Vulnerability from bitnami_vulndb
Published
2024-03-06 10:53
Modified
2025-05-20 10:02
Summary
Memory exhaustion in QUIC connection handling in crypto/tls
Details
QUIC connections do not set an upper bound on the amount of data buffered when reading post-handshake messages, allowing a malicious QUIC connection to cause unbounded memory growth. With fix, connections now consistently reject messages larger than 65KiB in size.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Bitnami",
"name": "golang",
"purl": "pkg:bitnami/golang"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.21.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.21.1"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-39322"
],
"database_specific": {
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:golang:go:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "QUIC connections do not set an upper bound on the amount of data buffered when reading post-handshake messages, allowing a malicious QUIC connection to cause unbounded memory growth. With fix, connections now consistently reject messages larger than 65KiB in size.",
"id": "BIT-golang-2023-39322",
"modified": "2025-05-20T10:02:07.006Z",
"published": "2024-03-06T10:53:58.705Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://go.dev/cl/523039"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://go.dev/issue/62266"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-dev/c/2C5vbR-UNkI/m/L1hdrPhfBAAJ"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2023-2045"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202311-09"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231020-0004/"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-39322"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.5.0",
"summary": "Memory exhaustion in QUIC connection handling in crypto/tls"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…