X-JQGV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-18 18:30 – Updated: 2026-07-18 18:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability was identified in zevorn rt-claw up to 0.2.0. This affects the function claw_net_get/claw_net_post of the file claw/tools/tool_net.c of the component http_request. Such manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Severity
7.3 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
5.5 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-16127"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-18T16:17:13Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was identified in zevorn rt-claw up to 0.2.0. This affects the function claw_net_get/claw_net_post of the file claw/tools/tool_net.c of the component http_request. Such manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.",
  "id": "GHSA-3mc6-pq7x-jqgv",
  "modified": "2026-07-18T18:30:20Z",
  "published": "2026-07-18T18:30:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-16127"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/zevorn/rt-claw/issues/139"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/zevorn/rt-claw"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-16127"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/856872"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/379839"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/379839/cti"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3MJ9-8H4M-J8F7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-12-14 15:30 – Updated: 2023-12-14 15:30
VLAI
Details

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in kubeflow/kubeflow

Severity
7.7 (High)
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-6570"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-12-14T13:15:55Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in kubeflow/kubeflow",
  "id": "GHSA-3mj9-8h4m-j8f7",
  "modified": "2023-12-14T15:30:22Z",
  "published": "2023-12-14T15:30:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-6570"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/82d6e853-013b-4029-a23f-8b50ec56602a"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3MP4-2W7H-6M56

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-14 18:31 – Updated: 2025-04-14 21:32
VLAI
Details

Dify v1.0 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component controllers.console.remote_files.RemoteFileUploadApi.

Severity
4.8 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-29720"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-14T17:15:26Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Dify v1.0 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component controllers.console.remote_files.RemoteFileUploadApi.",
  "id": "GHSA-3mp4-2w7h-6m56",
  "modified": "2025-04-14T21:32:24Z",
  "published": "2025-04-14T18:31:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-29720"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/15185"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://dify.ai"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3MP7-VP6J-2MXX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-18 15:03 – Updated: 2026-06-18 15:03
VLAI
Summary
BBOT: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in docker_pull module via WWW-Authenticate realm parsing
Details

The docker_pull module uses the realm parameter from a Docker registry's WWW-Authenticate response header as the authentication endpoint without validation. An attacker in a man-in-the-middle position between bbot and a Docker registry could modify this header to redirect the authentication request to an arbitrary endpoint, potentially leaking authentication tokens.

Severity
3.1 (Low)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.8.4"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "bbot"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.8.5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-12566"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20",
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-18T15:03:25Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-17T23:17:03Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "The `docker_pull` module uses the `realm` parameter from a Docker registry\u0027s `WWW-Authenticate` response header as the authentication endpoint without validation. An attacker in a man-in-the-middle position between bbot and a Docker registry could modify this header to redirect the authentication request to an arbitrary endpoint, potentially leaking authentication tokens.",
  "id": "GHSA-3mp7-vp6j-2mxx",
  "modified": "2026-06-18T15:03:25Z",
  "published": "2026-06-18T15:03:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/blacklanternsecurity/bbot/security/advisories/GHSA-3mp7-vp6j-2mxx"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-12566"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/blacklanternsecurity/bbot/commit/c2f4bc0f4"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/blacklanternsecurity/bbot"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "BBOT: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in docker_pull module via WWW-Authenticate realm parsing"
}

GHSA-3MQJ-X3CM-3WGR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-23 12:31 – Updated: 2026-04-29 04:14
VLAI
Details

