Common Weakness Enumeration
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Back to CWE stats page
CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
CVE-2026-24905 (GCVE-0-2026-24905)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-29 21:29 – Updated: 2026-04-30 19:21
VLAI
Title
Inspektor Gadget has a Command Injection vulnerability in Makefile.build
Summary
Inspektor Gadget is a set of tools and framework for data collection and system inspection on Kubernetes clusters and Linux hosts using eBPF. The `ig` binary provides a subcommand for image building, used to generate custom gadget OCI images. A part of this functionality is implemented in the file `inspektor-gadget/cmd/common/image/build.go`. The `Makefile.build` file is the Makefile template employed during the building process. This file includes user-controlled data in an unsafe fashion, specifically some parameters are embedded without an adequate escaping in the commands inside the Makefile. Prior to version 0.48.1, this implementation is vulnerable to command injection: an attacker able to control values in the `buildOptions` structure would be able to execute arbitrary commands during the building process. An attacker able to exploit this vulnerability would be able to execute arbitrary command on the Linux host where the `ig` command is launched, if images are built with the `--local` flag or on the build container invoked by `ig`, if the `--local` flag is not provided. The `buildOptions` structure is extracted from the YAML gadget manifest passed to the `ig image build` command. Therefore, the attacker would need a way to control either the full `build.yml` file passed to the `ig image build` command, or one of its options. Typically, this could happen in a CI/CD scenario that builds untrusted gadgets to verify correctness. Version 0.51.1 fixes the issue.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/inspektor-gadget/inspektor-gad… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/inspektor-gadget/inspektor-gad… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/inspektor-gadget/inspektor-gad… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| inspektor-gadget | inspektor-gadget |
Affected:
< 0.51.1
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-24905",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-30T14:39:04.833042Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-02T16:35:58.554Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "inspektor-gadget",
"vendor": "inspektor-gadget",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.51.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Inspektor Gadget is a set of tools and framework for data collection and system inspection on Kubernetes clusters and Linux hosts using eBPF. The `ig` binary provides a subcommand for image building, used to generate custom gadget OCI images. A part of this functionality is implemented in the file `inspektor-gadget/cmd/common/image/build.go`. The `Makefile.build` file is the Makefile template employed during the building process. This file includes user-controlled data in an unsafe fashion, specifically some parameters are embedded without an adequate escaping in the commands inside the Makefile. Prior to version 0.48.1, this implementation is vulnerable to command injection: an attacker able to control values in the `buildOptions` structure would be able to execute arbitrary commands during the building process. An attacker able to exploit this vulnerability would be able to execute arbitrary command on the Linux host where the `ig` command is launched, if images are built with the `--local` flag or on the build container invoked by `ig`, if the `--local` flag is not provided. The `buildOptions` structure is extracted from the YAML gadget manifest passed to the `ig image build` command. Therefore, the attacker would need a way to control either the full `build.yml` file passed to the `ig image build` command, or one of its options. Typically, this could happen in a CI/CD scenario that builds untrusted gadgets to verify correctness. Version 0.51.1 fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 6.6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-30T19:21:40.531Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/inspektor-gadget/inspektor-gadget/security/advisories/GHSA-79qw-g77v-2vfh",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/inspektor-gadget/inspektor-gadget/security/advisories/GHSA-79qw-g77v-2vfh"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/inspektor-gadget/inspektor-gadget/commit/7c83ad84ff7a68565655253e2cf1c5d2da695c1a",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/inspektor-gadget/inspektor-gadget/commit/7c83ad84ff7a68565655253e2cf1c5d2da695c1a"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/inspektor-gadget/inspektor-gadget/commit/d9bf2fe4a180dad33ce57ca793ff4799ee7b8320",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/inspektor-gadget/inspektor-gadget/commit/d9bf2fe4a180dad33ce57ca793ff4799ee7b8320"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-79qw-g77v-2vfh",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Inspektor Gadget has a Command Injection vulnerability in Makefile.build"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-24905",
"datePublished": "2026-01-29T21:29:24.260Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-27T19:35:20.530Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-30T19:21:40.531Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-25037 (GCVE-0-2026-25037)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-27 00:59 – Updated: 2026-03-02 14:27
VLAI
Title
Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection
Summary
An OS command injection
vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an
authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by
configuring a maliciously crafted LCD state which is later processed
during system setup, enabling remote code execution.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
3 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copeland | Copeland XWEB 300D PRO |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.12.1
(custom)
|
|
| Copeland | Copeland XWEB 500D PRO |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.12.1
(custom)
|
|
| Copeland | Copeland XWEB 500B PRO |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.12.1
(custom)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-25037",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-02T14:27:15.316142Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-02T14:27:22.123Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Copeland XWEB 300D PRO",
"vendor": "Copeland",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.12.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Copeland XWEB 500D PRO",
"vendor": "Copeland",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.12.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Copeland XWEB 500B PRO",
"vendor": "Copeland",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.12.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Amir Zaltzman and Noam Moshe of Claroty Team82 reported this vulnerability to CISA."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An OS command injection \n\nvulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an \nauthenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by\n configuring a maliciously crafted LCD state which is later processed \nduring system setup, enabling remote code execution."
