Vulnerability from bitnami_vulndb
Published
2024-03-06 10:51
Modified
2025-05-20 10:02
Summary
Apache Airflow: Missing CSRF protection on DAG/trigger
Details
Apache Airflow, version 2.7.0 through 2.7.3, has a vulnerability that allows an attacker to trigger a DAG in a GET request without CSRF validation. As a result, it was possible for a malicious website opened in the same browser - by the user who also had Airflow UI opened - to trigger the execution of DAGs without the user's consent. Users are advised to upgrade to version 2.8.0 or later which is not affected
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Bitnami",
"name": "airflow",
"purl": "pkg:bitnami/airflow"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.7.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.7.4"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-49920"
],
"database_specific": {
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:apache:airflow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"severity": "Medium"
},
"details": "Apache Airflow, version 2.7.0 through 2.7.3, has a vulnerability that allows an attacker to trigger a DAG in a GET request without CSRF validation.\u00a0As a result, it was possible for a malicious website opened in the same browser - by the user who also had Airflow UI opened - to trigger the execution of DAGs without the user\u0027s consent.\nUsers are advised to upgrade to version 2.8.0 or later which is not affected",
"id": "BIT-airflow-2023-49920",
"modified": "2025-05-20T10:02:07.006Z",
"published": "2024-03-06T10:51:17.298Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/21/3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36026"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/mnwd2vcfw3gms6ft6kl951vfbqrxsnjq"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-49920"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.5.0",
"summary": "Apache Airflow: Missing CSRF protection on DAG/trigger"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…