ghsa-5jrj-52x8-m64h
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-04-25 19:50
Modified
2024-06-18 15:04
Summary
vyper performs multiple eval of `sqrt()` argument built in
Details

Summary

Using the sqrt builtin can result in multiple eval evaluation of side effects when the argument has side-effects. The bug is more difficult (but not impossible!) to trigger as of 0.3.4, when the unique symbol fence was introduced (https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/2914).

A contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production.

Details

It can be seen that the build_IR function of the sqrt builtin doesn't cache the argument to the stack: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/4595938734d9988f8e46e8df38049ae0559abedb/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L2151

As such, it can be evaluated multiple times (instead of retrieving the value from the stack).

PoC

With at least Vyper version 0.2.15+commit.6e7dba7 the following contract: ```vyper c: uint256

@internal def some_decimal() -> decimal: self.c += 1 return 1.0

@external def foo() -> uint256: k: decimal = sqrt(self.some_decimal()) return self.c passes the following test:solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity >=0.8.13;

import "../../lib/ds-test/test.sol"; import "../../lib/utils/Console.sol"; import "../../lib/utils/VyperDeployer.sol";

import "../ITest.sol";

contract ConTest is DSTest { VyperDeployer vyperDeployer = new VyperDeployer();

ITest t;

function setUp() public {
    t = ITest(vyperDeployer.deployContract("Test"));
}

function testFoo() public {
    uint256 val = t.foo();
    console.log(val);
    assert (val == 4);
}

} ```

Patches

Patched in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/3976.

Impact

No vulnerable production contracts were found.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "vyper"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.4.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-32649"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-95"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-25T19:50:16Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-25T18:15:09Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nUsing the `sqrt` builtin can result in multiple eval evaluation of side effects when the argument has side-effects. The bug is more difficult (but not impossible!) to trigger as of 0.3.4, when the unique symbol fence was introduced (https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/2914).\n\nA contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production.\n\n### Details\nIt can be seen that the `build_IR` function of the `sqrt` builtin doesn\u0027t cache the argument to the stack: \nhttps://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/4595938734d9988f8e46e8df38049ae0559abedb/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L2151\n\nAs such, it can be evaluated multiple times (instead of retrieving the value from the stack).\n\n### PoC\nWith at least Vyper version `0.2.15+commit.6e7dba7` the following contract:\n```vyper\nc: uint256\n\n@internal\ndef some_decimal() -\u003e decimal:\n    self.c += 1\n    return 1.0\n\n@external\ndef foo() -\u003e uint256:\n    k: decimal = sqrt(self.some_decimal())\n    return self.c\n```\npasses the following test:\n```solidity\n// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT\npragma solidity \u003e=0.8.13;\n\nimport \"../../lib/ds-test/test.sol\";\nimport \"../../lib/utils/Console.sol\";\nimport \"../../lib/utils/VyperDeployer.sol\";\n\nimport \"../ITest.sol\";\n\ncontract ConTest is DSTest {\n    VyperDeployer vyperDeployer = new VyperDeployer();\n\n    ITest t;\n\n    function setUp() public {\n        t = ITest(vyperDeployer.deployContract(\"Test\"));\n    }\n\n    function testFoo() public {\n        uint256 val = t.foo();\n        console.log(val);\n        assert (val == 4);\n    }\n}\n```\n \n### Patches\nPatched in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/3976.\n\n### Impact\nNo vulnerable production contracts were found.",
  "id": "GHSA-5jrj-52x8-m64h",
  "modified": "2024-06-18T15:04:13Z",
  "published": "2024-04-25T19:50:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-5jrj-52x8-m64h"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-32649"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/2914"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "vyper performs multiple eval of `sqrt()` argument built in"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.