}
],
"value": "An OS command injection \n\nvulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an \nauthenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by\n configuring a maliciously crafted LCD state which is later processed \nduring system setup, enabling remote code execution."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-27T00:59:14.738Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://webapps.copeland.com/Dixell/Pages/SystemSoftwareUpdate"
},
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-26-057-10"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-057-10.json"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Copeland has provided a fix for the vulnerabilities and recommends users\n update the XWEB Pro to the latest version by going to their software \nupdate page \n\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://webapps.copeland.com/Dixell/Pages/SystemSoftwareUpdate\"\u003ehttps://webapps.copeland.com/Dixell/Pages/SystemSoftwareUpdate\u003c/a\u003e in the \nsections dedicated to the different XWEBPRO models page.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Copeland has provided a fix for the vulnerabilities and recommends users\n update the XWEB Pro to the latest version by going to their software \nupdate page \n https://webapps.copeland.com/Dixell/Pages/SystemSoftwareUpdate in the \nsections dedicated to the different XWEBPRO models page."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Alternatively, a user logged into an XWEB Pro with internet access can \nupdate XWEB Pro directly from Copeland servers via the menu SYSTEM -- \nUpdates | Network.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Alternatively, a user logged into an XWEB Pro with internet access can \nupdate XWEB Pro directly from Copeland servers via the menu SYSTEM -- \nUpdates | Network."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ICSA-26-057-10",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-25037",
"datePublished": "2026-02-27T00:59:14.738Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-05T16:47:16.585Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-02T14:27:22.123Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-25041 (GCVE-0-2026-25041)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-09 19:53 – Updated: 2026-03-09 20:34
VLAI
Title
Budibase has a Command Injection in PostgreSQL Dump Command
Summary
Budibase is a low code platform for creating internal tools, workflows, and admin panels. In 3.23.22 and earlier, the PostgreSQL integration constructs shell commands using user-controlled configuration values (database name, host, password, etc.) without proper sanitization. The password and other connection parameters are directly interpolated into a shell command. This affects packages/server/src/integrations/postgres.ts.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/security/adv… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/commit/9fdbf… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/blob/f34d545… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-25041",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-09T20:31:29.973731Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-09T20:34:21.741Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "budibase",
"vendor": "Budibase",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c= 3.23.22"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Budibase is a low code platform for creating internal tools, workflows, and admin panels. In 3.23.22 and earlier, the PostgreSQL integration constructs shell commands using user-controlled configuration values (database name, host, password, etc.) without proper sanitization. The password and other connection parameters are directly interpolated into a shell command. This affects packages/server/src/integrations/postgres.ts."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-09T19:53:10.448Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/security/advisories/GHSA-726g-59wr-cj4c",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/security/advisories/GHSA-726g-59wr-cj4c"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/commit/9fdbff32fb9e69650ba899a799e13f80d9b09e93",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/commit/9fdbff32fb9e69650ba899a799e13f80d9b09e93"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/blob/f34d545602a7c94427bae63312a5ee9bf2aa6c85/packages/server/src/integrations/postgres.ts#L529-L531",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/blob/f34d545602a7c94427bae63312a5ee9bf2aa6c85/packages/server/src/integrations/postgres.ts#L529-L531"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-726g-59wr-cj4c",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Budibase has a Command Injection in PostgreSQL Dump Command"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-25041",
"datePublished": "2026-03-09T19:53:10.448Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-28T14:50:47.886Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-09T20:34:21.741Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-25044 (GCVE-0-2026-25044)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-03 15:38 – Updated: 2026-04-03 16:45
VLAI
Title
Budibase: Command Injection in Bash Automation Step
Summary
