Common Weakness Enumeration
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Back to CWE stats page
CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
CVE-2026-12104 (GCVE-0-2026-12104)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-19 13:41 – Updated: 2026-06-19 15:03
VLAI
Title
Authenticated OS Command Injection in Bondix
Summary
OS command injection in the environment and tunnel configuration functionality in SIMA GmbH Bondix through version 1.25.7.5 on Linux allows an authenticated attacker with configuration write access to execute arbitrary operating-system commands via crafted configuration values passed to server-side scripts.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command injection')
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIMA GmbH | Bondix Server |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.25.7.5
(custom)
Unaffected: 1.25.7.6 (custom) |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Linux"
],
"product": "Bondix Server",
"vendor": "SIMA GmbH",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.25.7.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1.25.7.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jonas Friedli (avantguard cyber security AG)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "OS command injection in the environment and tunnel configuration functionality in SIMA GmbH Bondix through version 1.25.7.5 on Linux allows an authenticated attacker with configuration write access to execute arbitrary operating-system commands via crafted configuration values passed to server-side scripts."
}
],
"value": "OS command injection in the environment and tunnel configuration functionality in SIMA GmbH Bondix through version 1.25.7.5 on Linux allows an authenticated attacker with configuration write access to execute arbitrary operating-system commands via crafted configuration values passed to server-side scripts."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "YES",
"Recovery": "USER",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "AMBER",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/AU:Y/R:U/RE:L/U:Amber",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "LOW"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS command injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-19T15:03:06.381Z",
"orgId": "455daabc-a392-441d-aa46-37d35189897c",
"shortName": "NCSC.ch"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://wiki.bondix.dev/wiki/Security_Advisories#CVE-2026-12104_%E2%80%94_Authenticated_OS_Command_Injection_in_Bondix"
},
{
"url": "https://wiki.bondix.dev/wiki/Downloads#Release_Notes"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Authenticated OS Command Injection in Bondix",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "455daabc-a392-441d-aa46-37d35189897c",
"assignerShortName": "NCSC.ch",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-12104",
"datePublished": "2026-06-19T13:41:38.104Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-12T14:28:38.676Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-19T15:03:06.381Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-12161 (GCVE-0-2026-12161)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-15 23:55 – Updated: 2026-06-16 15:00
VLAI
Summary
Improper input validation in the SSH Elevate Shell feature in
Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2026.2.7 allows an authenticated user
with permission to create or modify a shared SSH entry to execute
arbitrary commands on a remote SSH host using stored elevation
credentials via a crafted alternate username and user interaction with
the Elevate Shell action.
Severity
8.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Devolutions | Remote Desktop Manager |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 2026.2.7
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-12161",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-16T14:59:54.304221Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-16T15:00:25.327Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Remote Desktop Manager",
"vendor": "Devolutions",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2026.2.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Improper input validation in the SSH Elevate Shell feature in \nDevolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2026.2.7 allows an authenticated user\n with permission to create or modify a shared SSH entry to execute \narbitrary commands on a remote SSH host using stored elevation \ncredentials via a crafted alternate username and user interaction with \nthe Elevate Shell action."
