ghsa-c34q-8xrw-g745
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-05-03 15:30
Modified
2024-06-03 18:53
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

IB/core: Fix a nested dead lock as part of ODP flow

Fix a nested dead lock as part of ODP flow by using mmput_async().

From the below call trace [1] can see that calling mmput() once we have the umem_odp->umem_mutex locked as required by ib_umem_odp_map_dma_and_lock() might trigger in the same task the exit_mmap()->__mmu_notifier_release()->mlx5_ib_invalidate_range() which may dead lock when trying to lock the same mutex.

Moving to use mmput_async() will solve the problem as the above exit_mmap() flow will be called in other task and will be executed once the lock will be available.

[1] [64843.077665] task:kworker/u133:2 state:D stack: 0 pid:80906 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [64843.077672] Workqueue: mlx5_ib_page_fault mlx5_ib_eqe_pf_action [mlx5_ib] [64843.077719] Call Trace: [64843.077722] [64843.077724] __schedule+0x23d/0x590 [64843.077729] schedule+0x4e/0xb0 [64843.077735] schedule_preempt_disabled+0xe/0x10 [64843.077740] __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x263/0x490 [64843.077747] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x13/0x20 [64843.077752] mutex_lock+0x34/0x40 [64843.077758] mlx5_ib_invalidate_range+0x48/0x270 [mlx5_ib] [64843.077808] __mmu_notifier_release+0x1a4/0x200 [64843.077816] exit_mmap+0x1bc/0x200 [64843.077822] ? walk_page_range+0x9c/0x120 [64843.077828] ? __cond_resched+0x1a/0x50 [64843.077833] ? mutex_lock+0x13/0x40 [64843.077839] ? uprobe_clear_state+0xac/0x120 [64843.077860] mmput+0x5f/0x140 [64843.077867] ib_umem_odp_map_dma_and_lock+0x21b/0x580 [ib_core] [64843.077931] pagefault_real_mr+0x9a/0x140 [mlx5_ib] [64843.077962] pagefault_mr+0xb4/0x550 [mlx5_ib] [64843.077992] pagefault_single_data_segment.constprop.0+0x2ac/0x560 [mlx5_ib] [64843.078022] mlx5_ib_eqe_pf_action+0x528/0x780 [mlx5_ib] [64843.078051] process_one_work+0x22b/0x3d0 [64843.078059] worker_thread+0x53/0x410 [64843.078065] ? process_one_work+0x3d0/0x3d0 [64843.078073] kthread+0x12a/0x150 [64843.078079] ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50 [64843.078085] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [64843.078093]

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-48675"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-667"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-03T15:15:07Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nIB/core: Fix a nested dead lock as part of ODP flow\n\nFix a nested dead lock as part of ODP flow by using mmput_async().\n\nFrom the below call trace [1] can see that calling mmput() once we have\nthe umem_odp-\u003eumem_mutex locked as required by\nib_umem_odp_map_dma_and_lock() might trigger in the same task the\nexit_mmap()-\u003e__mmu_notifier_release()-\u003emlx5_ib_invalidate_range() which\nmay dead lock when trying to lock the same mutex.\n\nMoving to use mmput_async() will solve the problem as the above\nexit_mmap() flow will be called in other task and will be executed once\nthe lock will be available.\n\n[1]\n[64843.077665] task:kworker/u133:2  state:D stack:    0 pid:80906 ppid:\n2 flags:0x00004000\n[64843.077672] Workqueue: mlx5_ib_page_fault mlx5_ib_eqe_pf_action [mlx5_ib]\n[64843.077719] Call Trace:\n[64843.077722]  \u003cTASK\u003e\n[64843.077724]  __schedule+0x23d/0x590\n[64843.077729]  schedule+0x4e/0xb0\n[64843.077735]  schedule_preempt_disabled+0xe/0x10\n[64843.077740]  __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x263/0x490\n[64843.077747]  __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x13/0x20\n[64843.077752]  mutex_lock+0x34/0x40\n[64843.077758]  mlx5_ib_invalidate_range+0x48/0x270 [mlx5_ib]\n[64843.077808]  __mmu_notifier_release+0x1a4/0x200\n[64843.077816]  exit_mmap+0x1bc/0x200\n[64843.077822]  ? walk_page_range+0x9c/0x120\n[64843.077828]  ? __cond_resched+0x1a/0x50\n[64843.077833]  ? mutex_lock+0x13/0x40\n[64843.077839]  ? uprobe_clear_state+0xac/0x120\n[64843.077860]  mmput+0x5f/0x140\n[64843.077867]  ib_umem_odp_map_dma_and_lock+0x21b/0x580 [ib_core]\n[64843.077931]  pagefault_real_mr+0x9a/0x140 [mlx5_ib]\n[64843.077962]  pagefault_mr+0xb4/0x550 [mlx5_ib]\n[64843.077992]  pagefault_single_data_segment.constprop.0+0x2ac/0x560\n[mlx5_ib]\n[64843.078022]  mlx5_ib_eqe_pf_action+0x528/0x780 [mlx5_ib]\n[64843.078051]  process_one_work+0x22b/0x3d0\n[64843.078059]  worker_thread+0x53/0x410\n[64843.078065]  ? process_one_work+0x3d0/0x3d0\n[64843.078073]  kthread+0x12a/0x150\n[64843.078079]  ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50\n[64843.078085]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n[64843.078093]  \u003c/TASK\u003e",
  "id": "GHSA-c34q-8xrw-g745",
  "modified": "2024-06-03T18:53:45Z",
  "published": "2024-05-03T15:30:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48675"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/819110054b14d7272b4188db997a3d80f75ab785"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83c43fd872e32c8071d5582eb7c40f573a8342f3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/85eaeb5058f0f04dffb124c97c86b4f18db0b833"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8de6cb5755eae7b793d8c00c8696c8667d44a7f"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.