Common Weakness Enumeration
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Back to CWE stats page
CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
CVE-2025-9424 (GCVE-0-2025-9424)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-25 22:32 – Updated: 2025-08-26 14:23
VLAI
Title
Ruijie WS7204-A branch_import.php os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability was identified in Ruijie WS7204-A 2017.06.15. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /itbox_pi/branch_import.php?a=branch_list. Such manipulation of the argument province leads to os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.321267 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.321267 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.634135 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/Hwwg/cve/issues/1 | exploitissue-tracking |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-9424",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-26T14:23:08.685731Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-26T14:23:11.485Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Hwwg/cve/issues/1"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "WS7204-A",
"vendor": "Ruijie",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2017.06.15"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "huangweigang (VulDB User)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "analyst",
"value": "huangweigang (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was identified in Ruijie WS7204-A 2017.06.15. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /itbox_pi/branch_import.php?a=branch_list. Such manipulation of the argument province leads to os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way."
},
{
"lang": "de",
"value": "In Ruijie WS7204-A 2017.06.15 ist eine Schwachstelle entdeckt worden. Dabei betrifft es einen unbekannter Codeteil der Datei /itbox_pi/branch_import.php?a=branch_list. Durch das Beeinflussen des Arguments province mit unbekannten Daten kann eine os command injection-Schwachstelle ausgenutzt werden. Der Angriff kann \u00fcber das Netzwerk passieren. Die Schwachstelle wurde \u00f6ffentlich offengelegt und k\u00f6nnte ausgenutzt werden."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 4.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 4.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 5.8,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-26T02:37:48.890Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-321267 | Ruijie WS7204-A branch_import.php os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.321267"
},
{
"name": "VDB-321267 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.321267"
},
{
"name": "Submit #634135 | Ruijie WS7204-A 2017.06.15 command execution",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.634135"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit",
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Hwwg/cve/issues/1"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-25T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-25T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-26T04:42:44.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "Ruijie WS7204-A branch_import.php os command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-9424",
"datePublished": "2025-08-25T22:32:10.274Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-25T09:25:33.907Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-26T14:23:11.485Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-9494 (GCVE-0-2025-9494)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-09-23 01:12 – Updated: 2025-09-23 13:34
VLAI
Title
Viessmann Vitogate 300 OS Command Injection
Summary
An OS command injection vulnerability has been discovered in the Vitogate 300, which can be exploited by malicious users to compromise affected installations. Specifically, the `/cgi-bin/vitogate.cgi` endpoint is affected, when the `form` JSON parameter is set to `form-0-2`. The vulnerability stems from the fact that that function at offset 0x21c24 does not properly sanitize supplied input before interpolating it into a format string which gets passed to `popen()`. Consequently, an authenticated attacker is able to inject arbitrary OS commands and thus gain code execution on affected devices.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viessmann | Vitogate 300 |
Affected:
1 , < 3.1.0.0
(SKU)
|
Date Public
2025-09-22 16:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-9494",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-23T13:33:59.911370Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-23T13:34:06.974Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Vitogate 300",
"vendor": "Viessmann",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.1.0.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1",
"versionType": "SKU"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "adhkr of LuwakLab working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-09-22T16:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An OS command injection vulnerability has been discovered in the Vitogate 300, which can be exploited by malicious users to compromise affected installations. Specifically, the `/cgi-bin/vitogate.cgi` endpoint is affected, when the `form` JSON parameter is set to `form-0-2`. The vulnerability stems from the fact that that function at offset 0x21c24 does not properly sanitize supplied input before interpolating it into a format string which gets passed to `popen()`. Consequently, an authenticated attacker is able to inject arbitrary OS commands and thus gain code execution on affected devices.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An OS command injection vulnerability has been discovered in the Vitogate 300, which can be exploited by malicious users to compromise affected installations. Specifically, the `/cgi-bin/vitogate.cgi` endpoint is affected, when the `form` JSON parameter is set to `form-0-2`. The vulnerability stems from the fact that that function at offset 0x21c24 does not properly sanitize supplied input before interpolating it into a format string which gets passed to `popen()`. Consequently, an authenticated attacker is able to inject arbitrary OS commands and thus gain code execution on affected devices."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-23T01:12:17.459Z",