}
],
"value": "Improper input validation in the SSH Elevate Shell feature in \nDevolutions Remote Desktop Manager 2026.2.7 allows an authenticated user\n with permission to create or modify a shared SSH entry to execute \narbitrary commands on a remote SSH host using stored elevation \ncredentials via a crafted alternate username and user interaction with \nthe Elevate Shell action."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS command injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-15T23:55:24.745Z",
"orgId": "bfee16bd-18e6-446c-9a65-f5b2e3d89c23",
"shortName": "DEVOLUTIONS"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2026-0018/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "bfee16bd-18e6-446c-9a65-f5b2e3d89c23",
"assignerShortName": "DEVOLUTIONS",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-12161",
"datePublished": "2026-06-15T23:55:24.745Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-12T19:16:15.418Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-16T15:00:25.327Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-12398 (GCVE-0-2026-12398)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-16 14:52 – Updated: 2026-06-17 03:55
VLAI
Title
Galaxy_ng: shell injection in legacy role import via unsanitized git ref names
Summary
A command injection vulnerability was found in galaxy_ng. The do_git_checkout() function in the legacy role import API (v1) interpolates unsanitized git ref names (branch/tag names) into shell commands executed via subprocess.run() with shell=True. An authenticated user who controls a git repository can create a branch or tag with shell metacharacters in the name to achieve remote code execution on the pulp worker. The vulnerable endpoint is only reachable when GALAXY_ENABLE_LEGACY_ROLES is set to True, which is not the default configuration.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-12398 | vdb-entryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2489180 | issue-trackingx_refsource_REDHAT |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 |
cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2 |
Date Public
2026-06-16 00:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-12398",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-16T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-17T03:55:53.274Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "ansible-automation-platform-24/hub-rhel8",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "ansible-automation-platform-25/hub-rhel8",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "ansible-automation-platform-26/hub-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "ansible-automation-platform-27/hub-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "automation-hub",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "This issue was discovered by Chris Meyers (Red Hat)."
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A command injection vulnerability was found in galaxy_ng. The do_git_checkout() function in the legacy role import API (v1) interpolates unsanitized git ref names (branch/tag names) into shell commands executed via subprocess.run() with shell=True. An authenticated user who controls a git repository can create a branch or tag with shell metacharacters in the name to achieve remote code execution on the pulp worker. The vulnerable endpoint is only reachable when GALAXY_ENABLE_LEGACY_ROLES is set to True, which is not the default configuration."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Moderate"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-16T14:52:06.734Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-12398"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2489180",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2489180"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-06-16T13:13:58.336Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-06-16T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "Galaxy_ng: shell injection in legacy role import via unsanitized git ref names",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The following practices would help for avoiding exposure and mitigate this flaw:\n\n1. Ensure that GALAXY_ENABLE_LEGACY_ROLES is set to False (the default) in your Galaxy/Hub configuration. This prevents the v1 API routes from being registered, making the vulnerable endpoint entirely unreachable.\n\n2. If legacy role support must be enabled, restrict access to the Galaxy/Hub API to trusted users only. The vulnerability requires authentication, so limiting who can authenticate reduces exposure.\n\n3. Monitor import activity for suspicious git references containing shell metacharacters in branch or tag names."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
},
"x_redhatCweChain": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-12398",
"datePublished": "2026-06-16T14:52:06.734Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-16T13:22:54.012Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-17T03:55:53.274Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-1324 (GCVE-0-2026-1324)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-22 13:02 – Updated: 2026-02-23 08:52
VLAI
Title
Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Management System SSH Protocol session SessionController os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability was identified in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Management System up to 3.0.12. Affected by this issue is the function SessionController of the file /isomp-protocol/protocol/session of the component SSH Protocol Handler. The manipulation of the argument keypassword leads to os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.342300 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.342300 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.735716 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/LX-LX88/cve/issues/20 | broken-linkexploitissue-tracking |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sangfor | Operation and Maintenance Management System |
Affected:
3.0.0
Affected: 3.0.1 Affected: 3.0.2 Affected: 3.0.3 Affected: 3.0.4 Affected: 3.0.5 Affected: 3.0.6 Affected: 3.0.7 Affected: 3.0.8 Affected: 3.0.9 Affected: 3.0.10 Affected: 3.0.11 Affected: 3.0.12 |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-1324",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-22T20:21:33.900416Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-22T20:21:47.014Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"modules": [
"SSH Protocol Handler"
],
"product": "Operation and Maintenance Management System",
"vendor": "Sangfor",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.9"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.10"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.11"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.12"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "LINXI666 (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was identified in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Management System up to 3.0.12. Affected by this issue is the function SessionController of the file /isomp-protocol/protocol/session of the component SSH Protocol Handler. The manipulation of the argument keypassword leads to os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 9,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-23T08:52:16.272Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-342300 | Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Management System SSH Protocol session SessionController os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.342300"
},
{
"name": "VDB-342300 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.342300"
},
{
"name": "Submit #735716 | Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Management System (OSM / \u8fd0\u7ef4\u5b89\u5168\u7ba1\u7406\u7cfb\u7edf) 3.0.8 OS Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.735716"
},
{
"tags": [
"broken-link",
"exploit",
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/LX-LX88/cve/issues/20"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-01-22T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-01-22T01:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-01-31T06:11:05.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Management System SSH Protocol session SessionController os command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-1324",
"datePublished": "2026-01-22T13:02:08.642Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-22T07:40:46.347Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-23T08:52:16.272Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-1345 (GCVE-0-2026-1345)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-01 20:39 – Updated: 2026-04-03 13:01
VLAI
Title
Security Vulnerabilities have been found in IBM Verify Identity Access and IBM Security Verify Access
Summary
IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary commands as lower user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input.
