ghsa-c87m-qf5q-jcgf
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-04-10 21:30
Modified
2024-04-10 21:30
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: ufs: core: Improve SCSI abort handling
The following has been observed on a test setup:
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 250 at drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c:2737 ufshcd_queuecommand+0x468/0x65c Call trace: ufshcd_queuecommand+0x468/0x65c scsi_send_eh_cmnd+0x224/0x6a0 scsi_eh_test_devices+0x248/0x418 scsi_eh_ready_devs+0xc34/0xe58 scsi_error_handler+0x204/0x80c kthread+0x150/0x1b4 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x30
That warning is triggered by the following statement:
WARN_ON(lrbp->cmd);
Fix this warning by clearing lrbp->cmd from the abort handler.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-47188" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-10T19:15:47Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: ufs: core: Improve SCSI abort handling\n\nThe following has been observed on a test setup:\n\nWARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 250 at drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c:2737 ufshcd_queuecommand+0x468/0x65c\nCall trace:\n ufshcd_queuecommand+0x468/0x65c\n scsi_send_eh_cmnd+0x224/0x6a0\n scsi_eh_test_devices+0x248/0x418\n scsi_eh_ready_devs+0xc34/0xe58\n scsi_error_handler+0x204/0x80c\n kthread+0x150/0x1b4\n ret_from_fork+0x10/0x30\n\nThat warning is triggered by the following statement:\n\n\tWARN_ON(lrbp-\u003ecmd);\n\nFix this warning by clearing lrbp-\u003ecmd from the abort handler.", "id": "GHSA-c87m-qf5q-jcgf", "modified": "2024-04-10T21:30:31Z", "published": "2024-04-10T21:30:31Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47188" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3ff1f6b6ba6f97f50862aa50e79959cc8ddc2566" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c36baca06efa833adaefba61f45fefdc49b6d070" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.