Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
Vulnerability from cleanstart
Multiple security vulnerabilities affect the kyverno-fips package. During the TLS 1. See references for individual vulnerability details.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "CleanStart",
"name": "kyverno-fips"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.16.1-r2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [],
"database_specific": {},
"details": "Multiple security vulnerabilities affect the kyverno-fips package. During the TLS 1. See references for individual vulnerability details.",
"id": "CLEANSTART-2026-FI29887",
"modified": "2026-02-12T13:07:54Z",
"published": "2026-02-13T00:39:44.225771Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/cleanstart-dev/cleanstart-security-advisories/tree/main/advisories/2026/CLEANSTART-2026-FI29887"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-47907"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-61726"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-61730"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-68119"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-273P-M2CW-6833"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-2X5J-VHC8-9CWM"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-4C4X-JM2X-PF9J"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-4QG8-FJ49-PXJH"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-6M8W-JC87-6CR7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-846P-JG2W-W324"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-F83F-XPX7-FFPW"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-FCV2-XGW5-PQXF"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-FPHV-W9FQ-2525"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-VVGC-356P-C3XW"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-WHQX-F9J3-CH6M"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-47907"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-61726"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-61730"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68119"
}
],
"related": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.3",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "During the TLS 1",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2025-47907",
"CVE-2025-61726",
"CVE-2025-61730",
"CVE-2025-68119",
"GHSA-273P-M2CW-6833",
"GHSA-2X5J-VHC8-9CWM",
"GHSA-4C4X-JM2X-PF9J",
"GHSA-4QG8-FJ49-PXJH",
"GHSA-6M8W-JC87-6CR7",
"GHSA-846P-JG2W-W324",
"GHSA-F83F-XPX7-FFPW",
"GHSA-FCV2-XGW5-PQXF",
"GHSA-FPHV-W9FQ-2525",
"GHSA-VVGC-356P-C3XW",
"GHSA-WHQX-F9J3-CH6M"
]
}
CVE-2025-47907 (GCVE-0-2025-47907)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-07 15:25 – Updated: 2025-11-04 21:10- CWE-362 - Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go standard library | database/sql |
Affected:
0 , < 1.23.12
(semver)
Affected: 1.24.0 , < 1.24.6 (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-47907",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-07T15:45:26.297503Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-07T15:48:03.634Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T21:10:56.083Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/08/06/1"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pkg.go.dev",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "database/sql",
"product": "database/sql",
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "Rows.Scan"
},
{
"name": "Row.Scan"
}
],
"vendor": "Go standard library",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.23.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.24.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.24.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Spike Curtis from Coder"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Cancelling a query (e.g. by cancelling the context passed to one of the query methods) during a call to the Scan method of the returned Rows can result in unexpected results if other queries are being made in parallel. This can result in a race condition that may overwrite the expected results with those of another query, causing the call to Scan to return either unexpected results from the other query or an error."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization (\u0027Race Condition\u0027)",
"lang": "en"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-07T15:25:30.704Z",
"orgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
"shortName": "Go"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://go.dev/cl/693735"
},
{
"url": "https://go.dev/issue/74831"
},
{
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/x5MKroML2yM"
},
{
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-3849"
}
],
"title": "Incorrect results returned from Rows.Scan in database/sql"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
"assignerShortName": "Go",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-47907",
"datePublished": "2025-08-07T15:25:30.704Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-05-13T23:31:29.597Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T21:10:56.083Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-61726 (GCVE-0-2025-61726)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-28 19:30 – Updated: 2026-01-29 18:31- CWE-400 - Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go standard library | net/url |
Affected:
