Vulnerability from bitnami_vulndb
Published
2026-04-13 10:20
Modified
2026-04-13 10:42
Summary
Apache Tomcat: OCSP checks sometimes soft-fail with FFM even when soft-fail is disabled
Details
CLIENT_CERT authentication does not fail as expected for some scenarios when soft fail is disabled and FFM is used in Apache Tomcat.
This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0 through 11.0.20, from 10.1.22 through 10.1.53, from 9.0.92 through 9.0.116.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.21, 10.1.54 or 9.0.117, which fixes the issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Bitnami",
"name": "tomcat",
"purl": "pkg:bitnami/tomcat"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "9.0.92"
},
{
"fixed": "9.0.117"
},
{
"introduced": "10.1.22"
},
{
"fixed": "10.1.54"
},
{
"introduced": "11.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "11.0.21"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-34500"
],
"database_specific": {
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:apache:tomcat:*:*:*:*:*:maven:*:*"
],
"severity": "Medium"
},
"details": "CLIENT_CERT authentication does not fail as expected for some scenarios when soft fail is disabled and FFM is used in Apache Tomcat.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0 through 11.0.20, from 10.1.22 through 10.1.53, from 9.0.92 through 9.0.116.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.21, 10.1.54 or 9.0.117, which fixes the issue.",
"id": "BIT-tomcat-2026-34500",
"modified": "2026-04-13T10:42:00.723Z",
"published": "2026-04-13T10:20:02.205Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/09/29"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/7rcl4zdxryc8hy3htyfyxkbqpxjtfdl2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34500"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.6.2",
"summary": "Apache Tomcat: OCSP checks sometimes soft-fail with FFM even when soft-fail is disabled"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…