Common Weakness Enumeration
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Back to CWE stats page
CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
CVE-2025-11285 (GCVE-0-2025-11285)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-05 06:02 – Updated: 2025-10-07 14:02
VLAI
Title
samanhappy MCPHub serverController.ts os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability was found in samanhappy MCPHub up to 0.9.10. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file src/controllers/serverController.ts. The manipulation of the argument command/args results in os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.327043 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.327043 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.659734 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/August829/YU1/issues/6 | exploitissue-tracking |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| samanhappy | MCPHub |
Affected:
0.9.0
Affected: 0.9.1 Affected: 0.9.2 Affected: 0.9.3 Affected: 0.9.4 Affected: 0.9.5 Affected: 0.9.6 Affected: 0.9.7 Affected: 0.9.8 Affected: 0.9.9 Affected: 0.9.10 |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-11285",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-07T14:02:41.185300Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-07T14:02:45.049Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/August829/YU1/issues/6"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "MCPHub",
"vendor": "samanhappy",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.9.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.9.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.9.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.9.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.9.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.9.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.9.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.9.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.9.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.9.9"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.9.10"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Yu Bao (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was found in samanhappy MCPHub up to 0.9.10. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file src/controllers/serverController.ts. The manipulation of the argument command/args results in os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way."
},
{
"lang": "de",
"value": "In samanhappy MCPHub up to 0.9.10 ist eine Schwachstelle entdeckt worden. Das betrifft eine unbekannte Funktionalit\u00e4t der Datei src/controllers/serverController.ts. Durch die Manipulation des Arguments command/args mit unbekannten Daten kann eine os command injection-Schwachstelle ausgenutzt werden. Der Angriff kann \u00fcber das Netzwerk angegangen werden. Der Exploit ist \u00f6ffentlich verf\u00fcgbar und k\u00f6nnte genutzt werden."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 6.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-05T06:02:06.272Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-327043 | samanhappy MCPHub serverController.ts os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.327043"
},
{
"name": "VDB-327043 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.327043"
},
{
"name": "Submit #659734 | samanhappy mcphub v0.9.10 Remote Code Execution (RCE)",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.659734"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit",
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/August829/YU1/issues/6"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-04T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-04T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-04T13:32:51.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "samanhappy MCPHub serverController.ts os command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-11285",
"datePublished": "2025-10-05T06:02:06.272Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-04T11:27:33.813Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-07T14:02:45.049Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-11407 (GCVE-0-2025-11407)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-07 20:02 – Updated: 2025-10-07 20:33
VLAI
Title
D-Link DI-7001 MINI upgrade_filter.asp os command injection
Summary
A weakness has been identified in D-Link DI-7001 MINI 24.04.18B1. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /upgrade_filter.asp. This manipulation of the argument path causes os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.327344 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.327344 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.665471 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/DavCloudz/cve/issues/4 | exploitissue-tracking |
| https://www.dlink.com/ | product |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-Link | DI-7001 MINI |
Affected:
24.04.18B1
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-11407",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-07T20:31:14.679154Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-07T20:33:12.045Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "DI-7001 MINI",
"vendor": "D-Link",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "24.04.18B1"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Yun Zhang (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A weakness has been identified in D-Link DI-7001 MINI 24.04.18B1. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /upgrade_filter.asp. This manipulation of the argument path causes os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited."
},
{
"lang": "de",
"value": "Eine Schwachstelle wurde in D-Link DI-7001 MINI 24.04.18B1 gefunden. Hierbei geht es um eine nicht exakt ausgemachte Funktion der Datei /upgrade_filter.asp. Durch Beeinflussen des Arguments path mit unbekannten Daten kann eine os command injection-Schwachstelle ausgenutzt werden. Die Umsetzung des Angriffs kann dabei \u00fcber das Netzwerk erfolgen. Die Ausnutzung wurde ver\u00f6ffentlicht und kann verwendet werden."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 6.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-07T20:02:05.836Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-327344 | D-Link DI-7001 MINI upgrade_filter.asp os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.327344"
},
{
"name": "VDB-327344 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.327344"
},
{
"name": "Submit #665471 | D-Link DI-7001MINI-8G Gateway V24.04.18B1 Remote Code Execution",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.665471"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit",
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/DavCloudz/cve/issues/4"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.dlink.com/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-07T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-07T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-07T09:28:40.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "D-Link DI-7001 MINI upgrade_filter.asp os command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-11407",
"datePublished": "2025-10-07T20:02:05.836Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-07T07:23:37.593Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-07T20:33:12.045Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-11490 (GCVE-0-2025-11490)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-08 18:32 – Updated: 2025-10-23 04:25
VLAI
Title
wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP Absolute Path command-manager.ts extractBaseCommand os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP up to 0.2.13. The affected element is the function extractBaseCommand of the file src/command-manager.ts of the component Absolute Path Handler. Such manipulation leads to os command injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor explains: "The usual use case is that AI is asked to do something, picks commands itself, and typically uses simple command names without absolute paths. It's curious why a user would ask the model to bypass restrictions this way. (...) This could potentially be a problem, but we are yet to hear reports of this being an issue in actual workflows. We'll leave this issue open for situations where people may report this as a problem for the long term."