0 , < 1.24.12
(semver)
Affected: 1.25.0 , < 1.25.6 (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-61726",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-29T18:31:39.150633Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-29T18:31:59.685Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pkg.go.dev",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "net/url",
"product": "net/url",
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "parseQuery"
},
{
"name": "ParseQuery"
},
{
"name": "URL.Query"
}
],
"vendor": "Go standard library",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.24.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.25.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.25.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "jub0bs"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The net/url package does not set a limit on the number of query parameters in a query. While the maximum size of query parameters in URLs is generally limited by the maximum request header size, the net/http.Request.ParseForm method can parse large URL-encoded forms. Parsing a large form containing many unique query parameters can cause excessive memory consumption."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-28T19:30:31.215Z",
"orgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
"shortName": "Go"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://go.dev/cl/736712"
},
{
"url": "https://go.dev/issue/77101"
},
{
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/Vd2tYVM8eUc"
},
{
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4341"
}
],
"title": "Memory exhaustion in query parameter parsing in net/url"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
"assignerShortName": "Go",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-61726",
"datePublished": "2026-01-28T19:30:31.215Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-30T15:05:03.605Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-29T18:31:59.685Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-61730 (GCVE-0-2025-61730)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-28 19:30 – Updated: 2026-02-02 17:28- CWE-940 - Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go standard library | crypto/tls |
Affected:
0 , < 1.24.12
(semver)
Affected: 1.25.0 , < 1.25.6 (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-61730",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-02T17:28:46.305649Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-02T17:28:49.572Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pkg.go.dev",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "crypto/tls",
"product": "crypto/tls",
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "Conn.handleKeyUpdate"
},
{
"name": "Conn.handshakeContext"
},
{
"name": "clientHandshakeStateTLS13.establishHandshakeKeys"
},
{
"name": "clientHandshakeStateTLS13.readServerFinished"
},
{
"name": "clientHandshakeStateTLS13.sendClientFinished"
},
{
"name": "serverHandshakeStateTLS13.checkForResumption"
},
{
"name": "serverHandshakeStateTLS13.doHelloRetryRequest"
},
{
"name": "serverHandshakeStateTLS13.sendServerParameters"
},
{
"name": "serverHandshakeStateTLS13.sendServerFinished"
},
{
"name": "serverHandshakeStateTLS13.readClientFinished"
},
{
"name": "Conn.quicSetReadSecret"
},
{
"name": "Conn.Handshake"
},
{
"name": "Conn.HandshakeContext"
},
{
"name": "Conn.Read"
},
{
"name": "Conn.Write"
},
{
"name": "Dial"
},
{
"name": "DialWithDialer"
},
{
"name": "Dialer.Dial"
},
{
"name": "Dialer.DialContext"
},
{
"name": "QUICConn.HandleData"
},
{
"name": "QUICConn.Start"
}
],
"vendor": "Go standard library",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.24.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.25.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.25.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Coia Prant (github.com/rbqvq)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "During the TLS 1.3 handshake if multiple messages are sent in records that span encryption level boundaries (for instance the Client Hello and Encrypted Extensions messages), the subsequent messages may be processed before the encryption level changes. This can cause some minor information disclosure if a network-local attacker can inject messages during the handshake."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "CWE-940: Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel",
"lang": "en"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-28T19:30:30.986Z",
"orgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
"shortName": "Go"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://go.dev/cl/724120"
},
{
"url": "https://go.dev/issue/76443"
},
{
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/Vd2tYVM8eUc"
},
{
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4340"
}
],
"title": "Handshake messages may be processed at the incorrect encryption level in crypto/tls"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
"assignerShortName": "Go",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-61730",
"datePublished": "2026-01-28T19:30:30.986Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-30T15:05:03.605Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-02T17:28:49.572Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-68119 (GCVE-0-2025-68119)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-28 19:30 – Updated: 2026-02-26 15:04- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go toolchain | cmd/go |