"orgId": "e24e6442-3ae1-4538-a7b8-7ac95586db8f",
"shortName": "Carrier"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.corporate.carrier.com/product-security/advisories-resources/"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThese\nvulnerabilities have been fixed with Vitogate 300 software version 3.1.0.1. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eCustomers\nare strongly encouraged to upgrade by downloading software version 3.1.0.1 at the\u0026nbsp;\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://connectivity.viessmann-climatesolutions.com/gb/mp-fp/vitogate/vitogate-300-bn-mb.html\"\u003eVitogate\n300\u0026nbsp;\u003c/a\u003ewebsite.\u003cb\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "These\nvulnerabilities have been fixed with Vitogate 300 software version 3.1.0.1. \n\n\n\nCustomers\nare strongly encouraged to upgrade by downloading software version 3.1.0.1 at the\u00a0Vitogate\n300\u00a0website."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Viessmann Vitogate 300 OS Command Injection",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "e24e6442-3ae1-4538-a7b8-7ac95586db8f",
"assignerShortName": "Carrier",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-9494",
"datePublished": "2025-09-23T01:12:17.459Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-26T17:40:54.110Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-23T13:34:06.974Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-9528 (GCVE-0-2025-9528)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-27 13:02 – Updated: 2025-08-27 13:26
VLAI
Title
Linksys E1700 systemCommand os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability was determined in Linksys E1700 1.0.0.4.003. This vulnerability affects the function systemCommand of the file /goform/systemCommand. Executing manipulation of the argument command can lead to os command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.321545 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.321545 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.634827 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/Link… | related |
| https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/Link… | exploit |
| https://www.linksys.com/ | product |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-9528",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-27T13:26:41.277837Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-27T13:26:50.938Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "E1700",
"vendor": "Linksys",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.0.4.003"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Bond_yes (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was determined in Linksys E1700 1.0.0.4.003. This vulnerability affects the function systemCommand of the file /goform/systemCommand. Executing manipulation of the argument command can lead to os command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way."
},
{
"lang": "de",
"value": "Es wurde eine Schwachstelle in Linksys E1700 1.0.0.4.003 entdeckt. Es geht hierbei um die Funktion systemCommand der Datei /goform/systemCommand. Durch das Manipulieren des Arguments command mit unbekannten Daten kann eine os command injection-Schwachstelle ausgenutzt werden. Der Angriff kann \u00fcber das Netzwerk erfolgen. Der Exploit steht zur \u00f6ffentlichen Verf\u00fcgung."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 4.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 4.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 5.8,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-27T13:02:08.736Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-321545 | Linksys E1700 systemCommand os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.321545"
},
{
"name": "VDB-321545 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.321545"
},
{
"name": "Submit #634827 | Linksys E1700 E1700(1.0.0.4.003) OS Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.634827"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/Linksys2/vuln_61/61.md"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/Linksys2/vuln_61/61.md#poc"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.linksys.com/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-27T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-27T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-27T09:37:05.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "Linksys E1700 systemCommand os command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-9528",
"datePublished": "2025-08-27T13:02:08.736Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-27T05:43:16.297Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-27T13:26:50.938Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-9573 (GCVE-0-2025-9573)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-09-02 08:42 – Updated: 2025-09-02 13:45
VLAI
Title
Command Injection in extension "TYPO3 Backup Plus" (ns_backup)
Summary
The ns_backup extension through 13.0.2 for TYPO3 allows command injection.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TYPO3 | Extension "TYPO3 Backup Plus" |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 13.0.2
(semver)
|
Date Public
2025-09-02 08:30
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-9573",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-02T13:45:27.608784Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-02T13:45:32.131Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://packagist.org/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "nitsan/ns-backup",
"product": "Extension \"TYPO3 Backup Plus\"",
"repo": "https://github.com/nitsan-technologies/ns_backup",
"vendor": "TYPO3",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "13.0.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Swiss NCSC Vulnerability Management Team"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-09-02T08:30:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "The ns_backup extension through 13.0.2 for TYPO3 allows command injection."