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.327609 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.327609 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.668005 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/wonderwhy-er/DesktopCommanderM… | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/wonderwhy-er/DesktopCommanderM… | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/wonderwhy-er/DesktopCommanderM… | exploitissue-tracking |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| wonderwhy-er | DesktopCommanderMCP |
Affected:
0.2.0
Affected: 0.2.1 Affected: 0.2.2 Affected: 0.2.3 Affected: 0.2.4 Affected: 0.2.5 Affected: 0.2.6 Affected: 0.2.7 Affected: 0.2.8 Affected: 0.2.9 Affected: 0.2.10 Affected: 0.2.11 Affected: 0.2.12 Affected: 0.2.13 |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-11490",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T19:25:53.411708Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-08T19:26:21.759Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wonderwhy-er/DesktopCommanderMCP/issues/218"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wonderwhy-er/DesktopCommanderMCP/issues/218#issue-3343855120"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wonderwhy-er/DesktopCommanderMCP/issues/218#issuecomment-3214135034"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"modules": [
"Absolute Path Handler"
],
"product": "DesktopCommanderMCP",
"vendor": "wonderwhy-er",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.9"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.10"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.11"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.12"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.13"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Max Alster-Caminer (Mantel)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "crem (VulDB User)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "analyst",
"value": "crem (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability has been found in wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP up to 0.2.13. The affected element is the function extractBaseCommand of the file src/command-manager.ts of the component Absolute Path Handler. Such manipulation leads to os command injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor explains: \"The usual use case is that AI is asked to do something, picks commands itself, and typically uses simple command names without absolute paths. It\u0027s curious why a user would ask the model to bypass restrictions this way. (...) This could potentially be a problem, but we are yet to hear reports of this being an issue in actual workflows. We\u0027ll leave this issue open for situations where people may report this as a problem for the long term.\""
},
{
"lang": "de",
"value": "Es wurde eine Schwachstelle in wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP up to 0.2.13 entdeckt. Betroffen hiervon ist die Funktion extractBaseCommand der Datei src/command-manager.ts der Komponente Absolute Path Handler. Durch das Beeinflussen mit unbekannten Daten kann eine os command injection-Schwachstelle ausgenutzt werden. Der Angriff kann remote ausgef\u00fchrt werden. Die Ausnutzung wurde ver\u00f6ffentlicht und kann verwendet werden."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:C",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 6.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:C",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-23T04:25:58.602Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-327609 | wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP Absolute Path command-manager.ts extractBaseCommand os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.327609"
},
{
"name": "VDB-327609 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.327609"
},
{
"name": "Submit #668005 | wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP 0.2.13 OS Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.668005"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wonderwhy-er/DesktopCommanderMCP/issues/218"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wonderwhy-er/DesktopCommanderMCP/issues/218#issuecomment-3214135034"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit",
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wonderwhy-er/DesktopCommanderMCP/issues/218#issue-3343855120"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-08T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-08T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-23T06:27:55.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP Absolute Path command-manager.ts extractBaseCommand os command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-11490",
"datePublished": "2025-10-08T18:32:05.161Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-08T10:53:40.882Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-23T04:25:58.602Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-11491 (GCVE-0-2025-11491)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-08 19:02 – Updated: 2025-10-23 04:25
VLAI
Title
wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP command-manager.ts CommandManager os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability was found in wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP up to 0.2.13. The impacted element is the function CommandManager of the file src/command-manager.ts. Performing manipulation results in os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.327610 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.327610 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.668006 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/wonderwhy-er/DesktopCommanderM… | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/wonderwhy-er/DesktopCommanderM… | exploitissue-tracking |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| wonderwhy-er | DesktopCommanderMCP |
Affected:
0.2.0
Affected: 0.2.1 Affected: 0.2.2 Affected: 0.2.3 Affected: 0.2.4 Affected: 0.2.5 Affected: 0.2.6 Affected: 0.2.7 Affected: 0.2.8 Affected: 0.2.9 Affected: 0.2.10 Affected: 0.2.11 Affected: 0.2.12 Affected: 0.2.13 |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-11491",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-08T19:30:05.417130Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-08T19:31:17.031Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "DesktopCommanderMCP",
"vendor": "wonderwhy-er",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.9"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.10"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.11"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.12"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.13"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Max Alster-Caminer (Mantel)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "crem (VulDB User)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "analyst",
"value": "crem (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was found in wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP up to 0.2.13. The impacted element is the function CommandManager of the file src/command-manager.ts. Performing manipulation results in os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used."