Affected:
1.25.0 , < 1.25.6
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-68119",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-29T04:55:55.432053Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T15:04:45.665Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pkg.go.dev",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "cmd/go",
"product": "cmd/go",
"vendor": "Go toolchain",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.25.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.25.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "splitline (@splitline) from DEVCORE Research Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Downloading and building modules with malicious version strings can cause local code execution. On systems with Mercurial (hg) installed, downloading modules from non-standard sources (e.g., custom domains) can cause unexpected code execution due to how external VCS commands are constructed. This issue can also be triggered by providing a malicious version string to the toolchain. On systems with Git installed, downloading and building modules with malicious version strings can allow an attacker to write to arbitrary files on the filesystem. This can only be triggered by explicitly providing the malicious version strings to the toolchain and does not affect usage of @latest or bare module paths."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-28T19:30:30.704Z",
"orgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
"shortName": "Go"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://go.dev/cl/736710"
},
{
"url": "https://go.dev/issue/77099"
},
{
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/Vd2tYVM8eUc"
},
{
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4338"
}
],
"title": "Unexpected code execution when invoking toolchain in cmd/go"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
"assignerShortName": "Go",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-68119",
"datePublished": "2026-01-28T19:30:30.704Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-15T16:48:04.450Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T15:04:45.665Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
GHSA-273P-M2CW-6833
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-22 18:41 – Updated: 2026-01-23 15:46Summary
Rekor’s cose v0.0.1 entry implementation can panic on attacker-controlled input when canonicalizing a proposed entry with an empty spec.message. validate() returns nil (success) when message is empty, leaving sign1Msg uninitialized, and Canonicalize() later dereferences v.sign1Msg.Payload.
Impact
A malformed proposed entry of the cose/v0.0.1 type can cause a panic on a thread within the Rekor process. The thread is recovered so the client receives a 500 error message and service still continues, so the availability impact of this is minimal.
Patches
Upgrade to v1.5.0
Workarounds
None
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.4.3"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/sigstore/rekor"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.5.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-23831"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-476"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-01-22T18:41:23Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-22T22:16:19Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nRekor\u2019s cose v0.0.1 entry implementation can panic on attacker-controlled input when canonicalizing a proposed entry with an empty `spec.message`. `validate()` returns nil (success) when `message` is empty, leaving `sign1Msg` uninitialized, and `Canonicalize()` later dereferences `v.sign1Msg.Payload`.\n\n## Impact\n\nA malformed proposed entry of the `cose/v0.0.1` type can cause a panic on a thread within the Rekor process. The thread is recovered so the client receives a 500 error message and service still continues, so the availability impact of this is minimal.\n\n## Patches\n\nUpgrade to v1.5.0\n\n## Workarounds\n\nNone",
"id": "GHSA-273p-m2cw-6833",
"modified": "2026-01-23T15:46:17Z",
"published": "2026-01-22T18:41:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sigstore/rekor/security/advisories/GHSA-273p-m2cw-6833"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23831"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sigstore/rekor/commit/39bae3d192bce48ef4ef2cbd1788fb5770fee8cd"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/sigstore/rekor"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sigstore/rekor/releases/tag/v1.5.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Rekor\u0027s COSE v0.0.1 entry type nil pointer dereference in Canonicalize via empty Message"
}
GHSA-2X5J-VHC8-9CWM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-10 21:18 – Updated: 2025-10-23 17:36Impact
The CIRCL implementation of FourQ fails to validate user-supplied low-order points during Diffie-Hellman key exchange, potentially allowing attackers to force the identity point and compromise session security.
Moreover, there is an incorrect point validation in ScalarMult can lead to incorrect results in the isEqual function and if a point is on the curve.
Patches
Version 1.6.1 (https://github.com/cloudflare/circl/tree/v1.6.1) mitigates the identified issues.