Severity
7.3 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7268253 | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
4 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | Verify Identity Access Container |
Affected:
11.0 , ≤ 11.0.2
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:verify_identity_access_container:11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:verify_identity_access_container:11.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:verify_identity_access_container:11.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| IBM | Security Verify Access Container |
Affected:
10.0 , ≤ 10.0.9.1
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access_container:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access_container:10.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access_container:10.0.9.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| IBM | Verify Identity Access |
Affected:
11.0 , ≤ 11.0.2
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:verify_identity_access:11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:verify_identity_access:11.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:verify_identity_access:11.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| IBM | Security Verify Access |
Affected:
10.0 , ≤ 10.0.9.1
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access:10.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access:10.0.9.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-1345",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-03T03:55:34.211974Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-03T13:01:57.966Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:verify_identity_access_container:11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:verify_identity_access_container:11.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:verify_identity_access_container:11.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "Verify Identity Access Container",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "11.0.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "11.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access_container:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access_container:10.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access_container:10.0.9.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "Security Verify Access Container",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "10.0.9.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:verify_identity_access:11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:verify_identity_access:11.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:verify_identity_access:11.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "Verify Identity Access",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "11.0.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "11.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access:10.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_verify_access:10.0.9.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "Security Verify Access",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "10.0.9.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary commands as lower user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary commands as lower user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-01T20:39:27.175Z",
"orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"shortName": "ibm"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7268253"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIBM encourages customers to update their systems promptly.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAppliance:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAffected Products and Versions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFix availability\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003eIBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 - 11.0.2\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/quickorder?product=ibm%2FTivoli%2FIBM+Verify+Identity+Access\u0026amp;fixids=11.0.2.0-ISS-IVIA-IF0001\u0026amp;source=SAR\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDownload IBM Verify Identity Access v11.0.2 IF1\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003eIBM Security Verify Access 10.0 - 10.0.9.1\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/quickorder?product=ibm%2FTivoli%2FIBM+Security+Verify+Access\u0026amp;fixids=10.0.9.1-ISS-ISVA-IF0001\u0026amp;source=SAR\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003eDownload IBM Security Verify Access v10.0.9.1 IF1\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM encourages customers to update their systems promptly.\n\n\u00a0\n\nAppliance:\u00a0\n\nAffected Products and Versions\n\nFix availability\n\nIBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 - 11.0.2\n\n Download IBM Verify Identity Access v11.0.2 IF1 https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/quickorder \n\nIBM Security Verify Access 10.0 - 10.0.9.1\n\n Download IBM Security Verify Access v10.0.9.1 IF1 https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/quickorder"
}
],
"title": "Security Vulnerabilities have been found in IBM Verify Identity Access and IBM Security Verify Access",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "ibm-cvegen"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"assignerShortName": "ibm",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-1345",
"datePublished": "2026-04-01T20:39:27.175Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-22T16:25:31.568Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-03T13:01:57.966Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-1427 (GCVE-0-2026-1427)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-26 08:06 – Updated: 2026-01-26 14:07
VLAI
Title
WellChoose｜Single Sign-On Portal System - OS Command Injection
Summary
Single Sign-On Portal System developed by WellChoose has a OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands and execute them on the server.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.twcert.org.tw/tw/cp-132-10654-23f40-1.html | third-party-advisory |
| https://www.twcert.org.tw/en/cp-139-10655-59160-2.html | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WellChoose | Single Sign-On Portal System |
Affected:
0 , < IFTOP_P4_181
(custom)
|
Date Public
2026-01-26 08:04
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-1427",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-26T14:07:41.207398Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-26T14:07:52.296Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Single Sign-On Portal System",
"vendor": "WellChoose",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "IFTOP_P4_181",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-01-26T08:04:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Single Sign-On Portal System developed by WellChoose has a OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands and execute them on the server."