Budibase is an open-source low-code platform. Prior to version 3.33.4, the bash automation step executes user-provided commands using execSync without proper sanitization or validation. User input is processed through processStringSync which allows template interpolation, potentially allowing arbitrary command execution. This issue has been patched in version 3.33.4.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/security/adv… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/releases/tag… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-25044",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-03T16:45:21.280192Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-03T16:45:28.857Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "budibase",
"vendor": "Budibase",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.33.4"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Budibase is an open-source low-code platform. Prior to version 3.33.4, the bash automation step executes user-provided commands using execSync without proper sanitization or validation. User input is processed through processStringSync which allows template interpolation, potentially allowing arbitrary command execution. This issue has been patched in version 3.33.4."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-03T15:38:23.853Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/security/advisories/GHSA-gjw9-34gf-rp6m",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/security/advisories/GHSA-gjw9-34gf-rp6m"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/releases/tag/3.33.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Budibase/budibase/releases/tag/3.33.2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-gjw9-34gf-rp6m",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Budibase: Command Injection in Bash Automation Step"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-25044",
"datePublished": "2026-04-03T15:38:23.853Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-28T14:50:47.886Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-03T16:45:28.857Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-25053 (GCVE-0-2026-25053)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-04 16:47 – Updated: 2026-02-05 14:35
VLAI
Title
n8n is Vulnerable to OS Command Injection in Git Node
Summary
n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to versions 1.123.10 and 2.5.0, vulnerabilities in the Git node allowed authenticated users with permission to create or modify workflows to execute arbitrary system commands or read arbitrary files on the n8n host. This issue has been patched in versions 1.123.10 and 2.5.0.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/security/advisories… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-25053",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-05T14:23:18.822033Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-05T14:35:56.358Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n8n",
"vendor": "n8n-io",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.123.10"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.5.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to versions 1.123.10 and 2.5.0, vulnerabilities in the Git node allowed authenticated users with permission to create or modify workflows to execute arbitrary system commands or read arbitrary files on the n8n host. This issue has been patched in versions 1.123.10 and 2.5.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.4,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-04T16:47:13.939Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/security/advisories/GHSA-9g95-qf3f-ggrw",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/security/advisories/GHSA-9g95-qf3f-ggrw"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-9g95-qf3f-ggrw",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "n8n is Vulnerable to OS Command Injection in Git Node"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-25053",
"datePublished": "2026-02-04T16:47:13.939Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-28T14:50:47.888Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-05T14:35:56.358Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-25063 (GCVE-0-2026-25063)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-29 21:47 – Updated: 2026-02-10 14:55
VLAI
Title
gradle-completion has a Bash command injection issue
Summary
gradle-completion provides Bash and Zsh completion support for Gradle. A command injection vulnerability was found in gradle-completion up to and including 9.3.0 that allows arbitrary code execution when a user triggers Bash tab completion in a project containing a malicious Gradle build file. The `gradle-completion` script for Bash fails to adequately sanitize Gradle task names and task descriptions, allowing command injection via a malicious Gradle build file when the user completes a command in Bash (without them explicitly running any task in the build). For example, given a task description that includes a string between backticks, then that string would be evaluated as a command when presenting the task description in the completion list. While task execution is the core feature of Gradle, this inherent execution may lead to unexpected outcomes. The vulnerability does not affect zsh completion. The first patched version is 9.3.1. As a workaround, it is possible and effective to temporarily disable bash completion for Gradle by removing `gradle-completion` from `.bashrc` or `.bash_profile`.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