}
],
"value": "The ns_backup extension through 13.0.2 for TYPO3 allows command injection."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-248",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-248 Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-02T09:09:57.244Z",
"orgId": "f4fb688c-4412-4426-b4b8-421ecf27b14a",
"shortName": "TYPO3"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://typo3.org/security/advisory/typo3-ext-sa-2025-011"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Command Injection in extension \"TYPO3 Backup Plus\" (ns_backup)",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f4fb688c-4412-4426-b4b8-421ecf27b14a",
"assignerShortName": "TYPO3",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-9573",
"datePublished": "2025-09-02T08:42:55.912Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-28T08:55:14.368Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-02T13:45:32.131Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-9575 (GCVE-0-2025-9575)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-28 18:02 – Updated: 2025-08-28 18:31
VLAI
Title
Linksys RE6250/RE6300/RE6350/RE6500/RE7000/RE9000 upload.cgi cgiMain os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability was determined in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 1.0.013.001/1.0.04.001/1.0.04.002/1.1.05.003/1.2.07.001. This issue affects the function cgiMain of the file /cgi-bin/upload.cgi. Executing manipulation of the argument filename can lead to os command injection. The attack may be performed from a remote location. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.321689 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.321689 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.634840 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/Link… | related |
| https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/Link… | exploit |
| https://www.linksys.com/ | product |
Impacted products
6 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linksys | RE6250 |
Affected:
1.0.013.001
Affected: 1.0.04.001 Affected: 1.0.04.002 Affected: 1.1.05.003 Affected: 1.2.07.001 |
|
| Linksys | RE6300 |
Affected:
1.0.013.001
Affected: 1.0.04.001 Affected: 1.0.04.002 Affected: 1.1.05.003 Affected: 1.2.07.001 |
|
| Linksys | RE6350 |
Affected:
1.0.013.001
Affected: 1.0.04.001 Affected: 1.0.04.002 Affected: 1.1.05.003 Affected: 1.2.07.001 |
|
| Linksys | RE6500 |
Affected:
1.0.013.001
Affected: 1.0.04.001 Affected: 1.0.04.002 Affected: 1.1.05.003 Affected: 1.2.07.001 |
|
| Linksys | RE7000 |
Affected:
1.0.013.001
Affected: 1.0.04.001 Affected: 1.0.04.002 Affected: 1.1.05.003 Affected: 1.2.07.001 |
|
| Linksys | RE9000 |
Affected:
1.0.013.001
Affected: 1.0.04.001 Affected: 1.0.04.002 Affected: 1.1.05.003 Affected: 1.2.07.001 |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-9575",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-28T18:31:02.503516Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T18:31:06.309Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/Linksys/vuln_13/13.md#poc"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/Linksys/vuln_13/13.md"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "RE6250",
"vendor": "Linksys",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.013.001"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.04.001"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.04.002"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.05.003"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.2.07.001"
}
]
},
{
"product": "RE6300",
"vendor": "Linksys",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.013.001"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.04.001"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.04.002"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.05.003"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.2.07.001"
}
]
},
{
"product": "RE6350",
"vendor": "Linksys",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.013.001"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.04.001"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.04.002"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.05.003"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.2.07.001"
}
]
},
{
"product": "RE6500",
"vendor": "Linksys",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.013.001"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.04.001"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.04.002"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.05.003"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.2.07.001"
}
]
},
{
"product": "RE7000",
"vendor": "Linksys",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.013.001"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.04.001"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.04.002"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.05.003"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.2.07.001"
}
]
},
{
"product": "RE9000",
"vendor": "Linksys",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.013.001"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.04.001"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.04.002"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.05.003"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.2.07.001"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Bond_yes (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was determined in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 1.0.013.001/1.0.04.001/1.0.04.002/1.1.05.003/1.2.07.001. This issue affects the function cgiMain of the file /cgi-bin/upload.cgi. Executing manipulation of the argument filename can lead to os command injection. The attack may be performed from a remote location. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way."