}
],
"value": "Single Sign-On Portal System developed by WellChoose has a OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands and execute them on the server."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-26T08:16:02.867Z",
"orgId": "cded6c7f-6ce5-4948-8f87-aa7a3bbb6b0e",
"shortName": "twcert"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/tw/cp-132-10654-23f40-1.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/en/cp-139-10655-59160-2.html"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Update to version IFTOP_P4_181 or later.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Update to version IFTOP_P4_181 or later."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "TVN-202601010",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "WellChoose\uff5cSingle Sign-On Portal System - OS Command Injection",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "cded6c7f-6ce5-4948-8f87-aa7a3bbb6b0e",
"assignerShortName": "twcert",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-1427",
"datePublished": "2026-01-26T08:06:49.755Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-26T07:21:57.296Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-26T14:07:52.296Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-1428 (GCVE-0-2026-1428)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-26 08:14 – Updated: 2026-01-26 14:04
VLAI
Title
WellChoose｜Single Sign-On Portal System - OS Command Injection
Summary
Single Sign-On Portal System developed by WellChoose has a OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands and execute them on the server.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.twcert.org.tw/tw/cp-132-10654-23f40-1.html | third-party-advisory |
| https://www.twcert.org.tw/en/cp-139-10655-59160-2.html | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WellChoose | Single Sign-On Portal System |
Affected:
0 , < IFTOP_P4_181
(custom)
|
Date Public
2026-01-26 08:07
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-1428",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-26T14:04:31.194159Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-26T14:04:40.424Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Single Sign-On Portal System",
"vendor": "WellChoose",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "IFTOP_P4_181",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-01-26T08:07:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Single Sign-On Portal System developed by WellChoose has a OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands and execute them on the server."
