GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-6246-6GX2-C2HW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-02 09:30 – Updated: 2025-03-17 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/amdkfd: Fix lock dependency warning with srcu

====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-kfd-yangp #2289 Not tainted


kworker/0:2/996 is trying to acquire lock: (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: __synchronize_srcu+0x5/0x1a0

but task is already holding lock: ((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x211/0x560

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #3 ((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x88/0x4f0 svm_range_list_lock_and_flush_work+0x3d/0x110 [amdgpu] svm_range_set_attr+0xd6/0x14c0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl+0x1d1/0x630 [amdgpu] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0

-> #2 (&info->lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc70 amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_restore_process_bos+0x54/0x740 [amdgpu] restore_process_helper+0x22/0x80 [amdgpu] restore_process_worker+0x2d/0xa0 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x29b/0x560 worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0

-> #1 ((work_completion)(&(&process->restore_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x88/0x4f0 __cancel_work_timer+0x12c/0x1c0 kfd_process_notifier_release_internal+0x37/0x1f0 [amdgpu] __mmu_notifier_release+0xad/0x240 exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0 mmput+0x6a/0x120 do_exit+0x322/0xb90 do_group_exit+0x37/0xa0 __x64_sys_exit_group+0x18/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x80

-> #0 (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1521/0x2510 lock_sync+0x5f/0x90 __synchronize_srcu+0x4f/0x1a0 __mmu_notifier_release+0x128/0x240 exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0 mmput+0x6a/0x120 svm_range_deferred_list_work+0x19f/0x350 [amdgpu] process_one_work+0x29b/0x560 worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0

other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: srcu --> &info->lock#2 --> (work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work)

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

    CPU0                    CPU1
    ----                    ----
    lock((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work));
                    lock(&info->lock#2);
        lock((work_completion)(&svms->deferred_list_work));
    sync(srcu);
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-52632"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-667"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-02T07:15:41Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amdkfd: Fix lock dependency warning with srcu\n\n======================================================\nWARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n6.5.0-kfd-yangp #2289 Not tainted\n------------------------------------------------------\nkworker/0:2/996 is trying to acquire lock:\n        (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: __synchronize_srcu+0x5/0x1a0\n\nbut task is already holding lock:\n        ((work_completion)(\u0026svms-\u003edeferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:\n\tprocess_one_work+0x211/0x560\n\nwhich lock already depends on the new lock.\n\nthe existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n\n-\u003e #3 ((work_completion)(\u0026svms-\u003edeferred_list_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:\n        __flush_work+0x88/0x4f0\n        svm_range_list_lock_and_flush_work+0x3d/0x110 [amdgpu]\n        svm_range_set_attr+0xd6/0x14c0 [amdgpu]\n        kfd_ioctl+0x1d1/0x630 [amdgpu]\n        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0\n\n-\u003e #2 (\u0026info-\u003elock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n        __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc70\n        amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_restore_process_bos+0x54/0x740 [amdgpu]\n        restore_process_helper+0x22/0x80 [amdgpu]\n        restore_process_worker+0x2d/0xa0 [amdgpu]\n        process_one_work+0x29b/0x560\n        worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0\n\n-\u003e #1 ((work_completion)(\u0026(\u0026process-\u003erestore_work)-\u003ework)){+.+.}-{0:0}:\n        __flush_work+0x88/0x4f0\n        __cancel_work_timer+0x12c/0x1c0\n        kfd_process_notifier_release_internal+0x37/0x1f0 [amdgpu]\n        __mmu_notifier_release+0xad/0x240\n        exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0\n        mmput+0x6a/0x120\n        do_exit+0x322/0xb90\n        do_group_exit+0x37/0xa0\n        __x64_sys_exit_group+0x18/0x20\n        do_syscall_64+0x38/0x80\n\n-\u003e #0 (srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}:\n        __lock_acquire+0x1521/0x2510\n        lock_sync+0x5f/0x90\n        __synchronize_srcu+0x4f/0x1a0\n        __mmu_notifier_release+0x128/0x240\n        exit_mmap+0x6a/0x3a0\n        mmput+0x6a/0x120\n        svm_range_deferred_list_work+0x19f/0x350 [amdgpu]\n        process_one_work+0x29b/0x560\n        worker_thread+0x3d/0x3d0\n\nother info that might help us debug this:\nChain exists of:\n  srcu --\u003e \u0026info-\u003elock#2 --\u003e (work_completion)(\u0026svms-\u003edeferred_list_work)\n\nPossible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n        CPU0                    CPU1\n        ----                    ----\n        lock((work_completion)(\u0026svms-\u003edeferred_list_work));\n                        lock(\u0026info-\u003elock#2);\n\t\t\tlock((work_completion)(\u0026svms-\u003edeferred_list_work));\n        sync(srcu);",
  "id": "GHSA-6246-6gx2-c2hw",
  "modified": "2025-03-17T15:31:37Z",
  "published": "2024-04-02T09:30:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52632"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1556c242e64cdffe58736aa650b0b395854fe4d4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2a9de42e8d3c82c6990d226198602be44f43f340"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/752312f6a79440086ac0f9b08d7776870037323c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b602f098f716723fa5c6c96a486e0afba83b7b94"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…