Vulnerability from bitnami_vulndb
Published
2026-06-10 08:39
Modified
2026-06-10 09:06
Summary
Apache HTTP Server: mod_dav_fs protected directory access
Details
A path handling issue in mod_dav_fs in Apache 2.4.67 and earlier allows a WebDAV content author to directly manipulate trusted DAV property databases, potentially causing child process crashes.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.68, which fixes this issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Bitnami",
"name": "apache",
"purl": "pkg:bitnami/apache"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.4.68"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42535"
],
"database_specific": {
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:apache:http_server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "A path handling issue in mod_dav_fs in Apache 2.4.67 and earlier\u00a0allows a WebDAV content author to directly manipulate trusted DAV property databases, potentially causing child process crashes.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.68, which fixes this issue.",
"id": "BIT-apache-2026-42535",
"modified": "2026-06-10T09:06:17.876Z",
"published": "2026-06-10T08:39:13.592Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/06/08/8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42535"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.6.2",
"summary": "Apache HTTP Server: mod_dav_fs protected directory access"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…