A security flaw has been discovered in Tiandy Video Surveillance System 视频监控平台 7.17.0. This impacts the function downloadImage of the file /com/tiandy/easy7/core/bo/CLSBODownLoad.java. Performing a manipulation of the argument urlPath results in server-side request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Severity
6.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
2.1 (Low)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-2985"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-02-23T11:16:39Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A security flaw has been discovered in Tiandy Video Surveillance System \u89c6\u9891\u76d1\u63a7\u5e73\u53f0 7.17.0. This impacts the function downloadImage of the file /com/tiandy/easy7/core/bo/CLSBODownLoad.java. Performing a manipulation of the argument urlPath results in server-side request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.",
  "id": "GHSA-3mqj-x3cm-3wgr",
  "modified": "2026-04-29T04:14:28Z",
  "published": "2026-02-23T12:31:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-2985"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://my.feishu.cn/wiki/C1TIwBoJziINWlkGt8ucnZJPnEb?from=from_copylink"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.347368"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.347368"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.756137"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3MV9-FMVF-XVMX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-19 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:33
VLAI
Details

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Montonio Montonio for WooCommerce, Wpopal Wpopal Core Features, AMO for WP – Membership Management ArcStone wp-amo, Long Watch Studio WooVirtualWallet – A virtual wallet for WooCommerce, Long Watch Studio WooVIP – Membership plugin for WordPress and WooCommerce, Long Watch Studio WooSupply – Suppliers, Supply Orders and Stock Management, Squidesma Theme Minifier, Paul Clark Styles styles, Designmodo Inc. WordPress Page Builder – Qards, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) PHPFreeChat, Arun Basil Lal Custom Login Admin Front-end CSS, Team Agence-Press CSS Adder By Agence-Press, Unihost Confirm Data, deano1987 AMP Toolbox amp-toolbox, Arun Basil Lal Admin CSS MU.This issue affects Montonio for WooCommerce: from n/a through 6.0.1; Wpopal Core Features: from n/a through 1.5.8; ArcStone: from n/a through 4.6.6; WooVirtualWallet – A virtual wallet for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.2.1; WooVIP – Membership plugin for WordPress and WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.4.4; WooSupply – Suppliers, Supply Orders and Stock Management: from n/a through 1.2.2; Theme Minifier: from n/a through 2.0; Styles: from n/a through 1.2.3; WordPress Page Builder – Qards: from n/a through 1.0.5; PHPFreeChat: from n/a through 0.2.8; Custom Login Admin Front-end CSS: from n/a through 1.4.1; CSS Adder By Agence-Press: from n/a through 1.5.0; Confirm Data: from n/a through 1.0.7; AMP Toolbox: from n/a through 2.1.1; Admin CSS MU: from n/a through 2.6.