}
],
"value": "Single Sign-On Portal System developed by WellChoose has a OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands and execute them on the server."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-26T08:14:58.762Z",
"orgId": "cded6c7f-6ce5-4948-8f87-aa7a3bbb6b0e",
"shortName": "twcert"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/tw/cp-132-10654-23f40-1.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/en/cp-139-10655-59160-2.html"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Update to version IFTOP_P4_181 or later.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Update to version IFTOP_P4_181 or later."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "TVN-202601010",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "WellChoose\uff5cSingle Sign-On Portal System - OS Command Injection",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "cded6c7f-6ce5-4948-8f87-aa7a3bbb6b0e",
"assignerShortName": "twcert",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-1428",
"datePublished": "2026-01-26T08:14:58.762Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-26T07:21:59.002Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-26T14:04:40.424Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-1448 (GCVE-0-2026-1448)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-26 23:32 – Updated: 2026-02-23 08:59 Unsupported When Assigned
VLAI
Title
D-Link DIR-615 Web Management wiz_policy_3_machine.php os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability was detected in D-Link DIR-615 up to 4.10. This impacts an unknown function of the file /wiz_policy_3_machine.php of the component Web Management Interface. Performing a manipulation of the argument ipaddr results in os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.342880 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.342880 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.737006 | third-party-advisory |
| https://pentagonal-time-3a7.notion.site/DIR-615-v… | exploit |
| https://www.dlink.com/ | product |
Impacted products
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-1448",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-27T21:28:44.456288Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-27T21:28:54.376Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"modules": [
"Web Management Interface"
],
"product": "DIR-615",
"vendor": "D-Link",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.9"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.10"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Zephyr369 (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was detected in D-Link DIR-615 up to 4.10. This impacts an unknown function of the file /wiz_policy_3_machine.php of the component Web Management Interface. Performing a manipulation of the argument ipaddr results in os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 8.3,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-23T08:59:03.345Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-342880 | D-Link DIR-615 Web Management wiz_policy_3_machine.php os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.342880"
},
{
"name": "VDB-342880 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.342880"
},
{
"name": "Submit #737006 | Dlink DIR615 Firmware v4.10 and earlier (DIR-615 Rev D) OS Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.737006"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://pentagonal-time-3a7.notion.site/DIR-615-v4-10-2e7e5dd4c5a580a5aac5c8ce35933396?pvs=73"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.dlink.com/"
}
],
"tags": [
"unsupported-when-assigned"
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-01-26T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-01-26T01:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-01-28T15:43:28.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "D-Link DIR-615 Web Management wiz_policy_3_machine.php os command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-1448",
"datePublished": "2026-01-26T23:32:08.743Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-26T17:34:30.346Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-23T08:59:03.345Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-1459 (GCVE-0-2026-1459)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-24 02:48 – Updated: 2026-02-26 14:44
VLAI
Summary
A post-authentication command injection vulnerability in the TR-369 certificate download CGI program of the Zyxel VMG3625-T50B firmware versions through 5.50(ABPM.9.7)C0 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to execute operating system (OS) commands on an affected device.
Severity
7.2 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.zyxel.com/global/en/support/security-… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zyxel | VMG3625-T50B firmware |
Affected:
<= 5.50(ABPM.9.7)C0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-1459",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-25T04:55:35.642079Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T14:44:10.011Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VMG3625-T50B firmware",
"vendor": "Zyxel",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c= 5.50(ABPM.9.7)C0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A post-authentication command injection vulnerability in the TR-369 certificate download CGI program of the Zyxel\u0026nbsp;VMG3625-T50B firmware versions through\u0026nbsp;5.50(ABPM.9.7)C0 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to execute operating system (OS) commands on an affected device."
}
],
"value": "A post-authentication command injection vulnerability in the TR-369 certificate download CGI program of the Zyxel\u00a0VMG3625-T50B firmware versions through\u00a05.50(ABPM.9.7)C0 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to execute operating system (OS) commands on an affected device."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-24T02:48:35.439Z",
"orgId": "96e50032-ad0d-4058-a115-4d2c13821f9f",
"shortName": "Zyxel"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.zyxel.com/global/en/support/security-advisories/zyxel-security-advisory-for-null-pointer-dereference-and-command-injection-vulnerabilities-in-certain-4g-lte-5g-nr-cpe-dsl-ethernet-cpe-fiber-onts-security-routers-and-wireless-extenders-02-24-2026"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "96e50032-ad0d-4058-a115-4d2c13821f9f",
"assignerShortName": "Zyxel",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-1459",
"datePublished": "2026-02-24T02:48:35.439Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-27T01:26:24.186Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T14:44:10.011Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-1460 (GCVE-0-2026-1460)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-28 02:06 – Updated: 2026-04-29 03:55
VLAI
Summary
A post-authentication command injection vulnerability in the “DomainName” parameter of the DHCP configuration file in Zyxel DX3301-T0 and EX3301-T0 firmware versions through 5.50(ABVY.7.1)C0 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to execute OS commands on an affected device.