We acknowledge Alon Livne (Botanica Software Labs) for the reported findings.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/cloudflare/circl"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.6.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-8556"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20",
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-06-10T21:18:33Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "### Impact\nThe CIRCL implementation of FourQ fails to validate user-supplied low-order points during Diffie-Hellman key exchange, potentially allowing attackers to force the identity point and compromise session security.\n\nMoreover, there is an incorrect point validation in ScalarMult can lead to incorrect results in the isEqual function and if a point is on the curve.\n\n\n### Patches\nVersion 1.6.1 (https://github.com/cloudflare/circl/tree/v1.6.1) mitigates the identified issues.\n\nWe acknowledge Alon Livne (Botanica Software Labs) for the reported findings.",
"id": "GHSA-2x5j-vhc8-9cwm",
"modified": "2025-10-23T17:36:51Z",
"published": "2025-06-10T21:18:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cloudflare/circl/security/advisories/GHSA-2x5j-vhc8-9cwm"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-8556"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-8556"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2371624"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/cloudflare/circl"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cloudflare/circl/tree/v1.6.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45669593"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.botanica.software/blog/cryptographic-issues-in-cloudflares-circl-fourq-implementation"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "CIRCL-Fourq: Missing and wrong validation can lead to incorrect results"
}
GHSA-4C4X-JM2X-PF9J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-22 18:41 – Updated: 2026-01-23 15:49Summary
/api/v1/index/retrieve supports retrieving a public key via a user-provided URL, allowing attackers to trigger SSRF to arbitrary internal services.
Since the SSRF only can trigger GET requests, the request cannot mutate state. The response from the GET request is not returned to the caller so data exfiltration is not possible. A malicious actor could attempt to probe an internal network through Blind SSRF.
Impact
- SSRF to cloud metadata (169.254.169.254)
- SSRF to internal Kubernetes APIs
- SSRF to any service accessible from Fulcio's network
Patches
Upgrade to v1.5.0. Note that this is a breaking change to the search API and fully disables lookups by URL. If you require this feature, please reach out and we can discuss alternatives.
Workarounds
Disable the search endpoint with --enable_retrieve_api=false.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.4.3"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/sigstore/rekor"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.5.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-24117"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-01-22T18:41:26Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-22T22:16:21Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\n`/api/v1/index/retrieve` supports retrieving a public key via a user-provided URL, allowing attackers to trigger SSRF to arbitrary internal services.\n\nSince the SSRF only can trigger GET requests, the request cannot mutate state. The response from the GET request is not returned to the caller so data exfiltration is not possible. A malicious actor could attempt to probe an internal network through [Blind SSRF](https://portswigger.net/web-security/ssrf/blind).\n\n## Impact\n\n* SSRF to cloud metadata (169.254.169.254)\n* SSRF to internal Kubernetes APIs\n* SSRF to any service accessible from Fulcio\u0027s network\n\n## Patches\n\nUpgrade to v1.5.0. Note that this is a breaking change to the search API and fully disables lookups by URL. If you require this feature, please reach out and we can discuss alternatives.\n\n## Workarounds\n\nDisable the search endpoint with `--enable_retrieve_api=false`.",
"id": "GHSA-4c4x-jm2x-pf9j",
"modified": "2026-01-23T15:49:13Z",
"published": "2026-01-22T18:41:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sigstore/rekor/security/advisories/GHSA-4c4x-jm2x-pf9j"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-24117"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sigstore/rekor/commit/60ef2bceba192c5bf9327d003bceea8bf1f8275f"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/sigstore/rekor"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sigstore/rekor/releases/tag/v1.5.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Rekor affected by Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via provided public key URL"
}
GHSA-4QG8-FJ49-PXJH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-05 18:19 – Updated: 2025-12-05 18:19Impact
Excessive memory allocation
Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string.
As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). Relevant weakness: CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)
Patches
Upgrade to v2.0.3.
