ghsa-c2g2-gx4j-rj3j
Vulnerability from github
Impact
Sentry's Slack integration incorrectly records the incoming request body in logs. This request data can contain sensitive information, including the deprecated Slack verification token. With this verification token, it is possible under specific configurations, an attacker can forge requests and act as the Slack integration.
The request body is leaked in log entries matching event == "slack.*" && name == "sentry.integrations.slack" && request_data == *
. The deprecated slack verification token, will be found in the request_data.token
key.
Example event:
json
{
"name": "sentry.integrations.slack",
"level": "info",
"event": "slack.event.message", # This could be any of the `slack.*` events
"request_data": {
# Other keys are omitted for brevity
"token": "<MyDeprecatedSlackVerificationToken>",
}
}
Patches
- SaaS users do not need to take any action.
- Self-hosted users should upgrade to version 24.5.0 or higher, rotate their Slack verification token, and use the Slack Signing Secret instead of the verification token.
- If you are only using the
slack.signing-secret
in your self-hosted configuration, then the legacy verification token is not used to verify the webhook payload. It is ignored.
⚠️ Sentry's support for validating Slack requests via the legacy verification token will be deprecated in version 24.7.0.
Workarounds
Option 1
Set the slack.signing-secret
instead of slack.verification-token
. The signing secret is Slack's recommended way of authenticating webhooks.
By having slack.singing-secret
set, Sentry self-hosted will no longer use the verification token for authentication of the webhooks, regardless of whether slack.verification-token
is set or not.
Option 2
The deprecated Slack verification token is leaked in log levels of INFO
and ERROR
in the Slack integration. If the self-hosted instance is unable to be upgraded or re-configured to use the slack.signing-secret
, the logging configuration can be adjusted to not generate logs from the integration. The default logging configuration can be found in src/sentry/conf/server.py
. Services should be restarted once the configuration change is saved.
Below you'll find an example of the configuration adjustments necessary to remove the Slack integration logs:
```python
src/sentry/conf/server.py
...
LOGGING: LoggingConfig = { ... handlers: { # the line below already exists in the default configuration "null": {"class": "logging.NullHandler"}, ... }, "loggers": { "sentry.integrations.slack": { "handlers": ["null"], # route logs to null handler "level": "CRITICAL", # prevent generation of logs a lower levels (ex. ERROR and INFO) }, ... }, } ```
References
- https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/pull/70508
- Sentry Slack Integration Documentation for Self-Hosted users
- Documentation on Slack Signing Secrets
- Slack Deprecation for Verification Tokens
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "sentry" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "24.3.0" }, { "fixed": "24.5.0" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-35196" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-532" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2024-06-02T22:28:09Z", "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-31T18:15:12Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "### Impact\nSentry\u0027s Slack integration incorrectly records the incoming request body in logs. This request data can contain sensitive information, including the [deprecated Slack verification token](https://api.slack.com/authentication/verifying-requests-from-slack#deprecation). With this verification token, it is possible under specific configurations, an attacker can forge requests and act as the Slack integration.\n\nThe request body is leaked in log entries matching `event == \"slack.*\" \u0026\u0026 name == \"sentry.integrations.slack\" \u0026\u0026 request_data == *`. The deprecated slack verification token, will be found in the `request_data.token` key.\n\nExample event:\n\n```json\n{\n \"name\": \"sentry.integrations.slack\",\n \"level\": \"info\",\n \"event\": \"slack.event.message\", # This could be any of the `slack.*` events\n \"request_data\": {\n # Other keys are omitted for brevity\n \"token\": \"\u003cMyDeprecatedSlackVerificationToken\u003e\",\n }\n}\n``` \n\n### Patches\n- **SaaS users** do not need to take any action.\n- **Self-hosted users** should upgrade to version 24.5.0 or higher, [rotate their Slack verification token](https://api.slack.com/authentication/verifying-requests-from-slack#regenerating), and [use the Slack Signing Secret instead of the verification token](https://develop.sentry.dev/integrations/slack/).\n - If you are only using the `slack.signing-secret` in your self-hosted configuration, then the legacy verification token is not used to verify the webhook payload. It is ignored. \n \n\u003e \u26a0\ufe0f Sentry\u0027s support for validating Slack requests via the legacy verification token will be deprecated in version 24.7.0.\n\n\n### Workarounds\n\n#### Option 1\n\nSet the `slack.signing-secret` instead of `slack.verification-token`. The [signing secret](https://api.slack.com/authentication/verifying-requests-from-slack#app-management-updates) is Slack\u0027s recommended way of authenticating webhooks.\n\nBy having `slack.singing-secret` set, Sentry self-hosted will no longer use the verification token for authentication of the webhooks, regardless of whether `slack.verification-token` is set or not.\n\n#### Option 2\n\nThe deprecated Slack verification token is leaked in log levels of `INFO` and `ERROR` in the Slack integration. If the self-hosted instance is unable to be upgraded or re-configured to use the `slack.signing-secret`, the logging configuration can be adjusted to not generate logs from the integration. The [default logging configuration can be found in `src/sentry/conf/server.py`](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/blob/17d2b87e39ccd57e11da4deed62971ff306253d1/src/sentry/conf/server.py#L1307). **Services should be restarted once the configuration change is saved.**\n\nBelow you\u0027ll find an example of the configuration adjustments necessary to remove the Slack integration logs:\n \n```python\n# src/sentry/conf/server.py\n\n...\n \nLOGGING: LoggingConfig = {\n ...\n handlers: {\n # the line below already exists in the default configuration\n \"null\": {\"class\": \"logging.NullHandler\"},\n ...\n },\n \"loggers\": {\n \"sentry.integrations.slack\": {\n \"handlers\": [\"null\"], # route logs to null handler\n \"level\": \"CRITICAL\", # prevent generation of logs a lower levels (ex. ERROR and INFO)\n },\n ...\n },\n}\n```\n\n### References\n- https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/pull/70508\n- [Sentry Slack Integration Documentation for Self-Hosted users](https://develop.sentry.dev/integrations/slack/)\n- [Documentation on Slack Signing Secrets](https://api.slack.com/authentication/verifying-requests-from-slack#app-management-updates)\n- [Slack Deprecation for Verification Tokens](https://api.slack.com/authentication/verifying-requests-from-slack#deprecation)\n", "id": "GHSA-c2g2-gx4j-rj3j", "modified": "2024-06-02T22:28:09Z", "published": "2024-06-02T22:28:09Z", "references": [ { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/security/advisories/GHSA-c2g2-gx4j-rj3j" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35196" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/pull/70508" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://api.slack.com/authentication/verifying-requests-from-slack#app-management-updates" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://api.slack.com/authentication/verifying-requests-from-slack#deprecation" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://api.slack.com/authentication/verifying-requests-from-slack#regenerating" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://develop.sentry.dev/integrations/slack" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/getsentry/sentry" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/blob/17d2b87e39ccd57e11da4deed62971ff306253d1/src/sentry/conf/server.py#L1307" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Slack integration leaks sensitive information in logs" }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.