CVE-2019-16770
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2019-12-05 19:35
Modified
2024-08-05 01:24
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Potential DOS attack in Puma
References
| ▼ | URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|---|
| security-advisories@github.com | https://github.com/puma/puma/security/advisories/GHSA-7xx3-m584-x994 | Mitigation, Third Party Advisory | |
| security-advisories@github.com | https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00034.html | Mailing List, Third Party Advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T01:24:48.578Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/puma/puma/security/advisories/GHSA-7xx3-m584-x994"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20220525 [SECURITY] [DLA 3023-1] puma security update",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00034.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "puma",
"vendor": "puma",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.3.1",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In Puma before versions 3.12.2 and 4.3.1, a poorly-behaved client could use keepalive requests to monopolize Puma\u0027s reactor and create a denial of service attack. If more keepalive connections to Puma are opened than there are threads available, additional connections will wait permanently if the attacker sends requests frequently enough. This vulnerability is patched in Puma 4.3.1 and 3.12.2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-05-26T00:06:11",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/puma/puma/security/advisories/GHSA-7xx3-m584-x994"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20220525 [SECURITY] [DLA 3023-1] puma security update",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00034.html"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-7xx3-m584-x994",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Potential DOS attack in Puma",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Reverse proxies in front of Puma could be configured to always allow less than X keepalive connections to a Puma cluster or process, where X is the number of threads configured in Puma\u0027s thread pool."
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
"ID": "CVE-2019-16770",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Potential DOS attack in Puma"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "puma",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_name": "\u003c 4.3.1",
"version_value": "4.3.1"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "puma"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "In Puma before versions 3.12.2 and 4.3.1, a poorly-behaved client could use keepalive requests to monopolize Puma\u0027s reactor and create a denial of service attack. If more keepalive connections to Puma are opened than there are threads available, additional connections will wait permanently if the attacker sends requests frequently enough. This vulnerability is patched in Puma 4.3.1 and 3.12.2."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/puma/puma/security/advisories/GHSA-7xx3-m584-x994",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/puma/puma/security/advisories/GHSA-7xx3-m584-x994"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20220525 [SECURITY] [DLA 3023-1] puma security update",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00034.html"
}
]
},
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-7xx3-m584-x994",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"work_around": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Reverse proxies in front of Puma could be configured to always allow less than X keepalive connections to a Puma cluster or process, where X is the number of threads configured in Puma\u0027s thread pool."
}
]
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2019-16770",
"datePublished": "2019-12-05T19:35:14",
"dateReserved": "2019-09-24T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T01:24:48.578Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2019-16770\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2019-12-05T20:15:10.093\",\"lastModified\":\"2022-10-08T02:42:22.527\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In Puma before versions 3.12.2 and 4.3.1, a poorly-behaved client could use keepalive requests to monopolize Puma\u0027s reactor and create a denial of service attack. If more keepalive connections to Puma are opened than there are threads available, additional connections will wait permanently if the attacker sends requests frequently enough. This vulnerability is patched in Puma 4.3.1 and 3.12.2.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En Puma, anterior a las versiones 3.12.2 y 4.3.1, un cliente con mal comportamiento podr\u00eda utilizar solicitudes de keepalive para monopolizar el reactor de Puma y crear un ataque de denegaci\u00f3n de servicio. Si se abren m\u00e1s conexiones keepalive a Puma que hilos disponibles, las conexiones adicionales esperar\u00e1n permanentemente si el atacante env\u00eda solicitudes con la suficiente frecuencia. Esta vulnerabilidad est\u00e1 reparada en Puma 4.3.1 y 3.12.2.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6},{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":1.4}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\",\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"baseScore\":5.0},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-770\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-770\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:puma:puma:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.0.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.12.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F07EBCE0-597F-4CC0-BD4F-93F97B05A684\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:puma:puma:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"4.0.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"4.3.1\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"2E92BCF2-211F-4B03-AC15-4053953FB112\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"DEECE5FC-CACF-4496-A3E7-164736409252\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/puma/puma/security/advisories/GHSA-7xx3-m584-x994\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mitigation\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00034.html\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
}
}
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.