cve-2024-27435
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-05-17 12:12
Modified
2024-12-19 08:54
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvme: fix reconnection fail due to reserved tag allocation We found a issue on production environment while using NVMe over RDMA, admin_q reconnect failed forever while remote target and network is ok. After dig into it, we found it may caused by a ABBA deadlock due to tag allocation. In my case, the tag was hold by a keep alive request waiting inside admin_q, as we quiesced admin_q while reset ctrl, so the request maked as idle and will not process before reset success. As fabric_q shares tagset with admin_q, while reconnect remote target, we need a tag for connect command, but the only one reserved tag was held by keep alive command which waiting inside admin_q. As a result, we failed to reconnect admin_q forever. In order to fix this issue, I think we should keep two reserved tags for admin queue.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Linux Linux Version: 5.12
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "LOCAL",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 5.5,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
              "integrityImpact": "NONE",
              "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-27435",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-05-31T18:39:12.435774Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "description": "CWE-noinfo Not enough information",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-11-06T16:36:56.843Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T00:34:52.327Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/149afee5c7418ec5db9d7387b9c9a5c1eb7ea2a8"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff2f90f88d78559802466ad1c84ac5bda4416b3a"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6851778504cdb49431809b4ba061903d5f592c96"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/262da920896e2f2ab0e3947d9dbee0aa09045818"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de105068fead55ed5c07ade75e9c8e7f86a00d1d"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Linux",
          "programFiles": [
            "drivers/nvme/host/core.c",
            "drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.h"
          ],
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "149afee5c7418ec5db9d7387b9c9a5c1eb7ea2a8",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "ff2f90f88d78559802466ad1c84ac5bda4416b3a",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "6851778504cdb49431809b4ba061903d5f592c96",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "262da920896e2f2ab0e3947d9dbee0aa09045818",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "de105068fead55ed5c07ade75e9c8e7f86a00d1d",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae",
              "versionType": "git"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "Linux",
          "programFiles": [
            "drivers/nvme/host/core.c",
            "drivers/nvme/host/fabrics.h"
          ],
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "5.12"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "5.12",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.1.83",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.6.23",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.7.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.7.11",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.8.*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.8.2",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.9",
              "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnvme: fix reconnection fail due to reserved tag allocation\n\nWe found a issue on production environment while using NVMe over RDMA,\nadmin_q reconnect failed forever while remote target and network is ok.\nAfter dig into it, we found it may caused by a ABBA deadlock due to tag\nallocation. In my case, the tag was hold by a keep alive request\nwaiting inside admin_q, as we quiesced admin_q while reset ctrl, so the\nrequest maked as idle and will not process before reset success. As\nfabric_q shares tagset with admin_q, while reconnect remote target, we\nneed a tag for connect command, but the only one reserved tag was held\nby keep alive command which waiting inside admin_q. As a result, we\nfailed to reconnect admin_q forever. In order to fix this issue, I\nthink we should keep two reserved tags for admin queue."
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-12-19T08:54:52.441Z",
        "orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
        "shortName": "Linux"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/149afee5c7418ec5db9d7387b9c9a5c1eb7ea2a8"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff2f90f88d78559802466ad1c84ac5bda4416b3a"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6851778504cdb49431809b4ba061903d5f592c96"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/262da920896e2f2ab0e3947d9dbee0aa09045818"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de105068fead55ed5c07ade75e9c8e7f86a00d1d"
        }
      ],
      "title": "nvme: fix reconnection fail due to reserved tag allocation",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "bippy-5f407fcff5a0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
    "assignerShortName": "Linux",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-27435",
    "datePublished": "2024-05-17T12:12:36.439Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-02-25T13:47:42.687Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-12-19T08:54:52.441Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-27435\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"published\":\"2024-05-17T13:15:58.073\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T09:04:36.097\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\\n\\nnvme: fix reconnection fail due to reserved tag allocation\\n\\nWe found a issue on production environment while using NVMe over RDMA,\\nadmin_q reconnect failed forever while remote target and network is ok.\\nAfter dig into it, we found it may caused by a ABBA deadlock due to tag\\nallocation. In my case, the tag was hold by a keep alive request\\nwaiting inside admin_q, as we quiesced admin_q while reset ctrl, so the\\nrequest maked as idle and will not process before reset success. As\\nfabric_q shares tagset with admin_q, while reconnect remote target, we\\nneed a tag for connect command, but the only one reserved tag was held\\nby keep alive command which waiting inside admin_q. As a result, we\\nfailed to reconnect admin_q forever. In order to fix this issue, I\\nthink we should keep two reserved tags for admin queue.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En el kernel de Linux, se resolvi\u00f3 la siguiente vulnerabilidad: nvme: se corrigi\u00f3 el error de reconexi\u00f3n debido a la asignaci\u00f3n de etiquetas reservadas. Encontramos un problema en el entorno de producci\u00f3n al usar NVMe sobre RDMA, la reconexi\u00f3n de admin_q fall\u00f3 para siempre mientras el objetivo remoto y la red est\u00e1n bien. Despu\u00e9s de investigarlo, descubrimos que puede deberse a un punto muerto de ABBA debido a la asignaci\u00f3n de etiquetas. En mi caso, la etiqueta estaba retenida por una solicitud de mantenimiento en espera dentro de admin_q, ya que desactivamos admin_q mientras reiniciamos Ctrl, por lo que la solicitud se realiz\u00f3 como inactiva y no se procesar\u00e1 antes de que el reinicio se realice correctamente. Como fabric_q comparte el conjunto de etiquetas con admin_q, mientras reconectamos el objetivo remoto, necesitamos una etiqueta para el comando de conexi\u00f3n, pero la \u00fanica etiqueta reservada estaba mantenida por el comando Keep Alive que esperaba dentro de admin_q. Como resultado, no pudimos volver a conectar admin_q para siempre. Para solucionar este problema, creo que deber\u00edamos mantener dos etiquetas reservadas para la cola de administraci\u00f3n.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":5.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.8,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/149afee5c7418ec5db9d7387b9c9a5c1eb7ea2a8\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/262da920896e2f2ab0e3947d9dbee0aa09045818\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6851778504cdb49431809b4ba061903d5f592c96\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de105068fead55ed5c07ade75e9c8e7f86a00d1d\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff2f90f88d78559802466ad1c84ac5bda4416b3a\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/149afee5c7418ec5db9d7387b9c9a5c1eb7ea2a8\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/262da920896e2f2ab0e3947d9dbee0aa09045818\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6851778504cdb49431809b4ba061903d5f592c96\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de105068fead55ed5c07ade75e9c8e7f86a00d1d\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff2f90f88d78559802466ad1c84ac5bda4416b3a\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.