Severity
8.2 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-40700"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-01-19T15:15:08Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Montonio Montonio for WooCommerce, Wpopal Wpopal Core Features, AMO for WP \u2013 Membership Management ArcStone wp-amo, Long Watch Studio WooVirtualWallet \u2013 A virtual wallet for WooCommerce, Long Watch Studio WooVIP \u2013 Membership plugin for WordPress and WooCommerce, Long Watch Studio WooSupply \u2013 Suppliers, Supply Orders and Stock Management, Squidesma Theme Minifier, Paul Clark Styles styles, Designmodo Inc. WordPress Page Builder \u2013 Qards, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) PHPFreeChat, Arun Basil Lal Custom Login Admin Front-end CSS, Team Agence-Press CSS Adder By Agence-Press, Unihost Confirm Data, deano1987 AMP Toolbox amp-toolbox, Arun Basil Lal Admin CSS MU.This issue affects Montonio for WooCommerce: from n/a through 6.0.1; Wpopal Core Features: from n/a through 1.5.8; ArcStone: from n/a through 4.6.6; WooVirtualWallet \u2013 A virtual wallet for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.2.1; WooVIP \u2013 Membership plugin for WordPress and WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.4.4; WooSupply \u2013 Suppliers, Supply Orders and Stock Management: from n/a through 1.2.2; Theme Minifier: from n/a through 2.0; Styles: from n/a through 1.2.3; WordPress Page Builder \u2013 Qards: from n/a through 1.0.5; PHPFreeChat: from n/a through 0.2.8; Custom Login Admin Front-end CSS: from n/a through 1.4.1; CSS Adder By Agence-Press: from n/a through 1.5.0; Confirm Data: from n/a through 1.0.7; AMP Toolbox: from n/a through 2.1.1; Admin CSS MU: from n/a through 2.6.",
  "id": "GHSA-3mv9-fmvf-xvmx",
  "modified": "2026-04-28T21:33:50Z",
  "published": "2024-01-19T15:30:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-40700"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/admin-css-mu/wordpress-admin-css-mu-plugin-2-6-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/amp-toolbox/wordpress-amp-toolbox-plugin-2-1-1-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/confirm-data/wordpress-confirm-data-plugin-1-0-7-unauth-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/css-adder-by-agence-press/wordpress-css-adder-by-agene-press-plugin-1-5-0-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/custom-login-admin-front-end-css-with-multisite-support/wordpress-custom-login-admin-front-end-css-plugin-1-4-1-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/montonio-for-woocommerce/wordpress-montonio-for-woocommerce-plugin-6-0-1-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/phpfreechat/wordpress-phpfreechat-plugin-0-2-8-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/qards-free/wordpress-wordpress-page-builder-qards-plugin-1-0-5-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/styles/wordpress-styles-plugin-1-2-3-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/theme-minifier/wordpress-theme-minifier-plugin-2-0-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/woosupply/wordpress-woosupply-plugin-1-2-2-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/woovip/wordpress-woovip-plugin-1-4-4-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/woovirtualwallet/wordpress-woovirtualwallet-plugin-2-2-1-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/wp-amo/wordpress-amo-for-wp-plugin-4-6-6-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/wpopal-core-features/wordpress-wpopal-core-features-plugin-1-5-7-server-side-request-forgery-ssrf?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3MXQ-X62M-9MVP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:37 – Updated: 2024-03-21 03:33
VLAI
Details

** DISPUTED ** An SSRF issue was discovered in cockpit-project.org Cockpit 234. NOTE: this is unrelated to the Agentejo Cockpit product. NOTE: the vendor states "I don't think [it] is a big real-life issue."

Severity
6.5 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-35850"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-12-30T02:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "** DISPUTED ** An SSRF issue was discovered in cockpit-project.org Cockpit 234. NOTE: this is unrelated to the Agentejo Cockpit product. NOTE: the vendor states \"I don\u0027t think [it] is a big real-life issue.\"",
  "id": "GHSA-3mxq-x62m-9mvp",
  "modified": "2024-03-21T03:33:56Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:37:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-35850"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/issues/15077"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/passtheticket/vulnerability-research/blob/main/cockpitProject/README.md"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-3P3P-CGJ7-VGW3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-06 17:03 – Updated: 2024-03-21 18:25
VLAI
Summary
RSSHub vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery
Details

Summary

Serveral Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in RSSHub allow remote attackers to use the server as a proxy to send HTTP GET requests to arbitrary targets and retrieve information in the internal network or conduct Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks.

Details

/mastodon/acct/:acct/statuses/:only_media?

https://github.com/DIYgod/RSSHub/blob/5928c5db2472e101c2f5c3bafed77a2f72edd40a/lib/routes/mastodon/acct.js#L4-L7

https://github.com/DIYgod/RSSHub/blob/5928c5db2472e101c2f5c3bafed77a2f72edd40a/lib/routes/mastodon/utils.js#L85-L105

/zjol/paper/:id?

https://github.com/DIYgod/RSSHub/blob/172f6cfd2b69ea6affdbdedf61e6dde1671f3796/lib/routes/zjol/paper.js#L7-L13

/m4/:id?/:category*

https://github.com/DIYgod/RSSHub/blob/172f6cfd2b69ea6affdbdedf61e6dde1671f3796/lib/routes/m4/index.js#L10-L14

PoC

  • https://rsshub.app/mastodon/acct/test@a6wt15r2.requestrepo.com%23/statuses
  • https://rsshub.app/zjol/paper/a6wt15r2.requestrepo.com%23
  • https://rsshub.app/m4/a6wt15r2.requestrepo.com%23/test