Workarounds
There are no workarounds with the service itself. If the service is behind a load balancer, configure the load balancer to reject excessively large requests.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.0.2"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.0.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-66564"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-405"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-12-05T18:19:00Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-04T23:15:47Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\n**Excessive memory allocation**\n\nFunction [api.ParseJSONRequest](https://github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority/blob/26d7d426d3000abdbdf2df34de56bb92246c0365/pkg/api/timestamp.go#L63) currently splits (via a call to [strings.Split](https://pkg.go.dev/strings#Split)) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function [api.getContentType](https://github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority/blob/26d7d426d3000abdbdf2df34de56bb92246c0365/pkg/api/timestamp.go#L114) splits the `Content-Type` header (which is also untrusted data) on an `application` string.\n\nAs a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed `Content-Type` header, a call to `api.ParseJSONRequest` or `api.getContentType` incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function\u0027s argument). Relevant weakness: [CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/405.html)\n\n### Patches\n\nUpgrade to v2.0.3.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nThere are no workarounds with the service itself. If the service is behind a load balancer, configure the load balancer to reject excessively large requests.",
"id": "GHSA-4qg8-fj49-pxjh",
"modified": "2025-12-05T18:19:00Z",
"published": "2025-12-05T18:19:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority/security/advisories/GHSA-4qg8-fj49-pxjh"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66564"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority/commit/0cae34e197d685a14904e0bad135b89d13b69421"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Sigstore Timestamp Authority allocates excessive memory during request parsing"
}
GHSA-6M8W-JC87-6CR7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-01 17:02 – Updated: 2025-05-05 22:02Impact
When run as a server, OPA exposes an HTTP Data API for reading and writing documents. Requesting a virtual document through the Data API entails policy evaluation, where a Rego query containing a single data document reference is constructed from the requested path. This query is then used for policy evaluation.
A HTTP request path can be crafted in a way that injects Rego code into the constructed query. The evaluation result cannot be made to return any other data than what is generated by the requested path, but this path can be misdirected, and the injected Rego code can be crafted to make the query succeed or fail; opening up for oracle attacks or, given the right circumstances, erroneous policy decision results. Furthermore, the injected code can be crafted to be computationally expensive, resulting in a Denial Of Service (DoS) attack.
Users are only impacted if all of the following apply:
- OPA is deployed as a standalone server (rather than being used as a Go library)
- The OPA server is exposed outside of the local host in an untrusted environment.
- The configured authorization policy does not do exact matching of the
input.pathattribute when deciding if the request should be allowed.
or, if all of the following apply:
- OPA is deployed as a standalone server.
- The service connecting to OPA allows 3rd parties to insert unsanitised text into the path of the HTTP request to OPA’s Data API.
Note: With no Authorization Policy configured for restricting API access (the default configuration), the RESTful Data API provides access for managing Rego policies; and the RESTful Query API facilitates advanced queries. Full access to these APIs provides both simpler, and broader access than what the security issue describes here can facilitate. As such, OPA servers exposed to a network are not considered affected by the attack described here if they are knowingly not restricting access through an Authorization Policy.
Patches
Fixed in OPA v1.4.0.
Workarounds
Don’t publicly expose OPA’s RESTful APIs
Unless necessary for production reasons, network access to OPA’s RESTful APIs should be limited to localhost and/or trusted networks.
Since OPA v1.0, unless otherwise configured, the server listener defaults to localhost.
Enable Authentication to Only Allow Access to Trusted Clients
A configured authentication scheme is a requirement when OPA is exposed in an untrusted environment. While requiring authentication alone doesn’t mitigate this attack, it effectively reduces the scope from untrusted clients to trusted clients.
Perform Path Validation Using OPA’s Authorization Policy Functionality
OPA can be configured to use an Authorization Policy to validate all incoming requests. By authoring the Authorization Policy to only accept paths corresponding to expected Rego package references, this attack can be fully mitigated.
The HTTP path in a Data API request is of the format /v1/data/{path:.+} (/v0/data/{path:.+}, for the v0 Data API), where data/{path:.+} directly corresponds to a reference to a virtual document, and a prefix of {path:.+} corresponds to a Rego package declaration.
E.g. the HTTP path v1/data/do/re/mi corresponds to the data reference data.do.re.mi, where do.re is the package and mi is the rule in the following Rego module:
package do.re
mi if {
...
