ghsa-5hv8-7f46-fxf6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-08-11 00:00
Modified
2022-08-17 00:00
Severity ?
Details
Acceptance of some invalid Transfer-Encoding headers in the HTTP/1 client in net/http before Go 1.17.12 and Go 1.18.4 allows HTTP request smuggling if combined with an intermediate server that also improperly fails to reject the header as invalid.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2022-1705", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-444", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2022-08-10T20:15:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "Acceptance of some invalid Transfer-Encoding headers in the HTTP/1 client in net/http before Go 1.17.12 and Go 1.18.4 allows HTTP request smuggling if combined with an intermediate server that also improperly fails to reject the header as invalid.", id: "GHSA-5hv8-7f46-fxf6", modified: "2022-08-17T00:00:33Z", published: "2022-08-11T00:00:16Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1705", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://go.dev/cl/409874", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://go.dev/cl/410714", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://go.dev/issue/53188", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://go.googlesource.com/go/+/e5017a93fcde94f09836200bca55324af037ee5f", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/nqrv9fbR0zE", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RQXU752ALW53OJAF5MG3WMR5CCZVLWW6", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2022-0525", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.