Impact

The attacker can send malicious requests to a RSSHub server, to make the server send HTTP GET requests to arbitrary destinations and see partial responses. This may lead to:

  1. Leak the server IP address, which could be hidden behind a CDN.
  2. Retrieve information in the internal network. e.g. which addresses/ports are accessible, the titles and meta descriptions of HTML pages.
  3. DoS amplification. The attacker could request the server to download some large files, or chain several SSRF requests in a single attacker request: https://rsshub.a.com/zjol/paper/rsshub.b.net%2Fzjol%2Fpaper%2Frsshub.a.com%252Fzjol%252Fpaper%252Frsshub.b.net%25252Fzjol%25252Fpaper%25252Frsshub.a.com%2525252Fzjol%2525252Fpaper%2525252Fexample.com%2525252523%25252523%252523%2523%23.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "rsshub"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.0.0-master.a429472"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-27927"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-03-06T17:03:11Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-03-21T02:52:21Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nServeral Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in RSSHub allow remote attackers to use the server as a proxy to send HTTP GET requests to arbitrary targets and retrieve information in the internal network or conduct Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks.\n\n### Details\n\n#### `/mastodon/acct/:acct/statuses/:only_media?`\n\nhttps://github.com/DIYgod/RSSHub/blob/5928c5db2472e101c2f5c3bafed77a2f72edd40a/lib/routes/mastodon/acct.js#L4-L7\n\nhttps://github.com/DIYgod/RSSHub/blob/5928c5db2472e101c2f5c3bafed77a2f72edd40a/lib/routes/mastodon/utils.js#L85-L105\n\n#### `/zjol/paper/:id?`\n\nhttps://github.com/DIYgod/RSSHub/blob/172f6cfd2b69ea6affdbdedf61e6dde1671f3796/lib/routes/zjol/paper.js#L7-L13\n\n#### `/m4/:id?/:category*`\n\nhttps://github.com/DIYgod/RSSHub/blob/172f6cfd2b69ea6affdbdedf61e6dde1671f3796/lib/routes/m4/index.js#L10-L14\n\n### PoC\n\n- https://rsshub.app/mastodon/acct/test@a6wt15r2.requestrepo.com%23/statuses\n- https://rsshub.app/zjol/paper/a6wt15r2.requestrepo.com%23\n- https://rsshub.app/m4/a6wt15r2.requestrepo.com%23/test\n\n### Impact\n\nThe attacker can send malicious requests to a RSSHub server, to make the server send HTTP GET requests to arbitrary destinations and see partial responses. This may lead to:\n\n1. Leak the server IP address, which could be hidden behind a CDN.\n2. Retrieve information in the internal network. e.g. which addresses/ports are accessible, the titles and meta descriptions of HTML pages.\n3. DoS amplification. The attacker could request the server to download some large files, or chain several SSRF requests in a single attacker request: `https://rsshub.a.com/zjol/paper/rsshub.b.net%2Fzjol%2Fpaper%2Frsshub.a.com%252Fzjol%252Fpaper%252Frsshub.b.net%25252Fzjol%25252Fpaper%25252Frsshub.a.com%2525252Fzjol%2525252Fpaper%2525252Fexample.com%2525252523%25252523%252523%2523%23`.\n",
  "id": "GHSA-3p3p-cgj7-vgw3",
  "modified": "2024-03-21T18:25:36Z",
  "published": "2024-03-06T17:03:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/DIYgod/RSSHub/security/advisories/GHSA-3p3p-cgj7-vgw3"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27927"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/DIYgod/RSSHub/commit/a42947231104a9ec3436fc52cedb31740c9a7069"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/DIYgod/RSSHub"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/DIYgod/RSSHub/blob/172f6cfd2b69ea6affdbdedf61e6dde1671f3796/lib/routes/m4/index.js#L10-L14"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/DIYgod/RSSHub/blob/172f6cfd2b69ea6affdbdedf61e6dde1671f3796/lib/routes/zjol/paper.js#L7-L13"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/DIYgod/RSSHub/blob/5928c5db2472e101c2f5c3bafed77a2f72edd40a/lib/routes/mastodon/acct.js#L4-L7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/DIYgod/RSSHub/blob/5928c5db2472e101c2f5c3bafed77a2f72edd40a/lib/routes/mastodon/utils.js#L85-L105"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "RSSHub vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery"
}