},
{
"lang": "de",
"value": "Es wurde eine Schwachstelle in Linksys RE6250, RE6300, RE6350, RE6500, RE7000 and RE9000 1.0.013.001/1.0.04.001/1.0.04.002/1.1.05.003/1.2.07.001 entdeckt. Es geht hierbei um die Funktion cgiMain der Datei /cgi-bin/upload.cgi. Die Manipulation des Arguments filename f\u00fchrt zu os command injection. Der Angriff kann \u00fcber das Netzwerk erfolgen. Die Ausnutzung wurde ver\u00f6ffentlicht und kann verwendet werden."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 6.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T18:02:06.116Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-321689 | Linksys RE6250/RE6300/RE6350/RE6500/RE7000/RE9000 upload.cgi cgiMain os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.321689"
},
{
"name": "VDB-321689 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.321689"
},
{
"name": "Submit #634840 | Linksys E6500\u3001RE6250\u3001RE6300\u3001RE6350\u3001RE7000\u3001RE9000 RE6500(1.0.013.001) RE6250(1.0.04.001) RE6300(1.2.07.001) RE6350(1.0.04.001) RE7000(1.1.05.003) RE9000(1.0.04.002) OS Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.634840"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/Linksys/vuln_13/13.md"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/Linksys/vuln_13/13.md#poc"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.linksys.com/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-28T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-28T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-28T13:05:52.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "Linksys RE6250/RE6300/RE6350/RE6500/RE7000/RE9000 upload.cgi cgiMain os command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-9575",
"datePublished": "2025-08-28T18:02:06.116Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-28T11:00:44.364Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T18:31:06.309Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-9579 (GCVE-0-2025-9579)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-28 18:32 – Updated: 2025-08-28 18:41
VLAI
Title
LB-LINK BL-X26 HTTP set_hidessid_cfg os command injection
Summary
A weakness has been identified in LB-LINK BL-X26 1.2.8. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /goform/set_hidessid_cfg of the component HTTP Handler. This manipulation of the argument enable causes os command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.321692 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.321692 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.636082 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/lin-3-start/lin-cve/blob/main/… | related |
| https://github.com/lin-3-start/lin-cve/blob/main/… | exploit |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-9579",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-28T18:41:56.264428Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T18:41:59.318Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/lin-3-start/lin-cve/blob/main/B-Link%20X26%20V1.2.8-1/B-Link%20X26%20V1.2.8.md"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/lin-3-start/lin-cve/blob/main/B-Link%20X26%20V1.2.8-1/B-Link%20X26%20V1.2.8.md#3-poc"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"modules": [
"HTTP Handler"
],
"product": "BL-X26",
"vendor": "LB-LINK",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.2.8"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "QMSSDXN (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A weakness has been identified in LB-LINK BL-X26 1.2.8. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /goform/set_hidessid_cfg of the component HTTP Handler. This manipulation of the argument enable causes os command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way."