}
Unless otherwise configured, OPA will use the rule at data.system.authz.allow as Authorization Policy. Authorization is enabled by starting OPA with the --authorization=basic flag, and the Authorization policy must be made available to the OPA runtime either through a bundle (via the --bundle flag or through discovery) or as an individual module via the command-line.
A trivial Authorization Policy example:
package system.authz
allowed_paths := [
["v1", "data", "policy1", "allow"],
["v1", "data", "policy2", "allow"],
...
]
allow if {
input.path in allowed_paths
}
Note: configuring an Authorization Policy in OPA isn't the only way to protect against malicious request paths. Path validation and sanitisation can also be performed by connecting clients and 3rd party intermediaries, such as API gateways, reverse proxies, etc.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/v1/server"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.4.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/server"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.4.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/open-policy-agent/opa"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.4.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-46569"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770",
"CWE-78",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-05-01T17:02:58Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-01T20:15:37Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nWhen run as a server, OPA exposes an HTTP[ Data API](https://www.openpolicyagent.org/docs/latest/rest-api/#data-api) for reading and writing documents. Requesting a virtual document through the Data API entails policy evaluation, where a Rego query containing a single data document [reference](https://www.openpolicyagent.org/docs/latest/policy-language/#references) is constructed from the requested path. This query is then used for policy evaluation.\n\nA HTTP request path can be crafted in a way that injects Rego code into the constructed query. The evaluation result cannot be made to return any other data than what is generated by the requested path, but this path can be misdirected, and the injected Rego code can be crafted to make the query succeed or fail; opening up for oracle attacks or, given the right circumstances, erroneous policy decision results. Furthermore, the injected code can be crafted to be computationally expensive, resulting in a Denial Of Service (DoS) attack.\n\n**Users are only impacted if all of the following apply:**\n\n* OPA is deployed as a standalone server (rather than being used as a Go library)\n* The OPA server is exposed outside of the local host in an untrusted environment.\n* The configured [authorization policy](https://www.openpolicyagent.org/docs/latest/security/#authentication-and-authorization) does not do exact matching of the `input.path` attribute when deciding if the request should be allowed.\n\n**or, if all of the following apply:**\n\n* OPA is deployed as a standalone server.\n* The service connecting to OPA allows 3rd parties to insert unsanitised text into the path of the HTTP request to OPA\u2019s Data API.\n\n**Note:** With **no** Authorization Policy configured for restricting API access (the default configuration), the RESTful Data API provides access for managing Rego policies; and the RESTful Query API facilitates advanced queries. Full access to these APIs provides both simpler, and broader access than what the security issue describes here can facilitate. As such, OPA servers exposed to a network are **not** considered affected by the attack described here if they are knowingly not restricting access through an Authorization Policy.\n\n### Patches\n\nFixed in OPA v1.4.0.\n\n### Workarounds\n\n#### Don\u2019t publicly expose OPA\u2019s RESTful APIs ####\n\nUnless necessary for production reasons, network access to OPA\u2019s RESTful APIs should be limited to `localhost` and/or trusted networks. \nSince OPA v1.0, unless otherwise configured, the server listener defaults to `localhost`.\n\n#### Enable Authentication to Only Allow Access to Trusted Clients ####\n\nA configured [authentication](https://www.openpolicyagent.org/docs/latest/security/#authentication-and-authorization) scheme is a requirement when OPA is exposed in an untrusted environment. While requiring authentication alone doesn\u2019t mitigate this attack, it effectively reduces the scope from untrusted clients to trusted clients.\n\n#### Perform Path Validation Using OPA\u2019s Authorization Policy Functionality ####\n\nOPA can be configured to use an [Authorization Policy](https://www.openpolicyagent.org/docs/latest/security/#authentication-and-authorization) to validate all incoming requests.