Severity
7.2 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.zyxel.com/global/en/support/security-… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zyxel | DX3301-T0 firmware |
Affected:
<= 5.50(ABVY.7.1)C0
|
|
| Zyxel | EX3301-T0 firmware |
Affected:
<= 5.50(ABVY.7.1)C0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-1460",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-28T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-29T03:55:38.320Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "DX3301-T0 firmware",
"vendor": "Zyxel",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c= 5.50(ABVY.7.1)C0"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "EX3301-T0 firmware",
"vendor": "Zyxel",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c= 5.50(ABVY.7.1)C0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A post-authentication command injection vulnerability in the \u201cDomainName\u201d parameter of the DHCP configuration file in Zyxel DX3301-T0 and EX3301-T0 firmware versions through 5.50(ABVY.7.1)C0 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to execute OS commands on an affected device."
}
],
"value": "A post-authentication command injection vulnerability in the \u201cDomainName\u201d parameter of the DHCP configuration file in Zyxel DX3301-T0 and EX3301-T0 firmware versions through 5.50(ABVY.7.1)C0 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to execute OS commands on an affected device."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS command injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-28T02:06:22.568Z",
"orgId": "96e50032-ad0d-4058-a115-4d2c13821f9f",
"shortName": "Zyxel"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.zyxel.com/global/en/support/security-advisories/zyxel-security-advisory-for-command-injection-vulnerabilities-in-certain-4g-lte-5g-nr-cpe-dsl-ethernet-cpe-fiber-onts-and-wireless-extenders-04-28-2026"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "96e50032-ad0d-4058-a115-4d2c13821f9f",
"assignerShortName": "Zyxel",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-1460",
"datePublished": "2026-04-28T02:06:22.568Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-27T01:26:25.772Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-29T03:55:38.320Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation ID: MIT-22
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Description:
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
Description:
- For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Mitigation ID: MIT-15
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation ID: MIT-4.3
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
Description:
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Mitigation ID: MIT-28
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Output Encoding
Description:
- While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
Mitigation
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- If the program to be executed allows arguments to be specified within an input file or from standard input, then consider using that mode to pass arguments instead of the command line.
Mitigation ID: MIT-27
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Parameterization
Description:
- If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Some languages offer multiple functions that can be used to invoke commands. Where possible, identify any function that invokes a command shell using a single string, and replace it with a function that requires individual arguments. These functions typically perform appropriate quoting and filtering of arguments. For example, in C, the system() function accepts a string that contains the entire command to be executed, whereas execl(), execve(), and others require an array of strings, one for each argument. In Windows, CreateProcess() only accepts one command at a time. In Perl, if system() is provided with an array of arguments, then it will quote each of the arguments.
Mitigation ID: MIT-5
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
Description:
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When constructing OS command strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing OS command injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent OS command injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, when invoking a mail program, you might need to allow the subject field to contain otherwise-dangerous inputs like ";" and ">" characters, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the character might reduce the risk of OS command injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the subject field would not be recorded as the user intended. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it could be more important when the program relies on well-structured subject lines in order to pass messages to other components.
- Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
Mitigation ID: MIT-21
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
Description:
- When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation ID: MIT-32
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Description:
- Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation ID: MIT-32
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation ID: MIT-39
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- In the context of OS Command Injection, error information passed back to the user might reveal whether an OS command is being executed and possibly which command is being used.
Mitigation
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Description:
- Use runtime policy enforcement to create an allowlist of allowable commands, then prevent use of any command that does not appear in the allowlist. Technologies such as AppArmor are available to do this.
Mitigation ID: MIT-29
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Firewall
Description:
- Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
Mitigation ID: MIT-17
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation ID: MIT-16
Phases: Operation, Implementation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-6: Argument Injection
An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection
In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.