ghsa-99mj-3x29-5mm3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-05-17 15:31
Modified
2024-05-17 15:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/amdgpu: fix deadlock while reading mqd from debugfs

An errant disk backup on my desktop got into debugfs and triggered the following deadlock scenario in the amdgpu debugfs files. The machine also hard-resets immediately after those lines are printed (although I wasn't able to reproduce that part when reading by hand):

[ 1318.016074][ T1082] ====================================================== [ 1318.016607][ T1082] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 1318.017107][ T1082] 6.8.0-rc7-00015-ge0c8221b72c0 #17 Not tainted [ 1318.017598][ T1082] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 1318.018096][ T1082] tar/1082 is trying to acquire lock: [ 1318.018585][ T1082] ffff98c44175d6a0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x40/0x80 [ 1318.019084][ T1082] [ 1318.019084][ T1082] but task is already holding lock: [ 1318.020052][ T1082] ffff98c4c13f55f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x6a/0x250 [amdgpu] [ 1318.020607][ T1082] [ 1318.020607][ T1082] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 1318.020607][ T1082] [ 1318.022081][ T1082] [ 1318.022081][ T1082] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 1318.023083][ T1082] [ 1318.023083][ T1082] -> #2 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 1318.024114][ T1082] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xe0/0x12f0 [ 1318.024639][ T1082] ww_mutex_lock+0x32/0x90 [ 1318.025161][ T1082] dma_resv_lockdep+0x18a/0x330 [ 1318.025683][ T1082] do_one_initcall+0x6a/0x350 [ 1318.026210][ T1082] kernel_init_freeable+0x1a3/0x310 [ 1318.026728][ T1082] kernel_init+0x15/0x1a0 [ 1318.027242][ T1082] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40 [ 1318.027759][ T1082] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1318.028281][ T1082] [ 1318.028281][ T1082] -> #1 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 1318.029297][ T1082] dma_resv_lockdep+0x16c/0x330 [ 1318.029790][ T1082] do_one_initcall+0x6a/0x350 [ 1318.030263][ T1082] kernel_init_freeable+0x1a3/0x310 [ 1318.030722][ T1082] kernel_init+0x15/0x1a0 [ 1318.031168][ T1082] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40 [ 1318.031598][ T1082] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1318.032011][ T1082] [ 1318.032011][ T1082] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: [ 1318.032778][ T1082] __lock_acquire+0x14bf/0x2680 [ 1318.033141][ T1082] lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2c0 [ 1318.033487][ T1082] __might_fault+0x58/0x80 [ 1318.033814][ T1082] amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x103/0x250 [amdgpu] [ 1318.034181][ T1082] full_proxy_read+0x55/0x80 [ 1318.034487][ T1082] vfs_read+0xa7/0x360 [ 1318.034788][ T1082] ksys_read+0x70/0xf0 [ 1318.035085][ T1082] do_syscall_64+0x94/0x180 [ 1318.035375][ T1082] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e [ 1318.035664][ T1082] [ 1318.035664][ T1082] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1318.035664][ T1082] [ 1318.036487][ T1082] Chain exists of: [ 1318.036487][ T1082] &mm->mmap_lock --> reservation_ww_class_acquire --> reservation_ww_class_mutex [ 1318.036487][ T1082] [ 1318.037310][ T1082] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 1318.037310][ T1082] [ 1318.037838][ T1082] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1318.038101][ T1082] ---- ---- [ 1318.038350][ T1082] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [ 1318.038590][ T1082] lock(reservation_ww_class_acquire); [ 1318.038839][ T1082] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [ 1318.039083][ T1082] rlock(&mm->mmap_lock); [ 1318.039328][ T1082] [ 1318.039328][ T1082] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 1318.039328][ T1082] [ 1318.040029][ T1082] 1 lock held by tar/1082: [ 1318.040259][ T1082] #0: ffff98c4c13f55f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x6a/0x250 [amdgpu] [ 1318.040560][ T1082] [ 1318.040560][ T1082] stack backtrace: [ ---truncated---