},
{
"lang": "de",
"value": "In wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP up to 0.2.13 wurde eine Schwachstelle gefunden. Es geht um die Funktion CommandManager der Datei src/command-manager.ts. Durch Beeinflussen mit unbekannten Daten kann eine os command injection-Schwachstelle ausgenutzt werden. Der Angriff kann \u00fcber das Netzwerk angegangen werden. Der Exploit steht zur \u00f6ffentlichen Verf\u00fcgung."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 6.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-23T04:25:49.508Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-327610 | wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP command-manager.ts CommandManager os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.327610"
},
{
"name": "VDB-327610 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.327610"
},
{
"name": "Submit #668006 | wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP 0.2.13 Improper Neutralization",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.668006"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wonderwhy-er/DesktopCommanderMCP/issues/217"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit",
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wonderwhy-er/DesktopCommanderMCP/issues/217#issue-3343853704"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-08T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-08T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-23T06:27:50.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP command-manager.ts CommandManager os command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-11491",
"datePublished": "2025-10-08T19:02:05.860Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-08T10:53:43.606Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-23T04:25:49.508Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-11546 (GCVE-0-2025-11546)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-07 01:09 – Updated: 2025-11-07 18:29
VLAI
Summary
CLUSTERPRO X for Linux 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2 and EXPRESSCLUSTER X for Linux 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2, CLUSTERPRO X SingleServerSafe for Linux 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2, EXPRESSCLUSTER X SingleServerSafe for Linux 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2 allows an attacker sends specially crafted network packets to the product, arbitrary OS commands may be executed without authentication.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEC Corporation | CLUSTERPRO X for Linux (EXPRESSCLUSTER X for Linux) |
Affected:
4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2
|
|
| NEC Corporation | CLUSTERPRO X SingleServerSafe for Linux (EXPRESSCLUSTER X SingleServerSafe for Linux) |
Affected:
4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-11546",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-07T18:29:04.715150Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-07T18:29:57.236Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "CLUSTERPRO X for Linux (EXPRESSCLUSTER X for Linux)",
"vendor": "NEC Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2"
}
]
},
{
"product": "CLUSTERPRO X SingleServerSafe for Linux (EXPRESSCLUSTER X SingleServerSafe for Linux)",
"vendor": "NEC Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "CLUSTERPRO X for Linux 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2 and EXPRESSCLUSTER X for Linux 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2, CLUSTERPRO X SingleServerSafe for Linux 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2, EXPRESSCLUSTER X SingleServerSafe for Linux 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2 allows an attacker sends specially crafted network packets to the product, arbitrary OS commands may be executed without authentication."
}
],
"value": "CLUSTERPRO X for Linux 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2 and EXPRESSCLUSTER X for Linux 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2, CLUSTERPRO X SingleServerSafe for Linux 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2, EXPRESSCLUSTER X SingleServerSafe for Linux 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2 allows an attacker sends specially crafted network packets to the product, arbitrary OS commands may be executed without authentication."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-07T04:04:50.054Z",
"orgId": "f2760a35-e0d8-4637-ac4c-cc1a2de3e282",
"shortName": "NEC"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://jpn.nec.com/security-info/secinfo/nv25-006_en.html"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f2760a35-e0d8-4637-ac4c-cc1a2de3e282",
"assignerShortName": "NEC",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-11546",
"datePublished": "2025-11-07T01:09:08.662Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-09T06:48:19.068Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-07T18:29:57.236Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-11571 (GCVE-0-2025-11571)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-24 16:26 – Updated: 2026-03-24 17:43
VLAI
Title
Command Execution vulnerability in Simplicity Installer
Summary
Vulnerable endpoints accept user-controlled input through a URL in JSON format which enables command execution. The commands allowed to execute can open executables. However, the commands cannot pass parameters or arguments.