4 references
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| gradle | gradle-completion |
Affected:
< 9.3.1
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-25063",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-30T14:43:48.091488Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-02T16:35:06.531Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-10T14:55:17.356Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/cve-2026-25063-detection-script-command-injection-vulnerability-in-bash-completion-component"
},
{
"url": "https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/cve-2026-25063-mitigation-script-command-injection-vulnerability-in-bash-completion-component"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "ADPogram 0.0.1"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "gradle-completion",
"vendor": "gradle",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 9.3.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "gradle-completion provides Bash and Zsh completion support for Gradle. A command injection vulnerability was found in gradle-completion up to and including 9.3.0 that allows arbitrary code execution when a user triggers Bash tab completion in a project containing a malicious Gradle build file. The `gradle-completion` script for Bash fails to adequately sanitize Gradle task names and task descriptions, allowing command injection via a malicious Gradle build file when the user completes a command in Bash (without them explicitly running any task in the build). For example, given a task description that includes a string between backticks, then that string would be evaluated as a command when presenting the task description in the completion list. While task execution is the core feature of Gradle, this inherent execution may lead to unexpected outcomes. The vulnerability does not affect zsh completion. The first patched version is 9.3.1. As a workaround, it is possible and effective to temporarily disable bash completion for Gradle by removing `gradle-completion` from `.bashrc` or `.bash_profile`."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 8.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-157",
"description": "CWE-157: Failure to Sanitize Paired Delimiters",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-29T21:47:16.881Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/gradle/gradle-completion/security/advisories/GHSA-qggc-44r3-cjgv",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gradle/gradle-completion/security/advisories/GHSA-qggc-44r3-cjgv"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/gradle/gradle-completion/commit/ecacc32bb882210e5d37cd79a74de1af0d0ccad7",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gradle/gradle-completion/commit/ecacc32bb882210e5d37cd79a74de1af0d0ccad7"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-qggc-44r3-cjgv",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "gradle-completion has a Bash command injection issue"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-25063",
"datePublished": "2026-01-29T21:47:16.881Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-28T14:50:47.889Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-10T14:55:17.356Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-25070 (GCVE-0-2026-25070)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-07 00:20 – Updated: 2026-05-11 23:11
VLAI
Title
XikeStor SKS8310-8X PingTestSet Command Injection
Summary
XikeStor SKS8310-8X Network Switch firmware versions 1.04.B07 and prior contain an OS command injection vulnerability in the /goform/PingTestSet endpoint that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands. Attackers can inject malicious commands through the destIp parameter to achieve remote code execution with root privileges on the network switch.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.aliexpress.com/i/3256808697772710.html | product |
| https://openwrt.org/toh/xikestor/sks8310-8x?s%5B%… | product |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anhui Seeker Electronic Technology Co., LTD. | XikeStor SKS8310-8X |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.04.B07
(custom)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-25070",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-10T17:45:00.740177Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-10T17:58:52.495Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "XikeStor SKS8310-8X",
"vendor": "Anhui Seeker Electronic Technology Co., LTD.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.04.B07",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Kazuma Matsumoto, a security researcher at GMO Cybersecurity by IERAE, Inc."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "VulnCheck"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "XikeStor SKS8310-8X Network Switch firmware versions 1.04.B07 and prior contain an OS command injection vulnerability in the /goform/PingTestSet endpoint that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands. Attackers can inject malicious commands through the destIp parameter to achieve remote code execution with root privileges on the network switch."
