ghsa-7wph-5wjx-7rgv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-07-29 18:30
Modified
2024-07-30 21:31
Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gfs2: Fix NULL pointer dereference in gfs2_log_flush
In gfs2_jindex_free(), set sdp->sd_jdesc to NULL under the log flush lock to provide exclusion against gfs2_log_flush().
In gfs2_log_flush(), check if sdp->sd_jdesc is non-NULL before dereferencing it. Otherwise, we could run into a NULL pointer dereference when outstanding glock work races with an unmount (glock_work_func -> run_queue -> do_xmote -> inode_go_sync -> gfs2_log_flush).
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-42079" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-476" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-07-29T16:15:07Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ngfs2: Fix NULL pointer dereference in gfs2_log_flush\n\nIn gfs2_jindex_free(), set sdp-\u003esd_jdesc to NULL under the log flush\nlock to provide exclusion against gfs2_log_flush().\n\nIn gfs2_log_flush(), check if sdp-\u003esd_jdesc is non-NULL before\ndereferencing it. Otherwise, we could run into a NULL pointer\ndereference when outstanding glock work races with an unmount\n(glock_work_func -\u003e run_queue -\u003e do_xmote -\u003e inode_go_sync -\u003e\ngfs2_log_flush).", "id": "GHSA-7wph-5wjx-7rgv", "modified": "2024-07-30T21:31:26Z", "published": "2024-07-29T18:30:40Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42079" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3429ef5f50909cee9e498c50f0c499b9397116ce" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/35264909e9d1973ab9aaa2a1b07cda70f12bb828" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f54f9d5368a4e92ede7dd078a62788dae3a7c6ef" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.