To successfully execute this attack, the attacker needs to be on the same network.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://community.silabs.com/068Vm00000htltZ | permissions-requiredvendor-advisory |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| silabs.com | Simplicity Studio v5 |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 5.11.2.1
(semver)
|
|
| silabs.com | Simplicity Installer tool (Silicon Labs Tool - SLT) for Simplicity Studio v6 |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.0.1
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-11571",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-24T17:42:54.893187Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-24T17:43:07.517Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Simplicity Studio v5",
"vendor": "silabs.com",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.11.2.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Simplicity Installer tool (Silicon Labs Tool - SLT) for Simplicity Studio v6",
"vendor": "silabs.com",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.0.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Vulnerable endpoints accept user-controlled input through a URL in JSON format which enables command execution. The commands allowed to execute can open executables. However, the commands cannot pass parameters or arguments.\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003eTo successfully execute this attack, the attacker needs to be on the same network.\u0026nbsp;"
}
],
"value": "Vulnerable endpoints accept user-controlled input through a URL in JSON format which enables command execution. The commands allowed to execute can open executables. However, the commands cannot pass parameters or arguments.\u00a0\nTo successfully execute this attack, the attacker needs to be on the same network."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 2.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-24T16:26:32.789Z",
"orgId": "030b2754-1501-44a4-bef8-48be86a33bf4",
"shortName": "Silabs"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"permissions-required",
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://community.silabs.com/068Vm00000htltZ"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Command Execution vulnerability in Simplicity Installer",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "030b2754-1501-44a4-bef8-48be86a33bf4",
"assignerShortName": "Silabs",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-11571",
"datePublished": "2026-03-24T16:26:32.789Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-09T16:26:44.833Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-24T17:43:07.517Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-11665 (GCVE-0-2025-11665)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-13 06:32 – Updated: 2025-10-14 15:02 Unsupported When Assigned
VLAI
Title
D-Link DAP-2695 Firmware Update rgbin fwupdater_main os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability was detected in D-Link DAP-2695 2.00RC131. This affects the function fwupdater_main of the file rgbin of the component Firmware Update Handler. Performing manipulation results in os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.328084 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.328084 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.673104 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/IOTRes/IOT_Firmware_Update/blo… | patch |
| https://www.dlink.com/ | product |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-11665",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-14T15:02:11.850428Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-14T15:02:23.734Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"modules": [
"Firmware Update Handler"
],
"product": "DAP-2695",
"vendor": "D-Link",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.00RC131"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "IOT_Res (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was detected in D-Link DAP-2695 2.00RC131. This affects the function fwupdater_main of the file rgbin of the component Firmware Update Handler. Performing manipulation results in os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer."
},
{
"lang": "de",
"value": "Eine Schwachstelle wurde in D-Link DAP-2695 2.00RC131 gefunden. Es ist betroffen die Funktion fwupdater_main der Datei rgbin der Komponente Firmware Update Handler. Durch Manipulieren mit unbekannten Daten kann eine os command injection-Schwachstelle ausgenutzt werden. Es ist m\u00f6glich, den Angriff aus der Ferne durchzuf\u00fchren."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 4.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:X/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 4.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:X/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 5.8,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:ND/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-13T06:32:05.570Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-328084 | D-Link DAP-2695 Firmware Update rgbin fwupdater_main os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.328084"
},
{
"name": "VDB-328084 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.328084"
},
{
"name": "Submit #673104 | DLink DAP-2695 v2.00RC131 CWE88 Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in Command",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.673104"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/IOTRes/IOT_Firmware_Update/blob/main/Dlink/DAP-2695.md"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.dlink.com/"
}
],
"tags": [
"unsupported-when-assigned"
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-12T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-12T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-12T10:18:10.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "D-Link DAP-2695 Firmware Update rgbin fwupdater_main os command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-11665",
"datePublished": "2025-10-13T06:32:05.570Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-12T08:13:07.287Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-14T15:02:23.734Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-11730 (GCVE-0-2025-11730)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-05 01:55 – Updated: 2026-02-26 15:04
VLAI
Summary
A post‑authentication command injection vulnerability in the Dynamic DNS (DDNS) configuration CLI command in Zyxel ATP series firmware versions from V5.35 through V5.41, USG FLEX series firmware versions from V5.35 through V5.41, USG FLEX 50(W) series firmware versions from V5.35 through V5.41, and USG20(W)-VPN series firmware versions from V5.35 through V5.41 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to execute operating system (OS) commands on an affected device by supplying a specially crafted string as an argument to the CLI command.