}
],
"value": "XikeStor SKS8310-8X Network Switch firmware versions 1.04.B07 and prior contain an OS command injection vulnerability in the /goform/PingTestSet endpoint that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands. Attackers can inject malicious commands through the destIp parameter to achieve remote code execution with root privileges on the network switch."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T23:11:05.962Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.aliexpress.com/i/3256808697772710.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://openwrt.org/toh/xikestor/sks8310-8x?s%5B%5D=xikestor\u0026s%5B%5D=sks8310\u0026s%5B%5D=8x"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "XikeStor SKS8310-8X PingTestSet Command Injection",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-25070",
"datePublished": "2026-03-07T00:20:03.359Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-28T21:47:35.120Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T23:11:05.962Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-25089 (GCVE-0-2026-25089)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-09 14:27 – Updated: 2026-06-10 13:35
VLAI
Summary
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.4 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.4 through 5.0.5 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests
Severity
9.1 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Execute unauthorized code or commands
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
3 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortinet | FortiSandbox |
Affected:
5.0.0 , ≤ 5.0.5
(semver)
Affected: 4.4.0 , ≤ 4.4.8 (semver) Affected: 4.2.1 , ≤ 4.2.8 (semver) cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:5.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:5.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:5.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:5.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:5.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:5.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| Fortinet | FortiSandbox Cloud |
Affected:
5.0.4 , ≤ 5.0.5
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandboxcloud:5.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandboxcloud:5.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| Fortinet | FortiSandbox PaaS |
Affected:
5.0.4 , ≤ 5.0.5
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandboxpaas:5.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandboxpaas:5.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-25089",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-10T03:58:38.447554Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-10T13:35:01.375Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:5.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:5.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:5.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:5.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:5.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:5.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:4.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "FortiSandbox",
"vendor": "Fortinet",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.0.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.4.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.2.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.2.1",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandboxcloud:5.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandboxcloud:5.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "FortiSandbox Cloud",
"vendor": "Fortinet",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.0.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.4",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandboxpaas:5.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandboxpaas:5.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "FortiSandbox PaaS",
"vendor": "Fortinet",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.0.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.4",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command (\u0027os command injection\u0027) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.4 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.4 through 5.0.5 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Execute unauthorized code or commands",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-09T14:27:47.492Z",
"orgId": "6abe59d8-c742-4dff-8ce8-9b0ca1073da8",
"shortName": "fortinet"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-141",
"url": "https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-141"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to upcoming FortiSandbox version 5.2.0 or above\nUpgrade to FortiSandbox version 5.0.6 or above\nUpgrade to FortiSandbox version 4.4.9 or above\nUpgrade to upcoming FortiSandbox PaaS version 5.2.0 or above\nUpgrade to FortiSandbox PaaS version 5.0.6 or above\nFortinet remediated this issue in FortiSandbox Cloud version 5.2.0 (not released) and hence customers do not need to perform any action.\nFortinet remediated this issue in FortiSandbox Cloud version 5.0.6 (not released) and hence customers do not need to perform any action."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6abe59d8-c742-4dff-8ce8-9b0ca1073da8",
"assignerShortName": "fortinet",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-25089",
"datePublished": "2026-06-09T14:27:47.492Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-29T09:27:29.820Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-10T13:35:01.375Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-25105 (GCVE-0-2026-25105)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-27 00:52 – Updated: 2026-03-02 12:47
VLAI
Title
Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection
Summary
An OS command injection
vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an
authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by
injecting malicious input into parameters of the Modbus command tool in
the debug route.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
3 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copeland | Copeland XWEB 300D PRO |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.12.1
(custom)
|
|
| Copeland | Copeland XWEB 500D PRO |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.12.1
(custom)
|
|
| Copeland | Copeland XWEB 500B PRO |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.12.1
(custom)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-25105",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-02T12:47:30.692019Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-02T12:47:45.130Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Copeland XWEB 300D PRO",
"vendor": "Copeland",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.12.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Copeland XWEB 500D PRO",
"vendor": "Copeland",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.12.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Copeland XWEB 500B PRO",
"vendor": "Copeland",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.12.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Amir Zaltzman and Noam Moshe of Claroty Team82 reported this vulnerability to CISA."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An OS command injection \n\n\n\n\n\nvulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an \nauthenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by\n injecting malicious input into parameters of the Modbus command tool in\n the debug route."