GHSA-3P65-76G6-3W7R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-06 17:52 – Updated: 2026-04-06 23:42
VLAI
Summary
Distribution affected by pull-through cache credential exfiltration via www-authenticate bearer realm
Details

hi guys,

commit: 40594bd98e6d6ed993b5c6021c93fdf96d2e5851 (as-of 2026-01-31) contact: GitHub Security Advisory (https://github.com/distribution/distribution/security/advisories/new)

summary

in pull-through cache mode, distribution discovers token auth endpoints by parsing WWW-Authenticate challenges returned by the configured upstream registry. the realm URL from a bearer challenge is used without validating that it matches the upstream registry host. as a result, an attacker-controlled upstream (or an attacker with MitM position to the upstream) can cause distribution to send the configured upstream credentials via basic auth to an attacker-controlled realm URL.

this is the same vulnerability class as CVE-2020-15157 (containerd), but in distribution’s pull-through cache proxy auth flow.

severity

HIGH

note: the baseline impact is credential disclosure of the configured upstream credentials. if a deployment uses broader credentials for upstream auth (for example cloud iam credentials), the downstream impact can be higher; i am not claiming this as default for all deployments.

impact

credential exfiltration of the upstream authentication material configured for the pull-through cache.

attacker starting positions that make this realistic: - supply chain / configuration: an operator configures a proxy cache to use an upstream that becomes attacker-controlled (compromised registry, stale domain, or a malicious mirror) - network: MitM on the upstream connection in environments where the upstream is reachable over insecure transport or a compromised network path

affected components

  • registry/proxy/proxyauth.go:66-81 (getAuthURLs): extracts bearer realm from upstream WWW-Authenticate without validating destination
  • internal/client/auth/session.go:485-510 (fetchToken): uses the realm URL directly for token fetch
  • internal/client/auth/session.go:429-434 (fetchTokenWithBasicAuth): sends credentials via basic auth to the realm URL

reproduction

attachment: poc.zip (local harness) with canonical and control runs.

the harness is local and does not contact a real registry: it uses two local HTTP servers (upstream + attacker token service) to demonstrate whether basic auth is sent to an attacker-chosen realm.

unzip -q -o poc.zip -d poc
cd poc
make canonical
make control

expected output (excerpt):

[CALLSITE_HIT]: getAuthURLs::configureAuth
[PROOF_MARKER]: basic_auth_sent=true realm_host=127.0.0.1 account_param=user authorization_prefix=Basic

control output (excerpt):

[CALLSITE_HIT]: getAuthURLs::configureAuth
[NC_MARKER]: realm_validation=PASS basic_auth_sent=false

suggested remediation

validate that the token realm destination is within the intended trust boundary before associating credentials with it or sending any authentication to it. one conservative option is strict same-host binding: only accept a realm whose host matches the configured upstream host.