Severity
7.2 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.zyxel.com/global/en/support/security-… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
4 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zyxel | ATP series firmware |
Affected:
versions from V5.35 through V5.41
|
|
| Zyxel | USG FLEX series firmware |
Affected:
versions from V5.35 through V5.41
|
|
| Zyxel | USG FLEX 50(W) series firmware |
Affected:
versions from V5.35 through V5.41
|
|
| Zyxel | USG20(W)-VPN series firmware |
Affected:
versions from V5.35 through V5.41
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-11730",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-06T04:55:19.377665Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T15:04:18.490Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "ATP series firmware",
"vendor": "Zyxel",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "versions from V5.35 through V5.41"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "USG FLEX series firmware",
"vendor": "Zyxel",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "versions from V5.35 through V5.41"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "USG FLEX 50(W) series firmware",
"vendor": "Zyxel",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "versions from V5.35 through V5.41"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "USG20(W)-VPN series firmware",
"vendor": "Zyxel",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "versions from V5.35 through V5.41"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A post\u2011authentication command injection vulnerability in the Dynamic DNS (DDNS) configuration CLI command in Zyxel ATP series firmware versions from V5.35 through V5.41, USG FLEX series firmware versions from V5.35 through V5.41, USG FLEX 50(W) series firmware versions from V5.35 through V5.41, and USG20(W)-VPN series firmware versions from V5.35 through V5.41 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to execute operating system (OS) commands on an affected device by supplying a specially crafted string as an argument to the CLI command.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A post\u2011authentication command injection vulnerability in the Dynamic DNS (DDNS) configuration CLI command in Zyxel ATP series firmware versions from V5.35 through V5.41, USG FLEX series firmware versions from V5.35 through V5.41, USG FLEX 50(W) series firmware versions from V5.35 through V5.41, and USG20(W)-VPN series firmware versions from V5.35 through V5.41 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to execute operating system (OS) commands on an affected device by supplying a specially crafted string as an argument to the CLI command."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-05T01:55:12.291Z",
"orgId": "96e50032-ad0d-4058-a115-4d2c13821f9f",
"shortName": "Zyxel"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.zyxel.com/global/en/support/security-advisories/zyxel-security-advisory-for-post-authentication-command-injection-vulnerability-in-the-ddns-configuration-cli-command-of-zld-firewalls-02-05-2026"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "96e50032-ad0d-4058-a115-4d2c13821f9f",
"assignerShortName": "Zyxel",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-11730",
"datePublished": "2026-02-05T01:55:12.291Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-14T02:35:13.097Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T15:04:18.490Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-11774 (GCVE-0-2025-11774)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-19 00:22 – Updated: 2025-12-19 19:08
VLAI
Title
Malicious Code Execution Vulnerability in the Software Keyboard Function of GENESIS64, ICONICS Suite, Mobile HMI, and MC Works64
Summary
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in the software keyboard function (hereinafter referred to as "keypad function") of Mitsubishi Electric GENESIS64 versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions GENESIS64 versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric ICONICS Suite versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions ICONICS Suite versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric MobileHMI versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions MobileHMI versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, and Mitsubishi Electric MC Works64 all versions allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary executable files (EXE) when a legitimate user uses the keypad function by tampering with the configuration file for the function. This could allow the attacker to disclose, tamper with, delete, or destroy information stored on the PC where the affected product is installed, or cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition on the system, through the execution of the EXE.
