ghsa-359h-vjp2-hp47
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:12
Modified
2022-05-13 01:12
Severity ?
Details
A null-pointer dereference vulnerability was found in libtirpc before version 0.3.3-rc3. The return value of makefd_xprt() was not checked in all instances, which could lead to a crash when the server exhausted the maximum number of available file descriptors. A remote attacker could cause an rpc-based application to crash by flooding it with new connections.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2018-14622", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-252", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2018-08-30T13:29:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "A null-pointer dereference vulnerability was found in libtirpc before version 0.3.3-rc3. The return value of makefd_xprt() was not checked in all instances, which could lead to a crash when the server exhausted the maximum number of available file descriptors. A remote attacker could cause an rpc-based application to crash by flooding it with new connections.", id: "GHSA-359h-vjp2-hp47", modified: "2022-05-13T01:12:25Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:12:25Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-14622", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1991", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968175", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-14622", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/08/msg00034.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3759-1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3759-2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=steved/libtirpc.git;a=commit;h=1c77f7a869bdea2a34799d774460d1f9983d45f0", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.