},
{
"lang": "de",
"value": "Eine Schwachstelle wurde in LB-LINK BL-X26 1.2.8 gefunden. Hierbei geht es um eine nicht exakt ausgemachte Funktion der Datei /goform/set_hidessid_cfg der Komponente HTTP Handler. Dank der Manipulation des Arguments enable mit unbekannten Daten kann eine os command injection-Schwachstelle ausgenutzt werden. Die Umsetzung des Angriffs kann dabei \u00fcber das Netzwerk erfolgen. Die Schwachstelle wurde \u00f6ffentlich offengelegt und k\u00f6nnte ausgenutzt werden."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 6.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T18:32:09.759Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-321692 | LB-LINK BL-X26 HTTP set_hidessid_cfg os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.321692"
},
{
"name": "VDB-321692 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.321692"
},
{
"name": "Submit #636082 | LB-LINK BL-X26 v1.2.8 Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.636082"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/lin-3-start/lin-cve/blob/main/B-Link%20X26%20V1.2.8-1/B-Link%20X26%20V1.2.8.md"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/lin-3-start/lin-cve/blob/main/B-Link%20X26%20V1.2.8-1/B-Link%20X26%20V1.2.8.md#3-poc"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-28T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-28T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-28T14:20:32.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "LB-LINK BL-X26 HTTP set_hidessid_cfg os command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-9579",
"datePublished": "2025-08-28T18:32:09.759Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-28T12:15:16.188Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T18:41:59.318Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-9580 (GCVE-0-2025-9580)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-28 19:02 – Updated: 2025-08-28 19:58
VLAI
Title
LB-LINK BL-X26 HTTP set_blacklist os command injection
Summary
A security vulnerability has been detected in LB-LINK BL-X26 1.2.8. This affects an unknown function of the file /goform/set_blacklist of the component HTTP Handler. Such manipulation of the argument mac leads to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.321693 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.321693 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.636083 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/lin-3-start/lin-cve/blob/main/… | related |
| https://github.com/lin-3-start/lin-cve/blob/main/… | exploit |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-9580",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-28T19:58:21.204966Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T19:58:24.267Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/lin-3-start/lin-cve/blob/main/B-Link%20X26%20V1.2.8-2/B-Link%20X26%20V1.2.8.md"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/lin-3-start/lin-cve/blob/main/B-Link%20X26%20V1.2.8-2/B-Link%20X26%20V1.2.8.md#3poc"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"modules": [
"HTTP Handler"
],
"product": "BL-X26",
"vendor": "LB-LINK",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.2.8"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "QMSSDXN (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A security vulnerability has been detected in LB-LINK BL-X26 1.2.8. This affects an unknown function of the file /goform/set_blacklist of the component HTTP Handler. Such manipulation of the argument mac leads to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way."
},
{
"lang": "de",
"value": "Es wurde eine Schwachstelle in LB-LINK BL-X26 1.2.8 entdeckt. Betroffen ist eine unbekannte Funktion der Datei /goform/set_blacklist der Komponente HTTP Handler. Dank Manipulation des Arguments mac mit unbekannten Daten kann eine os command injection-Schwachstelle ausgenutzt werden. Ein Angriff ist aus der Distanz m\u00f6glich. Der Exploit ist \u00f6ffentlich verf\u00fcgbar und k\u00f6nnte genutzt werden."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 6.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T19:02:06.830Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-321693 | LB-LINK BL-X26 HTTP set_blacklist os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.321693"
},
{
"name": "VDB-321693 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.321693"
},
{
"name": "Submit #636083 | LB-LINK BL-X26 v1.2.8 Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.636083"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/lin-3-start/lin-cve/blob/main/B-Link%20X26%20V1.2.8-2/B-Link%20X26%20V1.2.8.md"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/lin-3-start/lin-cve/blob/main/B-Link%20X26%20V1.2.8-2/B-Link%20X26%20V1.2.8.md#3poc"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-28T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-28T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-28T14:20:33.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "LB-LINK BL-X26 HTTP set_blacklist os command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-9580",
"datePublished": "2025-08-28T19:02:06.830Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-28T12:15:26.934Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T19:58:24.267Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-9588 (GCVE-0-2025-9588)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-09-23 07:51 – Updated: 2026-06-05 11:09
VLAI
Title
OS Command Injection in Iron Mountain's enVision
Summary
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in Iron Mountain Archiving Services Inc. EnVision allows Command Injection.
This issue affects enVision: before 250563.