Severity
8.2 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://jvn.jp/vu/JVNVU97729686/ | government-resource |
| https://www.mitsubishielectric.com/psirt/vulnerab… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
7 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | GENESIS64 |
Affected:
Version 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior
|
|
| Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions | GENESIS64 |
Affected:
Version 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior
|
|
| Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | ICONICS Suite |
Affected:
Version 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior
|
|
| Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions | ICONICS Suite |
Affected:
Version 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior
|
|
| Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | MobileHMI |
Affected:
Version 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior
|
|
| Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions | MobileHMI |
Affected:
Version 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior
|
|
| Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | MC Works64 |
Affected:
All versions
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-11774",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-19T19:08:06.554691Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-19T19:08:14.533Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "GENESIS64",
"vendor": "Mitsubishi Electric Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Version 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "GENESIS64",
"vendor": "Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Version 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "ICONICS Suite",
"vendor": "Mitsubishi Electric Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Version 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "ICONICS Suite",
"vendor": "Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Version 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "MobileHMI",
"vendor": "Mitsubishi Electric Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Version 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "MobileHMI",
"vendor": "Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Version 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "MC Works64",
"vendor": "Mitsubishi Electric Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All versions"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027) vulnerability in the software keyboard function (hereinafter referred to as \"keypad function\") of Mitsubishi Electric GENESIS64 versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions GENESIS64 versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric ICONICS Suite versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions ICONICS Suite versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric MobileHMI versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions MobileHMI versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, and Mitsubishi Electric MC Works64 all versions allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary executable files (EXE) when a legitimate user uses the keypad function by tampering with the configuration file for the function. This could allow the attacker to disclose, tamper with, delete, or destroy information stored on the PC where the affected product is installed, or cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition on the system, through the execution of the EXE."
}
],
"value": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027) vulnerability in the software keyboard function (hereinafter referred to as \"keypad function\") of Mitsubishi Electric GENESIS64 versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions GENESIS64 versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric ICONICS Suite versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions ICONICS Suite versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric MobileHMI versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions MobileHMI versions 10.97.2 CFR3 and prior, and Mitsubishi Electric MC Works64 all versions allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary executable files (EXE) when a legitimate user uses the keypad function by tampering with the configuration file for the function. This could allow the attacker to disclose, tamper with, delete, or destroy information stored on the PC where the affected product is installed, or cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition on the system, through the execution of the EXE."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Malicious Code Execution"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-19T00:22:03.528Z",
"orgId": "e0f77b61-78fd-4786-b3fb-1ee347a748ad",
"shortName": "Mitsubishi"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"government-resource"
],
"url": "https://jvn.jp/vu/JVNVU97729686/"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.mitsubishielectric.com/psirt/vulnerability/pdf/2025-018_en.pdf"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Malicious Code Execution Vulnerability in the Software Keyboard Function of GENESIS64, ICONICS Suite, Mobile HMI, and MC Works64",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "e0f77b61-78fd-4786-b3fb-1ee347a748ad",
"assignerShortName": "Mitsubishi",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-11774",
"datePublished": "2025-12-19T00:22:03.528Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-15T02:40:54.345Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-19T19:08:14.533Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-11787 (GCVE-0-2025-11787)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-02 13:02 – Updated: 2025-12-02 13:31 Unsupported When Assigned
VLAI
Title
Command injection vulnerability in Circutor SGE-PLC1000/SGE-PLC50
Summary
Command injection vulnerability in the operating system in Circutor SGE-PLC1000/SGE-PLC50 v9.0.2 through the 'GetDNS()', 'CheckPing()' and 'TraceRoute()' functions.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SGE-PLC1000 SGE-PLC50 | Circutor |
Affected:
9.0.2
|
Date Public
2025-10-28 11:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-11787",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-02T13:31:39.174867Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-02T13:31:49.784Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Circutor",
"vendor": "SGE-PLC1000 SGE-PLC50",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.0.2"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sge-plc1000_sge-plc50:circutor:9.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Gabriel Gonzalez and Sergio Ruiz"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-10-28T11:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Command injection vulnerability in the operating system in Circutor SGE-PLC1000/SGE-PLC50 v9.0.2 through the \u0027GetDNS()\u0027, \u0027CheckPing()\u0027 and \u0027TraceRoute()\u0027 functions."