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-35795"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-17T14:15:11Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amdgpu: fix deadlock while reading mqd from debugfs\n\nAn errant disk backup on my desktop got into debugfs and triggered the\nfollowing deadlock scenario in the amdgpu debugfs files. The machine\nalso hard-resets immediately after those lines are printed (although I\nwasn\u0027t able to reproduce that part when reading by hand):\n\n[ 1318.016074][ T1082] ======================================================\n[ 1318.016607][ T1082] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n[ 1318.017107][ T1082] 6.8.0-rc7-00015-ge0c8221b72c0 #17 Not tainted\n[ 1318.017598][ T1082] ------------------------------------------------------\n[ 1318.018096][ T1082] tar/1082 is trying to acquire lock:\n[ 1318.018585][ T1082] ffff98c44175d6a0 (\u0026mm-\u003emmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x40/0x80\n[ 1318.019084][ T1082]\n[ 1318.019084][ T1082] but task is already holding lock:\n[ 1318.020052][ T1082] ffff98c4c13f55f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x6a/0x250 [amdgpu]\n[ 1318.020607][ T1082]\n[ 1318.020607][ T1082] which lock already depends on the new lock.\n[ 1318.020607][ T1082]\n[ 1318.022081][ T1082]\n[ 1318.022081][ T1082] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n[ 1318.023083][ T1082]\n[ 1318.023083][ T1082] -\u003e #2 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n[ 1318.024114][ T1082]        __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xe0/0x12f0\n[ 1318.024639][ T1082]        ww_mutex_lock+0x32/0x90\n[ 1318.025161][ T1082]        dma_resv_lockdep+0x18a/0x330\n[ 1318.025683][ T1082]        do_one_initcall+0x6a/0x350\n[ 1318.026210][ T1082]        kernel_init_freeable+0x1a3/0x310\n[ 1318.026728][ T1082]        kernel_init+0x15/0x1a0\n[ 1318.027242][ T1082]        ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40\n[ 1318.027759][ T1082]        ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20\n[ 1318.028281][ T1082]\n[ 1318.028281][ T1082] -\u003e #1 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}:\n[ 1318.029297][ T1082]        dma_resv_lockdep+0x16c/0x330\n[ 1318.029790][ T1082]        do_one_initcall+0x6a/0x350\n[ 1318.030263][ T1082]        kernel_init_freeable+0x1a3/0x310\n[ 1318.030722][ T1082]        kernel_init+0x15/0x1a0\n[ 1318.031168][ T1082]        ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40\n[ 1318.031598][ T1082]        ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20\n[ 1318.032011][ T1082]\n[ 1318.032011][ T1082] -\u003e #0 (\u0026mm-\u003emmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}:\n[ 1318.032778][ T1082]        __lock_acquire+0x14bf/0x2680\n[ 1318.033141][ T1082]        lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2c0\n[ 1318.033487][ T1082]        __might_fault+0x58/0x80\n[ 1318.033814][ T1082]        amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x103/0x250 [amdgpu]\n[ 1318.034181][ T1082]        full_proxy_read+0x55/0x80\n[ 1318.034487][ T1082]        vfs_read+0xa7/0x360\n[ 1318.034788][ T1082]        ksys_read+0x70/0xf0\n[ 1318.035085][ T1082]        do_syscall_64+0x94/0x180\n[ 1318.035375][ T1082]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e\n[ 1318.035664][ T1082]\n[ 1318.035664][ T1082] other info that might help us debug this:\n[ 1318.035664][ T1082]\n[ 1318.036487][ T1082] Chain exists of:\n[ 1318.036487][ T1082]   \u0026mm-\u003emmap_lock --\u003e reservation_ww_class_acquire --\u003e reservation_ww_class_mutex\n[ 1318.036487][ T1082]\n[ 1318.037310][ T1082]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n[ 1318.037310][ T1082]\n[ 1318.037838][ T1082]        CPU0                    CPU1\n[ 1318.038101][ T1082]        ----                    ----\n[ 1318.038350][ T1082]   lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);\n[ 1318.038590][ T1082]                                lock(reservation_ww_class_acquire);\n[ 1318.038839][ T1082]                                lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);\n[ 1318.039083][ T1082]   rlock(\u0026mm-\u003emmap_lock);\n[ 1318.039328][ T1082]\n[ 1318.039328][ T1082]  *** DEADLOCK ***\n[ 1318.039328][ T1082]\n[ 1318.040029][ T1082] 1 lock held by tar/1082:\n[ 1318.040259][ T1082]  #0: ffff98c4c13f55f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read+0x6a/0x250 [amdgpu]\n[ 1318.040560][ T1082]\n[ 1318.040560][ T1082] stack backtrace:\n[\n---truncated---",
  "id": "GHSA-99mj-3x29-5mm3",
  "modified": "2024-05-17T15:31:09Z",
  "published": "2024-05-17T15:31:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35795"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/197f6d6987c55860f6eea1c93e4f800c59078874"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4687e3c6ee877ee25e57b984eca00be53b9a8db5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8678b1060ae2b75feb60b87e5b75e17374e3c1c5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b03556da6e576c62664b6cd01809e4a09d53b5b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.