fix accepted when

  • distribution does not send configured upstream credentials to an attacker-chosen realm URL
  • a regression test covers the canonical and blocked cases

addendum.md poc.zip PR_DESCRIPTION.md RUNNABLE_POC.md

best, oleh

Severity
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/distribution/distribution/v3"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.1.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/distribution/distribution"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "2.8.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-33540"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-06T17:52:52Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-06T15:17:10Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "hi guys,\n\ncommit: 40594bd98e6d6ed993b5c6021c93fdf96d2e5851 (as-of 2026-01-31)\ncontact: GitHub Security Advisory (https://github.com/distribution/distribution/security/advisories/new)\n\n## summary\n\nin pull-through cache mode, distribution discovers token auth endpoints by parsing `WWW-Authenticate` challenges returned by the configured upstream registry. the `realm` URL from a bearer challenge is used without validating that it matches the upstream registry host. as a result, an attacker-controlled upstream (or an attacker with MitM position to the upstream) can cause distribution to send the configured upstream credentials via basic auth to an attacker-controlled `realm` URL.\n\nthis is the same vulnerability class as CVE-2020-15157 (containerd), but in distribution\u2019s pull-through cache proxy auth flow.\n\n## severity\n\nHIGH\n\nnote: the baseline impact is credential disclosure of the configured upstream credentials. if a deployment uses broader credentials for upstream auth (for example cloud iam credentials), the downstream impact can be higher; i am not claiming this as default for all deployments.\n\n## impact\n\ncredential exfiltration of the upstream authentication material configured for the pull-through cache.\n\nattacker starting positions that make this realistic:\n- supply chain / configuration: an operator configures a proxy cache to use an upstream that becomes attacker-controlled (compromised registry, stale domain, or a malicious mirror)\n- network: MitM on the upstream connection in environments where the upstream is reachable over insecure transport or a compromised network path\n\n## affected components\n\n- `registry/proxy/proxyauth.go:66-81` (`getAuthURLs`): extracts bearer `realm` from upstream `WWW-Authenticate` without validating destination\n- `internal/client/auth/session.go:485-510` (`fetchToken`): uses the realm URL directly for token fetch\n- `internal/client/auth/session.go:429-434` (`fetchTokenWithBasicAuth`): sends credentials via basic auth to the realm URL\n\n## reproduction\n\nattachment: `poc.zip` (local harness) with canonical and control runs.\n\nthe harness is local and does not contact a real registry: it uses two local HTTP servers (upstream + attacker token service) to demonstrate whether basic auth is sent to an attacker-chosen realm.\n\n```bash\nunzip -q -o poc.zip -d poc\ncd poc\nmake canonical\nmake control\n```\n\nexpected output (excerpt):\n\n```\n[CALLSITE_HIT]: getAuthURLs::configureAuth\n[PROOF_MARKER]: basic_auth_sent=true realm_host=127.0.0.1 account_param=user authorization_prefix=Basic\n```\n\ncontrol output (excerpt):\n\n```\n[CALLSITE_HIT]: getAuthURLs::configureAuth\n[NC_MARKER]: realm_validation=PASS basic_auth_sent=false\n```\n\n## suggested remediation\n\nvalidate that the token `realm` destination is within the intended trust boundary before associating credentials with it or sending any authentication to it. one conservative option is strict same-host binding: only accept a realm whose host matches the configured upstream host.\n\n## fix accepted when\n\n- distribution does not send configured upstream credentials to an attacker-chosen realm URL\n- a regression test covers the canonical and blocked cases\n\n[addendum.md](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/24984637/addendum.md)\n[poc.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/24984638/poc.zip)\n[PR_DESCRIPTION.md](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/24984639/PR_DESCRIPTION.md)\n[RUNNABLE_POC.md](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/24984640/RUNNABLE_POC.md)\n\n\nbest,\noleh",
  "id": "GHSA-3p65-76g6-3w7r",
  "modified": "2026-04-06T23:42:43Z",
  "published": "2026-04-06T17:52:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/distribution/distribution/security/advisories/GHSA-3p65-76g6-3w7r"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33540"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/distribution/distribution/commit/cc5d5fa4ba02157501e6afa2cc6a903ad0338e7b"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/distribution/distribution"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Distribution affected by pull-through cache credential exfiltration via www-authenticate bearer realm"
}

No mitigation information available for this CWE.

CAPEC-664: Server Side Request Forgery

An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.

← Back to the CWE list