}
],
"value": "Command injection vulnerability in the operating system in Circutor SGE-PLC1000/SGE-PLC50 v9.0.2 through the \u0027GetDNS()\u0027, \u0027CheckPing()\u0027 and \u0027TraceRoute()\u0027 functions."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-02T13:02:40.055Z",
"orgId": "0cbda920-cd7f-484a-8e76-bf7f4b7f4516",
"shortName": "INCIBE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso-sci/multiple-vulnerabilities-circutor-products-0"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "The SGE-PLC100 and SGE-PLC50 units were discontinued in 2015. They were replaced by the Compact DC, which in turn became obsolete in November 2024. The current equivalent product is the GEDE EDC. The oldest version currently installed is 1.0.14, as it was the first to be compatible with the existing tariff system, while the latest version of these units is 1.2.21. Circutor recommends not extending the useful life of the SGE-PLC100 and SGE-PLC50 concentrators without keeping them updated. For both the Compact DC units (which replaced the SGE series) and the current GEDE EDC, it is recommended to update to the latest available version (2.0.4) or, at a minimum, to 2.0.0. This approach not only mitigates the identified vulnerabilities, but also provides new functionalities derived from the evolution of DLMS, the PRIME standard, STG protocols and the REST API."
}
],
"value": "The SGE-PLC100 and SGE-PLC50 units were discontinued in 2015. They were replaced by the Compact DC, which in turn became obsolete in November 2024. The current equivalent product is the GEDE EDC. The oldest version currently installed is 1.0.14, as it was the first to be compatible with the existing tariff system, while the latest version of these units is 1.2.21. Circutor recommends not extending the useful life of the SGE-PLC100 and SGE-PLC50 concentrators without keeping them updated. For both the Compact DC units (which replaced the SGE series) and the current GEDE EDC, it is recommended to update to the latest available version (2.0.4) or, at a minimum, to 2.0.0. This approach not only mitigates the identified vulnerabilities, but also provides new functionalities derived from the evolution of DLMS, the PRIME standard, STG protocols and the REST API."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"tags": [
"unsupported-when-assigned"
],
"title": "Command injection vulnerability in Circutor SGE-PLC1000/SGE-PLC50",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "0cbda920-cd7f-484a-8e76-bf7f4b7f4516",
"assignerShortName": "INCIBE",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-11787",
"datePublished": "2025-12-02T13:02:40.055Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-15T12:06:17.304Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-02T13:31:49.784Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation ID: MIT-22
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Description:
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
Description:
- For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Mitigation ID: MIT-15
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation ID: MIT-4.3
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
Description:
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Mitigation ID: MIT-28
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Output Encoding
Description:
- While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
Mitigation
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- If the program to be executed allows arguments to be specified within an input file or from standard input, then consider using that mode to pass arguments instead of the command line.
Mitigation ID: MIT-27
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Parameterization
Description:
- If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Some languages offer multiple functions that can be used to invoke commands. Where possible, identify any function that invokes a command shell using a single string, and replace it with a function that requires individual arguments. These functions typically perform appropriate quoting and filtering of arguments. For example, in C, the system() function accepts a string that contains the entire command to be executed, whereas execl(), execve(), and others require an array of strings, one for each argument. In Windows, CreateProcess() only accepts one command at a time. In Perl, if system() is provided with an array of arguments, then it will quote each of the arguments.
Mitigation ID: MIT-5
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
Description:
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When constructing OS command strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing OS command injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent OS command injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, when invoking a mail program, you might need to allow the subject field to contain otherwise-dangerous inputs like ";" and ">" characters, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the character might reduce the risk of OS command injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the subject field would not be recorded as the user intended. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it could be more important when the program relies on well-structured subject lines in order to pass messages to other components.
- Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
Mitigation ID: MIT-21
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
Description:
- When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation ID: MIT-32
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Description:
- Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation ID: MIT-32
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation ID: MIT-39
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- In the context of OS Command Injection, error information passed back to the user might reveal whether an OS command is being executed and possibly which command is being used.
Mitigation
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Description:
- Use runtime policy enforcement to create an allowlist of allowable commands, then prevent use of any command that does not appear in the allowlist. Technologies such as AppArmor are available to do this.
Mitigation ID: MIT-29
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Firewall
Description:
- Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
Mitigation ID: MIT-17
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation ID: MIT-16
Phases: Operation, Implementation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-6: Argument Injection
An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection
In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.