ghsa-5p3m-pw6j-5jwm
Vulnerability from github
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI/ASPM: Fix deadlock when enabling ASPM
A last minute revert in 6.7-final introduced a potential deadlock when enabling ASPM during probe of Qualcomm PCIe controllers as reported by lockdep:
============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.7.0 #40 Not tainted
kworker/u16:5/90 is trying to acquire lock: ffffacfa78ced000 (pci_bus_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: pcie_aspm_pm_state_change+0x58/0xdc
but task is already holding lock:
ffffacfa78ced000 (pci_bus_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: pci_walk_bus+0x34/0xbc
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(pci_bus_sem);
lock(pci_bus_sem);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Call trace: print_deadlock_bug+0x25c/0x348 __lock_acquire+0x10a4/0x2064 lock_acquire+0x1e8/0x318 down_read+0x60/0x184 pcie_aspm_pm_state_change+0x58/0xdc pci_set_full_power_state+0xa8/0x114 pci_set_power_state+0xc4/0x120 qcom_pcie_enable_aspm+0x1c/0x3c [pcie_qcom] pci_walk_bus+0x64/0xbc qcom_pcie_host_post_init_2_7_0+0x28/0x34 [pcie_qcom]
The deadlock can easily be reproduced on machines like the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s by adding a delay to increase the race window during asynchronous probe where another thread can take a write lock.
Add a new pci_set_power_state_locked() and associated helper functions that can be called with the PCI bus semaphore held to avoid taking the read lock twice.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-26605"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-667"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-26T16:28:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI/ASPM: Fix deadlock when enabling ASPM\n\nA last minute revert in 6.7-final introduced a potential deadlock when\nenabling ASPM during probe of Qualcomm PCIe controllers as reported by\nlockdep:\n\n ============================================\n WARNING: possible recursive locking detected\n 6.7.0 #40 Not tainted\n --------------------------------------------\n kworker/u16:5/90 is trying to acquire lock:\n ffffacfa78ced000 (pci_bus_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: pcie_aspm_pm_state_change+0x58/0xdc\n\n but task is already holding lock:\n ffffacfa78ced000 (pci_bus_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: pci_walk_bus+0x34/0xbc\n\n other info that might help us debug this:\n Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n CPU0\n ----\n lock(pci_bus_sem);\n lock(pci_bus_sem);\n\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n Call trace:\n print_deadlock_bug+0x25c/0x348\n __lock_acquire+0x10a4/0x2064\n lock_acquire+0x1e8/0x318\n down_read+0x60/0x184\n pcie_aspm_pm_state_change+0x58/0xdc\n pci_set_full_power_state+0xa8/0x114\n pci_set_power_state+0xc4/0x120\n qcom_pcie_enable_aspm+0x1c/0x3c [pcie_qcom]\n pci_walk_bus+0x64/0xbc\n qcom_pcie_host_post_init_2_7_0+0x28/0x34 [pcie_qcom]\n\nThe deadlock can easily be reproduced on machines like the Lenovo ThinkPad\nX13s by adding a delay to increase the race window during asynchronous\nprobe where another thread can take a write lock.\n\nAdd a new pci_set_power_state_locked() and associated helper functions that\ncan be called with the PCI bus semaphore held to avoid taking the read lock\ntwice.",
"id": "GHSA-5p3m-pw6j-5jwm",
"modified": "2024-04-28T12:30:27Z",
"published": "2024-02-26T18:30:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26605"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0f7908a016c092cfdaa16d785fa5099d867bc1a3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1e560864159d002b453da42bd2c13a1805515a20"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b0f4478838be1f1d330061201898fef65bf8fd7c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef90508574d7af48420bdc5f7b9a4f1cdd26bc70"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.