}
],
"value": "An OS command injection \n\n\n\n\n\nvulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an \nauthenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by\n injecting malicious input into parameters of the Modbus command tool in\n the debug route."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-27T00:52:21.154Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://webapps.copeland.com/Dixell/Pages/SystemSoftwareUpdate"
},
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-26-057-10"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-057-10.json"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Copeland has provided a fix for the vulnerabilities and recommends users\n update the XWEB Pro to the latest version by going to their software \nupdate page \n\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://webapps.copeland.com/Dixell/Pages/SystemSoftwareUpdate\"\u003ehttps://webapps.copeland.com/Dixell/Pages/SystemSoftwareUpdate\u003c/a\u003e in the \nsections dedicated to the different XWEBPRO models page.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Copeland has provided a fix for the vulnerabilities and recommends users\n update the XWEB Pro to the latest version by going to their software \nupdate page \n https://webapps.copeland.com/Dixell/Pages/SystemSoftwareUpdate in the \nsections dedicated to the different XWEBPRO models page."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Alternatively, a user logged into an XWEB Pro with internet access can \nupdate XWEB Pro directly from Copeland servers via the menu SYSTEM -- \nUpdates | Network.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Alternatively, a user logged into an XWEB Pro with internet access can \nupdate XWEB Pro directly from Copeland servers via the menu SYSTEM -- \nUpdates | Network."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ICSA-26-057-10",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Copeland XWEB and XWEB Pro OS Command Injection",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-25105",
"datePublished": "2026-02-27T00:52:21.154Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-05T16:47:16.532Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-02T12:47:45.130Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-25108 (GCVE-0-2026-25108)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-13 03:39 – Updated: 2026-02-26 14:44
VLAI
Summary
FileZen contains an OS command injection vulnerability. When FileZen Antivirus Check Option is enabled, a logged-in user may send a specially crafted HTTP request to execute an arbitrary OS command.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: active
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
3 references
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soliton Systems K.K. | FileZen |
Affected:
V5.0.0 to V5.0.10
|
|
| Soliton Systems K.K. | FileZen |
Affected:
V4.2.1 to V4.2.8
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-25108",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "active"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-25T04:55:24.116263Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"dateAdded": "2026-02-24",
"reference": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-25108"
},
"type": "kev"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T14:44:20.718Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"government-resource"
],
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-25108"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-02-24T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "CVE-2026-25108 added to CISA KEV"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "FileZen",
"vendor": "Soliton Systems K.K.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "V5.0.0 to V5.0.10"
}
]
},
{
"product": "FileZen",
"vendor": "Soliton Systems K.K.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "V4.2.1 to V4.2.8"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "FileZen contains an OS command injection vulnerability. When FileZen Antivirus Check Option is enabled, a logged-in user may send a specially crafted HTTP request to execute an arbitrary OS command."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en-US",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-13T04:36:19.553Z",
"orgId": "ede6fdc4-6654-4307-a26d-3331c018e2ce",
"shortName": "jpcert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.soliton.co.jp/support/2026/006657.html"
},
{
"url": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN84622767/"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ede6fdc4-6654-4307-a26d-3331c018e2ce",
"assignerShortName": "jpcert",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-25108",
"datePublished": "2026-02-13T03:39:03.795Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-30T11:03:04.608Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T14:44:20.718Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation ID: MIT-22
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Description:
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
Description:
- For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Mitigation ID: MIT-15
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation ID: MIT-4.3
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
Description:
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Mitigation ID: MIT-28
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Output Encoding
Description:
- While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
Mitigation
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- If the program to be executed allows arguments to be specified within an input file or from standard input, then consider using that mode to pass arguments instead of the command line.
Mitigation ID: MIT-27
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Parameterization
Description:
- If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Some languages offer multiple functions that can be used to invoke commands. Where possible, identify any function that invokes a command shell using a single string, and replace it with a function that requires individual arguments. These functions typically perform appropriate quoting and filtering of arguments. For example, in C, the system() function accepts a string that contains the entire command to be executed, whereas execl(), execve(), and others require an array of strings, one for each argument. In Windows, CreateProcess() only accepts one command at a time. In Perl, if system() is provided with an array of arguments, then it will quote each of the arguments.
Mitigation ID: MIT-5
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
Description:
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When constructing OS command strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing OS command injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent OS command injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, when invoking a mail program, you might need to allow the subject field to contain otherwise-dangerous inputs like ";" and ">" characters, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the character might reduce the risk of OS command injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the subject field would not be recorded as the user intended. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it could be more important when the program relies on well-structured subject lines in order to pass messages to other components.
- Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
Mitigation ID: MIT-21
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
Description:
- When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation ID: MIT-32
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Description:
- Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation ID: MIT-32
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation ID: MIT-39
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- In the context of OS Command Injection, error information passed back to the user might reveal whether an OS command is being executed and possibly which command is being used.
Mitigation
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Description:
- Use runtime policy enforcement to create an allowlist of allowable commands, then prevent use of any command that does not appear in the allowlist. Technologies such as AppArmor are available to do this.
Mitigation ID: MIT-29
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Firewall
Description:
- Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
Mitigation ID: MIT-17
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation ID: MIT-16
Phases: Operation, Implementation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-6: Argument Injection
An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection
In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.