ghsa-2x6j-879g-gpqr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:08
Modified
2022-05-13 01:08
Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel before version 4.12, Kerberos 5 tickets decoded when using the RXRPC keys incorrectly assumes the size of a field. This could lead to the size-remaining variable wrapping and the data pointer going over the end of the buffer. This could possibly lead to memory corruption and possible privilege escalation.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-7482" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-190" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-07-30T14:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "In the Linux kernel before version 4.12, Kerberos 5 tickets decoded when using the RXRPC keys incorrectly assumes the size of a field. This could lead to the size-remaining variable wrapping and the data pointer going over the end of the buffer. This could possibly lead to memory corruption and possible privilege escalation.", "id": "GHSA-2x6j-879g-gpqr", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:08:46Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:08:46Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-7482" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0641" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-7482" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=5f2f97656ada8d811d3c1bef503ced266fcd53a0" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3927" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3945" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q2/602" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99299" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038787" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.