\nBy authoring the Authorization Policy to only accept paths corresponding to expected Rego package references, this attack can be fully mitigated.\n\nThe HTTP path in a Data API request is of the format `/v1/data/{path:.+}` (`/v0/data/{path:.+}`, for the v0 Data API), where `data/{path:.+}` directly corresponds to a reference to a virtual document, and a prefix of `{path:.+}` corresponds to a Rego `package` declaration. \nE.g. the HTTP path `v1/data/do/re/mi` corresponds to the data reference `data.do.re.mi`, where `do.re` is the package and `mi` is the rule in the following Rego module:\n\n```rego\npackage do.re\n\nmi if {\n\t...\n}\n```\n\nUnless otherwise [configured](https://www.openpolicyagent.org/docs/latest/configuration/#miscellaneous), OPA will use the rule at `data.system.authz.allow` as Authorization Policy. Authorization is enabled by starting OPA with the `--authorization=basic` flag, and the Authorization policy must be made available to the OPA runtime either through a bundle (via the `--bundle` flag or through [discovery](https://www.openpolicyagent.org/docs/latest/management-discovery/)) or as an individual module via the command-line.\n\nA trivial Authorization Policy example:\n\n```rego\npackage system.authz\n\nallowed_paths := [\n\t[\"v1\", \"data\", \"policy1\", \"allow\"],\n\t[\"v1\", \"data\", \"policy2\", \"allow\"],\n\t...\n]\n\nallow if {\n\tinput.path in allowed_paths\n}\n```\n\n**Note:** configuring an Authorization Policy in OPA isn\u0027t the only way to protect against malicious request paths. Path validation and sanitisation can also be performed by connecting clients and 3rd party intermediaries, such as API gateways, reverse proxies, etc.",
"id": "GHSA-6m8w-jc87-6cr7",
"modified": "2025-05-05T22:02:31Z",
"published": "2025-05-01T17:02:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/security/advisories/GHSA-6m8w-jc87-6cr7"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-46569"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/commit/ad2063247a14711882f18c387a511fc8094aa79c"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/open-policy-agent/opa"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-3660"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OPA server Data API HTTP path injection of Rego"
}
GHSA-846P-JG2W-W324
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-21 16:19 – Updated: 2026-01-22 15:43Security Disclosure: Client DoS via malformed server response
Summary
If the TUF repository (or any of its mirrors) returns invalid TUF metadata JSON (valid JSON but not well formed TUF metadata), the client will panic during parsing, causing a DoS. The panic happens before any signature is validated. This means that a compromised repository/mirror/cache can DoS clients without having access to any signing key.
Impact
Client crashes upon receiving and parsing malformed TUF metadata. This can cause long running services to enter an restart/crash loop.
Workarounds
None currently.
Affected code
The metadata.checkType function did not properly type assert the (untrusted) input causing it to panic on malformed data.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/v2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.3.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-23991"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-617",
"CWE-754"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-01-21T16:19:28Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-22T03:15:47Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "# Security Disclosure: Client DoS via malformed server response\n\n## Summary\n\nIf the TUF repository (or any of its mirrors) returns invalid TUF metadata JSON (valid JSON but not well formed TUF metadata), the client will panic _during parsing_, causing a DoS. The panic happens before any signature is validated. This means that a compromised repository/mirror/cache can DoS clients without having access to any signing key.\n\n## Impact \n\nClient crashes upon receiving and parsing malformed TUF metadata. This can cause long running services to enter an restart/crash loop.\n\n## Workarounds\n\nNone currently. \n\n## Affected code\n\nThe `metadata.checkType` function did not properly type assert the (untrusted) input causing it to panic on malformed data.",
"id": "GHSA-846p-jg2w-w324",
"modified": "2026-01-22T15:43:38Z",
"published": "2026-01-21T16:19:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/security/advisories/GHSA-846p-jg2w-w324"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23991"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/commit/73345ab6b0eb7e59d525dac17a428f043074cef6"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/releases/tag/v2.3.1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "go-tuf affected by client DoS via malformed server response"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.