Severity
10 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.usom.gov.tr/bildirim/tr-25-0285 | government-resourcebroken-link |
| https://siberguvenlik.gov.tr/guvenlik-bildirimler… | government-resource |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Mountain Archiving Services Inc. | enVision |
Affected:
0 , < 250563
(custom)
|
Date Public
2025-09-23 07:46
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-9588",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-23T19:20:35.290451Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-23T19:20:48.995Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "enVision",
"vendor": "Iron Mountain Archiving Services Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "250563",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Ceylan BOZO\u011eULLARINDAN"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "sponsor",
"value": "Mehmet Emin Y\u00dcKSEL"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-09-23T07:46:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027) vulnerability in Iron Mountain Archiving Services Inc. EnVision allows Command Injection.\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects enVision: before 250563.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027) vulnerability in Iron Mountain Archiving Services Inc. EnVision allows Command Injection.\n\nThis issue affects enVision: before 250563."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-248",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-248 Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-05T11:09:28.792Z",
"orgId": "ca940d4e-fea4-4aa2-9a58-591a58b1ce21",
"shortName": "TR-CERT"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"government-resource",
"broken-link"
],
"url": "https://www.usom.gov.tr/bildirim/tr-25-0285"
},
{
"tags": [
"government-resource"
],
"url": "https://siberguvenlik.gov.tr/guvenlik-bildirimleri/detay/tr-25-0285"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "TR-25-0285",
"defect": [
"TR-25-0285"
],
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OS Command Injection in Iron Mountain\u0027s enVision",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ca940d4e-fea4-4aa2-9a58-591a58b1ce21",
"assignerShortName": "TR-CERT",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-9588",
"datePublished": "2025-09-23T07:51:53.825Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-28T13:36:53.676Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-05T11:09:28.792Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-9661 (GCVE-0-2025-9661)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-07 07:08 – Updated: 2026-05-07 13:02
VLAI
Title
OS command injection vulneravility in the management gui (maintenance utility) of Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23/24/26/28
Summary
OS command injection vulneravility in the management gui (maintenance utility) of Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23, 24, 26 and 28.
This issue affects Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23/24/26/28: before DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00, ESM A3-04-21/00.
Severity
8.1 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
4 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitachi | Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23 |
Affected:
0 , < DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00, ESM A3-04-21/00
(custom)
|
|
| Hitachi | Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 24 |
Affected:
0 , < DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00, ESM A3-04-21/00
(custom)
|
|
| Hitachi | Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 26 |
Affected:
0 , < DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00, ESM A3-04-21/00
(custom)
|
|
| Hitachi | Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 28 |
Affected:
0 , < DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00, ESM A3-04-21/00
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-9661",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-07T13:02:14.993613Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-07T13:02:35.204Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23",
"vendor": "Hitachi",
"versions": [
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00, ESM A3-04-21/00",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThan": "DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00, ESM A3-04-21/00",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 24",
"vendor": "Hitachi",
"versions": [
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00, ESM A3-04-21/00",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThan": "DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00, ESM A3-04-21/00",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 26",
"vendor": "Hitachi",
"versions": [
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00, ESM A3-04-21/00",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThan": "DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00, ESM A3-04-21/00",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 28",
"vendor": "Hitachi",
"versions": [
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00, ESM A3-04-21/00",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThan": "DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00, ESM A3-04-21/00",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cdiv\u003eOS command injection vulneravility in the management gui (maintenance utility) of Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23, 24, 26 and 28.\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThis issue affects Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23/24/26/28: before DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00, ESM A3-04-21/00.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"
}
],
"value": "OS command injection vulneravility in the management gui (maintenance utility) of Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23, 24, 26 and 28.\n\nThis issue affects Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23/24/26/28: before DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00, ESM A3-04-21/00."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS command injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-07T07:08:14.823Z",
"orgId": "50d0f415-c707-4733-9afc-8f6c0e9b3f82",
"shortName": "Hitachi"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.hitachi.com/products/it/storage-solutions/sec_info/2026/2026_309.html"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "hitachi-sec-2026-309",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OS command injection vulneravility in the management gui (maintenance utility) of Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23/24/26/28",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "50d0f415-c707-4733-9afc-8f6c0e9b3f82",
"assignerShortName": "Hitachi",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-9661",
"datePublished": "2026-05-07T07:08:14.823Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-29T07:14:42.691Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-07T13:02:35.204Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-9727 (GCVE-0-2025-9727)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-31 11:32 – Updated: 2025-10-23 16:24 Unsupported When Assigned
VLAI
Title
D-Link DIR-816L soap.cgi soapcgi_main os command injection
Summary
A weakness has been identified in D-Link DIR-816L 206b01. Affected by this issue is the function soapcgi_main of the file /soap.cgi. This manipulation of the argument service causes os command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.322016 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.322016 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.639698 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/scanleale/IOT_sec/blob/main/DI… | exploit |
| https://www.dlink.com/ | product |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-9727",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-02T14:42:26.338761Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-02T15:15:30.725Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "DIR-816L",
"vendor": "D-Link",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "206b01"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Lexpl0it (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A weakness has been identified in D-Link DIR-816L 206b01. Affected by this issue is the function soapcgi_main of the file /soap.cgi. This manipulation of the argument service causes os command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer."
},
{
"lang": "de",
"value": "Eine Schwachstelle wurde in D-Link DIR-816L 206b01 gefunden. Hierbei geht es um die Funktion soapcgi_main der Datei /soap.cgi. Mit der Manipulation des Arguments service mit unbekannten Daten kann eine os command injection-Schwachstelle ausgenutzt werden. Die Umsetzung des Angriffs kann dabei \u00fcber das Netzwerk erfolgen. Der Exploit wurde der \u00d6ffentlichkeit bekannt gemacht und k\u00f6nnte verwendet werden."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 6.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-23T16:24:37.931Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-322016 | D-Link DIR-816L soap.cgi soapcgi_main os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.322016"
},
{
"name": "VDB-322016 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.322016"
},
{
"name": "Submit #639698 | D-Link DIR-816L DIR816L_FW206b01 Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.639698"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/scanleale/IOT_sec/blob/main/DIR-816L.pdf"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.dlink.com/"
}
],
"tags": [
"unsupported-when-assigned"
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-30T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-30T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-08-31T16:25:35.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "D-Link DIR-816L soap.cgi soapcgi_main os command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-9727",
"datePublished": "2025-08-31T11:32:06.961Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-30T13:44:45.749Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-23T16:24:37.931Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation ID: MIT-22
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Description:
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
Description:
- For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Mitigation ID: MIT-15
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation ID: MIT-4.3
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
Description:
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Mitigation ID: MIT-28
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Output Encoding
Description:
- While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
Mitigation
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- If the program to be executed allows arguments to be specified within an input file or from standard input, then consider using that mode to pass arguments instead of the command line.
Mitigation ID: MIT-27
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Parameterization
Description:
- If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Some languages offer multiple functions that can be used to invoke commands. Where possible, identify any function that invokes a command shell using a single string, and replace it with a function that requires individual arguments. These functions typically perform appropriate quoting and filtering of arguments. For example, in C, the system() function accepts a string that contains the entire command to be executed, whereas execl(), execve(), and others require an array of strings, one for each argument. In Windows, CreateProcess() only accepts one command at a time. In Perl, if system() is provided with an array of arguments, then it will quote each of the arguments.
Mitigation ID: MIT-5
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
Description:
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When constructing OS command strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing OS command injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent OS command injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, when invoking a mail program, you might need to allow the subject field to contain otherwise-dangerous inputs like ";" and ">" characters, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the character might reduce the risk of OS command injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the subject field would not be recorded as the user intended. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it could be more important when the program relies on well-structured subject lines in order to pass messages to other components.
- Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
Mitigation ID: MIT-21
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
Description:
- When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation ID: MIT-32
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Description:
- Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation ID: MIT-32
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation ID: MIT-39
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- In the context of OS Command Injection, error information passed back to the user might reveal whether an OS command is being executed and possibly which command is being used.
Mitigation
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Description:
- Use runtime policy enforcement to create an allowlist of allowable commands, then prevent use of any command that does not appear in the allowlist. Technologies such as AppArmor are available to do this.
Mitigation ID: MIT-29
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Firewall
Description:
- Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
Mitigation ID: MIT-17
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation ID: MIT-16
Phases: Operation, Implementation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-6: Argument Injection
An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection
In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.